Skip to main content
Log in

Russia as a Recruited Development Donor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russia is often included in discussions of emerging donors, but it is an anomalous case whose actual development policies and practices have received little substantive analysis. This article examines internal and external processes that have influenced Russia’s evolving approach to international development assistance in the past decade. I argue that Russia is less an emerging donor than a recruited one, targeted in a concerted effort of capacity-building and consulting by several global agencies. However, while this effort attempted to encompass ‘Russia’ as a unitary entity, it has had differential effects among the great variety of Russian actors from different government ministries who participated in the programmes. The article traces the recent historical development of Russia’s donorship in the context of these capacity-building programmes, focusing in particular on tensions between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the fitful attempts to create a dedicated Russian aid agency.

Abstract

La Russie est souvent incluse dans la discussion sur pays donateurs émergents, mais il s’agit d’un cas unique chez qui les politiques et pratiques de développement ont reçu bien peu d’analyse substantive. Cet article examine les procès internes et externes qui ont influencé l’approche évoluant de la Russie comme donneur d’assistance international de développement. On argumente que la Russie n’est pas vraiment un pays donateur émergent, il est plutôt un pays qui a été recruté a cette pratique, ciblé par plusieurs agences globales de façon coordonnée, pour lui offrir du conseil et construire sa capacité dans ce domaine. Cependant, tandis que ces efforts ont ciblé la « Russie » comme une entité unitaire, ils ont eu des effets très différents parmi la grande variété d’acteurs russes apparentent aux différents ministères qui participent aux programmes. L’article trace l’évolution historique récente de la Russie comme agent donateur dans le contexte de ses programmes de construction de capacité, SE concentrant en particulier sur les tensions entre le Ministère des Finances et le Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, et les tentatives intermittentes de créer une organisation humanitaire Russe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Russian-Ethiopian relations’, document on the website of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 17 October 2011, www.mid.ru/bdomp/ns-rafr.nsf/89414576079db559432569d8002421fc/2a113be3c3e58c03c3256fb0002a7470!OpenDocument, accessed 25 April 2014.

  2. The concept of ‘transition’ has by now been thoroughly critiqued for being naively teleological and misleading (see Carothers, 2002; Buyandelgeriyn, 2008).

  3. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 14 августа 1992 г. N 889 ‘О Российском Агентстве Международного Сотрудничества и Развития’ (Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 14 August 1992, No. 889 ‘On the Russian Agency for International Cooperation and Development’); Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 21 июля 1994 г. N 1534 ‘О признании частично утратившим силу пункта 3 указа Президента Российской Федерации от 14 августа 1992 г. N 889 “О Российском Агентстве Международного Сотрудничества и Развития” ’ ’ (Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 21 July 1994 No. 1534 ‘On recognizing the partial invalidation of point 3 of the decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 14 August 1992 No. 889 “On the Russian Agency for International Cooperation and Development” ’).

  4. An English translation of the ‘Concept’ is available at the URL: www.minfin.ru/common/img/uploaded/library/2007/06/concept_eng.pdf, accessed 25 April 2014.

  5. The Ministries of Economic Development, Education and Science, and Health have also played a role.

  6. The original page was last accessed November 2009 at the URL www.dfid.gov.uk/where-we-work/europe/russian-federation/; the page is no longer available, and that URL redirects to www.gov.uk/government/world/Russia, accessed 25 April 2014.

  7. Russia Cares: the First Session of World Bank – DFID Program Advisory Council ‘Russia as a Donor Initiative (RDI)’. http://go.worldbank.org/O3TNN7YRR0. The pages of the ‘Russia as a Donor Initiative’ are no longer visible on the World Bank’s main website; this URL redirects to www.worldbank.org/en/country/Russia, accessed 25 April 2014.

  8. The results of the survey were not released publicly until April 2011.

  9. ‘The Russian Federation ODA National Report’, Russian Ministry of Finance website. www.minfin.ru/common/img/uploaded/library/2012/05/PresentationEng2012-0.pdf, accessed 25 April 2014.

  10. ‘DAC data submitters: data portals and other aid statistics resources’, OECD website, www.oecd.org/dac/stats/dataportals.htm, accessed 25 April 2014.

  11. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 6 сентября 2008 г. N 1315 ‘О некоторых вопросах государственного управления в области международного сотруд (Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 6 September 2008, No. 1315 ‘On some questions of state administration in the sphere of international cooperation’).

  12. ‘UNDP experts shared their experience in international development assistance with Russian government agencies’, www.undp.ru/index.php?iso=ru&lid=1&cmd=news&id=586, accessed 25 April 2014.

  13. ‘Минфин РФ внес в правительство пакет документов о создании Агентства международного развития [ MinFin RF handed over to the administration a packet of documents on the creation of an Agency for international development]’. Press release of 16 May 2012 on the Ministry of Finance website, www1.minfin.ru/ru/press/speech/index.php?id_4=16351, accessed 25 April 2014.

  14. ‘Источник: Агентство международного развития, скорее всего, не будет создано [Source: Agency for international development probably won’t be established]’, Gazeta.ru, 21 June 2012, www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2012/06/21/n_2400853.shtml, accessed 25 April 2014.

  15. ‘Лавров предлагает расширить полномочия Россотрудничества [Lavrov proposes to broaden the authority of Rossotrudnichestvo]’, РИА Новости, 3 September 2012, http://ria.ru/politics/20120903/741828152.html, accessed 25 April 2014.

  16. UNDP Programme in Europe and Central Asia, ‘Emerging Donors Initiative Revisited – Stock Taking and Next Steps’, p. 3. http://europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/File/Workshop_final_report(1).doc, accessed 25 April 2014.

  17. ‘Cовещание руководителей представительств Россотрудничества за рубежом [Gathering of heads of offices of Rossotrudnichestvo abroad]’, transcript posted on the website of the Russian government, 3 September 2012, http://archive.government.ru/stens/20531/, accessed 25 April 2014.

  18. In Russian, ‘brand’ is a transliterated loanword: брэнд.

  19. Published as an article in the Russian Government’s Федеральный Справочник, Vol. 26 (2012), pp. 185–94, available at http://federalbook.ru/files/FS/Soderjanie/FS-26/V/Kosachev.pdf, accessed 25 April 2014.

  20. Kosachev’s blog can be found at http://blog.rs.gov.ru, accessed 25 April 2014.

  21. ‘В мире сложилась презумпция виновности России [In the world there is a presumption of Russia’s guilt]’, Коммерсантъ-Online, 3 September 2012, www.kommersant.ru/doc/2014308, accessed 25 April 2014 (translation by the author).

  22. Transcript of Storchak’s interview on the programme ‘Разбор Полета [Flight Analysis]’ on Echo of Moscow, 10 September 2012, http://echo.msk.ru/programs/razbor_poleta/927845-echo/#element-text, accessed 25 April 2014 (translation by the author); Levkin (2012, p. 92, 97), who was a key figure in the UNDP programmes, also argues for a ‘learning-by-doing’ approach for the Russian government’s involvement in project aid.

  23. ‘Путин увеличил бюджет Россотрудничества до 9,5 млрд рублей [Putin increased Rossotrudnichestvo’s budget to 9.5 billion rubles]’, Грани.ру, 5 June 2013, http://grani.ru/Politics/Russia/President/m.215342.html, accessed 25 April 2014.

  24. A Russian version of the concept is available at the URL: http://news.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/41d4d539e758feebf03e.pdf, accessed 25 April 2014.

  25. ‘Косачев: РФ выступает за двусторонние, а не многосторонние отношения [Kosachev: Russia opts for bilateral, not multilateral relations]’, RIANovosti, 16 April 2014, http://ria.ru/politic/20140416/1004081987.html, accessed 25 April 2014.

  26. The concept of the ‘mask’ does not imply insincerity of motivations on the part of individuals; the ‘mask’ is a form of standardization worn for the sake of inter-institutional recognizability as well as public appeal.

References

  • Andersen, D. (2012) Russia abroad: In Ethiopia, Russian is the language of healing, The Moscow Times, online edition, 18 January, http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/russia-abroad-in-ethiopia-russian-is-the-language-of-healing/451183.html, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Antonov, S. (2006) Безвозмездно – не значит не выгодно [Free does not mean unprofitable], Парламентская газета, online edition, No. 195 (2045), 22 November, http://www.pressmon.com/cgi-bin/press_view.cgi?id=2011050, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Bach, Q.V.S. (1985) A note on Soviet statistics on their economic aid. Soviet Studies 37 (2): 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräutigam, D. (2011) Aid ‘with Chinese characteristics’: Chinese foreign aid and development finance meet the OECD-DAC aid regime. Journal of International Development 23 (5): 752–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyandelgeriyn, M. (2008) Post-post-transition theories: Walking on multiple paths. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. (2004) Not By Bread Alone: Social Support in the New Russia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2002) The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degterev, D.A. (2013) Содействие международному развитию: Эволюция международно-правовых режимов и эффективность внешней помощи [International Development Assistance: The Evolution of International Legal Regimes and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid]. Moscow, Russia: ЛЕНАНД.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, M. (2012) Remodelling the global development landscape: The China model and south-south cooperation in Latin America. Third World Quarterly 33 (7): 1359–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2009) An (iron) fistful of help, online edition, 4 June, http://www.economist.com/node/13799239, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Eyben, R. and Savage, L. (2012) Emerging and submerging powers: Imagined geographies in the new development partnership at the Busan fourth high level forum. Journal of Development Studies 49 (4): 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. (2005) Timing, scale and style: Capacity as governmentality in Tanzania. In: D. Mosse and D. Lewis (eds.) The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development. London: Pluto Press, pp. 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P.A. (2003) Volga farmers and arctic herders: Common (post)socialist experiences in rural Russia. In: Chris Hann and the Property Relations Group (eds.) The Postsocialist Agrarian Question: Property Relations and the Rural Condition. Muenster: Lit Verlag, pp. 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P.A. (2011) Looking ‘The Gift’ in the mouth: Russia as donor. Anthropology Today 27 (2): 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horký, O. and Lightfoot, S. (2012) From aid recipients to aid donors? Development policies of central and Eastern European states. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korepanov, D.V. and Komagaeva, J. (2012) Russia as an international development aid partner: Assistance efforts in global health. In: J. Twigg (ed.) Russia’s Emerging Global Health Leadership. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp. 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C.W. (1987) Soviet economic aid: Volume, function and importance. Development Policy Review 5 (3): 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levkin, E.V. (2012) Возможности повышения потенциала российских институтов содействия международному развитию на основе трехстороннего сотрудничество [The possibility of raising the potential of Russian institutions of international development assistance on the basis of triangular cooperation]. Вестник международных организаций 2 (2012): 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2011) Exchanges of professionals between the public and nongovernmental sectors: Lifework histories from Bangladesh. Modern Asian Studies 45 (3): 735–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. and Szent-Iványi, B. (2014) Reluctant donors? The Europeanization of international development policies in the new member states. Journal of Common Market Studies, doi:10.1111/jcms.12141.

  • Manning, R. (2006) Will ‘emerging donors’ change the face of international co-operation? Development Policy Review 24 (4): 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2012) From Recipients to Donors: Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazov, S. (2010) A Distant Front in the Cold War: The USSR in West Africa and the Congo, 1956–1964. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patico, J. (2005) To be happy in a Mercedes: Tropes of value and ambivalent visions of marketization. American Ethnologist 32 (3): 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pis’mennaia, E. and Kravchenko, E. (2011) МинФин России хочет помочь другим странам в ликвидации бедности [MinFin of Russia wants to help other countries liquidate poverty]. Ведомости, No. 159 (2925), online edition, 26 August, http://www.vedomosti.ru/newsline/news/1349485/agentstvo_pomoschi, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Raibman, N. (2012) МИД: Российское гражданское общество не нуждается во ‘внешнем руководстве’ [MFA: Russian civil society is not in need of ‘outside leadership’], Ведомости, online edition, 19 September, http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2012/09/19/4101761, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Rakhmangulov, M. (2010) Establishing international development assistance strategy in Russia. International Organizations Research Journal 5 (31): 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, N. (1997) Russian Talk: Culture and Conversation during Perestroika. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, D. (2012) Individual BRICS or a collective bloc? Convergence and divergence amongst ‘emerging donor’ nations’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25 (4): 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1953) Birth of an organization: The economic cooperation administration. Public Administration Review 13 (4): 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szent-Iványi, B. (2012) Hungarian international development cooperation: Context, stakeholders and performance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (1): 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takala, T. and Piattoeva, N. (2012) Changing conceptions of development assistance to education in the international discourse on post-Soviet countries. International Journal of Education Development 32 (1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Voice of Russia (2011) English edition, ‘Russia becomes UN donor country’, 13 February, http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/02/13/44123252/, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Wedel, J.R. (1998) Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe 1989–1998. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatsenko, E.B., Kozievskaya, E.B., Basova., P.S., Borisenko, A.I. and Emel’ianov, A.L. (2011) Приглашение к дискусии: Перспективы участия российского бизнеса в содействии междунардоному развитию в странах СНГ (на примере Киргизии и Таджикистана) [Invitation to a discussion: Perspectives on the participation of Russian business in international development assistance in countries of the CIS (on the examples of Kirgizia and Tajikistan)]. Вестник международных организаций 2 (33): 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, A. (2013) ‘Russia in a sea of rising powers’: The view from Washington, D.C.’, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 263, http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/russia-sea-rising-powers-view-washington-dc, accessed 25 April 2014.

  • Zimmerman, F. and Smith, K. (2011) More actors, more money, more ideas for international development co-operation. Journal of International Development 23 (5): 722–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research underlying this article was greatly facilitated by research assistants Tatiana Vagramenko, Dmitry Arzyutov, Anna Cherepanova, Anastasia Gulyavena, Katya Kapustina and John Whelan. Several people whom the author consulted on this topic in Russia provided invaluable guidance but wished to remain anonymous. The author is grateful to two anonymous reviewers who provided incisive and extremely helpful comments. Funding was provided by the Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences (IRCHSS) and the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) under the ‘Futures of Aid’ programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gray, P. Russia as a Recruited Development Donor. Eur J Dev Res 27, 273–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.34

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.34

Keywords

Navigation