General Obstetrics and Gynecology Gynecology
Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence,☆☆

Presented at the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the American UroGynecologic Society, San Francisco, Calif, October 6-118, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.379Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the construct validity of two global assessment questions, the Patient Global Impression of Severity and of Improvement, in female patients with stress urinary incontinence. Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that evaluated duloxetine for the treatment of predominant stress urinary incontinence in the United States (n = 1133 patients). Assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement and of Severity question results. Results: Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.36, 0.20, and −0.50 among the Patient Global Impression of Severity question and incontinence episode frequency, stress pad test, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, respectively (all P <.0001). Mean incontinence episode frequency and median stress pad test results increased and mean Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results decreased with increasing Patient Global Impression of Severity question severity levels. Similarly, significant (P <.0001) correlations were observed between the Patient Global Impression of Improvement question response categories and the three independent measures of improvement in stress urinary incontinence (0.49, 0.33, and −0.43 with incontinence episode frequency, stress pad test, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, respectively). As with the Patient Global Impression of Severity question, differences in mean changes for Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire and median percent changes for incontinence episode frequency and stress pad test among the Patient Global Impression of Improvement question response categories were highly significant (P <.0001). These relationships indicate appropriate and significant associations between the Patient Global Impression of Severity and of Improvement questions and the three independent measures of stress urinary incontinence severity and improvement, respectively. Conclusion: The Patient Global Impression of Severity and of Improvement question responses were correlated significantly with incontinence episode frequency, stress pad test, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire measures, which established the construct validity of these two global assessment questions for baseline severity and treatment response, respectively. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98-101.)

Section snippets

Participants

Women with urinary incontinence of at least 3 months duration were enrolled in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. The first trial was a phase II dose finding study (duloxetine 20, 40, and 80 mg/d) that was conducted at 48 study centers in the United States, the details of which have been previously published (n = 553 patients).9 The second study was a phase III study that was conducted in United States (n = 580 patients, 52 study centers) and Canada (n = 103

Results

A total of 1133 women entered the trials in the United States and were assigned randomly to receive duloxetine 20 mg/d (n = 138 women), duloxetine 40 mg/d (n = 137 women), duloxetine 80 mg/d (n = 433 women), or placebo (n = 425 women) therapy. Overall, the mean age was 51.1 ± 9.8 (SD) years, and the mean body mass index was 29.3 ± 6.5 kg/m2. Most of the subjects (91%) were white. None of these characteristics differed significantly among treatment groups. Self-reported ratings of urinary tract

Comment

The data from these combined studies indicate that the PGI-S and PGI-I responses were correlated significantly with incontinence episode frequency, stress pad test, and I-QOL measures, which established the construct validity of the 2 global assessment indexes for baseline severity and for treatment response, respectively, in a population of women in the United States with SUI. The PGI-I and PGI-S were modeled after scales that were described previously and used successfully in

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (706)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by Eli Lilly and Company.

☆☆

Reprint requests: Ilker Yalcin, Eli Lilly and Company Corporate Center, DC 6114, Indianapolis, IN 46285. E-mail: [email protected]

View full text