Summary
In vitro plants, in slow-growth storage require routine evaluation for assessment of viability and need for repropagation. Determination of plantlet health by visual assessment is subjective and varies by genus due to variations in growth pattern and plant structure. Developing a standardized plant evaluation system would improve the efficiency of in vitro storage. This study was initiated to develop digital image analysis techniques for plantlets during slow-growth cold storage and to compare that system with visual examinations. Pear (Pyrus communis L) cultivars were chosen for this initial trial because they have an open structure and clear internode position for image composition. Pear shoots stored at 4°C in tissue culture bags were evaluated monthly by standard visual examination and by digital image analysis. Digital images were evaluated for red, green, blue, modified normalized differences of vegetation index (MNDVI), green/red ratio (G/R), intensity, hue, and saturation at the first two nodes of each, plantlet. At 6 mo., the visual ratings had declined steadily for P. communis ‘Luscious’ and ‘Bartlett—Swiss’, while ‘Belle Lucrative’ and ‘Louse Bonne de Jersey’ ratings did not show significant declines until 9 mo. Correlations between visual ratings and G/R and MNDVI values were significant (r2>=0.5) for all cultivars. Regression analysis indicated that the MNDVI and G/R ratios changed significantly over the 15-mo. rating period for most cultivars. Intensity, hue and saturation values were not consistently significant and did not correlate with visual ratings. These results will assist in the development of digital imaging as an alternative technique for evaluation of stored in vitro plantlets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamsen, F.; Pinter, P.; Barnes, E.; LaMorte, R.; Wall, G.; Leavitt, S.; Kimball, B. Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera. Crop Sci. 39:719–724; 1999.
Alchanatis, V.; Pelege, K.; Ziv, M. Classification of tissue culture segments by colour machine vision. Agric. Eng. Res. 55:299–311; 1993.
Ashmore, S. E., ed. Status report on the development and application of in vitro techniques for the conservation and use of plant genetic resources. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; 1997:67.
Cheng, T. Y. Micropropagation of clonal fruit tree rootstocks. Compact Fruit Tree 12:127–137; 1979.
Choi, K.; Lee, G.; Han, Y. J.; Bunn, J. M. Tomato maturity evaluation using color image analysis. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 38:171–176; 1995.
Cliff, M.; Sanford, K.; Wismer, W.; Hampson, C. Use of digital images for evaluation of factors responsible for visual preference of apples by consumers. HortScience 37:1127–1131; 2002.
Dussert, S.; Chabrillange, N.; Anthony, F.; Engelmann, F.; Recalt, C.; Hamon, S. Variability in storage response within a coffee (Coffea spp.) core collection under slow growth conditions. Plant Cell Rep. 16:344–348; 1997.
Engelmann, F. In vitro conservation of horticultural species. Acta Hort. 298:327–332; 1991.
Gunasekaran, S.; Ding, K. Using computer vision for food quality evaluation. Food Technol. 48:151–154; 1994.
IPGRI/CIAT, ed. Establishment and operation of a pilot in vitro active genebank. Report of a CIAT-IBPGR collaborative project using cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) as a model. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute and International Center for Tropical Agriculture; 1994:59.
Karcher, D. E.; Richardson, M. D. Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image. Crop Sci. 43:943–951; 2003.
Miller, B. K.; Delwiche, M. J. A color vision system for peach grading. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 32:1484–1490; 1989.
Neuman, M. R.; Sapirstein, H. D.; Shwedyk, E.; Bushuk, W. Wheat grain color analysis by digital image processing I. Methodology. Cereal Sci. 10:175–182; 1989.
Paulsen, M. R.; McClure, W. F. Illumination for computer vision systems. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 29:1398–1404; 1986.
Reed, B. M. Application of gas-permeable bags for in vitro cold storage of strawberry germplasm. Plant Cell Rep. 10:431–434; 1991.
Reed, B. M. Cold storage of strawberries in vitro: a comparison of three storage systems. Fruit Var. J. 46:98–102; 1992.
Reed, B. M. Responses to ABA and cold acclimation are genotype dependent for cryopreserved blackberry and raspberry meristems. Cryobiology 30:179–184; 1993.
Reed, B. M. In vitro storage conditions for mint germplasm. HortScience 34:350–352; 1999.
Reed, B. Photoperiod improves long-term survival of in vitro-stored strawberry plantlets. HortScience 37:811–814; 2002.
Reed, B.M.; Chang, Y. Medium- and long-term storage of in vitro cultures of temperate fruit and nut crops. In: Razdan, M. K.; Cocking, E. C., eds. Conservation of plant genetic resources in vitro. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers Inc.; 1997:67–105.
Reed, B. M.; DeNoma, J.; Luo, J.; Chang, Y.; Towill, L. Cryopreservation and long-term storage of pear germplasm. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 34:256–260; 1998.
Reed, B. M.; Engelmann, F.; Dulloo, E.; Engels, J., eds. Technical guidelines for the management of field and in vitro germplasm collections. Rome: IPGRI/FAO/SGRP; 2005:1–95.
Sacks, E. J.; Shaw, D. V. Optimum allocation of objective color measurements for evaluating fresh strawberries. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:330–334; 1994.
Sarkar, D.; Naik, P. S. Factors affecting minimal growth conservation of potato microplants in vitro. Euphytica 102:275–280; 1998.
Schrevens, E.; Raeymaeckers, L. Colour characterization of golden delicious apples using digital image. Acta Hort. 304:159–161; 1992.
Shearer, S. A.; Payne, F. A. Color and defect sorting of bell peppers using machine vision. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 33:2045–2050; 1990.
Smith, M. A. Image analysis for plant cell culture and micropropagation. In: Christie, A. J.; Kozai, T.; Smith, M. A., eds. Automation and environmental control in plant tissue culture. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:145–163.
Smith, M. A. L.; Spomer, L. A.; Meyer, M. J.; McClelland, M. T. Non-invasive image analysis evaluation of growth during plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 19:91–102; 1989.
Tao, Y.; Heinemann, P. H.; Varghese, Z.; Morrow, C. T.; Sommerlii, H. J. Machine vision for color inspection of potatoes and apples. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 38:1555–1561; 1995.
Van de Houwe, I. INIBAP Germplasm Transit Centre: managing the in vitro medium term genebank for Musa spp. In: Engelmann, F., ed. Management of field and in vitro germplasm collections. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; 1999:127–131.
Wanas, W. H.; Callow, J. A.; Withers, L. A. Growth limitations for the conservation of pear genotypes. In: Withers, L. A.; Alderson, P. G., eds. Plant tissue culture and its agricultural applications. London: Butterworths; 1986:285–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aynalem, H.M., Righetti, T.L. & Reed, B.M. Non-destructive evaluation of in vitro-stored plants: A comparison of visual and image analysis. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 42, 562–567 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2006816
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2006816