Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:28:36.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Longitudinal Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Hong Kong Teaching Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Margaret Ip ,
D. J. Lyon ,
F. Chio  and
A. F. Cheng
Margaret Ip*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
D. J. Lyon
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
F. Chio
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
A. F. Cheng
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
*
Department of Microbiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To review the incidence and trends of MRSA during a 12-year (1989-2000) period at a university teaching hospital and the relationship between strain distribution by antibiogram and molecular typing.

Design:

Retrospective review of laboratory-based surveillance records on MRSA isolation and characterization of strains by antimicrobial susceptibility and PFGE. A patient episode was counted at the time when MRSA was first isolated.

Setting:

A 1,350-bed university teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

Patients:

Those with clinical isolates of MRSA.

Results:

During 1989 to 2000, the hospital recorded 1,203,175 deaths and discharges (D&D) and encountered 5,707 patient episodes of new MRSA isolation. The overall incidence of patient episodes of MRSA was 0.47/100 D&D. In 1989, the incidence was 0.81/100 D&D and fell to a low of 0.33/100 D&D in 1995, but then rose to 0.50/100 D&D in 2000. Antibiogram and DNA typing identified 5 major types. PFGE type A constituted 68% (211/312) of isolates and was present throughout the 12-year period. PFGE type B constituted 13% (40/312) of isolates and was only present from 1995 to 2000. These isolates form a distinct clone and had unique antibiotic resistance profiles.

Conclusions:

The study showed the establishment of a dominant MRSA clone (PFGE type A group) in the intensive care, medical, and surgical units and the appearance of a new MRSA strain in 1995 (PFGE type B), which partly explained the rise in incidence of MRSA cases and a disproportionate rise in MRSA bacteremia from 1995 to 2000.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , February 2004 , pp. 126 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bell, JM, Turnidge, JD, Sentry APAC participants. High prevalence of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitalized patients in Asia-Pacific and South Africa: results from SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1998-1999. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:879–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.French, GL, Ling, J, Ling, T, Hui, YW. Susceptibility of Hong Kong isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988;21:581–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Lyon, DJ. Living with MRSA in an area of high prevalence. Presented at the First International Congress of the Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control; August 1999; Hong Kong. Abstract S9.Google Scholar
4.Adeyemi-Doro, FAB, Scheel, O, Lyon, DJ, Cheng, AFB. Living with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a 7-year experience with endemie MRSA in a university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:765–767.Google Scholar
5.Farrington, M, Ling, J, Ling, T, French, GL. Outbreaks of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on neonatal and burns units of a new hospital. Epidemiol Infect 1990;105:215–228.Google Scholar
6.French, GL, Ling, J, Farrington, M. Typing of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin. BMJ 1986;293:1438–1439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000.Google Scholar
8.Brown, DJF, Livermore, DM, Symonds, JM, Wise, R. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: BSAC working party report. JAntimicrob Chemother 2002;48:1–102.Google Scholar
9.Kaufmann, ME, Pitt, TL. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of bacterial DNA. In: Chart, H, ed. Methods in Practical Laboratory Bacteriology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1994:83–92.Google Scholar
10.Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al.Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233–2239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Cheng, AF, French, GL. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect 1988;12:91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Scheel, O, Lyon, DJ, Rosdahl, VT, Adeyemi-Doro, FAB, Ling, TKW, Cheng, AFB. Invitro susceptibility of isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 1988-1993. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996:37:243-251.Google Scholar
13.Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CM. Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands. In: Coello, R, Casewell, MW, eds. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Kent, United Kingdom: Wells Medical Limited; 1993:75–78.Google Scholar