Skip to main content
Log in

Towards shared space

  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The streets and spaces that constitute the majority of our public realm play an increasingly important role in the economic and social foundations of towns and cities. Simultaneously, public dissatisfaction with the clutter and barriers associated with conventional traffic engineering is growing. There is also growing recognition of the links between health and the quality of the built environment. New approaches to reconciling the relationship between traffic and the public realm represent a significant challenge to long-standing assumptions underpinning the conventional segregation of traffic from civic space associated with established policy and practice. Often labelled ‘shared space’, such schemes raise important questions about risk and safety, the role of government in regulating and controlling behaviour and the conventional professional boundaries of urban designers and traffic engineers. A radical review of the role of government in regulating and controlling street design, combined with decisive changes in the organisational structure and processes employed by highway authorities is implied if the benefits for safety, traffic capacity, health and economic vitality from shared space are to be realised. This paper outlines the background and principles underpinning shared space, and describes some of the significant examples in the UK and mainland Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1995) Risk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (2007) Risk and the demise of children's play, in Thom, B., Sales, R. and Pearce, J. (eds.) Growing up with Risk. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CABE, Institution of Highways and Transportation and English Heritage. (2006) Streets for People: How Highways and Transportation Professionals can Help make Better Places. London: CABE.

  • CABE Space. (2005) What are we Scared of? The Value of Risk in Designing Public Space. London: CABE.

  • CABE Space. (2007) Living with Risk: Promoting Better Public Space Design. London: CABE.

  • CABE Space. (2007) This way to better streets. Ten case studies. London: CABE.

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1996) Review of Traffic Calming Schemes in 20 mph Zones. London: DETR.

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1997) Road Safety Strategy: Current Problems and Future Solutions. London: DETR.

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000) Tomorrow's Roads: Safer for Everyone. London: DETR.

  • Department for Transport. (2005) Home Zones: Challenging the Future of our Streets. London: DfT.

  • Engwicht, D. (1993) Reclaiming our Cities and Towns: Better Living with Less Traffic. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engwicht, D. (1999) Street Reclaiming: Creating Livable Streets and Vibrant Communities. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engwicht, D. (2006) Mental Speed Bumps. Annandale SW: Envirobooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton-Baillie, B. and Jones, P. (2005) Improving traffic behaviour through urban design, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 158: 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2002) The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions order. Statutory Instrument No. 3113, London: HMSO.

  • Ministry of Transport. (1963) Traffic in Towns: A Study of the Long Term Problems of Traffic in Urban Areas. London: HMSO.

  • Pilkington, P. (2000) Reducing the speed limit to 20 mph in urban areas Child deaths and injuries would be decreased, British Medical Journal, April 29; 320 (7243): 1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Dutch Touring Club. (1977) Woonerf. The Hague: RDTC.

  • Shared Space Project. (2005) Shared Space: Room for Everyone: a new vision for public spaces, Fryslân Province, PO Box 20120, 8900 HM Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

  • Shared Space Project. (2008) Shared Space: From Project to Process: a task for everyone, Fryslân Province, PO Box 20120, 8900 HM Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

  • Swinburne, G. (2005) Report on Road Safety in Kensington High Street. London: Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Hamilton-Baillie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton-Baillie, B. Towards shared space. Urban Des Int 13, 130–138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2008.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2008.13

Keywords

Navigation