Skip to main content
Log in

Not your fault, but your responsibility: worsened consumer sentiment on work-from-home products

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marketing Analytics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyses the evolution of people’s sentiment towards Work from Home (WFH)-related products during the pandemic, using user-generated content from social media platform X on responses for the largest US online furniture stores. We find that people interacted more about WFH products during the Covid-19 lockdowns, but sentiment towards WFH products worsened. For some online furniture stores, Covid-19 restrictions may explain the changes in sentiment, but firms’ idiosyncrasies also play a role. The methodology of this study allows companies to assess the impact of external effects on customers’ sentiments, allowing them to identify specific problems and to connect more naturally with their customers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Developed by the author

Fig. 3

Source: Data consolidated by the author and eCommerceDB (2022)

Fig. 4

Source: Developed by the author

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is available upon request.

Notes

  1. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-16/amazon-is-working-on-furniture-assembly-service-to-catch-wayfair.

  2. While incorporating data from additional platforms might enrich our insights, Twitter’s specific constraints and features create an ideal environment for our analysis for two reasons. First, Twitter’s text-centric nature, unlike Instagram and Facebook, enhances our text analysis algorithm’s ability to interpret the messages. Second, the brevity enforced by Twitter’s character limit streamlines our algorithmic analysis.

  3. It is worth mentioning that “work from home” and “home office” returned more than 10,000 tweets but were removed from the database because they are not directly related to products. In addition, we removed the duplicate tweets from the keywords that contained the word “desk” to avoid biasing the results. We acknowledge that this decision may potentially increase the dominance of popular terms, but it ensures a robust and continuous dataset, reducing the potential for temporal outliers in our sample.

  4. The decision to focus on these specific references was aimed at enhancing the precision of our analysis. By doing so, we avoid including generic furniture discussions and conversations about items unrelated to WFH scenarios.

  5. See, for example, Zhang et al. (2011) for a more detailed description of these algorithms.

  6. In this database, both models (SVM and MNB) have an accuracy of around 80%, indicating good predictive performance.

  7. This coefficient is comparing the sentiment towards each top-4 online store against the average sentiment towards the other 16 online stores.

References

  • Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., and Passonneau, R. (eds.) (2011) Sentiment analysis of twitter data. Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media 2011; 30–38

  • Aggarwal, S., S. Nawn, and A. Dugar. 2021. What caused global stock market meltdown during the COVID pandemic–Lockdown stringency or investor panic? Finance Research Letters 38: 101827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akana, T. 2021. Changing US consumer payment habits during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Payments Strategy and Systems 15 (3): 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, M., and V. Kansal. 2019. Character level embedding with deep convolutional neural network for text normalization of unstructured data for Twitter sentiment analysis. Social Network Analysis and Mining 9: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, A., H. Akram, M. Basit, A. Khan, S. Mahwish, R. Naqvi, and M. Bilal. 2020. E-commerce trends during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking 13 (2): 1449–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broniatowski, D.A., A.M. Jamison, S. Qi, L. AlKulaib, T. Chen, A. Benton, et al. 2018. Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health 108 (10): 1378–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.K., D. Riantama, and L.S. Chen. 2021. Using a text mining approach to hear voices of customers from social media toward the fast-food restaurant industry. Sustainability 13 (1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, A.D., and S. Tripathi. 2020. Analysing the sentiments towards work-from-home experience during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation Management 8 (1): 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eCommerceDB. (2022). E-commerce revenue analytics: https://ecommercedb.com/. Accessed 18 May 2022.

  • Estelami, H. 1999. The profit impact of consumer complaint solicitation across market conditions. Journal of Professional Services Marketing 20 (1): 165–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Go, A., Bhayani, R., and Huang, L. (2009) Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, pp. 1–12. Stanford University.

  • Guyon, I., S. Gunn, M. Nikravesh, and L.A. Zadeh. 2006. Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications, 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • He, W., F.-K. Wang, and V. Akula. 2017. Managing extracted knowledge from big social media data for business decision making. Journal of Knowledge Management 21 (2): 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N.F., X. Wang, and H. Bourne. 2017. Exploring the effect of user engagement in online brand communities: Evidence from Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior 72: 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B.J., M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2169–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., B.P.I. Chang, H. Hristov, I. Pravst, A. Profeta, and J. Millard. 2021. Changes in food consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of consumer survey data from the first lockdown period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia. Frontiers in Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.635859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, S. 2021. Analyzing restaurant customers’ evolution of dining patterns and satisfaction during COVID-19 for sustainable business insights. Sustainability 13 (9): 4981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H.-S., H.-H. Yoon, and M.-K. Song. 2021. A study on dining-out trends using big data: Focusing on changes since COVID-19. Sustainability 13 (20): 11480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, K., K. Tamilmani, N. Rana, P. Patil, Y. Dwivedi, and S. Nerur. 2018. Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers 20: 531–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., Y. Sung, and H. Kang. 2014. Brand followers’ retweeting behavior on Twitter: How brand relationships influence brand electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior 37: 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., W.-C. Choo, and C.-C. Lee. 2020. The response of the stock market to the announcement of global pandemic. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56 (15): 3562–3577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mościcka, P., N. Chróst, R. Terlikowski, M. Przylipiak, K. Wołosik, and A. Przylipiak. 2020. Hygienic and cosmetic care habits in polish women during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 19 (8): 1840–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, O., R. Feldman, J. Goldenberg, and M. Fresko. 2012. Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Science 31 (3): 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, J. 2003. Using TF-IDF to determine word relevance in document queries. Proceedings of the First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning 242 (1): 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, S., Sood, S., and Verma, V. (2019) Twitter sentiment analysis of real-time customer experience feedback for predicting growth of Indian telecom companies. Proceedings—4th International Conference on Computing Sciences, ICCS 2018: 166–174.

  • Ravi, K., and V. Ravi. 2015. A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems 89: 14–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Ortiz-Ospina, E., et al. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) from our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-stringency-index. Accessed 1 July 2022.

  • Sheth, J. 2020. Impact of Covid-19 on consumer behavior: Will the old habits return or die? Journal of Business Research 117: 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirdastian, H., M. Laroche, and M.-O. Richard. 2019. Using big data analytics to study brand authenticity sentiments: The case of Starbucks on Twitter. International Journal of Information Management 48: 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T., and Choi, S.-K. (2013) Extracting consumer preference from user-generated content sources using classification. ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Vol 3A: 39th Design Automation Conference. Portland: ASME.

  • Teng, S., K.W. Khong, A. Chong, and B. Lin. 2016. Persuasive electronic word-of-mouth messages in social media. Journal of Computer Information Systems 57: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle-Cruz, D., V. Fernandez-Cortez, A. López-Chau, and R. Sandoval-Almazán. 2022. Does Twitter affect stock market decisions? financial sentiment analysis during pandemics: a comparative study of the H1N1 and the COVID-19 periods. Cognitive Computation 14 (1): 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viglia, G., R. Minazzi, and D. Buhalis. 2016. The influence of e-word-of-mouth on hotel occupancy rate. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28: 2035–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., T. Yoshida, and X. Tang. 2011. A comparative study of TF*IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3): 2758–2765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Filipe Grilo acknowledges that his research has been financed by Portuguese public funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the framework of the project UIDB/04105/2020.

Funding

This work is supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant No. UIDB/04105/2020) to Filipe Grilo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe Grilo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cintra, G., Grilo, F. Not your fault, but your responsibility: worsened consumer sentiment on work-from-home products. J Market Anal (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00315-0

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00315-0

Keywords

Navigation