Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Purpose of the Ph.D. — A South African Perspective

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article sets out to explore how Ph.D. programme leaders in South Africa view the purpose of the Ph.D., and how their views shape their responses to recent policies with regard to the Ph.D. It refers in particular to the vision of the Department of Science and Technology for a five-fold increase in the number of Ph.D. graduates by 2018, and to the drive to achieve racial and gender equity as part of the transition to democracy. The article is based on interviews with leaders of 16 doctoral programmes in nine top Ph.D.-awarding South African universities, representing a range of disciplines. The data indicate that there is a strong predisposition among Ph.D. programme leaders to perceive the doctorate largely as an academic pursuit. At the same time, some tentative changes are being seen ‘on the ground’ in response to the needs of industry and business, to the various policies, and to a diverse student cohort. It seems that the Ph.D. attempts to serve several purposes within the single structure provided by the Higher Education Qualification Framework, sometimes in tense associations. Going forward, the article discusses two policy options available to South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The study was sponsored by the Academy of Science in South Africa (ASSAf).

  2. On the basis of unpublished interviews with major industries, international and local foundations, government departments and embassies that were conducted in the 2009 ASSAf Panel on the Ph.D.

References

  • ASSAf. (2010) ‘The Ph.D. study: An evidence-based study on how to meet the demands for high level skills in an emerging economy’, Consensus report, Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa.

  • Backhouse, J.P. (2009) ‘Doctoral education in South Africa: Models, pedagogies and student experiences’, Ph.D. thesis, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand.

  • Barnett, R. (2000) ‘University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity’, Higher Education 40: 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastalich, W. (2010) ‘Knowledge economy and research innovation’, Studies in Higher Education 35 (7): 845–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitusikova, A. (2009) ‘New Challenges in Doctoral Education in Europe’, in D. Boud and A. Lee (eds.) Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 200–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. and Lee, A. (eds). (2009) Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. and Tennant, M. (2006) ‘Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practice’, Higher Education Research and Development 25 (3): 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CREST. (2009) ‘Doctoral students in South Africa: A statistical profile based on HEMIS data’, A report commissioned by the ASSAf Panel on the Ph.D. Stellenbosch University: Centre for Research in Science and Technology (CREST).

  • Department of Basic Education. (2010) Education Statistics in South Africa, 2009, Pretoria: DBE.

  • Department of Education. (1997) Education White Paper 3. A Programme for the Transformation of Higher Education, Pretoria: DoE.

  • Department of Education. (2007) Higher Education Qualification Framework (HEQF), Pretoria: DoE.

  • Enders, J. (2004) ‘Research training and careers in transition: A European perspective on the many faces of the PhD’, Studies in Continuing Education 26 (3): 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limogenes, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scot, P. and Trow, M. (2004) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Sciences and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C.M. and Walker, G.E. (2006) Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline, Carnegie Essays on the Doctorate, 1st edn, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. and Powell, S. (2005) Doctoral Study in Contemporary Higher Education, Maidenhead and New York: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, K. (2008) ‘The research training mission of the university: Challenges to traditional systems of doctoral education’, Higher Education Forum 5: 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, C. and Yu, K. (2009) Survey of Doctoral Students in South African Universities, Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, I. and Naidoo, R. (2007) ‘University positioning and changing patterns of doctoral study: The case of the University of Bath’, European Journal of Education 42 (3): 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J.D., Bandi, N., Chalufu, S., Lethoko, M., Sehoole, C. and Soobrayan, V. (2002) Mergers in Higher Education, Lessons Learned in Transitional Contexts, Pretoria: University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. and Murray, R. (2004) ‘New routes to the PhD: Cause for concern?’ Higher Education Quarterly 58 (1): 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B.M. (2007) ‘Quo vadis doctoral education? New European approaches in the context of global changes’, European Journal of Education 42 (3): 308–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, G. (2002) ‘The crisis in doctoral education: A sociological analysis’, Higher Education Research and Development 21 (2): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Brennan, M. and Green, B. (2009) ‘Re-imagining doctoral education: Professional doctorates and beyond’, Higher Education Research and Development 28 (3): 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malfroy, J. and Yates, L. (2003) ‘Knowledge in action: Doctoral programmes forging new identities’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25 (2): 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Foundation (NRF). (2007) Institutional Research Development Programme, IRDP (Programme Framework 2007–2011), Pretoria: NRF.

  • Neumann, R. (2005) ‘Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2009) ‘Policy Driving Change in Doctoral Education’, in D. Boud and A. Lee (eds.) Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2005) ‘New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2007) ‘Redefining the doctorate’, Discussion Paper, Higher Education Academy, http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/research/redefining_the_doctorate.pdf, (accessed 12 May 2011).

  • Scott, D., Brown, A., Lunt, I. and Thorne, L. (2004) Professional Doctorates — Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servage, L. (2009) ‘Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand?’ Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997) Academic Capitalism, Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M. (2004) ‘Doctoring the knowledge worker’, Studies in Continuing Education 26 (3): 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R. (2002) ‘A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy’, Higher Education Research and Development 21 (2): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C. (2008) ‘The knowledge economy, skills and government labour market intervention’, Policy Studies 29 (1): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education Management and Policy Studies, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa

    Chaya Herman

Authors
  1. Chaya Herman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herman, C. The Purpose of the Ph.D. — A South African Perspective. High Educ Policy 25, 1–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.14

Keywords

Search

Navigation