Skip to main content

Using Argument Mapping to Improve Critical Thinking Skills

  • Chapter

Abstract

The centrality of critical thinking (CT) as a goal of higher education is uncontroversial. In a recent high-profile book, Academically Adrift, Arum and Roksa report that “99 percent of college faculty say that developing students’ ability to think critically is a ‘very important’ or ‘essential’ goal of undergraduate education” (2011, 35), citing (HERI 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., and Zhang, D. 2008. “Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 78 (4): 1102–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, C. 2007. Does Philosophy Improve Reasoning Skills? Masters Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., and Roksa, J. 2011. Academically Adrift : Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, S., Forster, D., Gold, I., Bigelow, J., Korb, K., Oppy, G., Serrenti, A. 2009. “Improving Critical Thinking Using Web Based Argument Mapping Exercises with Automated Feedback.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25 (2): 268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., and Mazur, R. 2001. “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results.” American Journal of Physics 69: 970–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. 2012. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. 2011. “Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping, Argument Mapping: What Are the Differences and Do They Matter?” Higher Education 62 (3): 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., and Stewart, I. 2011. “The Promotion of Critical Thinking Skills through Argument Mapping.” In Critical Thinking, edited by C. P. Horvath and J. M. Forte. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., and Stewart, I. 2012. “An Evaluation of Argument Mapping as a Method of Enhancing Critical Thinking Performance in E-Learning Environments.” Metacognition & Learning 7: 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., and Tesche-Römer, C. 1993. “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance.” Psychological Review 100: 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. 1991. “Using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test in Research, Evaluation, and Assessment.” ED337498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. 1988. The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge, England; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. 1988. A Practical Study of Argument. (second edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. 2010. Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. Vienna: Schuhfried.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, M. 2008. “No Computer Program Required.” Teaching Philosophy 31 (4): 351–374 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, M. 2011. “Argument Diagramming and Critical Thinking in Introductory Philosophy.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HERI. 2009. The American College Teacher: National Norms for2007–2008. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C., Kulik, J., and Bangert-Drowns, R. 1990. “Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 60 (2): 265–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Bridgeman, B., and Adler, R. 2012. “Measuring Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Motivation Matters.” Educational Researcher 41 (9): 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macagno, F., Reed, C., and Walton, D. 2007. “Argument Diagramming in Logic, Artificial Intelligence, and Law.” Knowledge Engineering Review 22 (1): 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencken, H. L. 1997. Minority Report : H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks. (Johns Hopkins paperbacks edition). Maryland Paperback Bookshelf. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Berg, T., van Gelder, T. J., Patterson, F., and Teppema, S. 2013. Critical Thinking: Reasoning and Communicating with Rationale. Seattle, WA: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardy, C. 2004. “Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking.” Teaching Philosophy 27 (2): 95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. J. 2007. “The Rationale for Rationale™.” Law, Probability and Risk 6:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. J. 2013. “Argument Mapping.” In Encyclopedia of the Mind, edited by H. Pashler. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. J., Bissett, M., and Cumming, G. 2004. “Cultivating Expertise in Informal Reasoning.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Gelder, T. (2015). Using Argument Mapping to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics