Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 2004 14(3):355-371; doi:10.1093/logcom/14.3.355
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peppas, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Article

The Limit Assumption and Multiple Revision

Pavlos Peppas

Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, Patras 265 00, Greece. E-mail: ppeppas{at}otenet.gr

In his seminal paper in 1988, Grove provided possible-world semantics for the axiomatic approach to belief revision proposed by Alchourron, Gardenfors, and Makinson. Grove's semantics are based on a system of spheres, which is essentially a total preorder on possible worlds, satisfying a particular smoothness condition called the limit assumption. In this article we build upon Grove's representation result working in two (related) directions. In particular, the first part of the article considers a number of smoothness conditions (variants of the limit assumption) as additional constraints to systems of spheres, and studies their implications for AGM belief revision. Such smoothness conditions are of particular importance in the context of multiple revision, that is, revision with respect to a (possibly infinite) set of sentences. In the second part of the article we examine closely this process and, in the spirit of Grove, we provide a constructive model for multiple revision based on systems of spheres and prove the corresponding representation result. Finally, we examine ways of reducing multiple revision to classical AGM sentence revision, and we devise a particular smoothness condition which is shown to be necessary and sufficient for such a reduction.

Keywords: Belief revision, systems of spheres, nonmonotonic reasoning, knowledge representation


Received 10 December 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.