Technological Innovation and Resources
CONSTANd : A Normalization Method for Isobaric Labeled Spectra by Constrained Optimization*

https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M115.056911Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

In quantitative proteomics applications, the use of isobaric labels is a very popular concept as they allow for multiplexing, such that peptides from multiple biological samples are quantified simultaneously in one mass spectrometry experiment. Although this multiplexing allows that peptide intensities are affected by the same amount of instrument variability, systematic effects during sample preparation can also introduce a bias in the quantitation measurements. Therefore, normalization methods are required to remove this systematic error. At present, a few dedicated normalization methods for isobaric labeled data are at hand. Most of these normalization methods include a framework for statistical data analysis and rely on ANOVA or linear mixed models. However, for swift quality control of the samples or data visualization a simple normalization technique is sufficient. To this aim, we present a new and easy-to-use data-driven normalization method, named CONSTANd. The CONSTANd method employs constrained optimization and prior information about the labeling strategy to normalize the peptide intensities. Further, it allows maintaining the connection to any biological effect while reducing the systematic and technical errors. As a result, peptides can not only be compared directly within a multiplexed experiment, but are also comparable between other isobaric labeled datasets from multiple experimental designs that are normalized by the CONSTANd method, without the need to include a reference sample in every experimental setup. The latter property is especially useful when more than six, eight or ten (TMT/iTRAQ) biological samples are required to detect differential peptides with sufficient statistical power and to optimally make use of the multiplexing capacity of isobaric labels.

Cited by (0)

Author contributions: J.H. and D.V. designed research; E.M., W.W.H., I.M., G.B., J.H., and D.V. performed research; W.W.H., J.H., and D.V. analyzed data; E.M., W.W.H., and D.V. wrote the paper.

*

This work was supported by SBO grant “InSPECtor” (120025) of the Flemish agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT).

This article contains supplemental material.

1

The abbreviations used are:

    LC

    liquid chromatography

    SILAC

    Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture

    ICAT

    Isotope coded affinity tags

    ICPL

    Isotope coded protein labels

    MS1

    Full scan mass spectrum

    MS2

    Tandem mass spectrum

    TMT

    Tandem Mass Tags

    iTRAQ

    isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantification

    TEAB

    Triethylammonium bicarbonate

    CID

    Collision induced dissociation

    HCD

    High energy collision induced dissociation

    PSM

    Peptide-to-spectrum match

    CONSTANd

    Constrained standardization

    IPFP

    Iterative proportional fitting procedure

    MLE

    Maximum likelihood estimator

    nan

    Not-a-number

    MAR

    missing at random

    MA-plot

    Minus Additive-plot

    PCA

    Principal component analysis

    DDA

    Data-dependent acquisition.