Skip to main content

Key Social Work Frameworks for Sociologists

  • Chapter
Book cover Social Work for Sociologists
  • 1684 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the distinctiveness of social work and sociology, their differences and similarities, and their converging and diverging histories. It also provides the rationale for subsequent chapters, wherein we will tease out the frameworks, theoretical concepts, values, and skills that social work offers to sociology. This chapter focuses on the conceptual frameworks that have currency in social work and offers sociologists the opportunity to expand on their understanding and analysis of the connections between social and personal problems. We begin with a brief discussion of frameworks as used in social work and then introduce Aleena and her family as a case study to which we later apply those frameworks. The first framework considered is that of critical reflection; in many respects, this is considered to be the framework of current social work practice. Many other frameworks used in social work practice have either been adapted to include critical reflection or been rejected as outmoded or as inappropriate in a critically reflective practice environment. In addition to the critical reflection framework, we will explore frameworks focusing on strengths, competencies, and success (Dybicz 2012); ecosystems approaches; anti-oppressive and empowerment frameworks; rights-based frameworks; indigenous frameworks, with a particular focus on frameworks used by the indigenous people of New Zealand; and finally, task-centered approaches. All of these continue to have a significant impact on social work practice and offer sociologists new ways of viewing vulnerable people in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agger, Ben. 1998. Critical Social Theories: An Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, Sarah. 2006. Ethics and Values in Social Work. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, Peter. 2013. “Theory and Practice of User Involvement in Research: Making the Connection with Public Policy and Practice.” In Involving Service Users in Health and Social Care Research, edited by Lesley Lowes and Ian Hulatt, 6–17. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Marie. 2013. “Values and Human Rights.” In Social Work: Contexts and Practice. 3rd ed., edited by Marie Connolly and Louise Harms, 48–59. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Marie, and Karen Healy. 2013. “Social Work Practice Theories and Frameworks.” In Social Work: Contexts and Practice. 3rd ed., edited by Marie Connolly and Louise Harms, 19–33. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Marie, and Kate Morris. 2012. Understanding Child and Family Welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Jane, and Beverley Burke. 1995. Anti-oppressive Practice: Social Care and the Law. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, Peter, and Insoo Kim Berg. 2001. “Co-constructing Cooperation with Mandated Clients.” Social Work 46 (4): 361–374. doi:10.1093/sw/46.4.361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominelli, Lena. 1998. “Anti-oppressive Practice in Context.” In Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, edited by Robert Adams, Lena Dominelli, and Malcolm Payne, 3–19. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dybicz, Phillip. 2012. “The Hero(ine) on a Journey: A Postmodern Conceptual Framework for Social Work Practice.” Journal of Social Work Education 48 (2): 267–283. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Laura. 1980. Helping People: The Task-Centered Approach. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, Jan. 2012. Social Work: A Critical Approach to Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, Jan, and Gurid Aga Askeland. 2006. “The ‘Critical’ in Critical Reflection.” In Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care, edited by Sue White, Jan Fook, and Fiona Gardner, 40–54. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, Jan, and Fiona Gardner. 2012. Critical Reflection in Context: Applications in Health and Social Care. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, Jan, Sue White, and Fiona Gardner. 2006. “Critical Reflection: A Review of Contemporary Literature and Understandings.” In Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care, edited by Sue White, Jan Fook, and Fiona Gardner, 3–20. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, Carel, and Alex Gitterman. 1980. The Life Model of Social Work Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Mel. 2011. “Back to Basics: A Critique of the Strengths Perspective in Social Work.” Families in Society 92 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, Lorraine M. 1990. “Working with Women of Color: An Empowerment Perspective.” Social Work 35 (2): 149–153. doi:10.1093/sw/35.2.149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Karen. 2005. Social Work Theories in Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ife, Jim. 2012. Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Rights-Based Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kisthart, Walter. 2002. “The Strengths Perspective in Interpersonal Helping.” In The Strengths Perspective in Social Work. 3rd ed., edited by Dennis Saleebey, 163–184. London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Jennifer. 2006. “Telling Stories … and the Pursuit of Critical Reflection.” In Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care, edited by Sue White, Jan Fook, and Fiona Gardner, 201–212. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Peter, and Mark Doel. 2005. The Task-Centred Book. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munford, Robyn, and Jackie Sanders. 2011. “Embracing the Diversity of Practice: Indigenous Knowledge and Mainstream Social Work Practice.” Journal of Social Work Practice 25 (1): 63–77. doi:10.1080/02650533.2010.532867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Malcolm. 2005. Modern Social Work Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihama, Leonie, Fiona Cram, and Sheila Walker. 2002. “Creating Methodological Space: A Literature Review of Kaupapa Maori Research.” Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26(1): 30–43. http://www.lights.ca/sifc/cjne.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, Allen, and Anne Minahan. 1973. Social Work Practice: Model and Method. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, Charles. 1998. The Strengths Model. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwhiu, Leland. 2013. “Making Sense of Indigenous Issues in Aotearoa New Zealand.” In Social Work: Contexts and Practice. 3rd ed., edited by Marie Connolly and Louise Harms, 124–137. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, Dennis. 2002. The Strengths Perspective in Social Work. 3rd ed. London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Jackie, and Robyn Munford. 2010. Working with Families: Strengths-Based Approaches. Auckland: Dunmore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevithick, Pam. 2008. “Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (6): 121–1237. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heugten, Kate. 2011. Social Work under Pressure: How to Overcome Stress, Fatigue and Burnout in the Workplace. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Shayne, Anaru Eketone, and Anita Gibbs. 2006. “An Exploration of Kaupapa Māori Research, Its Principles, Processes and Application.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (4): 331–344. doi:10.1080/13645570600916049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kate van Heugten Anita Gibbs

Copyright information

© 2015 Kate van Heugten and Anita Gibbs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, A., van Heugten, K. (2015). Key Social Work Frameworks for Sociologists. In: van Heugten, K., Gibbs, A. (eds) Social Work for Sociologists. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389688_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics