Articles

MID-INFRARED PROPERTIES OF OH MEGAMASER HOST GALAXIES. I. SPITZER IRS LOW- AND HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY

, , , , and

Published 2011 March 3 © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Kyle W. Willett et al 2011 ApJS 193 18 DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/18

0067-0049/193/1/18

ABSTRACT

We present mid-infrared spectra and photometry from the Infrared Spectrograph on the Spitzer Space Telescope for 51 OH megamasers (OHMs), along with 15 galaxies confirmed to have no megamaser emission above LOH = 102.3L. The majority of galaxies display moderate-to-deep 9.7 μm amorphous silicate absorption, with OHM galaxies showing stronger average absorption and steeper 20–30 μm continuum emission than non-masing galaxies. Emission from multiple polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), especially at 6.2, 7.7, and 11.3 μm, is detected in almost all systems. Fine-structure atomic emission (including [Ne ii], [Ne iii], [S iii], and [S iv]) and multiple H2 rotational transitions are observed in more than 90% of the sample. A subset of galaxies show emission from rarer atomic lines, such as [Ne v], [O iv], and [Fe ii]. Fifty percent of the OHMs show absorption from water ice and hydrogenated amorphous carbon grains, while absorption features from CO2, HCN, C2H2, and crystalline silicates are also seen in several OHMs. Column densities of OH derived from 34.6 μm OH absorption are similar to those derived from 1667 MHz OH absorption in non-masing galaxies, indicating that the abundance of masing molecules is similar for both samples. This data paper presents full mid-infrared spectra for each galaxy, along with measurements of line fluxes and equivalent widths, absorption feature depths, and spectral indices.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

OH megamasers (OHMs) are 18 cm masers with integrated line luminosities on the order of 101–104 L. They are an extremely rare phenomenon in the local universe, with roughly 100 currently known out to a redshift of z = 0.265 (Baan et al. 1992). All OHMs, including the more powerful "gigamasers" (LOH>104 L) are associated with starburst nuclei in merging galaxies. OHMs have been identified in many different types of nuclear environments as classified by optical spectra, but the merging galaxies are without exception (ultra)luminous infrared galaxies ((U)LIRGs). Since OHMs are signposts of gas-rich merging galaxies, their presence can also indicate the existence of associated phenomena including massive black hole mergers and highly obscured circumnuclear starbursts (Darling 2007). OHMs are a powerful tool in this respect due in large part to their ability to be seen at cosmic distances. In order to employ OHMs as tracers, however, the assumption must be made that the OH line properties remain constant as a function of cosmic time and host environment. An explanation of the physical mechanisms and conditions responsible for distinguishing OHMs from non-masing ULIRGs is thus vital for understanding both the megamaser phenomenon and the associated merger characteristics.

Spectroscopic studies of the mid-IR emission in the host galaxies offer multiple diagnostics which can provide clues to the nature of the maser pumping mechanism and the associated OH emission. We used the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) on board the Spitzer Space Telescope (Werner et al. 2004) to study merging ULIRGs. Since the dusty nuclear regions are typically obscured at optical wavelengths, mid-IR observations can yield valuable information specific to the locations in which the OHMs are generated. These include measurements of the dust temperature and optical depth (from broadband photometry and absorption features), the excitation and temperature of the gas (molecular and fine-structure atomic lines), and high-ionization lines that can signal the presence of an active galactic nucleus (AGN), a possible heating source for the dust.

This data paper presents full low-resolution (LR) and high-resolution (HR) IRS spectra along with measured mid-IR properties for 51 OHMs and 15 non-masing ULIRGs. An accompanying paper (Willett et al. 2011, Paper II) presents the full analysis, statistical comparisons of the masing and non-masing galaxies, and tests the viability of current OHM pumping models based on the IRS data.

2. THE SAMPLE

The OHM host galaxies selected for IRS observations were primarily drawn from the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli 2002a, 2002b). We selected well-studied OHMs with unambiguous maser detections and large amounts of ancillary data (including OH line and radio continuum maps, near-IR imaging, and optical imaging and spectroscopy) to maximize scientific return on the sample. A lower threshold of LOH>101.6L also eliminated extragalactic "kilomasers" from the sample, which are likely powered by different radiative processes than megamasers (Henkel & Wilson 1990).

In order to be detected in reasonable integration times using the IRS, we required that all potential targets have S(60 μm)>0.8 Jy as measured by the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS). After removing objects already observed by the IRS (largely through the GTO ULIRG program; e.g., Armus et al. 2007), we observed 24 galaxies in the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.2.

We supplemented these galaxies with additional spectra of OHM hosts publicly available through the Spitzer archive. To ensure uniformity of the data, we selected only galaxies from the archive that had full coverage with both the IRS LR and HR modules. As of 2008 March, the publicly available data from the archive yielded 27 additional OHM galaxies (Table 1).

Table 1. Radio, Optical, and FIR Properties of OHMs and Non-masing Galaxies

  IRAS FSC R.A. Decl. za DL log LFIRb log LOHc f1.4 GHzd Alt. Desig.
    J2000.0 J2000.0   (h−170 Mpc) (h−270L) (h−270L) (mJy)  
OHMs IRAS 01355–1814 01 37 57.4 –17 59 21 0.191 929 12.49 2.75 <5.0  
  IRAS 01418+1651 01 44 30.5 +17 06 05 0.0274 115 11.63 2.71 40.6 III Zw 035
  IRAS 01562+2528 01 59 02.6 +25 42 37 0.1658 788 12.19 3.31 6.3  
  IRAS 02524+2046 02 55 17.1 +20 58 43 0.1815 873 12.07–12.54 3.80 2.9  
  IRAS 03521+0028 03 54 42.2 +00 37 03 0.1522 718 12.59 2.49 6.7  
  IRAS 04121+0223 04 14 47.1 +02 30 36 0.1216 568 11.69–11.96 2.39 3.1  
  IRAS 04454–4838 04 46 49.5 –48 33 33 0.0529 235 11.89 2.95 <5.0 ESO 203-IG 001
  IRAS 06487+2208 06 51 45.8 +22 04 27 0.1437 678 12.34 2.87 10.8  
  IRAS 07163+0817 07 19 05.5 +08 12 07 0.1107 515 11.79 2.43 3.5  
  IRAS 07572+0533 07 59 57.2 +05 25 00 0.1894 926 12.31 2.80 5.0  
  IRAS 08201+2801 08 23 12.6 +27 51 40 0.1680 808 12.26 3.51 16.7  
  IRAS 08449+2332 08 47 51.0 +23 21 06 0.1510 723 12.05 2.65 6.1  
  IRAS 08474+1813 08 50 18.3 +18 02 01 0.1450 692 12.19 2.76 4.2  
  IRAS 09039+0503 09 06 34.2 +04 51 25 0.1250 589 12.16 2.88 6.6  
  IRAS 09539+0857 09 56 34.3 +08 43 06 0.1290 608 12.09 3.53 9.5  
  IRAS 10035+2740 10 06 26.3 +27 25 46 0.1662 794 12.26 2.55 6.3  
  IRAS 10039–3338 10 06 04.8 –33 53 15 0.0341 154 11.74 2.98 24.7  
  IRAS 10173+0828 10 20 00.2 +08 13 34 0.0480 222 11.86 2.77 10.8  
  IRAS 10339+1548 10 36 37.9 +15 32 42 0.1965 969 12.35 2.71 5.1  
  IRAS 10378+1109 10 40 29.2 +10 53 18 0.1362 646 12.35 3.35 8.9  
  IRAS 10485–1447 10 51 03.1 –15 03 22 0.1330 629 12.23 2.99 4.4  
  IRAS 11028+3130 11 05 37.5 +31 14 32 0.1990 975 12.39 3.03 5.0  
  IRAS 11180+1623 11 20 41.7 +16 06 57 0.1660 801 12.27 2.40 4.2  
  IRAS 11524+1058 11 55 02.8 +10 41 44 0.1784 868 12.19 3.04 5.0  
  IRAS 12018+1941 12 04 24.5 +19 25 10 0.1687 814 12.48 2.96 6.5  
  IRAS 12032+1707 12 05 47.7 +16 51 08 0.2170 1082 12.64 4.21 28.7  
  IRAS 12112+0305 12 13 46.0 +02 48 38 0.0730 335 12.38 3.04 23.8  
  IRAS 12540+5708 12 56 14.2 +56 52 25 0.0422 188 12.42 2.94 309.9 Mrk 231
  IRAS 13218+0552 13 24 19.9 +05 37 05 0.2051 1011 12.44 3.50 5.3  
  IRAS 13428+5608 13 44 42.1 +55 53 13 0.0378 167 12.18 2.61 145.4 Mrk 273
  IRAS 13451+1232 13 47 33.3 +12 17 24 0.1220 571 12.21 2.46 5398.0 4C +12.50
  IRAS 14059+2000 14 08 18.7 +19 46 23 0.1237 580 11.94 3.40 7.5  
  IRAS 14070+0525 14 09 31.2 +05 11 32 0.2644 1346 12.87 4.50 5.2  
  IRAS 14553+1245 14 57 43.4 +12 33 16 0.1249 585 11.87 2.33 3.8  
  IRAS 15327+2340 15 34 57.1 +23 30 11 0.0181 80 12.22 2.65 326.8 Arp 220
  IRAS 16090–0139 16 11 40.5 –01 47 06 0.1339 628 12.57 3.52 20.9  
  IRAS 16255+2801 16 27 38.1 +27 54 52 0.1340 627 11.94 2.62 5.0  
  IRAS 16300+1558 16 32 21.4 +15 51 45 0.2417 1212 12.80 2.91 7.9  
  IRAS 17207–0014 17 23 21.9 –00 17 01 0.0428 188 12.45 3.10 82.4  
  IRAS 18368+3549 18 38 35.4 +35 52 20 0.1162 536 12.24 2.91 21.0  
  IRAS 18588+3517 19 00 41.2 +35 21 27 0.1067 489 11.92 2.58 5.9  
  IRAS 20100–4156 20 13 29.5 –41 47 35 0.1296 603 12.68 4.13 <5.0  
  IRAS 20286+1846 20 30 55.5 +18 56 46 0.1347 633 12.06 3.47 5.0  
  IRAS 21077+3358 21 09 49.0 +34 10 20 0.1764 846 12.10–12.24 3.32 9.4  
  IRAS 21272+2514 21 29 29.4 +25 27 50 0.1508 709 11.99–12.14 3.71 4.4  
  IRAS 22055+3024 22 07 49.7 +30 39 40 0.1269 587 12.19 2.79 6.4  
  IRAS 22116+0437 22 14 09.9 +04 52 24 0.1939 937 12.12–12.32 2.83 8.4  
  IRAS 22491–1808 22 51 49.2 –17 52 23 0.0778 346 12.19 2.46 5.9  
  IRAS 23028+0725 23 05 20.4 +07 41 44 0.1496 701 11.86–12.06 3.34 19.5  
  IRAS 23233+0946 23 25 56.2 +10 02 49 0.1279 591 12.18 2.80 11.6  
  IRAS 23365+3604 23 39 01.3 +36 21 09 0.0645 283 12.19 2.52 28.7  
Non-masing IRAS 00164–1039 00 18 50.4 –10 22 08 0.0272 113 11.36 <1.25 <5.0 Arp 256
  IRAS 01572+0009 01 59 50.2 +00 23 41 0.1630 774 12.47 <2.12 26.7 Mrk 1014
  IRAS 05083+7936 05 16 46.4 +79 40 13 0.0537 237 11.93 <1.94 41.4  
  IRAS 06538+4628 06 57 34.4 +46 24 11 0.0214 93.6 11.24 <0.89 64.3 UGC 3608
  IRAS 08559+1053 08 58 41.8 +10 41 22 0.1480 705 12.18 <1.72 <5.0  
  IRAS 09437+0317 09 46 20.6 +03 03 30 0.0205 93.5 11.15 <1.01 <5.0  
  IRAS 10565+2448 10 59 18.1 +24 32 34 0.0431 194 12.04 <1.66 57.0  
  IRAS 11119+3257 11 14 38.9 +32 41 33 0.1890 923 12.48 <2.07 110.4  
  IRAS 13349+2438 13 37 18.7 +24 23 03 0.1076 500 11.39 <1.72 20.0  
  IRAS 15001+1433 15 02 31.9 +14 21 35 0.1627 781 12.42 <2.04 16.9  
  IRAS 15206+3342 15 22 38.0 +33 31 36 0.1244 582 12.13 <1.75 11.2  
  IRAS 20460+1925 20 48 17.3 +19 36 54 0.1807 868 12.03 <2.15 18.9  
  IRAS 23007+0836 23 03 15.6 +08 52 26 0.0163 64.9 11.43 <0.63 181.0 NGC 7469
  IRAS 23394–0353 23 42 00.8 –03 36 55 0.0232 95.4 11.11 <1.18 <5.0 Arp 295B
  IRAS 23498+2423 23 52 26.0 +24 40 17 0.2120 1037 12.44 <2.25 6.8  

Notes. aHeliocentric optical redshift (Darling & Giovanelli 2002a). bComputed according to the prescription of Sanders & Mirabel (1996), with a scale factor of C = 1.6. IRAS photometry is from Sanders et al. (2003); a range in LFIR means that the object was not detected by IRAS at 100 μm. cOH fluxes are from Darling & Giovanelli (2002a, 2002b); limits are computed according to Equation (1). dFlux densities at 1.4 GHz are from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (Condon et al. 1998).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

In order to provide a baseline for analysis of the OHMs, we also identified a control sample of ULIRGs that showed no megamaser emission above a firm limit. To identify these galaxies, we drew on non-detections from OH surveys by Baan et al. (1992), Staveley-Smith et al. (1992), Darling & Giovanelli (2000, 2001, 2002a), and Kent et al. (2002). The upper limit for OH emission is conservatively derived from the rms noise in the spectrum at 1667 MHz, assuming a boxcar line profile with a line width Δv = 150 km s–1 and a 1.5σ detection:

Equation (1)

For this control sample, we set an upper limit of LmaxOH < 102.3L; this limit compromises between ensuring that all but the faintest megamaser emission is excluded and yielding a reasonable number of objects in the control sample for statistical analysis. All 51 OHMs in our IRS sample have LOH above this limit.

In addition to selecting galaxies based on OH non-detection, we imposed two additional criteria to ensure that the control sample was as similar as possible to the OHM hosts. First, we set a lower limit on the far-infrared luminosity (Sanders & Mirabel 1996) of the non-masing galaxies as measured by their IRAS fluxes. OHMs occur exclusively in IR-bright galaxies, due to the fact that the maser is pumped primarily by rotational transitions of a few hundred kelvin above the ground state (Baan et al. 1982; Henkel et al. 1987). Darling & Giovanelli (2002a) show that the relationship between the OH and infrared luminosities is a power law with LOHL1.2FIR. Since no OHM observed with the IRS has LFIR < 1011L, we established this as the lower limit for inclusion in the non-masing sample.

Second, a cutoff in redshift space is applied to sample a sufficiently large volume (V ∼ 1 Gpc3) in order to avoid systematic effects such as the Malmquist bias. The available data in the archive contained many more galaxies at lower redshifts (z < 0.05) than those further away. To avoid overweighting the control sample toward galaxies at low redshifts, we sorted galaxies that met the LmaxOH and LIR criteria into bins of Δz = 0.02. For bins where the number of non-masing galaxies exceeded those of OHMs, we randomly removed objects from the non-masing bins until the numbers were equal. This reduced the control sample to one galaxy at 0 < z < 0.02 and four galaxies at 0.02 < z < 0.04; for all other redshift bins, no such adjustments were necessary. As of 2008 March, there existed 15 suitable candidates in the Spitzer archive qualifying for the non-masing control sample (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the distribution of OH luminosity for all objects as a function of redshift; for the non-masing galaxies, we display upper limits as computed in Equation (1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Distribution of integrated OH luminosity for the IRS samples as a function of redshift. For non-masing galaxies, the OH luminosity is an upper limit calculated from Equation (1). The dashed line at LOH = 102.3L is the upper limit on possible OH emission for the non-masing control sample.

Standard image High-resolution image

Throughout this paper, we assume the WMAP5 cosmology with H0 = 70.5, ΩM = 0.274, and ΩΛ = 0.726 (Hinshaw et al. 2009).

3. OBSERVATIONS

We observed 24 OHMs with the IRS from 2006 August through 2007 December. The IRS contains four modules in two different spectroscopic resolutions: LR and HR (Houck et al. 2004). The short–high (SH) and long–high (LH) modules operate at a resolution of R ∼ 600; the short–low (SL1 and SL2) and long–low (LL1 and LL2) modules operate at resolutions ranging from R ∼ 56–127, depending on the observing wavelength. Two orders, SL3 (7.3–8.7 μm) and LL3 (19.4–21.7 μm), cover the overlapping range between the first and second orders in both SL and LL. We used these only as checks for the absolute flux calibration between the different orders.

All targets used the Staring Mode Astronomical Observing Template (AOT) with the galaxies placed at two nod positions approximately one-third and two-thirds the length of the slit. We observed targets in all six modules as well as an equal-time, off-target exposure in the LH module to be used for sky subtraction.

Although the majority of our sources had no previous IRAS detections in either the 12 or 25 μm bands, we extrapolated the likely flux based on the colors of ULIRGs at similar redshifts and the measured fluxes at 60 μm. We chose cycle times intended to yield signal-to-noise ratios of S/N = 50–100 for the LR modules and S/N ⩾ 10 for the HR modules, allowing for accurate measurement of faint emission and absorption features, as well as accurate spectral decomposition.

For the 24 objects in the dedicated OHM program, we took dedicated peakup observations in both the blue (16 μm) and red (22 μm) filters in the sample-up-the-ramp (SUR) mode for photometric calibration of the spectra. The SUR peakups did not coincide in time with the spectroscopy for the majority of targets. None of the galaxies selected from the Spitzer archive possessed SUR peakup data; 16 archived galaxies have double correlated sampling (DCS) peakups with slightly worse photometric accuracy than those with SUR data. Only one galaxy, IRAS 10173+0828, had no peakup observations of any kind. Measured peakup fluxes are given in Table 3.

The Spitzer beam is diffraction limited past 6 μm, with slit widths for the spectral modules between 3'' and 11farcs. The vast majority of the nuclei in merging ULIRGs have angular separations less than the instrument point-source function, and thus can be treated as point sources. For the few galaxies close enough to be resolved, we chose staring mode observations centered on the IR-dominant nuclear region of the galaxy. The only available observations of the double nucleus in IRAS 10485–1447 were centered on the western nucleus. Details of the IRS observations are given in Table 2.

Table 2. IRS Observation Log

Object Date Peakup Type SL1 SL2 LL1 LL2 SH LH Program
IRAS 01355–1814   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 4 240 × 5 4, 6
IRAS 01418+1651   BPU 14 × 2 14 × 2 14 × 4 14 × 4 120 × 5 60 × 7 2, 3
IRAS 01562+2528 2007 Sep 9 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 02524+2046 2007 Sep 9 BPU 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 03521+0028   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 04121+0223 2007 Oct 5 BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 04454–4838   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 240 × 2 3
IRAS 06487+2208 2007 May 4 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 07163+0817 2007 May 3 BPU 14 × 6 14 × 6 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 07572+0533 2007 May 4 BPU 14 × 6 14 × 6 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 08201+2801 2007 May 3 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 08449+2332 2007 May 4 BPU-offset 14 × 6 14 × 6 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 08474+1813 2007 Dec 5 BPU 14 × 6 14 × 6 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 09039+0503   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 4 30 × 4 120 × 4 240 × 3 5, 6
IRAS 09539+0857   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 7 30 × 4 30 × 4 120 × 3 240 × 3 5, 6
IRAS 10035+2740 2007 Jun 9 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 10039–3338   BPU 14 × 6 14 × 6 14 × 4 14 × 4 30 × 6 60 × 2 3
IRAS 10173+0828   none 60 × 1 60 × 1 14 × 4 14 × 4 120 × 4 60 × 12 3, 7, 8
IRAS 10339+1548 2007 Jun 8 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 10378+1109   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 10485–1447   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 4 30 × 4 120 × 2 240 × 2 5, 6
IRAS 11028+3130 2007 Jun 9 BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 11180+1623 2007 Jun 8 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 11524+1058 2007 Jun 12 BPU-offset 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 12018+1941   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 12032+1707   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 3 240 × 3 4, 6
IRAS 12112+0305   BPU-offset 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 2 60 × 4 4
IRAS 12540+5708   BPU 14 × 2 14 × 2 6 × 5 6 × 5 30 × 6 60 × 4 9
IRAS 13218+0552   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 13428+5608   BPU 14 × 2 14 × 2 14 × 2 14 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 13451+1232   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 14059+2000 2007 Jul 31 BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 14070+0525   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 3 240 × 2 4
IRAS 14553+1245 2007 Jul 31 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 15327+2340   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 6 × 5 6 × 5 30 × 6 60 × 4 10
IRAS 16090–0139   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 4 4
IRAS 16255+2801 2006 Sep 17 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 16300+1558   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 5 30 × 5 120 × 4 240 × 4 4,6
IRAS 17207–0014   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 18368+3549 2007 May 1 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 18588+3517 2006 Nov 20 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 20100–4156   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 2 60 × 4 4
IRAS 20286+1846 2006 Nov 20 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 21077+3358 2007 Jun 13 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 21272+2514   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 240 × 1 4,11
IRAS 22055+3024 2007 Jun 27 BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 22116+0437 2006 Dec 21 BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 22491–1808   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 2 60 × 4 4
IRAS 23028+0725 2006 Dec 20 BPU 14 × 7 14 × 7 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 2 60 × 2 1
IRAS 23233+0946   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 4 30 × 4 120 × 5 240 × 4 5,6
IRAS 23365+3604   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 00163–1039   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 14 × 2 14 × 2 30 × 3 60 × 2 3
IRAS 01572+0009   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 05083+7936   BPU 14 × 6 14 × 6 14 × 4 14 × 4 30 × 6 60 × 2 3
IRAS 06538+4628   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 14 × 2 14 × 2 30 × 3 60 × 2 3
IRAS 08559+1053   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 12
IRAS 09437+0317   BPU 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 240 × 2 3
IRAS 10565+2448   BPU 14 × 3 14 × 3 30 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 6 60 × 4 4
IRAS 11119+3257   BPU 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 13349+2438   BPU 14 × 5 14 × 5 14 × 5 14 × 5 120 × 5 60 × 10 13
IRAS 15001+1433   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 15206+3342   BPU-offset 60 × 1 60 × 1 30 × 3 30 × 3 120 × 3 60 × 4 4
IRAS 20460+1925   BPU 14 × 5 14 × 5 14 × 5 14 × 5 120 × 5 60 × 10 13
IRAS 23007+0836   BPU 14 × 2 14 × 2 6 × 5 6 × 5 30 × 4 60 × 2 14
IRAS 23394–0353   BPU 30 × 6 30 × 6 60 × 2 60 × 2 14 × 6 14 × 4 3
IRAS 23498+2423   BPU-offset 60 × 2 60 × 2 30 × 2 30 × 2 120 × 3 240 × 2 4

Notes. Spitzer archival data are from programs: (1) 30407 (PI: J. Darling); (2) 3237 (PI: E. Sturm); (3) 30323 (PI: L. Armus); (4) 105 (PI: J. Houck); (5) 2306 (PI: M. Imanishi); (6) 3187 (PI: S. Veilleux); (7) 3605 (PI: C. Bradford); (8) 20549 (PI: R. Joseph); (9) 1442 (PI: L. Armus); (10) 1444 (PI: L. Armus); (11) 20375 (PI: L. Armus); (12) 666 (PI: J. Houck); (13) 61 (PI: G. Rieke); (14) 14 (PI: J. Houck). Exposure times for all modules are given as seconds per cycle × number of cycles.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 3. IRS Photometry and Continuum Measurements

Object 16 μm Peakup 22 μm Peakup Peakup Type α15–6 α30–20 S/N
  (mJy) (mJy)        
IRAS 01355–1814 ... 45.5 DCS 2.8 ± 0.3 5.2 ± 0.8 75
IRAS 01418+1651 ... ... ... 2.2 ± 0.3 5.2 ± 0.8 18
IRAS 01562+2528 6.1 13.0 SUR 1.8 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.8 11
IRAS 02524+2046 10.6 21.7 SUR 2.0 ± 0.4 5.7 ± 1.0 25
IRAS 03521+0028 25.6 ... DCS 2.3 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.8 63
IRAS 04121+0223 10.5 22.6 SUR 2.6 ± 0.1 5.9 ± 0.5 21
IRAS 04454–4838 ... ... ... 2.7 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.9 37
IRAS 06487+2208 85.0 177.5 SUR 2.4 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.8 48
IRAS 07163+0817 12.3 28.8 SUR 2.5 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 1.0 26
IRAS 07572+0533 52.1 103.0 SUR 2.6 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.7 55
IRAS 08201+2801 61.8 74.3 SUR 2.2 ± 0.2 4.5 ± 0.7 37
IRAS 08449+2332 26.6 48.2 SUR 2.2 ± 0.2 4.4 ± 0.4 52
IRAS 08474+1813 9.5 28.7 SUR 2.2 ± 0.5 6.5 ± 0.6 30
IRAS 09039+0503 86.7 ... DCS 1.8 ± 0.5 5.5 ± 0.7 41
IRAS 09539+0857 ... ... ... 2.2 ± 0.1 6.0 ± 0.3 36
IRAS 10035+2740 9.2 22.8 SUR 2.1 ± 0.2 6.0 ± 0.5 23
IRAS 10039–3338 ... ... ... –0.1 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 0.3 17
IRAS 10173+0828 ... ... ... 2.6 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 1.0 48
IRAS 10339+1548 10.7 28.1 SUR 2.5 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.7 22
IRAS 10378+1109 ... 114.8 DCS 2.0 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.7 35
IRAS 10485–1447 ... ... ... 2.5 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 0.8 75
IRAS 11028+3130 4.8 13.0 SUR 2.4 ± 0.2 7.0 ± 0.6 26
IRAS 11180+1623 14.8 33.6 SUR 2.2 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.9 15
IRAS 11524+1058 8.2 14.8 SUR 1.5 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.8 20
IRAS 12018+1941 121.7 ... DCS 3.0 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.4 63
IRAS 12032+1707 ... 73.9 DCS 2.2 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 0.7 42
IRAS 12112+0305 91.9 ... DCS 2.3 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.7 42
IRAS 12540+5708 ... ... ... 1.6 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.7 30
IRAS 13218+0552 212.9 ... DCS 0.6 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.7 100
IRAS 13428+5608 ... ... ... 1.9 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 0.6 12
IRAS 13451+1232 ... ... ... 2.3 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.7 50
IRAS 14059+2000 12.2 26.3 SUR 1.1 ± 0.6 4.9 ± 0.8 20
IRAS 14070+0525 ... 30.1 DCS 1.6 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.5 33
IRAS 14553+1245 28.7 61.2 SUR 2.0 ± 0.7 4.3 ± 0.7 22
IRAS 15327+2340 ... ... ... 2.4 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.4 17
IRAS 16090–0139 71.4 ... DCS 1.3 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.6 59
IRAS 16255+2801 16.0 36.7 SUR 1.4 ± 0.3 4.7 ± 0.6 22
IRAS 16300+1558 ... 35.0 DCS 1.7 ± 0.5 5.6 ± 0.9 31
IRAS 17207–0014 ... ... ... 1.8 ± 0.6 6.2 ± 0.6 28
IRAS 18368+3549 26.6 49.8 SUR 1.7 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 0.8 29
IRAS 18588+3517 43.6 92.1 SUR 1.5 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 0.8 28
IRAS 20100–4156 86.7 ... DCS 1.9 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.7 73
IRAS 20286+1846 11.4 22.0 SUR 2.3 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.6 20
IRAS 21077+3358 31.1 62.1 SUR 2.8 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 0.6 52
IRAS 21272+2514 ... 39.0 DCS 2.0 ± 0.3 5.0 ± 0.7 36
IRAS 22055+3024 54.5 132.4 SUR 2.7 ± 0.3 4.0 ± 0.7 30
IRAS 22116+0437 46.6 68.2 SUR 2.3 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.9 35
IRAS 22491–1808 87.5 ... DCS 2.8 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.6 28
IRAS 23028+0725 56.4 140.7 SUR ... 3.2 ± 0.7 25
IRAS 23233+0946 ... ... ... 2.1 ± 0.3 4.7 ± 0.5 33
IRAS 23365+3604 ... ... ... 2.5 ± 3.1 4.6 ± 0.5 15
IRAS 00163–1039 ... ... ... 2.3 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 0.4 34
IRAS 01572+0009 ... ... ... 1.8 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.3 81
IRAS 05083+7936 ... ... ... 2.0 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.4 48
IRAS 06538+4628 ... ... ... 2.9 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.4 37
IRAS 08559+1053 ... 90.7 DCS 1.3 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.4 64
IRAS 09437+0317 ... ... ... 1.7 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.4 19
IRAS 10565+2448 ... ... ... 2.1 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.5 19
IRAS 11119+3257 ... ... ... 1.2 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.3 79
IRAS 13349+2438 ... ... ... 0.8 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 110
IRAS 15001+1433 ... 135.3 DCS 1.9 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.5 58
IRAS 15206+3342 110.7 ... DCS 2.3 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.4 65
IRAS 20460+1925 ... ... ... ... 1.1 ± 0.3 16
IRAS 23007+0836 ... ... ... 1.7 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.4 19
IRAS 23394–0353 ... ... ... 1.8 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.4 37
IRAS 23498+2423 46.5 ... DCS 1.0 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.4 87

Note. Errors in the peakup fluxes are at the 15% level.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

4. DATA REDUCTION

4.1. Dedicated Observations of OHM Galaxies

The data were processed using the Spitzer Science Center S17.0 data pipeline. We used basic calibrated data (BCD) products for our analysis, having already been corrected for flat fielding, stray light contributions, nonlinear responsivity in the pixels, and "drooping" (an increase in detector pixel voltage that occurs during non-destructive readouts). The two-dimensional BCD images were first medianed over the data cycles at each nod position to remove transient effects such as cosmic rays. For the SL and LL modules, we subtracted the sky contribution by differencing the BCD images for each nod position with the adjacent position in the same module.

The slit sizes of the SH and LH modules are too small to permit extraction of a sky background during the same observation. The continuum levels in the HR modules, however, contain strong contributions from scattered zodiacal light. Estimations of the flux at 15 μm using SPOT predict zodi contributions within the Spitzer beam ranging from 20 to 80 mJy, which in many cases is of comparable magnitude to the expected signal from the galaxies themselves. The wavelength-dependent brightness of the sky contribution means that it cannot be corrected using a simple scaling, and so we did not attempt to further calibrate either HR module. The calibrated LR spectra were thus used for absolute fluxes and the HR spectra for line ratio diagnostics (which are unaffected by continuum levels).

To obtain more accurate measurements of faint lines at longer wavelengths, we took dedicated off-source sky observations in the LH module for all 24 OHMs in our program. Subtraction of the wavelength-dependent background, however, significantly affected the measured line fluxes. For galaxies with background subtraction in only the LH module, this changes the line ratios measured between different HR modules (e.g., [S iii]λ33/[S iv]λ10.5). We reduced the data both with and without subtraction of the sky backgrounds; the background-subtracted LH spectra are attached as an Appendix.

Following the initial cleaning of the two-dimensional BCD products, we eliminated rogue pixels using the IDL package IRSCLEAN_MASK7. We used rogue pixel masks provided by the SSC for each IRS campaign, and supplemented the standard masks with manual cleaning of each nod and module. The one-dimensional spectra were then extracted using the Spitzer IRS Custom Extractor version 2.0. For all modules we used the optimal extraction routine with the standard aperture to improve the S/N ratio in faint galaxies.

The LR modules were stitched together to match continuum levels by using a multiplicative scaling. We fixed the LL1 module and then scaled LL2 to LL1, SL1 to LL2, and SL2 to SL1. The mean scaling factors were 1.03 ± 0.08 for LL2 to LL1, 1.49 ± 0.69 for SL1 to LL2, and 1.37 ± 0.78 for SL2 to SL1. We then calibrated the entire LR spectra as a single unit by scaling to the IRS 22 μm SUR peakups. The required scaling in the majority of cases was quite small, indicating that the sky subtraction and spectral extraction techniques are robust; the mean scaling factor was 0.94 ± 0.08. The accuracy of the overall continuum flux calibration is ∼5% (Houck et al. 2004).

Noisy areas on both ends of the SH and LH orders were trimmed from the one-dimensional spectra. These areas typically encompass a range of 10–30 pixels on the edges of the orders and correspond to areas of decreased sensitivity on the detector. We deliberately trimmed only pixels with an overlapping wavelength range in adjacent orders so that a maximum amount of information is preserved. In isolated cases, we also removed obvious rogue pixels by hand from spectra in which exceptional one-channel features appear in only a single nod.

We calculated a simple figure of merit to measure the S/N in the LR data. The data near λrest = 21 μm (a feature-free area near the center of most spectra) are fit with a low-order polynomial; the median flux in that region is then divided by the rms noise to yield the S/N (Table 3). We note that this parameter is a function of wavelength, as well as the performance and integration time in each spectral module; this is intended to give only a rough estimate for each object. The S/N for the samples ranges from ∼10to110, with a median of 35.

4.2. Archival Data

Since the archival OHM and non-masing galaxies did not come from a unified observing program, the version of the Spitzer data pipeline and the level of processing varied slightly from object to object—we used the most recent versions available in the archive (version 15.3.0 or later). The reduction process was identical to that for the OHM galaxies in our program, with the exception of the LR photometric scaling; since observations in the archive varied in availability of peakup data, we used a variety of sources to calibrate the spectra. In order of priority, we used the IRS dedicated 22 μm SUR peakups, IRS acquisition 16 and 22 μm DCS peakups, or IRAS 25 μm observations (all lying within the coverage of the LL modules). For galaxies from the archive, 17 are calibrated with DCS peakups, 21 with IRAS 25 μm photometry, and four are left uncalibrated. The mean scaling factor for the objects without SUR photometry was 1.05 ± 0.25, slightly higher than the mean scaling for galaxies in the dedicated OHM program.

Five OHMs and five non-masing galaxies from the archive had both SH and LH sky backgrounds taken simultaneously with the spectroscopic observations; the remainder had no HR sky backgrounds in either module. Since we emphasize uniformity of the observations to the fullest extent possible, all data used for statistical comparisons between the samples use data without HR sky subtraction; line measurements for the background-subtracted objects are given in the Appendix.

The spectra for IRAS 20460+1925 and IRAS 23028+0725 had no flux in the SL modules, most likely due to a pointing error during observations. No SL data from either galaxy are used in our analyses here or in Paper II.

5. RESULTS

We show examples of the peakup-scaled LR spectra for the OHMs in Figure 2, with the individual modules stitched together and bonus orders removed. Examples of the HR SH and LH data are shown in Figures 3 and 4; full spectra for all galaxies are available as an online-only extended figures. While individual orders within the HR modules are typically well aligned in flux, the differences in calibration between the SH and LH modules are clearly apparent when matching the spectra; this is due to a combination of different slit sizes for the SH and LH modules (a factor of ∼4) and the lack of separate sky subtraction for the SH modules. For this reason, as well as emphasizing the narrow atomic and molecular features visible in the HR spectra, we display separate plots for the SH and LH modules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. 

IRS spectra from the low-resolution modules (LR) for OHMs. Spectra for all OHMs and non-masing galaxies are available as an online supplement; portions are shown here for guidance on form and style. All detected PAH emission and absorption features from water ice and silicates are marked. (An extended version of this figure is available in the online journal.)

Standard image High-resolution image
    Figure 3.

    Figure 3. 

    IRS spectra from the short-high module (SH) for OHMs. Spectra for all OHMs and non-masing galaxies are available as an online supplement; portions are shown here for guidance on form and style. All detected atomic and H2 features in each spectra are marked. (An extended version of this figure is available in the online journal.)

    Standard image High-resolution image
      Figure 4.

      Figure 4. 

      IRS spectra from the long–high module (LH) for OHMs. Spectra for all OHMs and non-masing galaxies are available as an online supplement; portions are shown here for guidance on form and style. All detected atomic and H2 emission features are marked. (An extended version of this figure is available in the online journal.)

      Standard image High-resolution image

        A small amount of the archival objects have previously published full IRS spectra (Armus et al. 2004; Weedman et al. 2005; Armus et al. 2007), mainly consisting of bright, nearby galaxies. Farrah et al. (2007) published HR spectra for roughly half of our archival OHM hosts. While many papers use the available data from the GTO programs, however, the majority of objects extracted from the archive have no published spectra, although some data are used in larger studies of ULIRG properties (e.g., Higdon et al. 2006; Desai et al. 2007; Hao et al. 2007). The spectra for many of the archival galaxies are thus presented here for the first time.

        Comparison of our data with the few spectra of objects previously published (e.g., Mrk 1014, Arp 220, NGC 7469) revealed no significant differences in spectral shape or detection of individual features. Measurements of line flux and equivalent widths (EWs), however, may be affected by the photometric scaling and/or line-fitting routines used; for this reason, we chose to reduce all data in a uniform matter.

        For many of our HR spectra, especially those with low S/N, there exist individual spikes that do not correspond to any identified feature (see IRAS 01562+2528 for a prominent example). These features are typically 1–2 channels wide, much narrower than the expected line width for an unresolved feature. We regard such features as spurious, possibly caused by hot pixels or other instrumental conditions that are not corrected by our cleaning routines. All features we regard as valid detections are listed in the data tables, with the locations of the most common features marked on the spectra themselves.

        5.1. Continuum

        The continuum emission for all objects in the OHM sample has a relatively homogenous spectral shape over the range of the IRS, although differences in spectral shape between the two samples do appear and are explored in Paper II. Figure 5 shows the individual objects overlaid with a template generated by medianing the flux in each wavelength bin from all galaxies. The template bears a close resemblance to starbursting ULIRG spectra seen in previous surveys (Hao et al. 2007; Weedman & Houck 2009). The LR spectrum clearly shows silicate absorption at 9.7 and 18 μm and water ice absorption at 6 μm. LR emission features are dominated by the broad polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features from 6 to 13 μm, with weaker contributions from neon, sulfur, and molecular hydrogen also visible.

        Figure 5.

        Figure 5. Low-resolution spectrum of all galaxies in our sample normalized at Sλ = 15 μm. The black spectrum is the composite template made from an error-weighted median of the individual galaxies; the gray shaded area shows the 1σ envelope for each resolution element (exaggerated toward negative values in log space).

        Standard image High-resolution image

        The continuum data from λrest = 20to30 μm are in most cases well characterized by a power-law fit, with the short wavelength break occurring near the 18 μm silicate feature and the long wavelength end cut off by the spectral range of the IRS. Shortward of 15 μm, the continuum becomes increasingly contaminated by individual absorption and emission features, especially from PAH emission and the deep silicate absorption at 9.7 μm. Following Brandl et al. (2006), we fit a spectral index to the continuum in two components, with α30–20 measuring the relatively feature-free flux from 20to30 μm and α15–6 measuring the contribution from 5.3to14.8 μm; the wavelengths are slightly shifted to avoid contamination from water ice at 6 μm and [Ne iii] at 15.6 μm (Table 3).

        The mean 15–6 spectral index for the entire OHM sample is α15–6 = 2.1 ± 0.6; the mean 30–20 slope is α30–20 = 4.8 ± 1.1. The shallowest 15–6 slope occurs for IRAS 10039–3338 (α15–6 = −0.1), an object with weak PAH features and very strong silicate absorption; the steepest index occurs for IRAS 12018+1941 (α15–6 = 3.0), which has moderate PAH and line emission features and a nearly constant spectral index over the entire mid-IR range. Steeper 15–6 indices are likely due to a combination of smaller relative quantities of warm dust (thermal blackbodies of ∼300 K peaking near 10 μm) and larger quantities of cooler dust.

        The shallowest 30–20 slope occurs for IRAS 13451+1232 (α30–20 = 1.9); the LR spectrum for this object more closely resembles that seen in Seyfert galaxies and PG quasars (Schweitzer et al. 2006; Hao et al. 2007), with weak PAH emission and shallower silicate absorption. The continuum emission for this object is also much closer to being uniform over the entire range of the IRS; the difference between the two spectral indices is only Δα = −0.4, compared to an average of Δα = 2.7 for the entire sample. This behavior is more typical of non-thermal emission that can extend over many decades with the same index. The steepest 30–20 emission measured is from IRAS 11028+3130 (α30–20 = 7.0); the galaxy shows moderate PAH and line emission features, but a flat continuum between 12 and 20 μm.

        The non-masing galaxies have average spectral indices of α15–6 = 1.8 ± 0.6 and α30–20 = 2.5 ± 0.9. A full statistical analysis of the values for the two samples (particularly α30–20) is presented in Paper II.

        5.2. Atomic Emission Lines

        We measured emission from atomic and molecular lines using the standard packages in the Spectroscopic Modeling Analysis and Reduction Tool (SMART) version 6.2.4 (Higdon et al. 2004). A simple Gaussian is a good fit for virtually all HR lines in the sample; in cases where lines are blended (such as the [Ne v]/[Cl ii] and [O iv]/[Fe ii] complexes), we used a multi-Gaussian fit centered at the redshifted rest wavelengths of the expected transitions. To compute upper limits for non-detections, we use the 3σ noise measured from the surrounding continuum and a Gaussian shape with an FWHM estimated from detected lines. Accuracy for all measured line fluxes is on the order of ∼10%.

        The most common lines detected are the forbidden [Ne ii] λ12.814 and [Ne iii] λ15.555 transitions (Table 4). [Ne ii] is observed in nearly the entire sample, with detections in 50/51 OHMs and 14/15 non-masing galaxies. The only exceptions are the OHM IRAS 11028+3130 and the non-maser IRAS 20460+1925. [Ne iii] is also common, detected in 43/51 OHMs and 14/15 non-masing galaxies. Other common lines are the [S iii] λ18.713 (detected in ∼80% of galaxies) and [S iv] λ10.511 (∼50%). [Ar iii] λ8.991 is detected in 15 OHMs and 5 non-masing galaxies, but the redshifted line is not visible in the SH module for archived objects at z < 0.1.

        Table 4. Atomic Line Fluxes for High-resolution Spectra

        Object [Ar III] [S IV] HI 7-6 [Ne II] [Ne V] [Cl II] [Ne III] [Fe II] [S III] [Ne V] [O IV] [Fe II] [S III] [Si II]
        λrest (μm) 8.991 10.511 12.368 12.814 14.322 14.369 15.555 17.936 18.713 24.318 25.890 25.988 33.481 34.815
        IRAS 01355–1814 0.15 0.10 <0.20 2.45 <0.27 <0.25 0.89 <0.51 <1.52 <0.78 <1.28 <0.82
        IRAS 01418+1651 0.15 0.13 4.17 <0.46 <0.29 0.41 <0.67 0.94 <3.84 <3.52 <4.05 <24.62 19.43
        IRAS 01562+2528 <0.77 <1.93 <0.30 1.07 <0.91 <0.75 0.77 <0.77 0.67 <0.73 <2.06 <1.29
        IRAS 02524+2046 <0.63 <1.01 <0.36 2.39 <0.68 <0.56 <0.97 <1.11 0.47 <1.04 <0.96 <0.59
        IRAS 03521+0028 <0.34 <0.40 <0.41 2.72 <0.36 <0.24 1.11 1.70 1.18 <1.02 <0.93 <0.59
        IRAS 04121+0223 0.35 <0.84 <0.41 1.81 <1.01 <0.99 <0.87 <0.92 0.93 <1.06 0.97 <1.34
        IRAS 04454–4838 0.47 <0.74 2.04 <0.75 <0.61 0.39 <0.27 <1.00 <7.75 <9.59 <6.29 0.90 <87.49
        IRAS 06487+2208 1.71 1.78 <0.81 11.75 <1.44 <1.19 9.45 <0.87 4.89 <1.36 0.48 1.31
        IRAS 07163+0817 0.44 <1.05 <0.22 3.19 <0.46 <0.39 0.33 <1.04 0.81 <1.73 <0.78 <0.71
        IRAS 07572+0533 <1.69 <0.87 <0.40 1.74 <0.79 <0.65 <0.89 <0.61 <1.15 <1.37 <1.53 <1.03
        IRAS 08201+2801 <0.70 <2.74 <0.64 2.23 <0.60 <0.41 0.88 <0.84 0.41 <0.50 <0.66 <0.50
        IRAS 08449+2332 <0.94 <0.71 <0.64 3.60 <2.03 <1.64 1.57 <0.60 1.62 <0.73 <0.69 <0.40
        IRAS 08474+1813 <0.76 <0.64 <0.36 1.26 <1.10 <0.89 <1.10 <1.09 0.86 <1.27 <3.04 <1.86
        IRAS 09039+0503 0.11 <0.27 <0.85 3.68 <0.46 <0.38 1.17 <0.85 0.88 <0.55 <1.11 0.48
        IRAS 09539+0857 <0.63 <0.43 <0.30 1.25 <0.86 <0.69 <1.88 <1.82 <1.02 <1.41 <2.05 <1.36
        IRAS 10035+2740 <0.89 <0.75 <0.48 1.82 <0.42 <0.31 0.57 <0.97 0.78 <0.95 <2.11 <1.37
        IRAS 10039–3338 0.93 <1.25 16.69 <1.21 <1.10 3.93 <0.81 6.57 <14.49 <11.09 <7.54 <10.49 101.40
        IRAS 10173+0828 <0.29 <0.34 1.71 <0.33 <0.32 0.46 <0.42 <1.36 <1.33 <2.42 <1.61 2.55 81.70
        IRAS 10339+1548 1.00 0.55 <0.34 1.25 1.24 <1.13 2.03 0.49 1.17 0.52 2.85 0.89
        IRAS 10378+1109 0.34 <0.25 <0.35 3.95 <0.61 <0.63 0.68 <0.95 1.82 <0.87 <1.99 <1.30
        IRAS 10485–1447 <1.14 <0.20 <0.23 1.99 <0.44 <0.48 0.36 <0.87 <1.08 <0.91 <1.08 <0.66
        IRAS 11028+3130 <1.06 <0.70 <0.28 <0.63 <0.44 <0.38 <0.74 <0.47 <0.71 <3.07 <4.45 <3.14
        IRAS 11180+1623 <0.80 <0.70 <0.36 1.98 <0.50 <0.39 0.62 <0.71 0.89 <0.85 <1.00 <0.69
        IRAS 11524+1058 <0.78 <0.56 <0.35 7.82 <0.43 <0.37 <0.77 <0.52 <1.61 <1.49 <0.93 <0.70
        IRAS 12018+1941 <0.27 <0.28 <0.59 2.73 <0.52 <0.38 0.64 <1.01 <1.32 <1.22 <1.71 <1.30
        IRAS 12032+1707 <1.33 0.13 <0.48 4.98 1.39: <1.51 1.57 <1.22 1.18 0.66 <1.50 <1.00
        IRAS 12112+0305 0.43 <0.88 13.06 <0.76 <0.55 3.37 0.68 4.32 <1.50 <7.56 <4.65 8.77
        IRAS 12540+5708 <11.45 <4.40 17.95 <8.05 <6.86 9.36 <4.40 <5.05 <22.99 <18.84 <14.43 <49.65 <163.66
        IRAS 13218+0552 <0.66 <0.54 <0.46 0.84 <0.71 <1.23 <1.24 <0.78 <2.27 <1.85 <2.93 <1.76
        IRAS 13428+5608 7.69 <2.42 41.21 10.62 <5.37 29.05 <1.32 16.67 9.28 75.13 <29.79 28.14 <134.61
        IRAS 13451+1232 0.57 1.57 <0.70 4.71 0.71 <0.88 4.73 <1.19 1.15 <2.50 <5.17 <1.85
        IRAS 14059+2000 <0.64 0.35 <0.53 2.83 <0.88 <1.00 2.65 <0.97 1.68 <1.04 <1.70 <1.11
        IRAS 14070+0525 <0.19 <0.18 <0.27 1.33 <0.42 <0.33 2.01 <0.53 <0.77 <1.25 <1.98 <1.37
        IRAS 14553+1245 0.47 0.71 <0.25 3.24 <1.55 <1.29 3.10 <0.89 1.58 <0.89 <2.38 <1.49
        IRAS 15327+2340 <0.79 <3.60 61.13 <6.29 <5.29 6.89 <1.04 5.19 <24.96 <24.33 <15.22 <151.68 <202.18
        IRAS 16090–0139 0.49 0.10 <0.49 6.72 <0.65 <0.76 2.26 1.03 3.07 <3.95 1.12 <2.23
        IRAS 16255+2801 0.18 0.20 <0.27 1.73 <0.82 <0.68 1.18 <5.36 1.54 <12.06 <7.16 <4.83
        IRAS 16300+1558 0.13 <0.15 <0.28 2.27 <0.33 <0.25 0.42 <1.20 0.50 <1.23 <0.88 <0.70
        IRAS 17207–0014 0.40 <2.12 38.84 <0.93 <0.69 8.42 <0.51 6.39 <6.40 <11.27 <7.70 12.24 46.91
        IRAS 18368+3549 <0.42 <0.81 0.11 6.91 <0.34 <0.43 1.07 <0.49 1.18 <1.07 <0.91 <0.59
        IRAS 18588+3517 0.57 0.37 0.24 5.12 <0.40 <0.43 1.87 <3.75 7.96 <4.91 <4.13 <4.05
        IRAS 20100–4156 0.33 0.23 <0.31 6.73 <0.65 <0.49 1.71 <0.69 2.86 <3.58 1.20 1.34
        IRAS 20286+1846 <0.56 <0.50 <0.27 1.67 <0.72 <0.65 0.37 <0.30 0.44 <0.58 <0.73 <0.70
        IRAS 21077+3358 <0.67 <0.63 <0.39 3.06 <0.45 <0.36 1.09 <0.50 0.77 <0.80 <0.60 <0.47
        IRAS 21272+2514 <0.18 <0.16 0.16 2.29 <0.31 <0.22 0.35 <0.21 0.45 <0.50 <0.68 <0.46
        IRAS 22055+3024 0.12 <0.67 <0.71 4.55 <0.76 <0.74 1.05 <0.51 1.04 <2.12 <2.30 <1.34
        IRAS 22116+0437 <0.47 <0.73 <0.37 2.25 <0.82 <0.68 1.33 <1.07 1.04 <2.16 <2.54 <2.35
        IRAS 22491–1808 0.41 <0.54 4.88 <0.55 <0.43 1.70 <0.72 1.86 <3.40 <7.11 <3.35 13.72
        IRAS 23028+0725 <0.55 <0.61 <0.39 1.81 <0.90 <0.72 1.04 <1.05 <1.15 <1.72 <2.70 <1.72
        IRAS 23233+0946 0.37 0.33 <0.43 4.93 <0.43 <0.38 1.06 <0.89 3.13 <1.06 1.20 0.66
        IRAS 23365+3604 <0.36 <0.51 8.51 <0.63 <0.52 1.12 <0.44 4.29 <4.74 <11.96 <7.97 6.81
        IRAS 00163–1039 3.40 0.43 80.95 <1.96 <0.92 14.53 <1.70 30.85 <7.59 1.42 3.35 34.70 73.84
        IRAS 01572+0009 0.73 3.06 <0.72 6.15 5.51 <3.23 10.34 <0.89 1.66 4.76 9.82 <6.12
        IRAS 05083+7936 <1.19 <1.57 49.40 0.60 0.48 7.63 <1.19 18.67 <1.89 1.28 1.33 28.00 71.27
        IRAS 06538+4628 0.80 1.09 47.39 0.69 <1.16 6.07 1.17 19.11 <2.33 <6.97 2.70 37.60 57.37
        IRAS 08559+1053 <0.37 0.56 <0.43 8.38 0.51 0.35 1.87 <0.93 1.35 <1.34 2.54 0.45
        IRAS 09437+0317 <1.04 <0.61 8.74 <0.64 <0.51 1.22 <0.70 3.33 <0.99 0.47 0.68 9.45 23.27
        IRAS 10565+2448 <0.76 <1.34 57.60 <1.29 0.67 7.65 <1.02 12.42 <3.07 <5.13 <2.35 20.89 51.37
        IRAS 11119+3257 <0.83 0.31 <0.78 2.19 <0.71 <0.58 1.89 <2.30 <1.75 <2.40 <3.08 <1.95
        IRAS 13349+2438 2.76 1.66 <0.45 1.43 0.81 <0.99 3.50 <4.54 1.68 3.46 7.28 <5.11
        IRAS 15001+1433 0.39 0.28 <0.30 6.61 1.08 <0.98 2.62 <0.78 2.36 0.67 1.21 0.56
        IRAS 15206+3342 2.01 3.82 0.23 10.96 <0.34 <0.41 19.87 <1.03 8.58 1.36 0.74 1.21
        IRAS 20460+1925 <0.39 <0.66 <0.42 <0.44 <0.60 <0.51 <0.69 <0.72 <0.79 <3.68 1.95 <1.01
        IRAS 23007+0836 8.67 <1.84 179.04 8.36 <4.23 33.69 <3.28 70.16 15.51 30.98 9.47 97.56 188.36
        IRAS 23394–0353 0.72 0.57 46.75 <1.45 <1.08 7.71 <1.10 17.16 <1.92 1.27 2.43 44.29 53.48
        IRAS 23498+2423 0.23 1.27 <0.23 3.10 0.92 <0.91 7.79 <0.55 1.13 1.26 4.61 <3.77

        Note. Line fluxes are given in 10–21 W cm–2. The symbol "–" indicates that the redshifted line wavelength lay outside the range of the IRS.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

        The IRS is designed to make accurate measurements of narrow atomic transitions in the SH and LH modules; however, several lines are also detected in the LR modules, most often the powerful neon, sulfur, and H2 transitions. The only emission lines visible in the LR modules without a corresponding detection in HR are the H2 S(7) line at 5.5 μm and the H2 S(5)/[Ar ii] complex near 6.7 μm; this is due to the SH low-wavelength cutoff at λrest = 8.2–9.0 μm, depending on the redshift of the galaxy. All other atomic emission features observed in the LR modules have corresponding detections in HR; furthermore, blending of narrow lines makes accurate measurements of flux difficult in the LR modules. For isolated lines with well-defined surrounding continuum, our fluxes are consistent for measurements in both low and high resolution.

        We note the presence of two features which have no obvious identifications occurring in the LH spectra for multiple objects: one is an emission feature seen near 29 μm (a prominent example occurs for IRAS 17539+2935) and the second is an absorption feature near 30 μm. The two are often paired and are seen in ∼50% of the galaxies observed. The rest wavelengths of the transitions, however, vary significantly from object to object (with a standard deviation of σλ ≃ 0.7 μm), while the observed wavelengths are nearly fixed (σλ ≲ 0.05 μm). This implies that the features are either artifacts of the extraction process or that both the emission and absorption come from unidentified foreground features with little to no Doppler shift. Given that we see no evidence for these unidentified lines in any of the LR spectra (which should be detectable, given the high S/N for many of the features), we consider both to be spurious.

        5.3. Molecular Hydrogen

        We detected multiple emission lines from the pure rotational series of molecular hydrogen in both OHMs and non-masing galaxies. At redshifts of z ≲ 0.1, transitions from H2 S(0) at 28.22 μm to H2 S(3) at 9.67 μm are visible in the HR modules; in addition, the LR module is capable of detecting lines as far out as the S(7) transition at 5.51 μm. In each case, the line number (e.g., 0 for H2 S(0)) indicates the rotational quantum number of the lower state (J = 2 → 0) for the quadrupole S-branch transition. ΔJ = 2 results in two separate branches: ortho (parallel nuclear spin, odd J) and para (anti-parallel nuclear spin, even J).

        We detected at least one H2 line in 49/51 OHMs and 13/15 non-masing galaxies, with S(1) seen in all objects for which at least one molecular hydrogen transition is reported. The higher-order S(2) and S(3) lines are seen in roughly 2/3 of the sample, while the para ground-state S(0) transition is detected in only ∼15% of the sample. Our line detection rate is consistent with results from the SINGS galaxies examined in Roussel et al. (2007) and the ULIRG sample of Higdon et al. (2006). Lower detection rates of S(0) and S(2) are likely due to a combination of the intrinsic ortho–para ratio as well as rising continuum levels near 28 μm that can obscure weak line emission by S(0). Higdon et al. (2006) find that the S(2)/S(3) ratios are consistent with no significant differential extinction for the two lines, which is supported by numerous detections in our sample of S(3) line emission superimposed on optically deep silicate absorption near 9.7 μm. We thus applied no extinction or reddening corrections to the line fluxes (Table 5).

        Table 5. Molecular H2 Gas Properties

        Object H2 S(7) H2 S(5) H2 S(4) H2 S(3) H2 S(2) H2 S(1) H2 S(0) Twarm Thot Mwarm Mhot
        λrest (μm) 5.51 μm 6.91 μm 8.03 μm 9.67 μm 12.28 μm 17.04 μm 28.22 μm (K) (K) (107 M) (107 M)
        IRAS 01355–1814 <1.52 <3.25 0.22 0.63 1.13 <1.63 262   4.74  
        IRAS 01418+1651 <5.29 6.96: 1.16 0.94 2.15 <5.40 320   0.14  
        IRAS 01562+2528 <3.25 <7.06 <0.52 <0.39 0.94 <0.92        
        IRAS 02524+2046 <1.52 0.88: <2.51 <0.46 0.88 <1.03        
        IRAS 03521+0028 <2.89 0.58: 0.63 0.47 1.69 <0.55 292   4.24  
        IRAS 04121+0223 <3.54 1.03: <1.62 <0.43 <0.73 <1.06        
        IRAS 04454–4838 <3.31 <13.24 1.04 1.27 3.05 0.76 222   0.82  
        IRAS 06487+2208 <5.99 0.97: 2.10 1.02 1.80 <1.52 381   4.13  
        IRAS 07163+0817 <1.84 <4.58 <0.77 0.04 0.47 1.68 110   0.60  
        IRAS 07572+0533 <1.03 <2.62 <0.90 <0.50 <0.99 <3.41        
        IRAS 08201+2801 <3.41 <10.84 0.28 <0.90 0.56 <0.91 313   1.79  
        IRAS 08449+2332 <3.67 1.22: 0.63 0.33 1.36 <0.70 301   3.48  
        IRAS 08474+1813 <1.07 0.61: 0.75 <0.46 0.27 <1.33 493   0.68  
        IRAS 09039+0503 1.13 2.69: 2.21 1.46 2.91 1.27 198 978 4.88 0.42
        IRAS 09539+0857 <2.40 <6.29 0.53 0.26 1.07 <0.95 308   1.93  
        IRAS 10035+2740 <0.98 0.81: 0.70 <0.63 1.06 <2.31 334   3.29  
        IRAS 10039–3338 <28.84 <46.95 3.27 1.71 3.95 <7.46 348   0.46  
        IRAS 10173+0828 <5.73 3.00: 0.58 0.49 1.38 <1.67 302   0.33  
        IRAS 10339+1548 <1.09 <2.88 <0.58 <0.42 0.42 <1.94        
        IRAS 10378+1109 0.53 1.42: 1.82 0.55 2.25 <0.61 315 876 4.59 0.46
        IRAS 10485–1447 0.52 <5.57 0.18 0.14 0.28 <0.76 307 1540 0.55 0.03
        IRAS 11028+3130 <0.44 <1.83 <0.61 <0.36 0.39 <1.75        
        IRAS 11180+1623 <2.25 0.51: 0.39 0.61 1.06 <1.88 302   3.32  
        IRAS 11524+1058 <1.99 <4.35 <0.43 <0.42 0.66 <2.14        
        IRAS 12018+1941 <3.27 <8.84 0.47 0.36 1.28 2.21 165   4.10  
        IRAS 12032+1707 <2.78 4.93: <0.27 0.81 0.58 1.61 <3.34 312   9.24  
        IRAS 12112+0305 7.03 5.89: 1.87 1.66 3.71 1.30 195 1680 2.01 0.08
        IRAS 12540+5708 <32.27 <49.24 2.42 3.21 6.23 <17.62 301   1.07  
        IRAS 13218+0552 <4.32 <7.55 0.32 0.42 0.97 <2.91 292   4.83  
        IRAS 13428+5608 <13.14 8.96: 7.77 4.83 8.63 <9.82 360   1.19  
        IRAS 13451+1232 <8.46 3.26: 1.65 1.10 2.61 <0.79 329   4.18  
        IRAS 14059+2000 0.91 1.55: 2.12 0.73 2.36 <0.88 319 944 3.90 0.40
        IRAS 14070+0525 <2.54 <5.85 <0.41 0.28 0.22 1.30 <0.85 260   11.42  
        IRAS 14553+1245 0.32 <9.92 0.92 0.19 1.05 <0.82 317 906 1.76 0.19
        IRAS 15327+2340 22.70 41.6: <0.56 7.66 13.68 14.53 159   0.42  
        IRAS 16090–0139 1.20 <15.12 1.10 <0.28 2.12 <2.93 299 1160 4.09 0.20
        IRAS 16255+2801 <1.82 0.21: <0.59 0.28 0.55 <4.18 348   1.07  
        IRAS 16300+1558 <1.77 <5.63 0.31 0.56 0.42 1.58 <1.31 287   11.33  
        IRAS 17207–0014 6.12 10.2: 4.56 4.44 7.51 <3.60 311 1230 1.30 0.07
        IRAS 18368+3549 <6.98 4.22: 1.11 0.70 1.38 <0.81 349   1.95  
        IRAS 18588+3517 <7.44 <15.54 0.92 0.76 1.61 <5.12 324   1.89  
        IRAS 20100–4156 <9.04 <15.77 0.78 0.35 0.92 0.94 195   1.61  
        IRAS 20286+1846 <1.74 0.35: <0.78 0.30 0.92 <0.51 282   1.80  
        IRAS 21077+3358 <2.13 1.59: 0.67 0.34 1.16 <1.29 319   4.05  
        IRAS 21272+2514 0.39 0.51: 0.36 0.28 0.91 <0.46 287 1160 2.22 0.09
        IRAS 22055+3024 0.65 2.52: 1.30 1.09 1.61 <1.39 320 976 2.72 0.24
        IRAS 22116+0437 <2.45 <6.21 0.74 0.64 1.09 <1.82 340   4.70  
        IRAS 22491–1808 <7.01 <14.81 0.76 0.92 2.10 <8.22 298   1.23  
        IRAS 23028+0725 0.48 0.45 0.77 <1.67 333   1.86  
        IRAS 23233+0946 <3.20 1.60: 1.03 0.80 1.47 <0.73 340   2.53  
        IRAS 23365+3604 <7.02 6.98: 1.26 0.73 2.14 <5.75 321   0.84  
        IRAS 00163–1039 <9.00 24.46: 2.79 2.87 5.13 <2.63 326   0.32  
        IRAS 01572+0009 2.15 1.21: 0.60 <0.71 2.15 <1.36 268 1650 6.26 0.15
        IRAS 05083+7936 <8.11 27.31: 2.34 2.73 3.59 <2.75 341   0.99  
        IRAS 06538+4628 <3.69 14.56: <0.63 3.28 8.86 2.63 189   0.38  
        IRAS 08559+1053 <5.91 1.76: 0.72 0.64 1.83 <0.74 298   4.44  
        IRAS 09437+0317 <9.39 22.60: <0.36 0.68 2.68 2.20 153   0.11  
        IRAS 10565+2448 <12.33 32.87: 3.34 1.95 5.73 <3.77 320   1.06  
        IRAS 11119+3257 <6.58 <7.87 0.42 <1.02 2.47 <2.23 256   10.21  
        IRAS 13349+2438 <23.79 <20.52 <1.67 <0.83 <1.05 <1.62        
        IRAS 15001+1433 <4.21 1.72: 0.44 0.24 1.25 <0.84 283   3.72  
        IRAS 15206+3342 <8.31 1.61: 0.65 0.46 0.94 1.02 196   1.54  
        IRAS 20460+1925 <0.48 <0.43 <0.88 <4.24        
        IRAS 23007+0836 <23.20 77.35: <3.53 6.30 12.90 <6.28 342   0.27  
        IRAS 23394–0353 <14.60 32.52: 3.15 2.44 5.24 1.79 226   0.23  
        IRAS 23498+2423 <1.25 0.49: 0.34 <0.29 0.89 <1.50 298   4.66  

        Notes. Line fluxes are given in 10–21 W cm–2. The symbol "–" indicates that the redshifted line lay outside of the IRS spectral range. Fluxes for H2 S(7) and S(5) are measured in the SL module; all other lines are measured in the SH and LH modules. S(5) lines are tentative upper limits (indicated by a colon (:)) due to possible blending with [Ar II] at 6.99 μm; see Section 5.3.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

        We did not detect the S(6) line in any galaxy, while S(4) showed a single detection in IRAS 16300+1558. Since these lines are excited by hotter gas (T ∼ 1000 K), they are typically weaker than the lower states which probe the larger reservoir of cool gas. In addition, both lines are only visible in the LR modules at z ∼ 0.1. This means that deblending is a significant issue, since both lines lie near broad PAH emission complexes. Eleven OHMs and one non-masing galaxy show the unresolved S(7) ortho line at 5.51 μm in the SL module.

        Measurement of the S(5) line presents a particular problem due to its location in a crowded section of the spectra. Its rest wavelength of 6.91 μm lies near the [Ar ii] feature at 6.99 μm; in addition, both features are bracketed by possible hydrocarbon absorption at 6.85 and 7.25 μm. This not only creates difficulties in establishing a reliable continuum, but also in deblending the [Ar ii] and the S(5) emission (see Section 5.5.2). Emission in the [Ar ii]/H2 S(5) complex is seen in more than half of our sample, however, and so we present measurements for the entire feature, including blended emission from both lines. We caution that these fluxes should be viewed as upper limits for either [Ar ii] or H2 S(5) emission, since the SL module does not have sufficient resolution to separate the two features.

        For galaxies in which multiple H2 lines are observed, we fit excitation temperatures (Tex) to the molecular gas following the methods of Rigopoulou et al. (2002) and Higdon et al. (2006). We assume that the emission is optically thin (so that the lines are unsaturated), populations are in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), and that the sources are unresolved in the Spitzer beam. The luminosity of a molecular emission line for the transition from (J +  2) → J is then LJ = AJ × ΔEJ × NJ+2, where AJ is the Einstein-A coefficient, ΔEJ is the energy of the transition, and NJ+2 is the number of molecules in the J + 2 state. The partition function for a given symmetry branch is

        Equation (2)

        where Tex is the excitation temperature and we sum only over a single symmetry branch (ortho or para). The statistical weights are gJ = (2J + 1) × Js, where Js = 1 for the para branch (even J) and Js = 3 for ortho (odd J).

        Assuming that the lines are in LTE, the ratio of level populations follows a Boltzmann distribution such that $N_J\propto g_J \exp[-E_J/k T_{\rm ex}]$. The inverse slope of the best-fit line of an excitation diagram yields Tex—Figure 6 shows examples of temperature fits for our data. The total warm H2 mass can be then calculated from Tex and the flux (FJ) from any transition as

        Equation (3)

        where ϕo/p is a numerical factor accounting for the ortho-to-para ratio (assumed to be 3:1), $m_{\rm H_2}$ is the mass of the hydrogen molecule, and DL is the luminosity distance.

        Figure 6.

        Figure 6. Example: H2 excitation diagrams for both non-masing (IRAS 01572+0009) and OHM galaxies (all others). Two galaxies (left) are fit with both warm and hot excitation temperatures; IRAS 08474+1813 fits only a warm component since the higher J lines are not detected. IRAS 11028+3130 shows an example of a galaxy with only a single H2 detection (for which no Tex can be determined). Dotted lines are fit to the warm gas for all detections from S(0) to S(3); dashed lines are fit to the hotter gas using detections of S(3), S(4), and S(7). The S(5) line is always an upper limit due to possible blending from [Ar ii] and is not used in the temperature fits.

        Standard image High-resolution image

        For cases where the S(7) line was detected, a single excitation temperature gives a poor fit to the full set of transitions. In these cases, we first fit Tex between S(3) and S(7), measuring hotter gas. We then subtracted this component from the S(0) to S(3) fluxes, and fit a second Tex to the warm gas component. This decreased the mean warm Tex by ∼20 K, with a negligible effect on the gas mass. We calculated the warm H2 mass using the flux in the S(1) transition and the hot gas mass using the S(3) flux (Table 5).

        Both Higdon et al. (2006) and Roussel et al. (2007) suggest that the H2 emission arises from far-ultraviolet photons from massive stars powering photodissociation regions (PDRs). Detections of the H2 S(3) transition in nearly all objects implies that the silicate absorption at 9.7 μm must be partially background to the warm molecular gas seen in emission. Since the dust is very optically thick in almost all ULIRGs, this means that at least some molecular gas (and possibly other atomic transitions) actually come from superficial layers at the edge of the merging system. Given that the OHM is typically formed within the central kiloparsec of the host galaxy, a link between the observed warm H2 gas and the OHM is uncertain.

        Eleven objects in the OHM sample and two non-masing galaxies have CO detections published in the literature (Solomon et al. 1997; Gao & Solomon 2004a). The beam width used for CO observations is several times that of the HR slits; since most ULIRGs are unresolved in the Spitzer beam, we consider the gas mass estimates to be comparable. The cold gas masses derived using a ULIRG-calibrated $M_{\rm H_2}/L_{\rm CO}$ ratio of ∼1.4M/(K km s–1 pc2) give a warm gas mass fraction for the OHMs ranging from 0.04%to0.8%, with the gas fraction of the non-masing galaxies lying in a similar range (0.06%–0.1%). This is comparable to warm gas fractions in ULIRGs from Higdon et al. (2006), implying that the mid-IR H2 lines probe only a small amount of the total gas mass in these galaxies. The bulk of the remaining portion is likely cold gas without sufficient energy to excite rotational transitions in the mid-IR.

        5.4. PAH Emission

        In addition to the atomic and simple molecular emission lines, we also observed multiple features attributed to PAHs; the broad-line emission comes from vibrational modes of C–C and C–H bonds (Draine 2003). PAH features are ubiquitous in the mid-IR emission of starburst galaxies and ULIRGs (Lutz et al. 1998; Genzel et al. 1998; Sturm et al. 2000; Peeters et al. 2004; Desai et al. 2007; Imanishi et al. 2007), and dominate the LR spectra of most galaxies in our sample. Multiple PAH features are seen for all OHMs, encompassing galaxies with very wide ranges in continuum shape and line emission. We detect strong PAH transitions centered at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and 12.7 μm, several of which are also visible in the HR spectra. Weaker emission features at 13.5, 14.2, 16.4, 17.1, and 17.4 μm are also visible in many galaxies.

        We measured the PAH emission via two methods: the first defines a local continuum around the PAH feature using a spline fit and then integrates the total flux after baseline subtraction. The default continuum pivots are located at 5.15, 5.55, 5.95, 6.55, and 7.10 μm for the 6.2 μm feature and at 10.1, 10.9, 11.8, and 12.4 μm for the 11.3 μm feature. These are shifted slightly for each object to avoid both broad absorption features (including water ice and hydrocarbons) and narrow atomic emission lines. We quantify the emission from the two cleanest PAH features appearing in our spectra: the 6.2 and 11.3 μm complexes (Table 6).

        Table 6. PAH Emission Features in Low-resolution Spectra

        Object PAHFIT Luminosity PAHFIT EW Spline-fit Luminosity Spline-fit EW
          6.2 11.3 6.2 6.2 ice 11.3 6.2 11.3 6.2 6.2 ice 11.3
          (log L/L) (log L/L) (μm) (μm) (μm) (log L/L) (log L/L) (μm) (μm) (μm)
        IRAS 01355–1814 9.81 9.42 2.25   0.49 9.07 8.97 0.14   0.26
        IRAS 01418+1651 8.98 9.07 1.81   1.86 8.60 8.48 0.44   0.61
        IRAS 01562+2528 9.59 9.71 2.07   2.22 9.23 9.43 0.37   0.86
        IRAS 02524+2046 9.37 9.62 0.54   1.85 9.19 9.13 0.49   0.53
        IRAS 03521+0028 9.78 9.60 1.67 0.36 0.81 9.41 9.29 0.43 0.36 0.60
        IRAS 04121+0223 9.48 9.42 1.82 0.89 2.01 9.11 9.02 0.44 0.38 0.78
        IRAS 04454–4838 10.07 9.90 23.53 0.05 1.31 8.26 8.42 0.07 0.05 1.07
        IRAS 06487+2208 9.89 9.75 0.55   0.36 9.60 9.47 0.26   0.26
        IRAS 07163+0817 9.21 9.12 12.82   1.30 8.93 8.84 0.58   0.77
        IRAS 07572+0533 8.95   0.04 <8.95 8.88 <0.10   0.04
        IRAS 08201+2801 10.03 9.52 2.83 0.39 0.57 9.41 9.33 0.19 0.09 0.71
        IRAS 08449+2332 9.78 9.63 2.79   1.09 9.38 9.25 0.43   0.59
        IRAS 08474+1813 9.37 9.20 2.33   1.41 8.72 8.82 0.23   1.40
        IRAS 09039+0503 9.65 9.73 1.59 0.19 2.58 9.13 9.09 0.30 0.19 0.76
        IRAS 09539+0857 10.2 10.06 6.38   6.50 8.91 8.96 0.11   1.09
        IRAS 10035+2740 9.21 9.33 2.10   1.03 8.77 8.72 0.27   0.25
        IRAS 10039–3338 10.96 10.32 2.90 0.01 8.28 8.72 8.94 0.01 0.01 0.72
        IRAS 10173+0828 9.37 9.51 2.50   5.13 8.65 8.64 0.35   0.95
        IRAS 10339+1548 9.30 9.63 0.71   0.85 9.14 9.23 0.42   0.44
        IRAS 10378+1109 9.30 9.36 0.45 0.04 0.64 8.62 9.02 0.07 0.04 0.49
        IRAS 10485–1447 9.73 9.19 1.64   0.47 8.73 8.84 0.09 0.08 0.36
        IRAS 11028+3130 9.11 9.54 1.13   2.33 8.41 8.85 0.14   0.64
        IRAS 11180+1623 9.69 9.44 5.87 0.97 0.95 9.02 9.07 0.24 0.26 0.57
        IRAS 11524+1058 9.55 9.85 1.09   3.07 8.87 9.17 0.12   0.69
        IRAS 12018+1941 9.85 9.44 0.25   0.08 9.58 9.06 0.17   0.05
        IRAS 12032+1707 10.33 10.20 3.54 0.06 1.33 9.40 9.64 0.07 0.06 0.61
        IRAS 12112+0305 9.62 9.35 4.39 0.37 0.76 9.27 9.02 0.61 0.37 0.52
        IRAS 12540+5708 9.59 8.66 0.03   0.01 8.94 9.29 0.01   0.04
        IRAS 13218+0552 <9.79 9.50 <0.01   <0.03
        IRAS 13428+5608 9.55 9.45 0.52 0.09 0.76 9.03 8.98 0.14 0.09 0.37
        IRAS 13451+1232 9.34 9.34 0.06   0.04 8.23 8.76 0.01   0.01
        IRAS 14059+2000 9.16 9.06 0.25   0.48 8.93 8.89 0.23   0.43
        IRAS 14070+0525 10.37 10.31 1.86 0.01 2.41 8.92 9.63 0.02 0.01 0.83
        IRAS 14553+1245 9.57 9.47 0.63   0.65 9.37 9.22 0.44   0.60
        IRAS 15327+2340 10.45 10.03 91.96 0.16 8.23 8.89 8.67 0.30 0.17 0.64
        IRAS 16090–0139 10.17 9.99 1.14 0.07 1.45 9.34 9.38 0.09 0.07 0.51
        IRAS 16255+2801 9.54 9.14 0.94 0.50 1.02 8.95 8.58 0.16 0.13 0.37
        IRAS 16300+1558 10.31 9.97 1.66 0.04 1.09 9.28 9.48 0.07 0.04 0.60
        IRAS 17207–0014 10.01 9.86 3.58 0.45 2.75 9.52 9.24 0.50 0.45 0.76
        IRAS 18368+3549 9.82 9.74 2.43   2.62 9.50 9.26 0.61   0.74
        IRAS 18588+3517 9.84 9.67 1.85 0.56 1.65 9.45 9.25 0.41 0.23 0.82
        IRAS 20100–4156 9.96 9.83 1.52 0.06 1.23 9.32 9.38 0.19 0.06 0.77
        IRAS 20286+1846 9.44 9.45 1.58 0.63 2.26 8.93 8.86 0.41 0.20 0.91
        IRAS 21077+3358 9.86 9.85 2.88   1.15 9.23 9.28 0.21   0.40
        IRAS 21272+2514 9.66 9.60 1.97 0.15 1.73 9.11 8.97 0.34 0.15 0.56
        IRAS 22055+3024 9.22 9.27 0.28   0.26 8.88 9.10 0.15   0.22
        IRAS 22116+0437 10.27 9.85 3.16   0.75 9.34 9.38 0.08   0.40
        IRAS 22491–1808 9.47 9.33 1.38 0.45 0.98 9.07 8.94 0.43 0.45 0.57
        IRAS 23028+0725 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 23233+0946 9.68 9.59 1.74 0.36 1.45 9.30 9.17 0.47 0.36 0.76
        IRAS 23365+3604 9.80 9.63 2.37 0.27 0.92 9.31 9.18 0.35 0.27 0.43
        IRAS 00163–1039 9.30 9.16 3.32   0.95 9.00 8.83 0.52   0.43
        IRAS 01572+0009 9.86 9.47 0.10   0.04 9.60 9.55 0.07   0.06
        IRAS 05083+7936 9.93 9.95 4.45   2.10 9.68 9.57 0.62   0.66
        IRAS 06538+4628 8.75 8.77 1.00   0.60 8.51 8.50 0.45   0.36
        IRAS 08559+1053 9.89 9.86 0.31 0.19 0.55 9.63 9.52 0.21 0.19 0.29
        IRAS 09437+0317 9.10 9.16 1.47   1.99 8.89 8.82 0.62   0.77
        IRAS 10565+2448 9.90 9.80 1.53   1.43 9.55 9.31 0.51   0.51
        IRAS 11119+3257 9.92 9.68 0.04 0.05 0.04 9.93 8.36 0.06 0.05 0.003
        IRAS 13349+2438 <9.39 <9.10 <0.01   <0.01
        IRAS 15001+1433 9.86 9.86 0.30 0.14 0.43 9.54 9.44 0.16 0.14 0.20
        IRAS 15206+3342 9.81 9.75 0.38   0.41 9.56 9.47 0.25   0.27
        IRAS 20460+1925 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 23007+0836 9.23 9.19 0.33   0.34 8.99 8.89 0.19   0.20
        IRAS 23394–0353 9.26 9.16 2.24   2.47 8.94 8.72 0.53   0.64
        IRAS 23498+2423 9.52 9.53 0.06   0.13 9.25 9.05 0.04   0.06

        Notes. The "ice" 6.2 μm PAH columns use a continuum that is corrected for water ice absorption (where present) at 6 μm. The symbol "–" indicates that PAHFIT fit no significant flux for a particular dust component.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

        A second method uses PAHFIT (Smith et al. 2007), a public IDL package, to fit global mid-IR spectral templates and simultaneously measure the relative effects of overlapping features. The routine decomposes the LR IRS spectra into emission from stellar continuum, dust features (including PAHs), atomic and molecular lines, and blackbodies from thermally heated dust at a variety of temperatures; this is simultaneously fit with an extinction curve including silicate features at 9.7 and 18 μm. Due to the large number of parameters being fit, however, even strong features may overlap sufficiently to affect the accuracy of the fit (Spoon et al. 2002); in addition, PAHFIT does not fit for several features commonly found in ULIRGs, such as absorption features from ice, hydrocarbons, and gas-phase molecules.

        PAHFIT fits the dust emission features (including PAHs) with a Drude profile, which has the form

        Equation (4)

        where λc is the central wavelength, γ is the fractional FWHM, and b is the (peak) central intensity. The Drude profile is typically broader than a Gaussian, with significant amounts of power in the extended wings. Several dust emission features (e.g., the 7.7 and 12.7 μm PAHs) require more than one component for a reasonable fit. PAHFIT returned positive detections for both the 6.2 and 11.3 μm PAH features for nearly all galaxies; the fit for OHM IRAS 07572+0533 showed no emission at 6.2 μm, while the fits to OHM IRAS 13218+0552 and the non-masing galaxy IRAS 13349+2438 show no emission in either dust feature.

        We compared the flux measured in the 6.2 and 11.3 μm PAH features from our baseline-subtracted spline fits to the PAHFIT values; results from PAHFIT are consistently higher than those from the spline fit, indicating significant mixing between the PAH emission and what was previously designated as "continuum" (Figure 7). Fluxes of the 6.2 μm complex measured with PAHFIT are a factor of ∼3–4 greater than the spline-fit fluxes, while the 11.3 μm feature is an average of ∼2–3 times larger. The relative strengths of the two features are consistent using both methods; the mean value of the (6.2 μm PAH/11.3 μm PAH) ratio is identical to within 15% for OHMs.

        Figure 7.

        Figure 7. Differences between two methods used to measure PAH fluxes in IRS spectra, illustrated on the spectrum of IRAS 15327+2340 (Arp 220). Left: the observed spectrum centered on the 6.2 μm PAH feature is shown in black. The minimum at 5.9 μm is the result of absorption by water ice. For the spline method, the PAH feature is defined as the integrated flux above a spline-interpolated continuum (green dotted line) between 5.95 and 6.5 μm. The dot-dashed blue lines represent individual Drude fit components from PAHFIT, while the red line is the continuum emission (blackbody dust + starlight). The dashed gray line shows PAHFIT's global fit to the data. Right: PAHFIT (blue) and spline-fit (green) results with the continuum subtracted; the feature as measured by PAHFIT has significantly more flux than with the spline continuum, typical of nearly all galaxies in our sample.

        Standard image High-resolution image

        Galliano et al. (2008) also use both spline and multi-component profile fitting approaches to measure the PAH variations within galaxies; they show that both methods yield the same overall trends, although each have their own underlying biases depending on the property being measured. Given the large contributions of overlapping dust emission features to the 5–10 μm spectrum, which are not possible to separate from the underlying blackbody emission using spline fits (Marshall et al. 2007), we consider the PAHFIT results to be the more robust method. Measurements of PAH features in the literature, however, typically use a spline-fit method (e.g., Brandl et al. 2006; Desai et al. 2007; Spoon et al. 2007; Zakamska et al. 2008). In particular, comparisons of PAH data from the OHM galaxies to other samples (e.g., the "fork diagram" from Spoon et al. 2007) must use the same method to return physically meaningful results. While PAHFIT fluxes may thus better represent the absolute PAH luminosity, the spline-fit data are used when comparing the OHMs to objects from the literature (Table 6).

        Water ice absorption at 6 μm can have significant effects on the measurement of the 6.2 μm PAH EW; following the method of Spoon et al. (2007), we correct for this by substituting the continuum inferred while measuring the 9.7 μm silicate strength for the measured 6.2 μm continuum (see Section 5.5). In total, 24 OHMs and three non-masing galaxies with SL data showed absorption strong enough to affect the measured EW; the spline fit with the new continuum decreased the EW for all objects except IRAS 11180+1623, for which the continuum levels as measured by the PAH fit and the silicate depth are nearly identical (within error). Since PAHFIT does not fit for ice absorption, we also calculate ice-corrected EW for objects showing absorption at 6 μm by using the flux from PAHFIT and the inferred continuum from silicate measurements.

        The 11.3 μm PAH is seated atop the edge of the deep silicate absorption at 9.7 μm; determining an extinction-corrected continuum level for EW measurements is thus also difficult. Spectral mapping of AGN galaxies with ISOCAM has shown that PAH emission can be spatially extended and suppressed near the nucleus (Le Floc'h et'al. 2001; Díaz-Santos et'al. 2010); this means that the PAH emission in AGNs may be largely unaffected by dust absorption. Starburst galaxies, however, can show strong PAH emission in both the 6.2 and 11.3 μm bands in the nuclear regions where the silicate optical depth is at its highest (Galliano et'al. 2008), and is likely to affect continuum levels for PAH features. The measured 11.3 μm PAH data using the spline-fit method are therefore likely to underestimate the luminosities.

        5.5. Absorption Features

        5.5.1. Silicates

        The LR spectra show near-ubiquitous absorption from amorphous silicate dust, with a strong feature caused by a Si–O stretching mode near 9.7 μm and a weaker feature caused by an Si–O–Si bending mode near 18 μm (Knacke & Thomson 1973). The presence of dust is unsurprising, as the characteristic extreme IR luminosities of ULIRGs are caused by large amounts of heated dust being thermally re-radiated. Hao et'al. (2007) found that ULIRGs nearly uniformly show absorption in the two silicate features, in contrast to QSOs and some Seyfert galaxies which typically show the feature in emission (Siebenmorgen et'al. 2005; Hao et'al. 2005; Sturm et'al. 2005; Schweitzer et'al. 2008).

        We measure the strength of the silicate absorption at both 9.7 and 18 μm using the method of Spoon et'al. (2007):

        Equation (5)

        where fλ is the measured flux and fcont is the interpolated continuum at the feature extremum. More negative values of Ssil represent deeper absorption. The expected continuum is calculated using a combination of spline and power-law fits, depending on the strength of the PAH and water ice features in the spectrum (Spoon et'al. 2007).

        All OHMs and ∼95% of the non-masing galaxies showed absorption at both 9.7 and 18 μm (Table'7); the average depth for the OHMs is S9.7 = −1.8 ± 0.8, while the average depth of the non-masing galaxies is S9.7 = −0.6 ± 0.4. The deepest absorption is in the OHM IRAS 04454–0838 (S9.7 = −3.7), while only one object (the non-masing galaxy IRAS 13349+2438) shows emission in both amorphous silicate features.

        Table 7. Solid-phase Absorption Features

        Object 6.0 μm H2O Ice 6.85 μm HAC 7.25 μm HAC 9.7 μm 18 μm 16 μm 23 μm
          τ τ Flux τ Flux Ssil Ssil Sresidsil Sresidsil
        IRAS 01355–1814           –2.4 –0.9 –0.3 –0.2
        IRAS 01418+1651   0.49 –8.3     –1.3 –0.4    
        IRAS 01562+2528           –0.7 –0.3    
        IRAS 02524+2046   0.20 –0.4     –0.9 –0.3    
        IRAS 03521+0028 0.42 0.13 –0.4     –1.4 –0.2 –0.1 –0.1
        IRAS 04121+0223 1.61         –1.0 –0.2    
        IRAS 04454–4838 0.42 0.35 –9.0 0.10 –1.5 –3.7 –1.0 –0.3 –0.2
        IRAS 06487+2208   0.23 –4.6     –1.2 –0.3    
        IRAS 07163+0817           –1.2 –0.1    
        IRAS 07572+0533           –0.6 –0.3    
        IRAS 08201+2801 1.06 0.37 –4.0 0.22 –1.5 –2.2 –0.6 –0.2 –0.1
        IRAS 08449+2332           –1.2 –0.5 –0.1 –0.1
        IRAS 08474+1813   0.36 –0.2     –1.9 –1.2    
        IRAS 09039+0503 0.98 0.15 –0.5     –2.0 –0.6    
        IRAS 09539+0857   0.24 –2.5     –3.1 –1.2 –0.4 –0.2
        IRAS 10035+2740           –1.5 –0.8    
        IRAS 10039–3338 0.23 0.23 –166.3     –3.1 –1.0 –0.4 –0.3
        IRAS 10173+0828           –1.9 –0.8 –0.3 –0.2
        IRAS 10339+1548           –1.1 –0.05    
        IRAS 10378+1109 0.72 0.18 –0.6     –2.0 –0.3    
        IRAS 10485–1447   0.25 –0.4     –2.9 –0.9    
        IRAS 11028+3130           –2.6 –1.0    
        IRAS 11180+1623 0.54         –1.7 –0.5    
        IRAS 11524+1058   0.27 –1.5 0.2: –0.3: –1.5 –0.8    
        IRAS 12018+1941   0.16 –2.6     –1.4 –0.4    
        IRAS 12032+1707 0.71 0.55 –6.6 0.30 –3.9 –2.7 –0.8    
        IRAS 12112+0305 0.59 0.41 –3.5     –1.8 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
        IRAS 12540+5708           –0.7 –0.2    
        IRAS 13218+0552           –0.5 –0.4    
        IRAS 13428+5608 0.50 0.40 –28.5     –2.0 –0.5    
        IRAS 13451+1232           –0.5 –0.1    
        IRAS 14059+2000           –0.8 –0.1    
        IRAS 14070+0525 0.90 0.24 –1.8 0.15 –1.8 –2.7 –0.9    
        IRAS 14553+1245           –1.3 –0.5    
        IRAS 15327+2340 0.68 0.35 –50.1     –3.1 –0.4 –0.2 –0.1
        IRAS 16090–0139 0.56 0.45 –10.5 0.24 –5.6 –2.4 –0.6    
        IRAS 16255+2801 0.54         –2.2 –0.6    
        IRAS 16300+1558 0.61 0.38 –2.2 0.21 –1.1 –2.7 –0.7 –0.3 –0.1
        IRAS 17207–0014 0.31 0.23 –17.4     –1.9 –0.6 –0.2 –0.1
        IRAS 18368+3549           –1.8 –0.2 –0.3 –0.2
        IRAS 18588+3517 0.72         –2.2 –0.6 –0.3
        IRAS 20100–4156 1.45 0.23 –2.9 0.23 –4.5 –2.4 –0.7 –0.2 –0.1
        IRAS 20286+1846 1.08         –1.6 –0.6    
        IRAS 21077+3358           –1.9 –0.7    
        IRAS 21272+2514 1.66 0.21 –0.7     –2.8 –0.7    
        IRAS 22055+3024           –1.3 –0.3    
        IRAS 22116+0437   0.04: –0.1:     –2.6 –0.9 –0.2 –0.2
        IRAS 22491–1808 0.43 0.19 –0.2     –1.5 –0.5 –0.2
        IRAS 23028+0725 ... ... ... ... ... ... –0.6    
        IRAS 23233+0946 0.44         –1.9 –0.4    
        IRAS 23365+3604 0.66         –2.0 –0.5    
        IRAS 00163–1039           –0.5 –0.1    
        IRAS 01572+0009           –0.2 –0.2    
        IRAS 05083+7936           –1.1 –0.3    
        IRAS 06538+4628           –0.5 –0.2    
        IRAS 08559+1053 0.18         –0.6 –0.2    
        IRAS 09437+0317           –1.1 –0.3    
        IRAS 10565+2448           –1.2 –0.3    
        IRAS 11119+3257 0.19         –0.7 –0.3 –0.2
        IRAS 13349+2438           0.1 0.07    
        IRAS 15001+1433 0.30         –0.9 –0.4    
        IRAS 15206+3342           –0.4 –0.2    
        IRAS 20460+1925 ... ... ... ... ... ... –0.4    
        IRAS 23007+0836           –0.3 –0.1    
        IRAS 23394–0353           –0.7 –0.3    
        IRAS 23498+2423           –0.6 –0.3    

        Notes. Silicate strength is defined in Equation'(5); the 9.7 and 18 μm features are depths for amorphous silicates, while the 16 and 23 μm crystalline features are residual depths measured after the 18 μm feature was subtracted. Fluxes are given in 10–21 W cm–2; objects marked with a colon ":" represent uncertain detections.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

        In addition to the amorphous silicate, we detect weaker features from crystalline silicate absorption in 19 OHMs, including bands at 11, 16, 19, 23, and 28 μm (see Figure'8 for an example). We use the method of Spoon et'al. (2006) to subtract off both the dust continuum and amorphous component to measure the residual optical depth at 16 and 23 μm, typically the strongest crystalline features (Table'7). The deepest S16 occurs for IRAS 10039–3338, at −0.4; however, the S/N ratio means we are only sensitive to an absorption limit of S16 ≃ −0.1 and S18 ≃ −0.05. Only one detection of crystalline silicates is made in a non-masing galaxy, in IRAS 11119+3257. Since all detections of crystalline silicates in OHMs have S9.7 < −1.4, the lower total dust column in non-masing galaxies is a likely contributor to the detection rate.

        Figure 8.

        Figure 8. Examples of mid-IR absorption features for the OHM IRAS 15327+2340 (Arp 220). Top left: the 6.0 μm H2O ice and 6.85 μm HAC absorption features. Top right: gas-phase C2H2 13.7 μm and HCN 14.0 μm absorption. Bottom left: gas-phase OH 34.6 μm absorption. Bottom right: residual optical depth of the 16 μm crystalline silicate feature. Measurements for all labeled features are in Tables'7 and 8.

        Standard image High-resolution image

        Table 8. Gas-phase Absorption Features

        Object 13.7 μm C2H2 14.02 μm HCN 15.0 μm CO2  
          fnorm Flux fnorm Flux fnorm Flux  
        IRAS 10039–3338 0.93 –0.9 0.86 –4.0      
        IRAS 12018+1941 0.95 –0.7 0.94 –0.8      
        IRAS 12540+5708 0.95 –9.5          
        IRAS 13218+0552 0.82 –1.1          
        IRAS 13428+5608 0.93 –0.8          
        IRAS 14070+0525 0.79 –0.4          
        IRAS 15327+2340 0.84 –5.8 0.90 –5.6 0.94 –2.0  
        IRAS 16090–0139 0.86 –1.1          
        IRAS 17207–0014 0.93 –0.7          
        IRAS 20100–4156 0.82 –1.4 0.84 –1.1      
        IRAS 22491–1808 0.92 –0.7          

        Notes. fnorm gives the peak depth of absorption features plotted in normalized flux units. Fluxes are measured in 10–21 W cm–2.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

        5.5.2. Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

        Absorption bands arising from hydrogenated amorphous carbon grains (HACs) can also be significant contributors to diffuse dust in the galactic interstellar medium (ISM; Chiar et'al. 2000). Observations from the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO; Spoon et'al. 2001, 2002) and Spitzer (Dartois et'al. 2007; Dartois & Muñoz-Caro 2007) have identified HAC absorption features due to bending modes at 6.85 μm (CH2/CH3) and 7.25 μm (CH3) in ULIRGs. These aliphatic features represent a counterpart to the aromatic hydrocarbons responsible for PAH emission and are an abundant component of the ISM in luminous galaxies.

        We detect absorption from the 6.85 μm HAC transition in 27/51 galaxies in the OHM sample (Figure'8), with zero detections in the non-masing sample. The accompanying 7.25 μm feature is detected in eight of the galaxies in which the 6.85 μm feature is seen. The strength of the HAC is measured using a spline fit with pivots at 5.2, 5.6, 7.8, 14.0, and 26.0 μm to determine the local continuum in the 6–8 μm region (Spoon et'al. 2007) and integrate the total flux within the absorption feature (Table'7). The average optical depth of the 6.85 μm feature is τ6.85 = 0.23 ± 0.11, and the average depth of the 7.25 μm feature is τ7.25 = 0.20 ± 0.06. Many of the galaxies with no detection of HACs, however, have limits from noise that are consistent with the absorption depths measured in brighter galaxies.

        5.5.3. Ices

        Absorption from ices in a variety of molecular species (including H2O, CO, CO2, and CH4) has been detected in spectroscopy of IR-bright galaxies (Spoon et'al. 2000, 2001; Sturm et'al. 2000). The band from water ice absorption stretching from 6 to 8 μm is prominent (Figure'8) and was detected in ∼10% of a sample of bright galaxies using ISO (Spoon et'al. 2002) and IRS (Armus et'al. 2004, 2007; Spoon et'al. 2005).

        We detected water ice absorption at 6 μm in 24 OHMs and three non-masing galaxies. We use the spline continuum from fitting the 9.7 μm silicate feature as the local 5.5–7 μm continuum in order to obtain an optical depth spectrum for the 6 μm absorption complex. The resulting water ice optical depths are tabulated in Table'7. We note that contamination by 6.2 μm PAH emission and absorption by other species than water ice (Spoon et'al. 2005) may add confusion in properly measuring optical depths.

        5.5.4. C2H2, HCN, and CO2

        Previous mid-IR surveys have also identified bands of molecular gas absorption in ULIRGs (Spoon et'al. 2006; Armus et'al. 2007; Lahuis et'al. 2007), including the vibration–rotation bands of acetylene (C2H2; 13.7 μm), hydrogen cyanide (HCN; 14.02 μm), and carbon dioxide (CO2; 15.0 μm). Lahuis et'al. (2007) reported the detection of both C2H2 and HCN in 15 (U)LIRG nuclei, with detections of CO2 in four objects. Eight of the objects in the Lahuis sample are OHMs in our sample; we confirm detections of C2H2 in all eight galaxies, in addition to the OHMs IRAS 10039–3338 and IRAS 12018+1941 (Figure'8). HCN is detected in only 4/10 archival galaxies, meaning that we cannot confirm the HCN detection of four galaxies; since the optical depth of HCN is typically much weaker than that of C2H2, however, it is possible that our lower detection rate is a result of improved S/N in their reduction process. We also confirm the detection of CO2 in IRAS 15327+2340 (Arp 220). No galaxies in the non-masing control sample showed absorption in any molecular band, nor did any of the OHMs observed in our dedicated program.

        Since these gas-phase absorption features are actually a blend of multiple absorption lines, the peak optical depth measured is a function of the velocity resolution of the spectrograph. We therefore report the integrated flux and the peak depth in normalized flux units (fnorm, where the spectrum has been divided by the adopted continuum; Spoon et'al. 2004) in Table'8.

        Lahuis et'al. (2007) model abundances for ULIRGs with detections of C2H2, HCN, and CO2, and suggest that they are associated with a phase of deeply embedded star formation, excluding the possibility of the features arising from an X-ray dominated region (XDR) powered by AGNs. Darling (2007) has also shown that OHMs have the highest mean molecular gas densities among starburst galaxies (traced by the J = 1 → 0 rotational HCN transition) and also possess high dense molecular gas fractions, comprising a distinct population in the IR–CO relation. The results of Lahuis et'al. (2007) show that 9/15 ULIRGs with absorption in both C2H2 and HCN are known OHMs in our Spitzer sample; this dense gas fraction (∼50%) is nearly identical to the observed OHM fraction in starbursts with dense (ULIRGs with LHCN/LCO>0.07) fractions of molecular gas (Gao & Solomon 2004b; Darling 2007; Baan et'al. 2008).

        Given that the S/N ratio for the OHM and non-masing galaxies are of comparable magnitude, the lack of detection of any gas-phase species in the non-masing galaxies is a striking difference compared to the OHMs. Figure'9 shows the median stack of both samples near the regions of gas-phase absorption; while the C2H2 feature at 13.7 μm can be clearly seen in the median OHM spectrum, neither the HCN nor the CO2 transition is prominent. Since the data have been median stacked (as opposed to a mean, which can be dominated by a few deep absorbers), this suggests low levels of C2H2 present in a significant fraction of the OHM host galaxies. No molecular absorption appears in the medianed spectrum for the non-masing galaxies.

        Figure 9.

        Figure 9. Medianed HR spectra for both OHMs (black) and non-masing (gray) galaxies, sampled at intervals of 0.01 μm and normalized in flux at 15 μm. PAH emission is visible in bands centered at 13.6 and 14.2 μm. The dotted lines mark locations of gas-phase absorption in C2H2 (13.7 μm), HCN (14.02 μm), and CO2 (15.0 μm). The spectra are vertically offset to highlight the differences between the samples.

        Standard image High-resolution image

        While a connection between OHMs and dense molecular gas is known to exist, the lack of detected molecular absorption in the mid-IR for the majority of OHMs is not entirely unexpected. OHMs occur in merging galaxies where different populations of gas may be kinematically and thermally distinct, yet are observed as a single unresolved region within the Spitzer beam. Lahuis et'al. (2007) suggest that high abundances of warm, dense gas are associated with deeply embedded star formation, where H ii regions are prevented from expanding by large pressure gradients and extend the lifetime of the star formation process.

        Baan et'al. (2008) interpret dense gas abundances as excluding very hard radiation fields (such as those found in XDRs) that dissociate the molecules; they suggest that the molecular emission arises from PDRs surrounding H ii regions. Although few OHMs show absorption from dense molecular gas, the OHM sample also has few identified AGNs or XDRs (only 4/51 OHMs show [Ne v] at 14 μm). The connection between dense molecular gas and the presence of an AGN is thus unclear based on this data alone.

        5.5.5. Gas-phase OH

        For three OHMs, we report detection of the 2Π1/2 J'= 5/2→ 2Π3/2 J'= 3/2 OH absorption doublet near 34.616 μm: III Zw 35 (IRAS 01418+1651), Mrk 273 (IRAS 13428+5608), and Arp 220 (IRAS 15327+2340). This feature is generally difficult to detect since it lies near the noisy, far-red edge of the LH module; for all objects with z>0.08, it is redshifted out of the IRS range. OH absorption at 34.6 μm in Arp 220 was first reported by Skinner et'al. (1997) using ISO and confirmed with the IRS by Farrah et'al. (2007), who incorrectly identified it as the OH ion. All OH absorption features are well fit with a single Gaussian (Figure 10), since the separation between the doublet features (Δλ ≃ 0.02 μm) is comparable to the resolution element in the LH module. No detection of OH absorption was made for any of the non-masing galaxies.

        Assuming the OH transitions are optically thin, we can use the EW to derive a column density for the OH ground state, which is likely to be a good proxy for the total column at typical molecular cloud densities (Bradford et'al. 1999):

        Equation (6)

        OH column densities for all galaxies are quite similar, lying between (1–3) × 1017 cm–2 (Table'9). The measured NOH from the IRS data for Arp 220 also agrees within a factor of two of the column measured with ISO (Skinner et'al. 1997). Limits for galaxies in which the 34.6 μm OH feature is not detected are of order NOH ≲ 1 × 1017 cm–2.

        Table 9. Properties of OH Gas-phase Absorption

        OHM fOH τpeak EW NOH γabs γOHM ϕpump
          (10–21 W cm–2)   (10–3 μm) (cm–2) (photons s–1) (photons s–1) (%)
        IRAS 01418+1651 (III Zw 35) –6.1 0.15 5.5 1.1 × 1017 1.7 × 1054 1.8 × 1053 10
        IRAS 13428+5608 (Mrk 273) –28.5 0.14 10.2 2.1 × 1017 1.7 × 1055 1.4 × 1053 0.8
        IRAS 15327+2340 (Arp 220) –172 0.21 15.0 3.0 × 1017 2.3 × 1055 1.6 × 1053 0.7

        Note. The pumping efficiency (ϕpump = γOHMabs × 100) assumes all pumping comes from the 34.6 μm transition.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

        Figure 10.

        Figure 10. 34.6 μm OH absorption feature in III Zw 35, Mrk 273, and Arp 220. All spectra are been normalized in flux near 34.5 μm.

        Standard image High-resolution image

        We compare the NOH derived from the rotational 34.6 μm transitions to the OH column density measured in galaxies who show the hyperfine 1667 MHz feature in absorption. The majority of such galaxies are ULIRGs of comparable luminosity to the galaxies in our non-masing sample. Measurements from 10 OH absorbers (Baan et'al. 1992; Darling 2007) give NOH = Tex(1.8 ± 1.9) × 1015 cm–2, where Tex is the OH excitation temperature in K. If the dust and gas are well mixed, then the temperature of the dust (∼50–100 K) can be used as a proxy for Tex. This gives OH column densities for both OHMs (34.6 μm) and non-masing galaxies (1667'MHz) with comparable values of NOH ≃ 1017 cm–2. If so, then this addresses one of the crucial differences between OHMs and non-masing ULIRGs—namely, that differences in the abundance of masing molecules are not a key factor for triggering an OHM.

        The amount of OH available in the galaxy can also test models of the OHM pumping mechanism. Skinner et'al. (1997) computed the photon flux (γabs = LOHabs/hνOH) absorbed in the 34.6 μm transition from the OHM Arp 220. They found that γabs is roughly 1% of the photon flux in the OHM (γOHM = LOHM/hνOHM). If the 18 cm and mid-IR pumping photons lie along the same line of sight, this means that pumping photons from the 34.6 μm transition alone can power the OHM (given an efficiency of ∼1% or higher). While radiative transfer models from Lockett & Elitzur (2008) suggest that the 53 μm OH transition likely contributes more pumping photons than the 34.6 μm line, the energetics are consistent with the basic accepted mid-IR pumping model.

        For the galaxies in our sample with OH absorption, Arp 220 and Mrk 273 would require pumping efficiencies on the order of 1% to power the OHMs from the 34.6 μm transition alone. III Zw 35 shows the weakest OH absorption among our detections and would require an efficiency of ϕpump ≃ 10%.

        6. CONCLUSIONS

        We present mid-infrared spectra and photometry for 51 OH megamasers taken with the IRS on Spitzer, along with 15 galaxies confirmed to have no megamaser emission above LOH = 102.3L. All objects in both samples have full coverage in both the LR and HR IRS modules. We measure both emission (PAH, H2, and fine-structure atomic transitions) and absorption (silicates, HAC grains, and molecular bands) features, with full spectra, line fluxes, EWs, and absorption depths presented for each object.

        The majority of the galaxies closely resemble standard mid-IR ULIRG templates, with the low-resolution emission dominated by moderate-to-deep amorphous silicate absorption at 9.7 and 18 μm and PAH features at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3 and 12.7 μm. The OHMs (on average) show deeper silicate absorption and steeper continuum slopes than the non-masing galaxies. Crystalline silicate absorption is detected in roughly a third of OHMs, but in only 1 out of 15 non-masing galaxies. OHMs are also the only galaxies in our sample to show absorption from HACs, gas-phase HCN, C2H2, and CO2; however, higher average noise in the non-masing spectra mean that features at similar absorption depths could be obscured due to lack of sensitivity. High-resolution spectra show emission from [Ne ii] and [Ne iii] in almost all galaxies, with emission from [S iii], [S iv], and [O iv] commonly detected. The high-ionization [Ne v] line (a clear tracer of AGN) is detected in <10% of OHMs and in 53% of the non-masing galaxies. Almost all galaxies in both samples also show emission in multiple H2 rotational transitions.

        We also measure the 34.6 μm OH transition in three OHMs. OH column densities derived from the mid-IR OH transition are of the same order of magnitude as the column densities derived from the 1667 MHz OH transition for ULIRGs in the literature. We interpret this as evidence that the OH abundances in both OHMs and non-masing galaxies are similar, and are not a limiting factor for megamaser emission.

        A companion paper (Willett et'al. 2011, Paper II) presents a full analysis of the mid-IR data, with comparisons between the two samples and connections to the OHM properties.

        This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA through grant 30407 issued by JPL/Caltech. We have made extensive use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by JPL and Caltech under contract with NASA. Many thanks are due to J.-D. Smith for help with PAHFIT, N. Halverson for comments on computing flux limits, D. Farrah for useful discussions, and to the Spitzer Science Center for hosting K.W.W. and J.D. in 2007 April. V.C. acknowledges partial support from the EU ToK grant 39965 and FP7-REGPOT 206469.

        APPENDIX: HIGH-RESOLUTION DATA WITH BACKGROUND SKY SUBTRACTION

        As discussed in Section'3, the reduction process for the overall sample is slightly different for some archival galaxies that did not have separate IRS sky backgrounds in the HR modules. Since much of our subsequent analysis (Paper II) depends on statistical comparisons between the two samples, we chose to minimize possible systematic errors and reduced all galaxies in a uniform manner without HR sky subtraction. These data are, however, likely to be a more reliable indicator of the absolute flux levels due to subtraction of the zodiacal background; therefore, we also present atomic and molecular line fluxes for these galaxies (Tables 1012).

        Table 10. Hi-res Line Fluxes for Common Atomic Emission Lines with HR Sky Subtraction

        Object [S IV] [Ne II] [Ne III] [S III]
          10.511 μm 12.814 μm 15.555 μm 18.713 μm
        IRAS 01562+2528 ... ... ... 0.65
        IRAS 02524+2046 ... ... ... 0.47
        IRAS 04121+0223 ... ... ... 0.67
        IRAS 04454–4838 0.42 1.95 0.43 ...
        IRAS 06487+2208 ... ... ... 5.01
        IRAS 07163+0817 ... ... ... 1.34
        IRAS 08201+2801 ... ... ... 0.41
        IRAS 08449+2332 ... ... ... 1.60
        IRAS 08474+1813 ... ... ... 0.14
        IRAS 10035+2740 ... ... ... 0.35
        IRAS 10039–3338 0.98 17.22 4.20 8.08
        IRAS 10339+1548 ... ... ... 0.97
        IRAS 11180+1623 ... ... ... 0.40
        IRAS 11524+1058 ... ... ... 0.27
        IRAS 12540+5708 ... 19.47 ... ...
        IRAS 14059+2000 ... ... ... 0.59
        IRAS 14553+1245 ... ... ... 1.58
        IRAS 15327+2340 ... 59.39 6.73 7.54
        IRAS 16255+2801 ... ... ... 1.54
        IRAS 18368+3549 ... ... ... 1.01
        IRAS 18588+3517 ... ... ... 2.89
        IRAS 20286+1846 ... ... ... 0.48
        IRAS 21077+3358 ... ... ... 0.74
        IRAS 21272+2514 ... 2.22 0.33 0.40
        IRAS 22055+3024 ... ... ... 1.16
        IRAS 22116+0437 ... ... ... 0.90
        IRAS 00163–1039 2.64 87.43 14.30 32.10
        IRAS 05083+7936 ... 49.95 7.63 19.60
        IRAS 06538+4628 0.84 47.34 5.90 20.49
        IRAS 09437+0317 ... 8.72 1.22 3.58
        IRAS 23394–0353 ... 46.45 7.60 18.50

        Notes. Fluxes are in 10–21 W cm–2. No data are given for the 26 OHMs in our program for lines with λrest ≲ 16 μm since we have no SH sky subtraction available for these objects.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

        Table 11. Hi-res Line Fluxes for Rarer Atomic Emission Lines with HR Sky Subtraction

        Object H I 7-6 [Ne V] [Cl II] [Fe II] [Ne V] [O IV] [Fe II] [S III] [Si II]
        λrest (μm) 12.368 14.322 14.369 17.936 24.318 25.890 25.988 33.481 34.815
        IRAS 04454–4838 ... ... ... ... ... 1.12 ... 0.90 ...
        IRAS 06487+2208 ... ... ... ... ... 1.12 ... ... ...
        IRAS 07163+0817 ... ... ... 0.73 ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 10339+1548 ... ... ... ... 0.84 2.55 ... ... ...
        IRAS 11524+1058 ... ... ... 0.35 ... 0.59 ... ... ...
        IRAS 14553+1245 ... ... ... 0.41 ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 16255+2801 ... ... ... ... ... 0.46 ... ... ...
        IRAS 18368+3549 ... ... ... 0.51 ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 21272+2514 0.20 0.10 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
        IRAS 00163–1039 0.64 ... ... ... ... 1.56 2.46 32.18 74.28
        IRAS 05083+7936 ... 0.58 0.43 ... ... 1.53 1.97 29.34 43.28
        IRAS 06538+4628 ... 1.08 ... 1.06 ... ... 2.15 37.21 48.72
        IRAS 09437+0317 ... ... ... ... ... 0.47 0.68 9.60 22.74
        IRAS 23394–0353 0.59 ... ... ... ... 1.49 2.53 42.37 53.56

        Notes. Fluxes are in 10–21 W cm–2. No data are given for the 26 OHMs in our program for lines with λrest ≲ 16 μm since we have no SH sky subtraction available for these objects.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

        Table 12. Hi-res Line Fluxes and Upper Limits for H2 Transitions with HR Sky Subtraction

        Object H2 S(3) H2 S(2) H2 S(1) H2 S(0)
        λrest (μm) 9.67 12.28 17.04 28.22
        IRAS 01562+2528 ... ... 0.78 ...
        IRAS 02524+2046 ... ... 0.72 ...
        IRAS 04454–4838 1.05 1.21 3.03 0.76
        IRAS 06487+2208 ... ... 2.03 ...
        IRAS 08201+2801 ... ... 0.51 ...
        IRAS 08449+2332 ... ... 1.40 ...
        IRAS 08474+1813 ... ... 0.27 ...
        IRAS 10035+2740 ... ... 1.16 ...
        IRAS 10039–3338 3.39 1.79 3.85 ...
        IRAS 10339+1548 ... ... 0.46 ...
        IRAS 11180+1623 ... ... 0.89 ...
        IRAS 11524+1058 ... ... 0.81 ...
        IRAS 12540+5708 2.42 4.22 ... ...
        IRAS 14059+2000 ... ... 2.55 ...
        IRAS 15327+2340 ... 7.36 15.42 14.55
        IRAS 16255+2801 ... ... 0.55 ...
        IRAS 21077+3358 ... ... 1.17 ...
        IRAS 21272+2514 0.26 0.35 0.68 ...
        IRAS 22116+0437 ... ... 1.35 ...
        IRAS 23028+0725 ... ... 1.11 ...
        IRAS 00163–1039 2.18 2.82 6.01 ...
        IRAS 05083+7936 2.34 2.64 5.11 ...
        IRAS 06538+4628 ... 3.33 8.70 2.99
        IRAS 09437+0317 ... ... 2.67 1.78
        IRAS 23394–0353 3.40 2.25 4.99 1.38

        Notes. Fluxes are in 10–21 W cm–2. No data are given for the 26 OHMs in our program for the S(2) or S(3) lines since we have no SH sky subtraction available for these objects.

        Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

        Footnotes

        Please wait… references are loading.
        10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/18