Abstract
Much of the graphic satire produced in England on the subject of France was not targeted towards the French people as such, but against their rulers, primarily kings, and later Napoleon who was accused of aspiring to be a king in all but name. Religious leaders also featured, usually depicted as generic malicious or gluttonous monks, although their appearances became less frequent in the second half of the century, a phenomenon that undermines the pertinence of cultural anti-Catholicism and common Protestant identity to conceptions of British identity. Depictions of French leaders were used to convey the perceived superiorities of British rulers and the British system of government. They also, however, made more general comments about the nature of power, authority, religion and legitimacy, and regularly exposed and criticised the inadequacies of domestic monarchs and statesmen, both explicitly and implicitly, and, at times unintentionally perhaps, as satirists projected British failings onto images of the French ‘Other’. Along with the projection of British anxieties onto images of France, and the habitual contrasts and comparisons between British and French rule, the prominence of France in graphic satire gave observers at home the opportunity to share and experience France’s political turbulences, albeit in a skewed and often inaccurate form.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Adrian Bury, Maurice-Quentin de la Tour (London: Charles Skilton, 1971), pp. 1.
Michael Pickering, Stereotyping: The Politics of Representation (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), 56.
Stephen Conway, ‘Continental Connections: Britain and Europe in the Eighteenth Century’, History 90 (2005), 356.
Conway, ‘Continental Connections’, 356; T.C.W. Blanning, ‘“That Horrid Electorate” or “Ma Patrie Germanique”? George III, Hanover, and the Fürstenbund of 1785’, The Historical Journal 20 (1977), 311–44.
Alexandra K. Wettlaufer, ‘Absent Fathers, Martyred Mothers: domestic drama and (royal) family values in A Graphic History of Louis the Sixteenth’, Eighteenth Century Life 23 (1999), 2.
Linda Colley, ‘Britishness and Otherness: an argument’, Journal of British Studies 31 (1992), 316.
John Miller, Religion in the Popular Prints 1600–1832 (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey 1986), 31
Jeremy Gregory, ‘Religion: faith in the Age of Reason’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 34 (2011), 434–43.
Quoted by Clare Haynes in Pictures and Popery: Art and Religion in England, 1660–1760 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 5.
Tobias Smollett, Humphry Clinker (London: Penguin, 2008), 83.
Vicesimus Knox, ‘On the effect of caricatures exhibited at the windows of print sellers’, in Winter Evenings: or, lubrications on life and letters, Volume 1 (3rd edn, 1795), 143.
David Hume, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1987), 199.
Colley, Britons, 11–54. In an earlier article Colley admits that British anti-Catholicism’s ‘utility and attractiveness waned’ following the Seven Years’ War, though in Britons this is largely ignored in the interests of her Protestant identity thesis. Colley, ‘Whose Nation? Class and National Consciousness in Britain 1750–1830’, Past and Present 113 (1986), 108.
George Rudé, ‘The Gordon Riots: a study of the rioters and their victims’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, vol. 6 (1956), 93–114
Clare Haynes, ‘“A Trial for the Patience of Reason”? Grand tourists and anti-Catholicism after 1745’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 33 (2010), 195–208.
Ruth Scurr, Fatal Purity: Robespierre and the French Revolution (London: Chatto and Windus, 2006), 267.
Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (London: Penguin, 2004), 656–7.
Geoffrey Ellis, Napoleon (London: Longman, 2000), 62
Stuart Semmel, Napoleon and the British (London: Yale University Press, 2004), 74
Ibid., 20. The proclamation, though cynical and opportunistic, had referred to the French as ‘muslims’ with a small ‘m’, meaning the French believed in only one God, as deist Unitarians, unlike Christians who believed in the Trinity. In Arabic the word ‘muslim’ could be used for anybody who had submitted to the one God, and non-Muslims are represented in the Qur’an as calling themselves ‘muslim’. Napoleon’s assertion was ‘absurd, but not as absurd as the English rendering makes it appear.’ Juan Cole, Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East (New York: Palgrave, 2008), 31.
Nabil Matar, ‘Islam in Britain, 1689–1750’, Journal of British Studies 47 (2008), 284
Alan Fonest, Napoleon’s Men: The Soldiers of the Revolution and Empire (London: Hambledon and London, 2002), 122.
Stuart Semmel, ‘British Uses for Napoleon’, MLN 120 (2005), 741.
Mark Bryant, Napoleonic Wars in Cartoons (London: Grub Street, 2009), 9.
Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels (London: Penguin, 2003), 112.
James Baker, ‘Locating Gulliver: unstable loyalism in James Gillray’s The King of Brobdingnag and Gulliver’, Image & Narrative 14 (2013), 137.
Quoted in Christopher Fox, ‘Introduction: Biographical and Historical Contexts’, in Christopher Fox (ed.), Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 1995), 21.
D.M.G. Sutherland, France 1789–1815: Revolution and Counterrevolution (London: Fontana, 1985), 429.
Gillray was such a hero to Cruikshank that when Gillray died in June 1815, Cruikshank bought Gillray’s work table from Hannah Humphrey and used it until his own health declined. Robert L. Patten, George Cruikshank’s Life, Times, and Art, Volume 1:1792–1835 (Cambridge: Lutterworth Press, 1992), 120.
Holger Hoock, Empires of the Imagination: Politics, War, and the Arts in the British World, 1750–1850 (London: Profile, 2010), 179–82.
Stuart Semmel, ‘Reading the Tangible Past: British tourism, collecting, and memory after Waterloo’, Representations 69 (2000), 12.
Christopher Plumb, ‘“Strange and Wonderful”: encountering the elephant in Britain, 1675–1830’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 33 (2010), 525–43.
Colley, Britons, 209–10; Marilyn Morris, The British Monarchy and the French Revolution (London: Yale University Press, 1998), 176–8
For example, see Jeff Percels and Russell Ganim (eds), Fecal Matters in Early Modern Literature and Art: Studies in Scatology (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).
Copyright information
© 2015 John Richard Moores
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moores, J.R. (2015). Kings and Leaders. In: Representations of France in English Satirical Prints 1740–1832. War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137380142_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137380142_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47912-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38014-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)