Brought to you by:

Difference between photoluminescence and electroluminescence of excimer-based platinum [1, 3-difluoro-4,6-di(2-pyridinyl) benzene]chloride

, , , , , , and

Published 26 September 2011 2011 IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Hong Xu et al 2011 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44 415102 DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/44/41/415102

0022-3727/44/41/415102

Abstract

A chromatically stable white phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode using platinum [1,3-difluoro-4,6-di(2-pyridinyl)benzene]chloride (Pt-4) dye as the emitting layer, producing both light blue-monomer and red-excimer emission, is obtained. We have investigated both photoluminescence (PL) and electroluminescence (EL) of Pt-4 dye, which appear to be very different. Whereas the PL spectra reveal monomer and excimer peaks at around 480 nm and 610 nm, the 480 nm monomer and 660 nm excimer emission are characteristic of the EL spectra. It is shown that in contrast to PL, which is ascribed to an energy transfer process, EL emission can be explained by direct hole trapping, which is deduced from the energy levels of Pt-4 dye and 1, 3-bis(9-carbazolyl) benzene host and demonstrated by current density–voltage characteristics of various concentrations.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0022-3727/44/41/415102