Brought to you by:
Paper

Analytical derivation of second-order deflection in the equatorial plane of a radially moving Kerr–Newman black hole

and

Published 19 April 2017 © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Guansheng He and Wenbin Lin 2017 Class. Quantum Grav. 34 105006 DOI 10.1088/1361-6382/aa691d

0264-9381/34/10/105006

Abstract

In this work, we base ourselves on the second-order post-Minkowskian equations of motion, and apply an iterative technique to analytically derive the gravitational deflection of the relativistic particles in the equatorial plane of a Kerr–Newman black hole with a radial (or longitudinal) and constant velocity. We find that the kinematically correctional effects on the second-order contributions to the deflection can be expressed in a very compact form, which are valid for both the massive particle and photon. Our result reduces to the previous formulation for the first-order deflection caused by a moving Schwarzschild black hole when the second-order contributions are dropped.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Gravitational lensing serves as one of the most powerful tools in modern astrophysics. In the last two decades, the kinematically correctional effects [1, 2] induced by the lens' motion on the gravitational deflection have attracted considerable attention from the relativity community [212]. Previous works were mainly concentrated on the velocity effects in the first-order gravitational deflection of test particles. In particular, Wucknitz and Sperhake [9] investigated the deflection of test particles in the time-dependent field of a radially (or longitudinally) moving Schwarzschild source in the first post-Minkowskian (PM) approximation. Given the rapid progress achieved in astronomical observations [1318], we can expect that the kinematical effects on the higher-order deflection might be detectable in the near future and are therefore worthy of our consideration. Recently, on the basis of numerical calculations, we studied the velocity-correctional effects on the second-order contributions to the gravitational deflection of relativistic test particles including a photon in the equatorial plane of a radially and constantly moving Kerr–Newman (KN) black hole [19]. In that work, we have obtained the analytical form for the second-order deflection angle of a photon by the moving black hole. However, a general formulation of the second-order deflection for both relativistic massive particles and the photon due to the moving lens has not been achieved.

In this paper, we start with the 2PM equations of motion of test particles, and then apply an iterative technique to analytically calculate the second-order gravitational deflection of relativistic test particles including the photon in the equatorial plane of a moving KN black hole with a radial constant velocity. We constrain our discussions to the small-angle, weak-field, and thin-lens approximation. This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we first review the 2PM equations of motion for test particles, and then derive the second-order deflection angle of the test particles. Section 3 presents the discussions of the formulation and a summary.

Natural units in which G  =  c  =  1 are used throughout the paper.

2. Second-order gravitational deflection caused by the moving Kerr–Newman source

2.1. Equations of motion up to second post-Minkowskian order for test particles

The 2PM equations of motion for test particles in the field of a longitudinally and constantly moving KN black hole can be calculated directly from the corresponding metric [20], which can be obtained from the harmonic KN metric [21] via a Lorentz boosting. Let $\{{\boldsymbol e}_1, ~{\boldsymbol e}_2, ~{\boldsymbol e}_3\}$ denote the orthonormal basis of a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system. We assume the rest frame of the background spacetime and the comoving frame for the barycentre of the gravitational source to be $(t, ~x, ~y, ~z)$ and $(X_0, ~X_1, ~X_2, ~X_3)$ , respectively. The 2PM equations of motion for test particles propagating in the equatorial plane of a moving KN source with a constant radial velocity ${\boldsymbol v}=v{\boldsymbol e}_1$ can be written as follows [19]

Equation (1)

Equation (2)

Equation (3)

Here, $\gamma=(1-v^2){}^{-\scriptstyle \frac{1}{2}}$ is the Lorentz factor and a dot denotes the derivative with respect to the affine parameter ξ which describes the trajectory [9, 22]. M, Q, and ${\boldsymbol J} (= J{\boldsymbol e}_3)$ are the rest mass, electrical charge, and angular momentum vector (along the positive X3 axis) of the gravitational source, respectively. $\Phi\equiv -\frac{M}{R}=-\frac{M}{\sqrt{X_1^2+X_2^2-a^2}}$ denotes the Newtonian gravitational potential, with $a = \frac{J}{M}$ being the angular momentum per mass. The relation $M^2\geqslant a^2+Q^2$ is assumed to avoid naked singularity for the black hole. Notice that equations (1)–(3) correspond to the $t, ~x, $ and $y\, -$ component of the geodesic equations in the background's rest frame, respectively, and that the residual component is trivial and omitted for the equatorial-plane propagation ($z=\frac{\partial}{\partial z}=0$ ). The coordinates $X_0, ~X_1, ~X_2$ , and X3 are related to $t, ~x, ~y$ , and z by the Lorentz transformation

Equation (4)

The schematic diagram for the deflection of test particles caused by a longitudinally moving KN source is shown in figure 1. The spatial coordinates of the test-particle source (denoted by A on the source plane) and observer (denoted by B on the observer plane) are assumed as $(x_A, ~y_A, ~0)$ and $(x_B, ~y_B, ~0)$ , respectively, in the background's rest frame, where $y_A\approx -b$ , $x_A\ll-b$ , and $x_B\gg b$ , with b being the impact parameter. In the comoving frame, the locations of A and B are denoted by $(X_A, ~Y_A, ~0)$ and $(X_B, ~Y_B, ~0)$ , respectively. The solid blue line represents the perturbed propagation path of a test particle coming from $x=-\infty$ with a relativistic initial velocity ${\boldsymbol w}\vert _{x\rightarrow-\infty}~(\approx {\boldsymbol w}\vert _{x\rightarrow x_A})~=w{\boldsymbol e}_1~$ ($0<w\leqslant1$ ). We assume v  <  w [9, 19] and that the test particle can pass by the black hole to reach the observer. The gravitational deflection is greatly exaggerated to distinguish between the perturbed and unperturbed (dashed horizontal line) paths.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the gravitational deflection of a test particle caused by a longitudinally moving Kerr–Newman black hole. We assume the test particle takes the prograde motion relative to the rotation of the gravitational source.

Standard image High-resolution image

2.2. Second-order deflection angle due to the moving KN black hole

The gravitational deflection angle for a test particle traveling from A to B is defined as $\alpha\equiv \arctan\left. \frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}x}\right\vert _{B}-\arctan \left.\frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}x}\right\vert _{A}$ . In the following, we employ an iterative technique to derive the gravitational deflection angle up to the second order, which can be written as

Equation (5)

Up to the zero order, equations (1)–(3) result in

Equation (6)

Equation (7)

Equation (8)

where we have followed Wucknitz and Sperhake's idea [9] and used the boundary conditions $\dot{t}\vert _{\xi\rightarrow -\infty}=\dot{t}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=\frac{1}{w}$ , $\dot{x}\vert _{\xi\rightarrow -\infty}=\dot{x}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=1$ , and $\dot{y}\vert _{\xi\rightarrow -\infty}=\dot{y}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=0$ . From equations (7)–(8), we can get a zero-order parameter transformation and the zero-order value for y

Equation (9)

Equation (10)

where the boundary condition $y\vert _{\xi\rightarrow -\infty}=y\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=-b$ has been adopted.

Substituting equations (6)–(8) and (10) into (1)–(3) and integrating the latter equations over ξ, we can obtain the analytical first-order forms for $\dot{t}$ , $\dot{x}$ , and $\dot{y}$ as follows:

Equation (11)

Equation (12)

Equation (13)

where equation (9) and the zero-order parameter transformation ${\rm d}X_1 = \left[\gamma\left(1 - \frac{v}{w}\right)+O(M)\right]{\rm d}x$ [9] have been used, and the integral constants have been determined in the lens's comoving frame. With the help of equations (9) and (10), we integrate equation (13) over ξ and obtain the explicit form for y up to the 1PM order as

Equation (14)

We then plug equations (11)–(14) into (3), ignore the third and higher order terms, and have

Equation (15)

in which the zero-order relation $\dot{X}_1=\gamma\left(\dot{x}-v\dot{t}\, \right)=\gamma\left(1-\frac{v}{w}\right)$ has been used. In addition, equation (12) gives the first-order parameter transformation

Equation (16)

Therefore, we can apply equation (16) to the integration of equation (15) over ξ, up to the 2PM order, and obtain

Equation (17)

In order to integrate equation (17) more conveniently, we perform a coordinate transformation ${\rm d}X_1=\gamma(1- v\dot{t}/\dot{x}){\rm d}x$ which is to be calculated up to the first post-Minkowskian order. Considering equations (11)–(12), we can get

Equation (18)

We then substitute equations (18) into (17) and have

Equation (19)

where C denotes the integral constant and we have dropped the third and higher order terms in the derivation.

Finally, substituting equations (12) and (19) into (5) and considering the conditions $X_A\ll -b$ and $X_B\gg b$ , we can obtain the 2PM gravitational deflection angle of a test particle propagating from $A~(X_A, ~Y_A, ~0)$ to $B~(X_B, ~Y_B, ~0)$ as follows

Equation (20)

where the kinematical correctional coefficients Ni(i  =  1, 2, 3, 4) are the functions of v and w:

Equation (21)

Equation (22)

Equation (23)

Equation (24)

Notice that in equation (20) the second-order terms with the factor $\frac{1}{X_A}$ or $\frac{1}{X_B}$ have been ignored since they are much smaller than the second-order terms with the factor $\frac{1}{b^2}$ such as the term $\frac{3N_2\left(1+\frac{4}{w^2}\right)\pi M^2}{4b^2}$ . The gravitational deflection angle α is a function of v and w, therefore, we denote it as $\alpha(v, w)$ from now on.

In the above derivations, we assume that the trajectory parameter ξ has the dimension of length [9]. In fact, we can also assume it to have the dimension of time [22], and the same result can be achieved. The detailed derivations are given in the appendix.

3. Discussion and summary

When the second-order contributions are dropped in equation (20), we can get the first-order deflection angle induced by a radially moving Schwarzschild source [9]

Equation (25)

Among the second-order contributions in equation (20), the third term, which corresponds to the rotation-induced effect, is the same as our previous result [23] achieved via the Euler–Lagrange method [9]. The second term (the second-order moving Schwarzschild contribution) and the fourth term (the charge-induced contribution) are analytically derived for the first time and completely new.

For the case of no translational motion (v  =  0) of the gravitational source, the four kinematical coefficients reduce to $N_1=N_2=N_3=N_4=1$ , and equation (20) becomes the second-order Kerr–Newman deflection angle of a massive particle (w  <  1) [19, 24]

Equation (26)

which can be reduced to the second-order Schwarzschild deflection of massive particles [25, 26] when we drop the rotation and electrical charge of the black hole (a  =  Q  =  0).

For a photon (w  =  1), $N_i=(1-v)\gamma$ , and equation (20) reduces to the second-order deflection angle caused by a radially moving KN source

Equation (27)

which is just the result based on the numerical calculations [19]. Notice that the second and fourth terms in equation (27) have been correctly anticipated by the numerical analysis [19], but they are rigorously derived here for the first time.

In the limit $v\rightarrow0$ and $w\rightarrow1$ , equation (20) is simplified to the second-order Kerr–Newman deflection angle of a photon [27]

Equation (28)

Finally, it should be mentioned that the measurability of the kinematically correctional effects on the second-order contributions to the gravitational deflection has been discussed in our previous work [19].

In summary, based on the equations of motion of test particles and the iterative technique, we achieve a general formulation for the second-order gravitational deflection of the test particles in the equatorial plane of a longitudinally and constantly moving Kerr–Newman black hole. Our formulation is not only valid for photons but also for relativistic massive particles, which generalizes the results presented in the previous literature and might be useful in future observations.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the reviewers for their useful suggestions and comments on improving the quality of this paper. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11647314 and 11547311).

Appendix. Derivations of the gravitational deflection angle based on the trajectory parameter having the dimension of time

As done in [22], we now assume the trajectory parameter ξ of a test particle to have the dimension of time in the following computations for the deflection angle $\alpha(v, w)$ .

Considering the boundary conditions $\dot{t}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=1$ , $\dot{x}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=w$ , and $\dot{y}\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=0$ , we can obtain the zero-order values for $\dot{t}$ , $\dot{x}$ , and $\dot{y}$ from equations (1)–(3) as follows

Equation (A.1)

Equation (A.2)

Equation (A.3)

Equations (A.2)–(A.3) lead to

Equation (A.4)

Equation (A.5)

where the boundary condition $y\vert _{x\rightarrow -\infty}=-b$ has been used.

We then substitute equations (A.1)–(A.4) into (1)–(3), integrate equations (1)–(3) over ξ, and get the analytical first-order forms for $\dot{t}$ , $\dot{x}$ , and $\dot{y}$ as

Equation (A.6)

Equation (A.7)

Equation (A.8)

where equation (A.5) and the parameter transformation ${\rm d}X_1=\left[\gamma\left(1-\frac{v}{w}\right)+O(M)\right]{\rm d}x$ have been applied. The integration of equation (A.8) over ξ gives us

Equation (A.9)

Plugging equations (A.6)–(A.9) into (3) and ignoring the third and higher order terms, we have

Equation (A.10)

Notice that equation (A.7) gives the first-order parameter transformation as follows

Equation (A.11)

We can thus apply equation (A.11) to the integration of equation (A.10) over ξ, up to the second order, and obtain

Equation (A.12)

In order to get the explicit form for $\dot{y}$ conveniently, we perform a 1PM coordinate transformation ${\rm d}X_1=\gamma(1- v\dot{t}/\dot{x}){\rm d}x$ , which can be calculated via equations (A.6)–(A.7) as follows

Equation (A.13)

Substituting equations (A.13) into (A.12), we have

Equation (A.14)

where we have ignored the third and higher order terms. Based on equations (A.14) and (A.7), we can obtain the explicit form of the 2PM deflection angle $\alpha(v, w)$ by performing a definite integral over X1 from $A~(X_A, ~Y_A, ~0)$ to $B~(X_B, ~Y_B, ~0)$ . Considering $X_A\ll -b$ and $X_B\gg b$ and omitting the second-order terms with the factor $\frac{1}{X_A}$ or $\frac{1}{X_B}$ , we can achieve the same result as equation (20).

Please wait… references are loading.