Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholders’ assessment of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s contributions to the development of National Public Health Institutes in seven countries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) can strengthen countries’ public health capacities to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies. This qualitative evaluation assessed the role of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in NPHI development and strengthening of public health functions. We interviewed NPHI staff (N = 43), non-NPHI government staff (N = 29), and non-governmental organization staff (N = 24) in seven countries where CDC has supported NPHI development: Cambodia, Colombia, Liberia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zambia. Participants identified four areas of support that were the most important: workforce capacity building, technical assistance for key public health functions, identifying institutional gaps and priorities, and funding to support countries’ priorities. Participants underscored the need for capacity building directed toward country-driven priorities during planning and implementation. Continued support for NPHI development from CDC and other partners is vital to building stronger public health systems, improving population health, and strengthening global health security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 20 December 2021

    The ORICD of Mahlet A. Woldetsadik has been omitted

References

  1. IANPHI. Savings lives through NPHIs. 2015. https://ianphi.org/_includes/documents/sections/tools-resources/fs-generaltwopager.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2021.

  2. Binder S, Adigun L, Dusenbury C, Greenspan A, Tanhuanpaa P. National Public Health Institutes: contributing to the public good. J Public Health Policy. 2008;29(1):3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verrecchia R, Dar O, Mohamed-Ahmed O, et al. Building operational public health capacity through collaborative networks of National Public Health Institutes. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloland P, Simone P, Burkholder B, Slutsker L, De Cock KM. The role of public health institutions in global health system strengthening efforts: the US CDC’s perspective. PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koplan JP, Dusenbury C, Jousilahti P, Puska P. The role of national public health institutes in health infrastructure development. BMJ. 2007;335(7625):834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. WHO benchmarks for international health regulations (I.H.R.) capacities. 2019. https://www.who.int/ihr/publications/9789241515429/en/. Accessed 29 January 2021.

  7. Adigun L, Dusenbury C, Schoub BD. Public health in Africa-the role of national public health institutes. S Afr Med J. 2007;97(11):1036–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Global Health Strategy: 2019–2021. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/strategy/pdf/CDC-Global-Strategy_01.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2021.

  9. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s National Public Health Institute Program. 2020.

  10. Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. 2012. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018.

  11. Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh H-F. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry, vol. 75. New York: SAGE; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. New York: SAGE; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. New York: SAGE; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global Health Protection. The Staged Development Tool. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/nphi/sdt/index.html. Accessed 05 May 2021.

  18. NPHIL. National Public Health Institute of Liberia. 2019. https://nationalphil.org/. Accessed 29 January 2021.

  19. NIPH. Cambodia National Institute of Public Health. 2019. https://niph.org/kh/niph/home/index.html. Accessed 29 January 2021.

  20. Mukonka DV. Zambia: a regional leader in NPHI development and emergency management. 2018. https://blogs.cdc.gov/global/2018/08/17/zambia-a-regional-leader-in-nphi/. Accessed 29 January 2021.

  21. INS. Instuto Nacional De Sause Mocambique. 2018. https://www.ins.gov.mz/index.php. Accessed 29 January 2021.

  22. Njidda AM, Oyebanji O, Obasanya J, Ojo O, Adedeji A, Mba N, Oladejo J, Ihekweazu C. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2):e000712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barzilay EJ, Vandi H, Binder S, Udo I, Ospina ML, Ihekweazu C, Bratton S. Use of the staged development tool for assessing, planning, and measuring progress in the development of national public health institutes. Health Secur. 2018;16(S1):S18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frieden TR, Koplan JP. Stronger national public health institutes for global health. Lancet. 2010;376(9754):1721–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Natalie Brown and Basia Tomczyk for protocol review, Camila Florez, Dilia Ballen, and Kanha Sar for interpretation services in Colombia and Cambodia, Martha Knuth for assistance with literature reviews, and CDC country offices and NPHIs in the seven countries for logistical support and recruitment of participants. We also thank Malikah Waajid and the Division of Global Health Protection’s Science Office in the Center for Global Health at CDC for reviewing and providing constructive feedback on various drafts of this manuscript. Lastly, we greatly appreciate all the participants who agreed to be interviewed and shared their perspectives. This publication was supported in part by RTI International Contract Number # 200-2017-F-96261, funded by the US CDC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahlet A. Woldetsadik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the US Department of Health and Human Services or RTI International.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woldetsadik, M.A., Fitzpatrick, K., Del Castillo, L. et al. Stakeholders’ assessment of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s contributions to the development of National Public Health Institutes in seven countries. J Public Health Pol 42, 589–601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-021-00310-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-021-00310-0

Keywords

Navigation