The following article is Free article

ERRATUM: "THE MID-INFRARED EMISSION OF SEYFERT GALAXIES. A NEW ANALYSIS OF ISOCAM DATA*" (2007, AJ, 134, 2006)

, , , and

Published 2008 March 13 © 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation C. Ramos Almeida et al 2008 AJ 135 1657 DOI 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1657

This is a correction for 2007 AJ 134 2006

1538-3881/135/4/1657

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

In our original paper (Section 4.4) we compared the ratios of hard X-ray to nuclear mid-infrared emission for Seyfert 1 and 2 (Sy1 and Sy2) nuclei, finding that both distributions appear significatively different according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. We have detected a mistake in the computation of the X-ray luminosities (the lack of a 4π factor). Additionally, for two galaxies, the nuclear mid-infrared fluxes used within calculations are slightly different from the correct values which are reported in Table 3 of the original version. These mistakes affect the mentioned ratios of hard X-ray to nuclear mid-infrared emission, although they do not alter the result concerning the distributions, being statistically different. The correct values of these ratios are 〈log(LXintr/LMIR)〉 = −0.21 ± 0.33 for the Seyfert 1 galaxies, and 〈log(LXintr/LMIR)〉 = 0.17 ± 0.62 for the type 2 nuclei. Figure 8 has been updated with the newly computed values. We have also corrected the X-axis with respect to the original figure, which is now ν Lν. We have performed again Spearman's rank correlation test, finding that the correlation is significant when all galaxies and types 1 and 2 are considered separately. It is worthwhile to note that here we have excluded from the analysis two Seyfert 2 galaxies (NGC 1386 and NGC 7674) due to their extremely low hard X-ray luminosities, consistent with being optically thick sources. Recently, Horst et al. (2008) have estimated an intrinsic X-ray luminosity for NGC 7674 of log LXintr = 44.56 erg s−1, in contrast to the non-absorption-corrected value reported by Lutz et al. (2004) (log LXobs = 41.91 erg s−1). Such a difference of about 2.5 dex corroborates our decision of not including these galaxies.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Absorption-corrected hard X-ray luminosities versus nuclear 6.75 μm luminosities. The solid black line is the total fit and the dotted lines correspond to 1σ limits. Filled circles represent Sy1 (17 in total), open diamonds Sy2 (13 in total), and the QSO H 1821+643 is represented by an open triangle. Fits to Sy1 and Sy2 data are also represented. Observed hard X-ray luminosities are represented as lower limits when no NH data are reported. The galaxies NGC 7674 and NGC 1386 have not been taken into account in the correlation analysis. The values of α and k are derived from the expression LXintr/1043 = kLMIRν/1043)α.

Standard image High-resolution image

In a recent work, Horst et al. (2008) have argued that our luminosity ratios are ∼8 larger than what they have found for their well-resolved objects, claiming that our nuclear data are heavily contaminated by nuclear star formation. Our new values are now of the same order of magnitude than theirs, even smaller for the case of Seyfert 2 galaxies. Therefore, we believe that despite the limited resolution of ISOCAM images, our nuclear fluxes are representative of the torus emission, and the contamination by circumnuclear star formation, although present, is not dominant.

There is a typographical mistake in Table 3 for the point-spread function (PSF) flux in the LW7 filter corresponding to the galaxy ESO144-G55; the correct value is 84.2 ± 2.44 mJy.

Footnotes

  • Based on observations with the Infrared Space Observatory, an ESA project with instruments funded by ESA member states (especially the PI countries: France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom) and with the participation of ISAS and NASA.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1657