Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reassessing Chilean international security

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I offer a neorealist interpretation of Chile’s pursuit of security in the Southern Andean Cone in Latin America. I challenge current liberal institutionalist interpretations to shed light on the mounting evidence suggesting Chile’s strong sense of interstate rivalry and competition for power with its regional neighbours. Since the turn of the century, relations with Peru and Bolivia are at a low considering the recent demands in The Hague over territorial bargaining, and, unlike the amicable bilateral relations that have developed recently with long-time rival Argentina, Chile’s interactions with Lima and La Paz reveal the use of purposeful alliances, military deterrence, and diplomatic means to balance each other’s strategic advantages. Against this backdrop, the paper provides with explanatory power to understand Chile’s overall mistrust of Latin America’s rebellious security scenario as it breaks through the theoretical ceiling of current Southern Cone international politics studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdenur, A.E., F. Mattheis, and P. Seabra. 2016. An ocean for the Global South: Brazil and the zone of peace and cooperation in the South Atlantic. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29(3): 1112–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim Neto, O., and A. Malamud. 2015. What determines foreign policy in Latin America? Systemic versus domestic factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008. Latin American Politics and Society 57(4): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avilés, W. 2010. Globalization and military power in the Andes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceño-Ruiz, J., and A.R. Hoffmann. 2015. Post-hegemonic regionalism, UNASUR, and the reconfiguration of regional cooperation in South America. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 40: 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., O.R. Coté, S.M. Lynn-Jones, and S.E. Miller. 2004. Offense, defense, and war. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, S.W. 2008. Consensual hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian foreign policy after the Cold War. International Relations 22(1): 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buszynski, L. 2002. Realism, institutionalism, and Philippine Security. Asian Survey 42(3): 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., C. Jones, and R. Little. 1993. The logic of anarchy: Neorealism to structural realism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, C.T. 2012. Why peace fails. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilean Ministry of Defence. 2010. Libro de la defensa. Retrieved from http://www.defensa.cl/libro-de-la-defensa-nacional-de-chile/libro-de-la-defensa-2010/. Accessed 12 June 2017.

  • Chilean Ministry of Defence. 2016. Ministerios de Defensa de Chile y Argentina acuerdan plan de accion bilateral en Defensa. Retrieved from http://www.defensa.cl/noticias/ministerios-de-defensa-de-chile-y-argentina-acuerdan-plan-de-accion-bilateral-en-defensa/. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Chilean Ministry of Defence. 2017. Cuenta Pública Participativa. Retrieved from http://www.defensa.cl/media/CtaPublica.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2017.

  • Chilean Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2017. Cuenta Pública Participativa. Retrieved from http://chile.gob.cl/files/2017/05/Cuenta-MINISTRO-21.04.2017-correo-para-comentarios.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Chipman, J., and J. Lockhart Smith. 2009. South America: Framing regional security. Survival 51(6): 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., and M. Maass. 2010. Introduction: The foreign policy power of small states. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(3): 381–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, S., and S.M. Walt. 2009. Realism, really? Foreign Policy 175: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. 1986. Distant battles: Modern war in the third world. International Security 10(4): 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daddow, O. 2017. International relations theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, C. 2014. Rivalry and alliance politics in Cold War Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamint, R. 2004. Security Challenges in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research 23(1): 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección General de Relaciones Economicas Internacionales (Direcon). 2017. 20 años del acuerdo Chile Mercosur 1996–2016. Retrieved from https://www.direcon.gob.cl/2017/05/20-anos-del-acuerdo-chile-mercosur/. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Donnelly, J. 2000. Themes in international relations: Realism and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, R.A., and B. Weiffen. 2014. South American re-armament: From balancing to symbolizing power. Contemporary Security Policy 35(1): 138–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Comercio. 2015. Bachelet asisitió a ejercicio militar cerca de frontera con Perú’. Retrieved from http://elcomercio.pe/mundo/actualidad/bachelet-asistio-ejercicio-militar-cerca-frontera-peru-203913. Accessed 20 May 2017.

  • Fukuyama, F. 2015. Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalisation of democracy. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K.P. 2017. China steps into the Latin American void Donald Trump has left behind. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/06/china-steps-into-the-latin-american-void-trump-has-left-behind. Accessed 13 June 2017.

  • Gardini, G.L. 2012. Latin America in the 21st century: Nations, regionalism, globalization. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón, M. 2003. Incomplete democracy: Political democratization in Chile and Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. 2012. Latin American foreign policy analysis: External influences and internal circumstances. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(4): 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibler, D.M., and A. Braithwaite. 2012. Dangerous neighbours, regional territorial conflict and the democratic peace. British Journal of Political Science 43(4): 877–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M.S., and E.E. Goodman. 2016. Reflection on memory and democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanami, A.K. 2003. Perspective on structural realism. New York: Palgrave Macmilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassner, R.E. 2007. The Path to intractability: Time and the entrenchment of territorial disputes. International Security 31(3): 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellinger, D. 2011. Obama and the Bolivarian agenda for the Americas. Latin American Perspectives 38(4): 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, M. 2010. Concepts of security in South America. International Peacekeeping 17(5): 598–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. 1999. Realism, neoliberalism, and cooperation: Understanding the debate. International Security 24(1): 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacowicz, A.M. 1998. Zones of peace in the third world: South America and West Africa in comparative perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. 1985. Structural conflict: The third world against global liberalism. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F., P. Rohrloich, and H. Mahajan. 1985. Peace and disputed sovereignty: Reflections on conflict over territory. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, R. 2008. América Latina: ¿Integración o fragmentación?. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D.A. 2008. The state and international relations. In The Oxford handbook of international relations, ed. C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, A.F., T.J. Piccone, and L. Whitehead. 2009. The Obama administration and the Americas: Agenda for change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, D.R. 1994. Foreign policy in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile: The burden of the hast, the Hope for the future. Latin American Research Review 29(1): 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, D.R. 2001. Violent peace: Militarized interstate bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, D.R. 2011. Exploring the impact of economic cooperation and on political security relations between Argentina and Chile. Retrieved from https://www.stimson.org/sites/default/files/file-attachments/exploring-impact-economic-cooperation-political-security-relations.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Mares, D.R. 2012. Latin America and the illusion of peace. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.B. 2003. From balance of power to balancing behaviour: The long and winding road. In Perspectives on structural realism, ed. A.K. Hanami, 60–82. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2009. Reckless states and realism. International Relations 23(2): 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2010. Structural realism. In International relations theories: Discipline and diversity, ed. T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2011. Realists as idealists. Security Studies 20(3): 424–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales Castillo, R., G. Maldonado, and J.A. Schiavon. 2015. To know or not to know? Realist and liberal theories on foreign affairs and public opinion in Latin America. Latin American Policy 6: 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhindo, M., and G. Calenzo. 2011. Neorealism and international subsystems of small states: Insights from Sub-Saharan African countries’ interactions. Interdisciplinary Political Studies 1: 148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatory of Economic Complexity. 2017 Chile. Retrieved from http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/chl. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Oelsner, A. 2009. Consensus and governance in Mercosur: The evolution of the South American Security agenda. Security Dialogue 40(2): 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent, J.W., and S. Rosato. 2015. Balancing in neorealism. International Security 40(2): 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlo-Freeman, S. 2011. Budgetary priorities in Latin America: Military, health and education spending. Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/insight/SIPRIInsight1102.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2017.

  • Pion-Berlin, D. 2016. Military missions in democratic Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. 2008. A rose by any other name: Neoclassical realism as the logical and necessary extension of structural realism. Security Studies 17(2): 294–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende-Santos, J. 2002. The origins of security cooperation in the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society 44(4): 89–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende-Santos, J. 2007. Neorealism, states, and the modern mass army. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, P., and J. Grugel. 2015. Regional governance and legitimacy in South America: The meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs 91(4): 781–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripsman, N.M., J.W. Taliaferro, and S.E. Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. Perú realiza ejercicios militares cerca de la frontera con Chile. El Mercurio, 25 November 2015.

  • Scott, J.M., and R.G. Carter. 2016. Promoting democracy in Latin America: Foreign policy change and US democracy assistance, 1975–2010. Third World Quarterly 37(2): 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C.M. 2003. Limits to hegemonic influence in the Organization of American States’. Latin American Politics and Society 45(3): 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G.H. 2007. Alliance politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar, C. 2015a. Governance of defense and policymaking in Chile. Latin American Policy 6(2): 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar, C. 2015b. Police bribery: Is corruption fostering dissatisfaction with the political system? Democracy and Security 11(4): 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar, C. 2017. Civil-military relations and human security in a post-dictatorship. Journal of Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1358168. Accessed 12 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J., and S. Strange. 1991. Rival states, rival firms: Competition for world market shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, M.A.G., R. Duarte, and B. Weiffen. 2017. Power dynamics and regional security in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, C. 2014. Neorealist reductionism. Australian Journal of Political Science 49(3): 547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, J.W. 2000. Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited. International Security 25(3): 128–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia Figueroa, C. 2011. Chilean foreign policy in the regional dilemma: The Ecuadorian–Peruvian territorial conflict circa 1910. Historia Critica 43: 156–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telhami, S. 2002. Kenneth Waltz, neorealism, and foreign policy. Security Studies 11(3): 158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A. 2003. Seeing IR differently: Notes from the third world. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32(2): 295–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies, C.G. 2010. State socialization and structural realism. Security Studies 19(4): 689–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toro-Hardy, A. 2004. Is there a future for Latin America? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(1): 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulchin, J.S. 2016. Latin America in international politics: Challenging US hegemony. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugarte Díaz, E.J. 2014. The War of the Pacific as a national reference point and determinant issue of Chilean–Peruvian relations. Sí Somos Americanos 14: 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Ree, G. 2010. Chile’s (inter)national identities: Framing the relations with Bolivia and Peru. Bulletin of Latin American Research 29(2): 208–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Klaveren, A. 2000. Chile’s international integration. In Chile in the nineties, ed. C. Toloza and E. Lahera. Stanford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar Gertner, A. 2014. The Beagle Channel frontier dispute between Argentina and Chile: Converging domestic and international conflicts. International Relations 28(2): 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. 1998. International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy 110: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. 1999. Rigor or rigor mortis? Rational choice and security studies. International Security 23 (4): 5–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. 2013. Revolution and war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1988. The origins of war in neorealist theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4): 615–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1990. Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs 4(1): 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1997. Evaluating theories. American Political Science Review 91(4): 913–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 2000. Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security 25(1): 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiffen, B. 2012. Persistence and change in regional security institutions: Does the OAS still have a project? Contemporary Security Policy 33(2): 360–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, S. 2007. Neorealism, Iranian style. Iranian Studies 40(1): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G. 2015. U.S. and Latin American relations. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W.C. 2008. Realism. In The Oxford handbook of international relations, ed. C. Reus-Smit, and D. Snidal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Latin American Centre, University of Oxford, 1 Church Walk, Oxford, OX2 6LY, UK

    Carlos Solar

Authors
  1. Carlos Solar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Solar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solar, C. Reassessing Chilean international security. Int Polit 56, 569–584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0157-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0157-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation