Skip to main content

Studying Language in Society and Society through Language: Context and Multimodal Communication

  • Chapter
Society in Language, Language in Society
  • 958 Accesses

Abstract

Hasan describes context in the following way: ‘context of situation as construed by discourse is a tripartite entity, each component of which is always active in the production of a text’ (Hasan, 2004, p. 21). This description of context of situation as an entity may be due to a number of reasons. For instance, there is a language-driven semantic drift towards reification because once we start to talk about ‘context’ we come to refer to it as an entity since all our language pushes us in that direction. There is also a discourse focus on context, in the sense that ‘context of situation is construed by discourse’ (Hasan, 2004, p. 21). And there is a bounded notion of discourse, in that a text view of discourse tends towards strong boundaries that make it more likely for context to be seen as an entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronin, L. (2014) ‘The concept of affordances in applied linguistics and multilingualism’. In M. Pawlak and L. Aronin (eds) Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism (Second Language Learning and Teaching) (Berlin: Springer), pp. 157–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, T. (2013) ‘I’ll manage the context: context, environment and the potential for institutional change’. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, and G. O’Grady (eds) Choice: Critical Considerations in Systemic Functional Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 346–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (1977) An Introduction to Systemic Linguistics 2: Levels and Links (London: B.T. Batsford Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowcher, W. (2007) ‘Field in multimodal texts’. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language (London: Equinox), pp. 619–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowcher, W. (2013) ‘Material action as choice in field’. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett and G. O’Grady (eds) Choice: Critical Considerations in Systemic Functional Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 318–41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. (2003) Structure and Function: a Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Part 2: From Clause to Discourse and Beyond (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. (1996) ‘Theories, maps and descriptions’. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran and D. Butt (eds) Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. xv–xxxv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloran, C. (1994). Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into Some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar (Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. (1990) ‘Transcribing infinity: problems of context presentation’. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R.-L. (eds) (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, R. P. (1988) ‘Language generation as choice in social interaction’. In M. Zock and G. Sabah (eds) Advances in Natural Language Generation (Vol. 2) (London: Pinter Publishers), pp. 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, R. P. (1990) ‘The COMMUNAL Project: two years old and going well’. Network: News, Views and Reviews in Systemic Linguistics and Related Areas 13: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1974) ‘Michael Halliday’. In H. Parret (ed.) Discussing Language: Dialogues with Wallace L. Chafe, Noam Chomsky, Algirdas J. Greimas, M. A. K. Halliday, Peter Hartmann, George Lakoff, Sydney M. Lamb, André Martinet, James McCawley, Sebastian K. Saumjan, Jacques Bouveresse (The Hague: Mouton), pp. 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1992) ‘New ways of meaning: the challenge to applied linguistics’. In M. Putz (ed.) Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn) (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1981) ‘What’s going on: a dynamic view of context’. In J. E. Copeland and P. W. Davis (eds) The Seventh LACUS Forum (Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press), pp. 106–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1995) ‘The conception of context in text’. In P. H. Fries and M. Gregory (eds) Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday (Norwood, NJ: Ablex), pp. 183–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1996) ‘Semantic networks: a tool for the analysis of meaning’. In C. Cloran, D. G. Butt and G. Williams (eds) Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (London: Cassell), pp. 104–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1999) ‘Speaking with reference to context’. In M. Ghadessy (ed.) Text and Context in Functional Linguistics: Systemic Perspectives (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 219–328.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2001) ‘Wherefore context? The place of context in the system and process of language’. In S. Ren, W. Guthrie and I. W. R. Fong (eds) Grammar and Discourse: Proceedings of the International Conference on Discourse Analysis (Macau: University of Macau Publication Centre), pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2004) ‘Analysing discursive variation’. In L. Young and C. Harrison (eds) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change (London: Continuum), pp. 15–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. and Fries, P. (eds) (1995) On Subject and Theme: a Discourse Functional Perspective (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipps, C. M., Nestor, P. J., Acosta-Cabronero, R., Arnold, R. and Hodge, J. R. (2009) ‘Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: the role of emotion and sarcasm processing’. Brain: a Journal of Neurology 132: 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication (London: Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1984) The Formal Analysis of Instruction and Action, Context and Meaning. Semiotics and Education (Victoria University, Toronto Semiotics Circle Monographs, Working Papers and Prepublications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepschy, G. (1970) A Survey of Structural Linguistics (London: Faber and Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, A. (2014) ‘Creating a parallel universe: mode and the textual metafunction in the study of one news story’. In W. L. Bowcher and B. A. Smith (eds) Systemic Phonology: Recent Studies in English (London: Equinox), pp. 53–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1992) English Text: System and Structure (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995) Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems (Tokyo, Taipei and Dallas: International Language Sciences Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, A., Romary, L. and Gibbon, D. (2012) ‘Introduction: framing technical communication’. In A. Mehler and L. Romary (eds) Handbook of Technical Communication (Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 1–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. (2004) ‘The discursive construction of treatment decisions in the management of HIV disease’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. (in press) ‘Surgical teams in action: a contextually sensitive approach to modelling body alignment and interpersonal engagement’. In A. Baldry and E. Montagna (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory and Practice (Campobasso, Italy: Palladino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. and Wegener, R. (2010) ‘Report on the language of Consumer Medicines Information Leaflets’. Draft project report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, G. (1989) ‘Malinowski’s “context of situation”’. Language & Communication 9(4): 259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Rebekah Wegener

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wegener, R. (2016). Studying Language in Society and Society through Language: Context and Multimodal Communication. In: Bowcher, W.L., Liang, J.Y. (eds) Society in Language, Language in Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40286-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics