Abstract
This paper traces the ‘securitization’ of US foreign economic policy since the advent of the Bush administration.1 It argues that in the context of US economic and military preponderance in the world order, the US has been unable to resist the temptation to link foreign economic and security policy. While there was evidence of the securitization of economic globalization in US policy from day one of the Bush administration, it was 9/11 that firmed up this trend. For the key members of the Bush foreign policy team, globalization is now seen not simply in neo-liberal economic terms, but also through the lenses of the national security agenda of the United States. Economic globalization is now not only a benefit, but also a ‘security problem’. 9/11 offered the opportunity for what we might call the ‘unilateralist–idealists’, in the Bush Administration, to set in train their project for a post-sovereign approach to American foreign policy. The paper identifies some intellectual contradictions in current US strategy and raises a series of questions about the implications for world order of the consolidation of the trends identified in the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Higgott, R. US Foreign Policy and the ‘Securitization’ of Economic Globalization. Int Polit 41, 147–175 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800073
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800073