Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship between the Adoption of Triple Bottom Line and Enhanced Corporate Reputation and Legitimacy

  • The Contributors
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triple bottom line (TBL) reporting has been a revolutionary non-financial reporting framework that corporations have certainly accepted into their culture. However, the level of tangible results from TBL reporting is still not evident in the literature or even in corporate reports. The research problem upon which this study is conducted is to investigate the effects of triple bottom line reporting and how it affects the relationship between organizations and their stakeholders, as well as on the reputation of organizations and whether it affects their financial performance. This study has looked at 40 organizations and their sustainability-reporting processes during the period 2009–2010 mainly focusing on their TBL adoption. Corporations constantly mention holism as being an essential part of their sustainability initiatives; TBL seems to be still fostering an economically oriented paradigm in corporations rather than pushing the holistic paradigm, and this claim needs to be justified through interviews conducted. Finally, the level of reputational enhancement that TBL has given corporations needs to be investigated qualitatively. Are organizations adopting TBL primarily to reduce the battering they might take if they do not portray a sense of being socially and environmentally responsible, or do they see a greater benefit from TBL itself? The results from this paper conclude that TBL reporting is a mechanism boosting organizational credentials that input into organizations a cognitive validity, a status boost, and develop their reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There was a consensus in the responses from interviewees regarding their overall views on TBL as a competitive advantage, its weaknesses, its driver as an engagement tool with stakeholders and driving business strategy, and its application as a reputation and legitimacy tool. This consensus might vary if the author introduced the GRI or other advanced frameworks.

References

  • Adams, C. and Frost, G. (2008) ‘Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices’, Accounting Forum, 32 (4), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. and Larrinaga-González, C. (2007) ‘Engaging with corporations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20 (3), 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R.J. (2004) ‘Corporate reputation: Anything but superficial – The deep but fragile nature of corporate reputation’, The Journal of Business Strategy, 25 (6), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archel, P., Fernandez, M. and Larrinaga, C. (2008) ‘The corporate and operational boundaries of triple bottom line reporting: A survey’, Environmental Management, 41 (1), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, A. and Grubnic, S. (2007) ‘Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector’, in J. Unerman, J. Bebbington and B. O’Dwyer (eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (2001) ‘Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: Seeing through the fog’, European Journal of Marketing, 35 (3–4), 248–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I., Cunningham, P. and Drumwright, M. (2007) ‘Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue’, California Management Review, 49 (4), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, L. and Beckett, R. (2000) ‘Corporate citizenship and the communicator: Communication's role in developing the “triple bottom line” in the new economy’, Strategic Communications Management, 4 (4), 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L.D. and Hartel, C.E.J. (2004) ‘The five capabilities of socially responsible companies’, Journal of Public Affairs, 4 (2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (2000) ‘Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image and reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (3), 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. and Smith, A.D. (2005) ‘Exploring prevention & perpetrator aspects concerning employee fraud in corporations’, International Journal of Management & Enterprise Development, 2 (3–5), 257–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., Balzarova, M.A., Bamber, C.J. and Sharp, J.M. (2004) ‘How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11 (3), 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J.F., Bettidge, N. and Toyne, P. (2005) ‘Responding to global business critical issues: A source of innovation and transformation for FTSE 350 companies?’ Corporate Governance, 5 (3), 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daub, C.H. (2007) ‘Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: An alternative methodological approach’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (1), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation – Concepts, evidence, and implications’, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. (2001) Creating Corporate Reputations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. and Winston, A. (2006) Green to Gold, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. (1996) Reputation: Realising Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) ‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. (2006) ‘Beyond the pillars: Sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making’, Journal of Environment Assessment Policy and Management, 8 (3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.R. and Smeltzer, L.R. (1985) ‘Corporate image – An integral part of a strategy’, Sloan Management Review, 26 (4), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2002) ‘The social accounting project and accounting corporations and society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?’ Accounting, Corporations and Society, 27 (7), 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2006) ‘Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and corporate value creation: Whose value? Whose creation?’ Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19 (6), 793–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, T. and Guthrie, P. (2008) ‘A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom line, integrated, and sustainability assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28 (2–3), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. (1994) ‘Seeing the future first’, Fortune, 130 (5), 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Carroll, G. (1992) Dynamics of Corporate Populations: Density, Legitimation and Competition, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, T.M. (1999) ‘Are managers obsolete?’ Harvard Business Review, 77 (2), 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, G. (2009) ‘Measuring corporate performance: Beyond the triple bottom line’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 18 (3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, J.G., Goodman, M.B., Alexander, J.B. and Genest, C.M. (2001) ‘Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations?’ Public Relations Review, 27 (3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (2004) Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (1977) ‘Nurturing corporate image: Corporate communication or ego trip?’ European Journal of Marketing, 11 (3), 120–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmett, P. and Boyd, T. (2004) An Institutional Understanding of Triple Bottom Line Evaluations and the Use of Social and Environmental Metrics Construction Innovation Project, School of Construction Management and Property, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2009) Transient Caretakers, Pan Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2005) ‘Social and environmental accounting’, in C. Clubb (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management Accounting, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden, pp. 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalisin, M.D., Kline, D.M. and Smith, R.F. (2000) ‘Intangible strategic assets and firm performance: A multi-industry study of the resource-based view’, Journal of Business Strategy, 17 (2), 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalisin, M.D., Smith, R.F. and Kline, D.M. (1997) ‘In search of strategic assets’, The International Journal of Corporate Analysis, 5 (4), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S., Hammond, K. and Friedman, A.L. (2002) ‘Social and environmental reporting and ethical investment’, ACCA Research Report No. 77, ACCA, London.

  • Morland, M.P. (2006) ‘Triple bottom line reporting as social grammar: Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate codes of conduct’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15 (4), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. and Macdonald, C. (2003) ‘Getting to the Bottom of Triple Bottom Line’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 14 (2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olins, W. (1989) Corporate Identity, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, A. (1995) ‘Corporate identity: What's in a name?’ Harvard Business Review, 73 (2), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978) The External Control of Corporations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2001a) ‘Strategy and the internet’, Harvard Business Review, 79 (3), 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2001b) ‘Competition and antitrust: Toward a productivity-based approach to evaluating mergers and joint ventures’, Antitrust Bulletin, 46 (4), 919–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, L. and Norton, J. (2004) ‘Beyond the bottom line: Practicing leadership for sustainability’, Leadership in Action, 24 (1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raar, J. (2002) ‘Environmental initiatives: Towards triple bottom line reporting’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7 (3), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riel, V.C (1995) Principles of Corporate Communication, Prentice Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, F. (2006) ‘The challenge of TBL: A responsibility to whom?’ Business and Society Review, 111 (4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A. and Weber, K. (2006) The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best Run Companies are Achieving Economic, Social, and Environmental Success – And How You Can Too, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987) ‘The adolescence of institutional theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.D. and Lias, A.R. (2005) ‘Identity theft and e-fraud as critical CRM concerns’, International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 1 (2), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, K. (2011) ‘A multi-dimensional criticism of the triple bottom line reporting approach’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 6 (1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggett, D. and Goodsir, B. (2002) Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia, The Allen Consulting Group, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004) ‘Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real’, Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A.M., Anderson, E. and MacInnis, D.J. (1999) ‘Reputation management as a motivation for sales structure decisions’, Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. and McIntosh, M. (2002) ‘Introduction’, theme issue on corporate transparency, accountability and governance’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 8, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G (1986) ‘The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure: 1840–1920’, in B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Corporate Behavior, Vol. 8, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Net Balance Management Group, Sydney, Australia

    Kaushik Sridhar

Authors
  1. Kaushik Sridhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sridhar, K. The Relationship between the Adoption of Triple Bottom Line and Enhanced Corporate Reputation and Legitimacy. Corp Reputation Rev 15, 69–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2012.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2012.4

Keywords

Search

Navigation