Abstract
Both in the Netherlands and Flanders, the lack of efficiency in the supply of programmes in the university sectors was considered a policy problem in the late 1980s and beginning of the 1990s. This article explores how the institutional context of the university sector (including the governmental steering model and the conflicting interests regarding the programme supply) played a role in the responses regarding the programme supply of four universities in the two higher education systems. The cases show that the institutional context provided mixed incentives, leading to both predictable and unpredictable responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Advanced academic courses (third cycle courses) are courses following after the basic academic courses and are designed to broaden the knowledge gained from a basic academic course (complementary courses) or orientated towards specialization in a given area of study (specialist courses). In general they take 1 year of study.
Each basic course is split into one or two cycles, each comprising 2–4 years of study, depending on the subject.
References
Dillemans, R. (1999) Optimalisering Universitair Aanbod in Vlaanderen. Derde rapport voor de Minister van Onderwijs, Brussel: Departement Onderwijs.
Gornitzka, Å. (1999) ‘Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education’, Higher Education 38: 5–31.
Gornitzka, Å., Huisman, J., Heffen, O., Klemperer, A., Maassen, P., van de Maat, L. and Vossensteyn, H. (1999) State Steering Models with Respect to Western European Higher Education, Enschede: CHEPS.
Heffen, O., van, J.C., Verhoeven, K. and De Wit (1999) ‘Higher Education Policies and Institutional Response in Flanders: Instrumental Analysis and Cultural Theory’, in B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen and G. Neave (eds.) From the Eye of the Storm. Higher Education's Changing Institution, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 263–294.
Huisman, J. (1995) Differentiation, Diversity and Dependency in Higher Education, Utrecht: Lemma.
Jenniskens, I. (1997) Governmental Steering and Curriculum Innovations. A Comparative Study of the Relation between Governmental Steering Instruments and Innovations in Higher Education Curricula, Utrecht: Lemma.
Lijphart, A. (1968) The Politics of Accomodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley: University of California Press.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions, New York: The Free Press.
Olsen, J.P. (1988) ‘Administrative Reform and Theories of Organization’, in C. Campbell and B.G. Peters (eds.) Organizing Governance, Governing Organizations, Pittsburgh: University of Pitssburgh Press.
Scott, W.R. (1995) Institutions and Organisations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Vanderpoorten, M. (1999) Beleidsnota: Onderwijs en Vorming. 2000–2004, Brussel.
Verhoeven, J.C. (1982) ‘Belgium: Linguistic Communalism, Bureaucratisation and Democratisation’, in H. Daalder and E. Shils (eds.) Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–171.
van den Bossche, L. (1998) Optimalisatie universitair aanbod in Vlaanderen, Besluitvorming n.a.v. de besprekingen met de rectoren en minister L. Van Den Bossche van het eerste voortgangsrapport van ere-rector Dillemans, Brussel: Departement Onderwijs.
Van Vught, F.A. (ed.) (1989) Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education, London: Jessica Kingsley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huisman, J., Verhoeven, J. & De Wit, K. Change in Study Programmes: The Low Countries. High Educ Policy 17, 269–285 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300055
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300055