Cover not available
Part of
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness
Edited by Marina Terkourafi
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14] 2015
► pp. 41–70

The M-word

A Greek collocation between solidarity and insult

We investigate the conventionalization of mock impoliteness through a study of the Greek collocation re malaka, which can be construed as either solidary (dude) or insulting (asshole). Questionnaire results showed that the solidary sense prevails across the board, in contrast to the insulting sense, about which consensus was much lower. We propose that, when the expression is used between young males in a close relationship, the Banter Principle (Leech 1983) is no longer in operation and no inference is needed to disambiguate the interactional import of the collocation. Rather, the solidary sense, having resulted from a “conventionalization of invited inferences” (Traugott 1999), is activated automatically in this “minimal context” (Terkourafi 2005). Our study has implications for the debates on the inherent nature of im/politeness and on the semantics/pragmatics interface from the perspective of im/politeness research.

Published online: 28 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.03ver
References
Allan, K
2007 The pragmatics of connotation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(6): 1047–1057. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J
2001 The language of youth. In Encyclopedic Guide to Language (in Greek), A.F. Christidis (ed.) ⟨[URL]⟩ (17 March 2012).Google Scholar
Asim, J
2007 The N Word. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bianchi, C
2014 Slurs and appropriation: An echoic account. Journal of Pragmatics 66 (5) 35–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S
1978/1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, P
1969 Frequency and kinds of words in various social settings, or what the hell is going on? Pacific Sociological Review 12: 101–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J
1996 Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek, Center for the Greek Language
[URL]⟩
Eder, D
1990 Serious and playful disputes: Variation in conflict talk among female adolescents. In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, A. Grimshaw (ed.), 67–84. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M
2009 Designing a multimodal spoken component to the Australian National Corpus. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 HSCNet Workshop on Designing the Australian National Corpus: Mustering Languages, M. Haugh, K. Burridge, J. Mulder & P. Peters (eds), 74–86. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. ⟨[URL]⟩Google Scholar
2010 When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6(1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In Situated Politeness, B.L. Davies, M. Haugh & A.J. Merrison (eds). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. & Bousfield, D
2012 Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1099–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J
1994 Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 26–55.Google Scholar
2002 Male cheerleaders and wanton women: Humour among New Zealand friends. TeReo (Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand) 45: 3–36.Google Scholar
Holmes, J
2000 Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L
1984 Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ‘84), D. Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Karachaliou, R. & Archakis, A
2012 The Greek particle re as a marker of unexpectedness: Evidence from the analysis of conversational narratives. In Studies in Greek Linguistics. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki: Institute for Modern Greek Studies.
Karamitsiou, A
2005 Swearing language and gender: Male and female use of the word malakas among Greek University students. Paper presented at SociolinguistEssex X-2005, University of Essex, UK.
Kasper, G
1990 Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S
2004 Dude. American Speech 79(3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov W
1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C
1995 Three levels of meaning. In Grammar and Meaning, F. Palmer (ed.), 90–115. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loentz, E
2006 Yiddish, kanak sprak, klezmer, and hip hop: Ethnolect, minority culture, multiculturalism, and stereotype in Germany. Shofar 25(1): 33–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S
2003 ‘What’s in a name?’ Social labelling and gender practices. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds), 69–97. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slugoski, B.R. & Turnbull, W
1988 Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7(2): 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, L
1995 Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated. Language and the Socially Constructed Self, K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (eds), 279–296. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M
2003 Generalised and particularised implicatures of linguistic politeness. In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 114], P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser & H. Zeevat (eds), 149–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of ‘minimal context’. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, K. Nikiforidou, S. Marmaridou & E. Antonopoulou (eds), 209–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice [LPSP 21], D. Bousfield & M. Locher (eds), 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 On de-limiting context. In Contexts and Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Language 9], A. Bergs & G. Diewald (eds), 17–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a Politeness and pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, K. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (eds), 617–637. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Between pragmatics and sociolinguistics: Where does pragmatic variation fit in? In Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts: Methodological Issues [IMPACT 31], C. Felix-Brasdefer & D. Koike (eds), 295–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C
1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 The role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic change. In Pragmatics in 1998 Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. II, J. Verschueren (ed.), 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Semantic change: Bleaching, strengthening, narrowing, extension. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, K. Brown (ed.), 124–131. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Topics in English Linguistics: Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, K. Davidse, Vandelanotte, L. & Cuyckens, H. (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P
1974 The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergis, N. & Terkourafi, M
2014 The role of the speaker’s emotional state in im/politeness assessments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergis, N
2015 The Interplay of Pragmatic Inference, Face and Emotion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Vitsos, D
2009 Ecce Malakas (Idhou o Malakas). Athens: Periplous Editions.Google Scholar
Watts, R
1989 Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8(2–3): 131–66 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Dendenne, Boudjemaa
2023. “Shut up! Don’t say that! You’ve got to say ḤASHĀKEM!” The pragmatics of Ḥashāk and its variants in colloquial Algerian Arabic. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Karachaliou, Rania & Argiris Archakis
2015. Identity construction patterns via swearing:. Pragmatics and Society ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Karachaliou, Rania & Argiris Archakis
2018. Chapter 2. Reactions to jab lines in conversational storytelling. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor [Topics in Humor Research, 7], ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Teneketzi, Korallia
2022. Impoliteness across social media platforms. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Vergis, Nikos
2023. How affect modulates conversational meanings: a review of experimental research: invited review. Cognition and Emotion ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Vergis, Nikos & Marina Terkourafi
2015. The Role of the Speaker’s Emotional State in Im/politeness Assessments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34:3 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.