Dielectronic Recombination of Fe xix Forming Fe xviii: Laboratory Measurements and Theoretical Calculations
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory and Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; savin@astro.columbia.edu
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany; and Physikalisches Institut der Universität Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Institut für Kernphysik, Strahlenzentrum der Justus-Liebig-Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0NG, UK
andDepartment of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008
ABSTRACT
We have measured resonance strengths and energies for dielectronic recombination (DR) of Fe xix forming Fe xviii via
and
core excitations. All measurements were carried out using the heavy-ion Test Storage Ring at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany. We have also calculated these resonance strengths and energies using two independent, state-of-the-art techniques: the perturbative multiconfiguration Breit-Pauli (MCBP) and multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock (MCDF) methods. Overall, reasonable agreement is found between our experimental results and theoretical calculations. The most notable discrepancies are for the 3l3l
resonances. The calculated MCBP and MCDF resonance strengths for the
complex lie, respectively, ≈47% and ≈31% above the measured values. These discrepancies are larger than the estimated
20% total experimental uncertainty in our measurements. We have used our measured
and
results to produce a Maxwellian-averaged rate coefficient for DR of Fe xix. Our experimentally derived rate coefficient is estimated to be good to better than ≈20% for
eV. Fe xix is predicted to form in photoionized and collisionally ionized cosmic plasmas at
eV. Hence, our rate coefficient is suitable for use in ionization balance calculations of these plasmas. Previously published theoretical DR rate coefficients are in poor agreement with our experimental results. None of these published calculations reliably reproduce the magnitude or temperature dependence of the experimentally derived rate coefficient. Our MCBP and MCDF results agree with our experimental rate coefficient to within ≈20%.
Received 2002 March 6; accepted 2002 May 15
Subject heading:
atomic data—atomic processes—methods: laboratory
Cited by
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007.
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 10-May-2006.
Online publication date: 20-Apr-2006.
Online publication date: 10-Feb-2005.
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004.
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.
Online publication date: 20-Dec-2003.
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2003.
Online publication date: 20-Jun-2003.
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002.
CrossRef



