The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context

References

1. Aaron, J. E.
   (2010) Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context, Language Variation and Change, 22(1), 1–36.10.1017/S0954394509990226
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990226 [Google Scholar]
2. Aarts, B. , Close, J. , & Wallis, S.
   (2010) Recent changes in the use of the progressive construction in English. In B. Cappelle & N. Wada (Eds.), Distinctions in English grammar (pp.148–167). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahmadi, N.
   (2016) The effects and effectiveness of contrastive form-focused instruction on mastering tense-aspect. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 9–30.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Andersen, R.
   (1991) Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and linguistic theories (pp.305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.2.17and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.17and [Google Scholar]
5. Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y.
   (1994) Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 133–156.10.1017/S0272263100012845
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012845 [Google Scholar]
6. Anderwald, L.
   (2016)  I’m loving it: Marketing ploy or language change in progress?Studia Neophilologica, 13(1), 1–21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anthony, L.
   (2014) AntConc (3.4.1). Tokyo: Waseda University.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Axelsson, M. & Hahn, A.
   (2001) The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English – a corpus-based study. ICAME Journal, 25, 5–30.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M. R.
   (2008) Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning, 58(3), 555–595.10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00450.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00450.x [Google Scholar]
10. Bailey, N. , Madden, C. , & Krashen, S. D.
    (1974) Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?Language Learning, 24(2), 235–243.10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00505.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00505.x [Google Scholar]
11. Balasubramanian, C.
    (2009) Register variation in Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.37 [Google Scholar]
12. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (1998) Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 471–508.10.1017/S0272263198004021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198004021 [Google Scholar]
13. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2000) Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition. Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2012) After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In I. Saddour & E. Labeau (Eds.), Tense, aspect and mood in First and Second Language Acquisition (pp.131–151). New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bardovi-Harlig, K. , & Bergström, A.
    (1996) Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and EFL. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 308–330.10.3138/cmlr.52.2.308
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.2.308 [Google Scholar]
16. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D. W.
    (1995) The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 107–131.10.2307/3587807
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587807 [Google Scholar]
17. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version1.1–7. Retrieved fromCRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bayley, R.
    (2013) Data analysis: Quantitative approaches. In M. R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp.357–389). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167.357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078167.357 [Google Scholar]
19. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Boneh, N.
    (2013) Aspect: Modern Hebrew. In G. Khan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics (pp.205–218). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Brisard, F. & De Wit, A.
    (2013) Modal uses of the English present progressive. In J. I. Marin-Arrese , M. Carretero , J. Arús Hita , & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality. Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp.201–220). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110286328.201
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110286328.201 [Google Scholar]
22. Chan, H. L.
    (2012) Tense-aspect processing in second language learners. PhD thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chan, H. L. , Finberg, J. , Costello, W. , & Shirai, Y.
    (2012) L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: Lexical aspect, morphological regularity, and transfer. In L. Filipovic & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (pp.181–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.36.12chan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.36.12chan [Google Scholar]
24. Collins, L.
    (2002) The role of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52(1), 43–94.10.1111/1467‑9922.00177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00177 [Google Scholar]
25. Comajoan, L.
    (2006) The Aspect Hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56(2), 201–268.10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2006.00347.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00347.x [Google Scholar]
26. Deshors, S. & Rautionaho, P.
    (2018) The progressive vs. non-progressive alternation: A semantic exploration across World Englishes. English World-Wide, 39(3).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dose-Heidelmayer, S. & Götz, S.
    (2016) The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), 229–256.10.1515/iral‑2016‑9982
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982 [Google Scholar]
28. Dowty, D. R.
    (1975) The stative in the progressive and other essence/accident contrasts. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(4), 579–588.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M.
    (Eds.) (2013) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved fromwals.info
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K.
    (1974) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53.10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00234.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x [Google Scholar]
31. Edwards, A.
    (2014) The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173–194.10.1111/weng.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12080 [Google Scholar]
32. Ellis, N. C.
    (2008) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. J. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 372–405.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ellis, R.
    (2015) Researching acquisition sequences: Idealization and de-idealization in SLA, Language Learning, 65(1), 181–209.10.1111/lang.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12089 [Google Scholar]
35. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. P.
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Fuchs, R. , Götz, S. , & Werner, V.
    (2016) The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In V. Werner , E. Seoane , & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-Assessing the present perfect (pp.297–338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110443530‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-013 [Google Scholar]
37. Fuchs, R. & Gut, U.
    (2015) An apparent time study of the progressive in Nigerian English. In P. Collins (Ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp.373–387). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gablasova, D. & Brezina, V.
    (2015) Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2015. Current approaches to discourse and translation studies (pp.117–136). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17948‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6 [Google Scholar]
39. Garside, R. & Smith, N.
    (1997) A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside , G. Leech , & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation. Linguistic information from computer text corpora (pp.102–121). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gass, S. & Ard, J.
    (1984) Second language acquisition and the ontology of language universals. In W. E. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universals and Second Language Acquisition (pp.33–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.5.05gas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.5.05gas [Google Scholar]
41. Giacalone Ramat, A.
    (2002) How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp.221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.11gia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.11gia [Google Scholar]
42. Gilquin, G.
    (2015) From design to collection of learner corpora. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp.9–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139649414.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.002 [Google Scholar]
43. Goldschneider, J. M. & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50.10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
44. Granath, S. & Wherrity, M.
    (2013) ‘I’m loving you – and knowing it too’: Aspect and so-called stative verbs. Rhesis. International Journal of Linguistics, Philology, and Literature, 4(1), 6–22.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Gries, S. T. & Wulff, S.
    (2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 182–200.10.1075/arcl.3.10gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.10gri [Google Scholar]
46. Gut, U. & Fuchs, R.
    (2013) Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 243–267.10.1177/0075424213492799
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213492799 [Google Scholar]
47. Gut, U. , Fuchs, R. , & Wunder, E. -M.
    (Eds.) (2015) Universal or diverse paths to English phonology? Bridging the gap between research on phonological acquisition of English as a Second, Third or Foreign Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hahn, A.
    (2007) Learning and teaching processes. Teachers’ learning and teaching strategies for tense and aspect. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hilbert, M. & Krug, M.
    (2012) Progressives in Maltese English: A comparison with spoken and written text types of British and American English. In U. Gut & M. Hundt (Eds.), Mapping unity and diversity world-wide. Corpus-based studies of New Englishes (pp.103–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g43.05hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.05hil [Google Scholar]
50. Housen, A.
    (2000) Verb semantics and the acquisition of tense-aspect in L2 English. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 249–259.10.1111/1467‑9582.00064
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00064 [Google Scholar]
51. Housen, A.
    (2002a) A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In S. Granger , J. Hung , & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, Second Language Acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.77–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.6.08hou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.08hou [Google Scholar]
52. Housen, A.
    (2002b) The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.155–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.09hou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.09hou [Google Scholar]
53. Hulstijn, J. H. , Ellis, R. , & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2015) Orders and sequence in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax, 40 years on. Language Learning, 65(1), 1–5.10.1111/lang.12097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12097 [Google Scholar]
54. Hundt, M. & Vogel, K.
    (2011) Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction?In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap (pp.145–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44.08vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.08vog [Google Scholar]
55. Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A.
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kim, H. -J.
    (2012) A case study of tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of Korean. In E. Labeau & I. Saddour (Eds.), Tense, apect and mood in First and Second Language Acquisition (pp.153–177). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Klein, W.
    (1995) The acquisition of English. In R. Dietrich , W. Klein , & C. Noyau (Eds.), The acquisition of temporality in a second language (pp.31–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.7.04kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7.04kle [Google Scholar]
58. König, E. & Gast, V.
    (2012) Understanding English-German contrasts. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K.
    (Eds.) (2013) The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available atewave-atlas.org/
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kranich, S.
    (2010) The progressive in modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kruger, H. & Van Rooy, B.
    (2017) Editorial practice and the progressive in Black South African English. World Englishes, 36(1), 20–41.10.1111/weng.12202
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12202 [Google Scholar]
62. Lee, S. -A.
    (2015) Aktionsart, progressive aspect and underspecification. Linguistic Research, 32(1), 151–193.10.17250/khisli.32.1.201504.006
    https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.32.1.201504.006 [Google Scholar]
63. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2007) Past progressive or simple past? The acquisition of progressive aspect by Polish advanced learners of English. In E. Hidalgo , L. Quereda , & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp.253–266). Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203906_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203906_017 [Google Scholar]
64. Lenth, R. V. & Hervé, M.
    (2015) lsmeans: Least-Squares Means. R package version2.17. Retrieved fromCRAN.R-project.org/package=lsmeans.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Levin, M.
    (2013) The progressive verb in modern American English. In B. Aarts , J. Close , G. Leech , & S. Wallis (Eds.), The verb phrase in English. Investigating recent language change with corpora (pp.187–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139060998.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.009 [Google Scholar]
66. Liszka, S. A.
    (2015) The L2 acquisition of the English present simple – present progressive distinction: Verb-raising revisited. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp.57–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196.03lis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.03lis [Google Scholar]
67. Mair, C.
    (2012) Progressive and continuous aspect. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp.803–827). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. McClure, W.
    (1993) A semantic parameter: The progressive in Japanese and English. In S. Choi (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (pp.254–270). Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.
    [Google Scholar]
69. McLaughlin, B.
    (1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 113–128.10.1093/applin/11.2.113
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.113 [Google Scholar]
70. Meriläinen, L. , Paulasto, H. , & Rautionaho, P.
    (2017) Extended uses of the progressive form in inner, outer and expanding circle Englishes. In M. Filppula , J. Klemola , A. Mauranen , & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Changing English. Global and local perspectives (pp.191–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429657‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429657-011 [Google Scholar]
71. Mufwene, S. S.
    (1984) Stativity and the progressive. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M.
    (Eds.) (2011) Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44 [Google Scholar]
73. Mukherjee, J. & Rohrbach, J. -M.
    (2006) Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Planing, gluing and painting corpora. Inside the applied corpus linguist’s workshop (pp.205–232). Frankfurt: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Ortega, L.
    (2009) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Pashler, H. & Harris, C. R.
    (2012) Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536.10.1177/1745691612463401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401 [Google Scholar]
76. Paulasto, H.
    (2014) Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide, 35(3), 247–276.10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau [Google Scholar]
77. Petré, P.
    (2017) The extravagant progressive: An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [BE Ving]. English Language and Linguistics, 21(2), 227–250.10.1017/S1360674317000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000107 [Google Scholar]
78. Platt, J. , Weber, H. , & Ho, M. L.
    (1984) The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Poplack, S.
    (1993) Variation theory and language contact. In D. Preston (Ed.), American dialect research (pp.251–286), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.68.13pop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.68.13pop [Google Scholar]
80. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2013) R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ranta, E.
    (2006) The ‘attractive’ progressive: Why use the -ing form in English as a Lingua Franca?Nordic Journal of English Studies, 5(2), 95–116.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Rautionaho, P.
    (2014) Variation in the progressive. A corpus-based study into world Englishes. Tampere: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Robison, R. E.
    (1990) The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 315–330.10.1017/S0272263100009190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009190 [Google Scholar]
84. Robison, R. E.
    (1995) The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 344–370.10.1093/applin/16.3.344
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.344 [Google Scholar]
85. Rocca, S.
    (2002) Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: A bidirectional study. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.249–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.12roc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.12roc [Google Scholar]
86. Rogatcheva, S.
    (2014) Aspect in learner writing. A corpus-Based comparison of advanced Bulgarian and German learners’ written English. PhD thesis. Giessen: University of Giessen.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Rohde, A.
    (1996) The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 34(5), 1115–1137.10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.1115
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.1115 [Google Scholar]
88. Römer, U.
    (2005) Progressives, patterns, pedagogy. A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.18 [Google Scholar]
89. Römer, U.
    (2009) The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 141–163.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Rüdiger, S.
    (2016.) Cuppa coffee? Challenges and opportunities of compiling a conversational English corpus in an Expanding Circle setting. In H. Christ , D. Klenovšak , L. Sönning , & V. Werner (Eds.), A blend of MaLT. Selected contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium 2015 (pp.49–72). Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Ruwayshid, A.
    (2014) Second language acquisition of aspect and tense by Saudi-Arabic learners of English. PhD thesis. York: University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Salaberry, M. R.
    (1998) The development of aspectual distinctions in classroom L2 French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(4), 504–542.10.3138/cmlr.54.4.508
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.4.508 [Google Scholar]
93. Salaberry, M. R.
    (2008) Marking past tense in Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Salaberry, M. R. & Shirai, Y.
    (2002) L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.04sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.04sal [Google Scholar]
95. Schilk, M. , & Hammel, M.
    (2014) The progressive in South Asian and Southeast Asian varieties of English: Mapping areal homogeneity and heterogeneity. Language and Computers, 78(1), 147–171.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Schneider, E. W.
    (2007) Postcolonial English. Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
97. Schramm, A. & Mensink, M. C.
    (2016) Processing of aspectual meanings by non-native and native English speakers during narrative comprehension. In O. Timofeeva , A. -C. Gardner , A. Honkapohja & S. Chevalier (Eds.), New approaches to English linguistics. Building bridges (pp.251–280). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.177.10sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.10sch [Google Scholar]
98. Sharma, D.
    (2009) Typological diversity in new Englishes. English World-Wide, 30(2), 170–195.10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha [Google Scholar]
99. Sharma, D. & Deo, A.
    (2010) A new methodology for the study of aspect in contact: Past and progressive in Indian English. In J. A. Walker (Ed.), Aspect in grammatical variation (pp.111–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.6.08sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.6.08sha [Google Scholar]
100. Shirai, Y.
     (1994) On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input?First Language, 14(40), 67–82.10.1177/014272379401404005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379401404005 [Google Scholar]
101. Shirai, Y.
     (2009) Temporality in first and second language acquisition. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp.167–194). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Shirai, Y.
     (2014) The acquisition of tense-aspect in Asian languages. In H. Winskel & P. Padakanna (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (pp.60–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Shirai, Y. & Kurono, A.
     (1998) The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48(2), 279–244.10.1111/1467‑9922.00041
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00041 [Google Scholar]
104. Śmiecińska, J.
     (2003) Stative verbs and the progressive aspect in English. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 38, 187–195.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Smith, C. S.
     (1983) A theory of aspectual choice. Language, 59(3), 479–501.10.2307/413899
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413899 [Google Scholar]
106. Ssempuuma, J. , Isingoma, B. , & Meierkord, C.
     (2016) The use of the progressive in Ugandan English. In C. Meierkord , B. Isingoma , & S. Namyalo (Eds.), Ugandan English. Its sociolinguistics, structure and uses in a globalizing post-protectorate (pp.173–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g59.08sse
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.08sse [Google Scholar]
107. Tagliamonte, S. & Roberts, C.
     (2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech, 80(3), 280–300.10.1215/00031283‑80‑3‑280
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-3-280 [Google Scholar]
108. Thewissen, J.
     2013 Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error-tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(s1), 77–101.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01422.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01422.x [Google Scholar]
109. Tono, Y. & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
     2014 Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(2), 163–177.10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton [Google Scholar]
110. Van Rooy, B.
     (2006) The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes, 25(1), 37–64.10.1111/j.0083‑2919.2006.00446.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00446.x [Google Scholar]
111. Van Rooy, B.
     (2014) Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle varieties. World Englishes, 33(2), 157–172.10.1111/weng.12079
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12079 [Google Scholar]
112. Van Rooy, B. & Kruger, H.
     (2016) The innovative progressive aspect of Black South African English: The role of language proficiency and normative processes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(2), 205–228.10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04van [Google Scholar]
113. Van Rooy, B. & Piotrowska, C.
     (2015) The development of an extended time period meaning of the progressive in Black South African English. In P. Collins (Ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp.465–483). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Van Rooy, B. & Schäfer, L.
     (2002) The effect of learner errors on POS tag errors during automatic POS tagging. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 20(4), 325–335.10.2989/16073610209486319
     https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610209486319 [Google Scholar]
115. Vraicu, A.
     (2013) Exploring the upper limits of the Aspect Hypothesis: Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced English L2 variety. Language, Interaction and Acquisition4(2), 256–290.10.1075/lia.4.2.06vra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.06vra [Google Scholar]
116. Wulff, S. & Römer, U.
     (2009) Becoming a proficient academic writer: Shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora, 4(2), 115–133.10.3366/E1749503209000276
     https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503209000276 [Google Scholar]
117. Wulff, S. , Ellis, N. C. , Römer, U. , Bardovi-Harlig, K. , & LeBlanc, C.
     (2009) The acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 354–369.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]
118. Yip, P. -C. & Rimmington, D.
     (2004) Chinese. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Yue, A.
     (2003) Chinese dialects: Grammar. In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.). The Sino-Tibetan languages (pp.84–125). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Zagona, K.
     (2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Zhao, Y. & MacWhinney, B.
     (2010) Competing cues: A corpus-based study of the English tense-aspect in second language acquisition. In K. Franich , K. M. Iserman , & L. L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.503–514). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]