|
Journal of Endourology
Technical Modifications for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
To cite this paper:
Freddy Mendez-Torres, Michael Woods, Raju Thomas.
Journal of Endourology.
April 1, 2005,
19(3): 393-396.
doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.393.
Freddy Mendez-Torres, M.D.Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Section of Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery, Department of Urology, New Orleans, Louisiana. Michael Woods, M.D.Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Section of Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery, Department of Urology, New Orleans, Louisiana. Raju Thomas, M.D., FACSTulane University Health Sciences Center, Section of Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery, Department of Urology, New Orleans, Louisiana. Purpose: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is gaining acceptance as a standard of care for the repair of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, with results comparable to those of open repair. However, it remains a technically challenging procedure requiring intracorporeal suturing skills. Recent reports have demonstrated equally effective results with robot-assisted laparoscopy with shorter operative times. We present our modified technique for daVinci robot-assisted LP. Patients and Methods: From November 2002 to May 2004, 32 consecutive patients underwent LP with the daVinci robotic system for UPJ obstruction. Just prior to laparoscopy, 31 patients underwent retrograde pyelography and cystoscopic placement of a ureteral catheter just distal to the UPJ, which was prepared into the operative field. The remaining patient had an indwelling stent placed preoperatively. Three transperitoneal ports are placed for the robot. A fourth port is placed for retraction, suction, dissection, and suture passage by the bedside surgeon. This port was placed at McBurney’s point in the first two patients and the subxiphoid area in the subsequent 30 patients. A ureteral stent was inserted retrograde intraoperatively with laparoscopic assistance after exchanging the ureteral catheter for a guidewire. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed in all cases. Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 31 patients, while Fengerplasty was performed in 1 patient. The average operative time was 300 minutes (initial 12 procedures: 384 minutes; last 10 procedures: 197 minutes). The average blood loss was approximately 50 mL and the average hospital stay 1.1 days. A crossing vessel was present in 44% of the cases. Stone extraction was performed in 5 cases (23%) and kidney biopsy in 1 case. The only perioperative complications were one migrated stent, which was repositioned under sedation without sequelae and one urinarytract infection. Of the 18 patients with follow-up exceeding 6 months (average 10.3 months), 16 have improved drainage and function and are asymptomatic. One patient with flank pain has no evidence of obstruction. One with delayed, although improved, drainage is asymptomatic. Conclusions: The daVinci robot system can be used effectively for LP. Although initial operative times were long, there was a significant decrease after the first 12 cases. Having retrograde access to the ureter allows simple intraoperative stent placement. We found that the subxiphoid placement of the fourth port gave the bedside surgeon the optimal location for suction, dissection, and intracorporeal suture passage. This approach and technique have become standard in our treatment of UPJ obstruction.  This paper was cited by:Novel Technique of Retrograde Ureteral Stenting during Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Krishnanath Gaitonde, Gwen Roesel, James Donovan Journal of Endourology. Jun 2008, Vol. 22, No. 6: 1199-1202 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsRobot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Technical Considerations and Outcomes Brent V. Yanke, Costas D. Lallas, Christopher Pagnani, Demetrius H. Bagley Journal of Endourology. Jun 2008, Vol. 22, No. 6: 1291-1296 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsOptimizing Robotic Renal Surgery: The Lateral Camera Port Placement Technique and Current Results Ketan K. Badani, Fred Muhletaler, Michael Fumo, Sanjeev Kaul, James O. Peabody, Mahendra Bhandari, Mani Menon Journal of Endourology. Mar 2008, Vol. 22, No. 3: 507-510 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsRobot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction Vipul R. Patel, Nilesh N. Patil, Geoff Coughlin, Pankaj P. Dangle, Kenneth Palmer Journal of Robotic Surgery. Mar 2008, Vol. 1, No. 4: 247-252 CrossRef Robot-assisted surgery in children: current status C. K. Sinha, M. Haddad Journal of Robotic Surgery. Mar 2008, Vol. 1, No. 4: 243-246 CrossRef Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty Robert J. Stein, Inderbir S. Gill, Mihir M. Desai Current Urology Reports. Apr 2007, Vol. 8, No. 2: 140-149 CrossRef Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre Christian Schwentner, Alexandre Pelzer, Richard Neururer, Brigitte Springer, Wolfgang Horninger, Georg Bartsch, Reinhard Peschel BJU International. 2007, Vol. 100, No. 4: 880 CrossRef Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes Mario F. Chammas, Jacques Hubert, Vipul R. Patel BJU International. 2007, Vol. 99, No. 5: 1113 CrossRef Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: a review of the current status Ketul K. Shah, Michael Louie, Rahul K. Thaly, Vipul R. Patel The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2007, Vol. 3, No. 1: 35 CrossRef Robotic Computer-Assisted Pyeloplasty versus Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Erik S. Weise, Howard N. Winfield Journal of Endourology. Oct 2006, Vol. 20, No. 10: 813-819 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsThe current status of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Kirsten Rose, Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2006, Vol. 60, No. 1: 6 CrossRef Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction Fatih Atug, Scott V. Burgess, Erik P. Castle, Raju Thomas International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2006, Vol. 60, No. 1: 9 CrossRef LiteratureWatch Journal of Endourology. Oct 2005, Vol. 19, No. 8: 1045-1062 Citation | Full Text PDF
|
|