ARTICLES
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Depressed, Substance-Abusing Adolescents: Development and Pilot Testing

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CHI.0000046861.56865.6CGet rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objectives

To develop a cognitive-behavioral treatment for depressed, substance-abusing adolescents, determine its feasibility, and test its association with symptomatic improvement.

Method

Based on the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions for either adolescent depression or substance abuse, an integrated group and family therapy intervention was developed for adolescents with both problems. The developers treated a group of six adolescents and families, and then trained experienced therapists to deliver the treatment to a second group of seven. Adolescents were 14 to 18 years of age. Measures of depression and substance abuse were collected before, during, and after treatment.

Results

High retention in treatment and attendance at sessions supported feasibility. Parent interviews demonstrated significant improvement in adolescent substance abuse, and adolescent measures demonstrated significant improvement in both domains.

Conclusions

Integrated outpatient cognitive-behavioral intervention is feasible and associated with improvement for depressed, substance-abusing adolescents. Controlled efficacy studies are needed. Additional treatment modalities will be required for a proportion of these adolescents.

Section snippets

Theoretical and Empirical Foundation

Our treatment program, Family and Coping Skills (FACS) therapy, is based in cognitive-behavioral family theory and research. Deficiencies in social cognitive processes have been identified in substance-abusing and in depressed adolescents and their families. Such deficiencies are targets of treatment in FACS therapy. Compared with other adolescents, substance abusers have less impulse control, poorer problem-solving skills, poorer affect regulation and assertion skills, and more positive

Subjects

Thirteen adolescents and one (n = 4) or both parents (n = 9) participated. The adolescents included one African-American male, five white females, and seven white males (mean age = 16.16 years, SD = 1.34 years). Nine adolescents lived with one parent and four with both parents. Socioeconomic status, based on the 7-point Hollingshead (1975) index of parents’ occupations, was middle class (mean = 3.3; range = 1–5). The first group included three white males, two white females, and one

Pretreatment Diagnoses

CAPA diagnoses based separately on the adolescent and on the parent interviews are included in Table 1. All 13 adolescents met full diagnostic criteria for definite or probable (one symptom less than definite) depression diagnosis on either the adolescent or parent interview, and 12 of 13 met criteria for a substance use disorder. The remaining subject was retained because of very strong evidence of substance abuse on the initial clinical interview.

Of the 16 diagnoses assessed by the CAPA

DISCUSSION

Results of this open pilot study suggest that outpatient cognitive-behavioral intervention is feasible and is associated with short-term improvement in target symptoms for depressed, substance-abusing adolescents. The intervention included group and family modalities, telephone contacts, and additional sessions as needed. Thus FACS therapy is an intensive outpatient form of treatment, requiring active therapist involvement and availability. Retention in treatment was in the very high range for

REFERENCES (35)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1987)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1994)
  • A Angold et al.

    A test-retest reliability study of child-reported psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment

    Psychol Med

    (1995)
  • NH Azrin et al.

    Youth drug abuse treatment: a controlled outcome study

    J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse

    (1994)
  • AT Beck et al.

    Cognitive Therapy for Substance Abuse

    (1993)
  • GJ Botvin

    Life Skills Training

    (1989)
  • GJ Botvin et al.

    Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Comorbidity of addictive problems: Assessment and treatment implications

      2020, Adolescent Addiction: Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment
    • Group CBT for Externalizing Disorders in Urban Schools: Effect of Training Strategy on Treatment Fidelity and Child Outcomes

      2018, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other words, consultants received feedback about whether they used any elements of enhanced consultation during C sessions, and the supervisor and consultant problem-solved strategies to ensure that conditions remained distinct. The Coping Power Program (CPP; Curry, Wells, Lochman, Craighead, & Nagy, 2003; Lochman & Wells, 2004) is a cognitive-behavioral, multicomponent group intervention for elementary and middle school students with, or at risk for, externalizing behavior disorders. In addition to anger management, CPP includes units on goal-setting, emotional awareness, relaxation training, social skills training, problem solving, and handling peer pressure.

    • Age-varying associations between substance use behaviors and depressive symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood

      2015, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      With regard to alcohol, the crucial window for intervention appears to be early adolescence, when the comorbidity association is the strongest. While treatment modalities that jointly address depression and substance use have not been well-developed, particularly for adolescents, one promising approach is integrated CBT that focuses on both substance use and depression (Curry et al., 2003). Additionally, a recent study comparing sequential and simultaneous substance use and depression treatment found both to be efficacious (Rohde et al., 2014).

    • Delinquency, depression, and substance use disorder among child welfare-involved adolescent females

      2014, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      More specifically, in order to help prevent depression or SUD, practitioners could: (a) examine the presence and nature of delinquency using the NSCAW-II delinquency assessment and (b) use evidence-based practices such as cognitive-behavioral treatments, for example, to effectively and proactively address depression or SUD. ( Clarke, Rohde, Lewinsohn, Hops, & Seeley, 1999; Curry, Wells, Lochman, Craighead, & Nagy, 2003; National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2010; National Institute of Mental Health, 2012; Seligman, Schulman, DeRubeis, & Hollon, 1999). In this particular population of child welfare-involved adolescents, screenings for delinquency will yield a higher-than-average number of at-risk persons, given the well-documented link between child maltreatment and delinquency, and among these delinquent adolescents, a higher-than-average number will develop depression or SUD because of the known link between child maltreatment and mental illness or drug addiction.

    • Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescent offenders with mental health problems in custody

      2011, Journal of Adolescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      The structured approach of CBT clinical trials, while helpful in generating a significant evidence base, often have a narrow therapeutic focus and have been criticised for using samples that are not clinically representative, thus raising questions about the more general implementation of the interventions (Reinecke & Shirk, 2005). The trials often have exclusion criteria such as learning disability (Curry, Wells, Lochman, Craighead, & Nagy, 2003) or exclude otherwise eligible participants on the basis of co-morbidity, despite this being common in the diagnoses of young people (Vermeiren, Jespers, & T.E, Moffitt, 2006). Co-morbidity has been noted as a predictor of premature termination of treatment in trials as well as influencing the effectiveness of treatment (Kazdin & Holland, 1997) and therefore is thought to complicate the treatment process (Reinecke & Shirk, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by grant DA08931 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors thank David Brent, M.D., Gregory Clarke, Ph.D., Thomas Dishion, Ph.D., Lorraine Collins, Ph.D., and Gayle Belsher, Ph.D., who consulted in treatment and manual development.

    Article Plus (online only) materials for this article appear on the Journal's Web site: www.jaacap.com. Treatment manuals are available from Dr. Curry.

    View full text