Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Karyotype of Araucaria angustifolia and the decondensation/activation mode of its nucleolus organiser region

Manoela Miranda A B , Cícero Carlos de Souza Almeida A and Marcelo Guerra A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Rua Nelson Chaves s/n, 50670-420, Brazil.

B Present address: Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna A-1400, Austria.

C Corresponding author. Email: msfguerra@hotmail.com

Australian Journal of Botany 55(2) 165-170 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06087
Submitted: 28 April 2006  Accepted: 24 October 2006   Published: 16 March 2007

Abstract

The chromosomes of the gymnosperm Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Kuntze were analysed with the fluorochromes chromomycin A3 (CMA) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and with C-banding. This species contains a diploid complement made of 26 chromosomes, with 18 larger metacentric, four smaller metacentric and four submetacentric chromosomes. The only CMA+/DAPI region observed corresponded to the nucleolus organiser region (NOR) localised at the proximal portion of a large metacentric chromosome pair. C-banding marked the NOR as well as a terminal region of another chromosome pair. In addition, small C-bands were occasionally seen interspersed in many chromosomes. The NOR appeared to condense at approximately the same rate as the rest of the chromosome from prophase throughout metaphase. In interphase nuclei, NOR decondensation and activation was characterised by the formation of CMA+ blocks that resembled a string of beads inside the nucleolus. The number and size of beads was inversely proportional to the size of the nucleolus, suggesting that transcriptional activation of the nucleolar cistrons starts simultaneously at several points of the NOR. The mode of NOR activation in A. angustifolia differs from that observed in most species, providing a unique opportunity to study activation and transcriptional control of rRNA genes.


References


Cardemil L, Salas E, Godoy M (1984) Comparative study of karyotypes of South American species of Araucaria. Journal of Heredity 75, 121–125. open url image1

Chen R (1988) G-band staining of chromosomes in some higher plants with special reference to Lilium davidii. La Kromosomo 2, 1635–1651. open url image1

Covas G , Hunziker JH (1995) ‘Flora Fanerógamica Argentina. Fascículo 4.’ (Museo Botánico: Córdoba)

Dainty A (1982) Chromosome numbers and karyotype variation in Araucaria. Kew Bulletin 37, 511–514. open url image1

Davies BJ, O’Brien IEW, Murray BG (1997) Karyotypes, chromosome bands and genome size variation in New Zealand endemic gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208, 169–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Earley K, Lawrence RJ, Pontes O, Reuther R, Enciso AJ, Silva M, Neves N, Gross M, Viegas W, Pikaard CS (2006) Erasure of histone acetylation by Arabidopsis HDA6 mediates large-scale gene silencing in nucleolar dominance. Genes & Development 20, 1283–1293.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Esponda P, Giménez-Martins G (1975) Nucleolar organizer ultrastructure in Allium cepa. Chromosoma 52, 73–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fiskejö G (1984) Two types of constitutive heterochromatin made visible in Allium by a rapid C-banding method. Hereditas 78, 153–156. open url image1

Flory WS (1936) Chromosome numbers and phylogeny in the gymnosperms. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 17, 83–89. open url image1

Gill BS, Friebe TR, Endo TR (1991) Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Genome 34, 830–839. open url image1

Givens JF, Phillips RL (1976) The nucleolus organizer region of maize (Zea mays L.). Chromosoma 57, 103–117.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Guerra MS (1986) Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Revista Brasileira de Genética 4, 741–743. open url image1

Guerra MS (1988) Characterization of different types of condensed chromatin in Costus (Zingiberaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 158, 107–115.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Guerra M (1991) Cis-acting of NOR cistrons in Eleutherine bulbosa (Iridaceae). Genetica 83, 235–241.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Guerra M (2000) Patterns of heterochromatin in plant chromosomes. Genetics and Molecular Biology 23, 1029–1041. open url image1

Hair JB, Beuzenberg EJ (1958) Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora—1. New Zealand Journal of Science 1, 617–628. open url image1

Hodcent E (1968) Numeration et morphologie des chromosomes du prothalle femelle de l’ Araucaria araucana. Caryologia 21, 386–387. open url image1

Jacobs MD, Gardner RC, Murray BG (2000) Cytological characterization of heterochromatin and rDNA in Pinus radiata and P. taeda. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223, 71–79.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kodama Y, Yoshida MC, Sasaky M (1980) An improved silver staining technique for nucleolus organizer regions by using a nylon cloth. Japanese Journal of Human Genetics 25, 229–233.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Koshoo TN (1961) Chromosome numbers in gymnosperms. Silvae Genetica 10, 1–32. open url image1

Leitch AR, Chase MW, Bennett MD (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 82, 85–94.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leitch AR, Mosgöller W, Shi M, Heslop-Harrison JS (1992) Different patterns of rDNA organization at interphase in nuclei of wheat and rye. Journal of Cell Science 101, 751–757.
PubMed |
open url image1

MacPherson P, Filion WG (1981) Karyotype analysis and the distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in five species of Pinus. Journal of Heredity 72, 193–198. open url image1

Murray B (1998) Nuclear DNA amounts in gymnosperms. Annals of Botany 82, 3–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Murray BG, Friesen N, Heslop-Harrison JS (2002) Molecular cytogenetics analysis of Podocarpus and comparison with other gymnosperm species. Annals of Botany 89, 483–489.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Prokopowich CD, Gregory TR, Crease TJ (2003) The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome 46, 48–50.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Sakowicz T, Olszewska MJ (1997) DNA content, interphase AgNOR-area, number of 3HrDNA hybridization signals and the methylation level in coding rDNA sequence in different organs of Lupinus luteus L. Genetica 99, 67–72. open url image1

Sato S (1985) The structure of the nucleolus organizer regions in root tip meristems of Allium cepa. Caryologia 38, 229–245. open url image1

Schlarbaum SE, Tsuchiya T (1981) Differential reactivity to staining in tree chromosomes. Journal of Heredity 72, 62–63. open url image1

Schwarzacher T, Ambros P, Schweizer D (1980) Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 126, 706–712. open url image1

Schweizer D , Ambros PF (1994) Chromosome banding. In ‘Methods in molecular biology’. (Ed. JR Gosden) pp. 97–113. (Humana Press: Humana, Totowa)

Shibata F, Matsuaki Y, Hizume M (2005) AT-rich sequences containing Arabidopsis-type telomere sequence and their chromosomal distribution in Pinus densiflora. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110, 1253–1258.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tagashira N, Kondo K (1999) A karyotype comparison of nine species of aneuploid Zamia by using the conventional orcein staining and the fluorochrome CMA-DAPI differential staining methods. Cytologia 64, 449–458. open url image1

Tanaka R, Hizume M (1980) C banding treatment for the chromosomes of some gymnosperms. Botanical Magazine 93, 167–170.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1