Skip to main content
Log in

What kind of person is the state? The pilgrim as a processual metaphor beyond the Leviathan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the debates on metaphors in IR and on the debate about Wendt’s claim that ‘States are persons, too’ (1999/2004), this paper discusses what kind of person we can imagine when we talk about states and other actors of world politics. Following approaches like Jackson’s (2004) suggestion of ‘personation’, Kustermans’ (2011) argument for states as citizens, Luoma-aho’s (2009, 2012) critique of the political theology of the divine state, and Drulak’s (2006) take on the metaphors of motion in the EU discourse, the paper draws on religious semantics to introduce the pilgrim as a new processual metaphor for actors. The metaphor of the homo viator is brought into the debates of constructivism to qualify the homo sociologicus for Aristotelian constructivism in contrast to the legacy of the homo economicus and the Leviathan. The EU serves as a test of the analytical validity of the pilgrimage metaphor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Emanuel and Vincent Pouliot, eds. (2011) International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict (1983/2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah (1959) The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, Jens (2009) Visions of World Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, Francis A. and Christ'l De Landtsheer, eds. (2004) Metaphorical World Politics, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., ed. (1999) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Washington: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans (2010) Paradigms for a Metaphorology, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, Charlotte and John Vogler (2001) The European Union as a Global Actor, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Chris (2002) Sovereignty, Rights, and Justice: International Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, Timothy A. and Peter J. Katzenstein, eds. (2006) Religion in an Expanding Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Call, Charles T. (2011) ‘Beyond the “Failed State”: Toward Conceptual Alternatives’, European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1939/1964) The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, Terrell and Jernej Pikalo, eds. (2008) Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cienki, Alan (2012) ‘Bringing Concepts from Cognitive Linguistics into the Analysis of Policies and the Political’, Journal of International Relations and Development 16(2): 294–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cienki, Alan and Dvora Yanow (2012) ‘Why Metaphor and Other Tropes: Linguistic Approaches to Analysing Policies and the Political’, Journal of International Relations and Development 16(2): 167–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Simon and John Elsner (1995) Pilgrimage Past and Present in the World Religions, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, William E. (1999) Why I Am Not a Secularist, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and its Critics, 204–54, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen, ed. (2003) Contractarianism/Contractualism, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Baecque, Antoine (1997) The Body Politic: Corporeal Metaphor in Revolutionary France, 1770–1800, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Maribel (2005) Wandering Monks, Virgins, and Pilgrims. Ascetic Travel in the Mediterranean World, A.D. 300–800, University Park, PN: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drulák, Petr (2006) ‘Motion, Container and Equilibrium: Metaphors in the Discourse About European Integration’, European Journal of International Relations 12(4): 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drulák, Petr (2008) ‘Identifying and Assessing Metaphors: Discourse on EU Reform’, in Terrell Carver and Jernej Pikalo eds, Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, 105–18, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade, John and Michael Sallnow, ed. (1991) Contesting the Sacred. The Anthropology of Christian Pilgrimage, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, Toni (2003) Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations, New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, Karin M. (1998) Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John (2007) Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals, New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. (1975) The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2003) The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2006a) ‘Pre-political Foundations of the Democratic Constitutional State?’ in Jürgen Habermas, Joseph Ratzinger and Florian Schuller eds, The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion, 19–52, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2006b) ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy 14(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2007) ‘Replik’, in Rudolf Langthaler and Herta Nagl-Docekal eds, Glauben und Wissen: Ein Symposium mit Jürgen Habermas, 366–414, Vienna: Oldenbourg/Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, Aidan (2007) ‘The Myth of the Failed State and the War on Terror: A Challenge to the Conventional Wisdom’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1(3): 307–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, Simon (1999) The Political System of the European Union, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, Miles (2010) The Pilgrim City: St Augustine of Hippo and his Innovation in Political Thought, London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, Rainer (2006) ‘Imagine the EU: The Metaphorical Construction of a Supra-Nationalist Identity’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9(4): 396–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus (2001) ‘The Governance Approach to European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 245–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2004a) ‘Forum Introduction: Is the State a Person? Why Should We Care?’ Review of International Studies 30(2): 255–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2004b) ‘Hegel’s House or People are States, too’, Review of International Studies 30(2): 281–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, David (1986) The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, Ernst H. (1957) The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. ed. (1986) Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate and Berthold Rittberger (2006) ‘Review Article: The “Governance Turn” in EU Studies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1): 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornprobst, Markus, Vincent Pouliot, Nisha Shah and Ruben Zarotti, eds (2007) Metaphors of Globalization, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2001) ‘Constructivism as an Approach to Interdisciplinary Study’, in Karin Fierke and Knud Erik Jørgensen eds, Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, 13–35, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2005) ‘Religion and (Inter-)National Politics. On the Heuristics of Identities, Structures, and Agents’, Alternatives 30(2): 113–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2006) ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy?’ in Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander eds, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics, 21–47, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2013) ‘Politics, Law, and the Sacred: A Conceptual Analysis’, Journal of International Relations and Development 16(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. and John Gerard Ruggie (1986) ‘The State of the Art, or the Art of the State’, International Organization 40(2): 753–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki, Milja (2008) Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kustermans, Jorg (2011) ‘The State as Citizen: State Personhood and Ideology’, Journal of International Relation and Development 14(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laustsen, Carsten B. and Ole Wæver (2000) ‘In Defence of Religion: Sacred Referent Objects for Securitization’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(3): 705–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Samuel R. (1982) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor’, Philosophy & Rhetoric 15(1): 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Richard (2007) The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, Mika (2002) ‘Body of Europe and Malignant Nationalism: A Pathology of the Balkans in European Security Discourse’, Geopolitics 7(3): 117–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, Mika (2004) ‘Arm versus Pillar: The Politics of Metaphors of the Western European Union at the 1990–91 Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(1): 106–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, Mika (2009) ‘Political Theology, Anthropomorphism, and Person-hood of the State: The Religion of IR’, International Political Sociology 3(3): 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, Mika (2012) God and International Relations: Christian Theology and World Politics, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, Crawford B. (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Michael P. (2004) The Prison as Metaphor: Re-Imagining International Relations, Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Michael P. (2011) Metaphors in International Relations Theory, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli, Luca and Fabio Petito (2012) ‘The Postsecular in International Relations: An Overview’, Review of International Studies 38(5): 931–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, Mark (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (2004) ‘Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State’, Review of International Studies 30(2): 259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas G. (2001) ‘The Politics of Constructivism’, in Karin Fierke and Knud Erik Jørgensen eds, Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, 236–54, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas G (2009) ‘Friendship and Hospitality: Some Conceptual Preliminaries’, Journal of International Political Theory 5(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas G. (2010) ‘Polemics: Fitting Metaphors. The Case of the European Union’, Perspectives: Review of International Affairs 18(1): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas G. (2013) Making Sense, Making World: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Craig (2003) A Certain Idea of Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazos, Antón M. (2012a) ‘Introduction’, in Antón M. Pazos ed, Pilgrims and Politics: Rediscovering the Power of the Pilgrimage, 1–8, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazos, Antón M. (2012b) ‘Old and New Pilgrimages in the Context of the Spanish Civil War’, in Antón M. Pazos ed, Pilgrims and Politics: Rediscovering the Power of the Pilgrimage, 151–60, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, Jo-Anne (2001) Global Metaphors: Modernity and the Quest for One World, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Eric (1996) ‘On the Ontological Status of the State’, European Journal of International Relations 2(4): 439–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2007) Why Europe Was First: Social Change and Economic Growth in Europe and East Asia, 1500–2050, London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2008) ‘Metaphors of Social Order’, in Terrell Carver and Jernej Pikalo eds, Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, 57–68, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John G. (1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization, London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin (1996) Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steve (2000) ‘Wendt’s World’, Review of International Studies 26(1): 151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, Robert and Reinhard Löw (1981) Die Frage Wozu? Geschichte und Wiederentdeckung des teleologischen Denkens, München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatos, William H. and Luigi Tomasi, eds. (2002) From Medieval Pilgrimage to Religious Tourism. The Social and cultural Economics of Piety, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Scott M. (2010) ‘Living Critically and “Living Faithfully” in a Global Age: Justice, Emancipation and the Political Theology of International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(2): 505–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasi, Luigi (2002) ‘Homo Viator: From Pilgrimage to Religious Tourism via the Journey’, in William H. Swatos and Luigi Tomasi eds, From Medieval Pilgrimage to Religious Tourism. The Social and Cultural Economics of Piety, 1–24, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, Adriel M. (2013) Aristotle on the Nature of Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor (1974) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor and Edith L. B. Turner (1978) Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture: Anthropological Perspectives, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, R. J. (1986) Human Rights and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William (1983) ‘Less than a Federation, More than a Regime: The Community as a Political System’, in Helen Wallace, Mark A. Pollack and Alasdair R. Young eds, Policy Making in the European Community, 403–36, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2007) ‘A Christian Europe? Europe and Christianity: Rules of Commitment’, European View 6(1): 143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it’, International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (2003) ‘Why a World State is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (2004) ‘The State as Person in International Theory’, Review of International Studies 30(2): 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Colin (2006) Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K. (2011) After Secularism: Rethinking Religion in Global Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehfuss, Maja (2001) ‘Constructivisms in International Relations: Wendt, Onuf, and Kratochwil’, in Karin Fierke and Knud Erik Jørgensen eds, Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, 54–75, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Barbato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbato, M. What kind of person is the state? The pilgrim as a processual metaphor beyond the Leviathan. J Int Relat Dev 19, 558–582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.25

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.25

Keywords

Navigation