Skip to main content
Log in

Place branding through public management lenses: supplementing the participatory agenda

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local participation and support are integral to any successful place branding exercise. However, this is easier said than done. The tools for cultivating support from local players in place branding are quite limited. To expand on participation as a conceptual framework, this paper explores the application of public management lenses to place branding. The public management domain offers insights and a toolbox for place branding scholarship and practice. By examining Tasmania’s “Go Behind the Scenery” branding strategy, this study explores the various and complex processes of mobilizing local support for the brand. Our main findings concern the complex processes of brand knowledge dissemination, negotiation, persuasion (and, at times, coercion) in the branding exercise, to align perimeters of value creation, stakeholder interests, and operational capacity. We eventually draw three lessons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Traditional public management has been characterized as the most ethical in terms of addressing public value and common good, but has shortcomings in terms of its inefficient and complex procedures that are administratively and operationally unfeasible; and its inability to take irrational aspects of public value into account (Shafritz, Russell, and Borick 2016; Peters and Pierre 1998). New public management, it is argued, cannot assert contribution to public value and common good due to its neo-liberal orientation and lack of democratic legitimacy and accountability around determined goals (Gromark and Melin 2013; Dunleavy and Hood 1994). Finally, while the achievement of public value is at the core of public value management, this paradigm faces some challenges around legitimacy and dependency in networks (e.g., strong players’ ability to push demands), as well as the challenges of finding reasonable and feasibly solutions through deliberation (McGuire and Agranoff 2011; Meier and O'Toole Jr 2009).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberte Tøttenborg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tøttenborg, A., Ooi, CS. & Hardy, A. Place branding through public management lenses: supplementing the participatory agenda. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 114–127 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00252-0

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00252-0

Keywords

Navigation