1887

Abstract

Summary: Past experiments have shown that CheA and CheY are required to generate smooth swimming signals in chemotaxis. This study, as anticipated from experiments, demonstrates that an attractant-bound chemoreceptor leads to an increase in CheA activity, which in turn leads to an increase in the Che Y-P pool that ultimately causes a behavioural change in the bacteria. Asparagine has been found to increase the rate of Che Y-P formation in the presence of McpB-containing membranes, CheA, and an excess of CheY. This asparagine effect requires the presence of both CheA and McpB, the latter of which has been shown to be the sole receptor for this attractant. Utilizing membranes from a number of null mutant strains, insight has also been gained into the potential roles of a number of unique chemotaxis proteins in the regulation of CheA activity in the presence and absence of this attractant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-9-2945
1997-09-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/143/9/mic-143-9-2945.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-9-2945&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ames P., Parkinson J. S. 1994; Constitutively signaling fragments of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor. J Bacteriol 176:6340–6348
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arico B., Miller J. F., Roy R. C., Stibitz S., Monack D. 1989; Sequences required for expression of Bordetella pertussis virulence factors share homology with prokaryotic signal transduction proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6671–6675
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bischoff D. S., Ordal G. W. 1991; Sequence and characterization of Bacillus subtilis CheB, a homolog of E. coli CheY, and its role in a different mechanism of chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 266:12301–12305
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. 1990; The dynamics of protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 63:1339–1348
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourret R. B., Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. 1991; Signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem 60:401–441
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Forst S., Inouye M. 1988; Environmentally regulated gene expression for membrane proteins in Escherichia coli . Annu Rev Cell Biol 4:21–42
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuhrer D. K., Ordal G. W. 1991; Bacillus subtilis CheN, a homolog of CheA, the central regulator of chemotaxis in E. coli . J Bacteriol 173:7443–7448
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Garrity L. F., Ordal G. W. 1995; Chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis: how bacteria monitor environmental signals. Pharmacol Ther 68:87–104
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanlon D. W., Ordal G. W. 1994; Cloning and characterization of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins from Bacillus subtilis . J Biol Chem 269:14038–14046
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hazelbauer G. L., Adler J. 1971; Role of the galactose binding protein in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward galactose. Nature New Biol 230:101–104
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hess F. J., Oosawa K., Matsumura P., Simon M. I. 1987; Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7609–7613
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hess F. J., Bourret R. B., Simon M. I. 1988a; Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 336:139–143
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hess F. J., Oosawa K., Kaplan N., Simon M. I. 1988b; Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 53:79–87
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Igo M. M., Ninfa A. J., Stock J. B., Silhavy T. J. 1989; Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of a bacterial activator by a transmembrane receptor. Genes Dev 3:1725–1734
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirsch M. L., Peters P. D., Hanlon D. W., Kirby J. R., Ordal G. W. 1993a; Chemotactic methylesterase brings about adaptation to attractants in Bacillus subtilis . J Biol Chem 268:18610–18616
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirsch M. L., Zuberi A. R., Henner D., Peters P. D., Yazdi M. A., Ordal G. W. 1993b; Chemotactic methyltransferase promotes adaptation to repellent in Bacillus subtilis . J Biol Chem 268:25350–25356
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Makino D., Shinagawa H., Nakoto A. 1985; Regulation of the phosphate regulon in Escherichia coli K12: regulation and the role of the regulatory gene phoR . Mol Gen Genet 195:381–390
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller S. I., Kukral A. M., Mekalanos J. J. 1989a; A two-component regulatory system (phoPphoQ) controls Salmonella typhimurium virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5054–5058
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller J. F., Mekalanos J. J., Falkow S. 1989b; Coordinate regulation and sensory transduction in the control of bacterial virulence. Science 243:916–922
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ninfa A. J., B. Magasanik B. 1986; Covalent modification of glnG product, NRI, by the glnL product, NRII, regulates the transcription of the glnALG operon in Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5909–5913
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ninfa E. G., Stock A. M., Mowbray S., Stock J. 1991; Reconstitution of the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction system from purified components. J Biol Chem 266:9764–9770
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ordal G. W., Villani D. P., Gibson K. J. 1977; Amino acid chemoreceptors of Bacillus subtilis . J Bacteriol 129:156–165
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosario M. M., L, Fredrick K., Ordal G. W., Helmann J. D. 1994; Chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis requires either of two functionally redundant homologs. J Bacteriol 176:2736–2739
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosario M. M. L., Kirby J. R., Bochar D. A., Ordal G. W. 1995; Chemotactic methylation and behavior in Bacillus subtilis: role of two unique proteins, CheC and CheD. Biochemistry 34:3823–3831
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stock J. B., Ninfa A. J., Stock A. M. 1989; Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 53:450–490
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Strange P. G., Koshland D. E. Jr 1976; Receptor interactions in a signaling system; competition between ribose receptor and galactose receptor in the chemotaxis response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:762–766
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-9-2945
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-9-2945
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error