Skip to main content

Feminist Interventions in International Relations

  • Chapter
Under Development: Gender

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

Does feminist International Relations (IR) have anything to say about development? Twenty years ago the question would have been purely rhetorical: feminists working in the field of IR were deeply informed by literature on gender and development, and they contributed to this literature. However, in the wake of the militarisation of international politics in the new century, feminists in IR shifted their attention to studying security and to critiquing the traditional core of the field. The same seemed true for development as development practitioners recognised that countries embroiled in violent conflict ranked at the bottom of measures of development. Concepts such as risk-reduction, conflict prevention, conflict resolution, peace building and state-building joined the vocabulary of development. In this context, feminist IR scholarship became relevant for development in a new way. It put at the centre of attention two propositions. First, there is a relationship between war and gender and second, processes of peace-making and post-war reconstruction are thoroughly gendered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aharoni, S. 2011. Gender and “Peace-work”: An Unofficial History of the Israeli-Palestinian Formal Peace Negotiations, Politics and Gender, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J. 2010. Transnational Feminisms and Norm Diffusion in Peace Processes: The Cases of Burundi and Northern Ireland, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 4, No. 1, March, pp. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. and O’Rourke, C. 2010. Peace Agreements or Pieces of Paper? The Impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on Peace Processes and Their Agreements, International Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 59, October, pp. 941–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. K., Gluch, T. and Mitchell, N. J. 2007. Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 669–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United State Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, 2nd edn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli, M. 2000. Gendered Conflict, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli, M. 2003. Gender Equality and State Aggression: The Impact of Domestic Gender Equality on State First Use of Force, International Interactions, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli, M. 2005. Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict, International Studies Quarterly, No. 49, pp. 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli, M. Boyer, M. 2001. Gender, Violence, and International Crisis, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, H. F. 2001. Women and Peace and Security: The Politics of Implementing Gender Sensitivity Norms in Peacekeeping. In L. Olsson and T. L. Tryggestad (eds), Women and International Peacekeeping. London: Frank Cass, pp. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. C. 2003. Women and Children First: Gender, Norms and Humanitarian Evacuation in the Balkans 1991–95, International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 661–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. von 1984[1832]. On War, M. Howard and P. Paret (eds) New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. 2010. Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War: A Feminist Standpoint, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, June, pp. 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. and Zarkov, D. (eds) 2002. The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. Bosnia and the Netherlands. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, M. 2002. A Gentlemen’s Agreement: Srebrenica in the Context of Dutch War History. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 162–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudink, S. 2002. The Unheroic Men of a Moral Nation: Masculinity and Nation in Modern Dutch History. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B., Pollit, K., Ferguson, R. B., Tiger, L. and Jaquette, J. S. 1999. Fukuyama’s Follies: So What, if Women Ruled the World? Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 118–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eifler, C. 2002. Soldatin — ein neuer Job für Frauen? Geschlechterkonstruktionen im Vergleich USA, BRD und Russland. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspectiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich, pp. 163–172.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J. B. 2009. Woman, the State, and War, International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 2002. Demilitarization — Or More of the Same? Feminist Questions to Ask in the Postwar Moment. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 2007. Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 2010. Nimo’s War, Emma’s War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson Baaz, M. and Stern, M. 2009. Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC), International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, K. 2009. Extreme War Rape in Today’s Civil-War-Torn States: A Contextual and Comparative Analysis, Gender Issues, No. 26, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. 2011. Explaining Sexual Violence and Gender Inequalities in the DRC, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 170–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, E 1998. Women and the Evolution of World Politics, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gizelis, T.-I. 2009. Gender Empowerment and United Nations Peacebuilding, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 505–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, H. 2009. Peacebuilding Through a Gender Lens and the Challenges of Implementation in Rwanda and Côte d’Ivoire, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 287–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. M., Caprioli, M., Ballil-Spanvill, B., McDermott, R. and Emmett, C. E 2008/09. The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States, International Security, Vol. 33, No. 3, Winter, pp. 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, K. 2008. Making Sense of Masculinity and War, Men and Masculinities, Vo. 10, No. 4, June, pp. 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, K. M. 2009. The Political Economy of DDR in Liberia: A Gendered Critique, Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, pp. 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, H. 2005. Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War. In M. N. Barnett and R, Duvall (eds), Power and Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. and Svedberg, E. (eds) 2012. Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiby, M. L. 2009. Wartime Sexual Violence in Guatemala and Peru, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, M. 2009. Securitization and Desecuritization: Female Soliders and the Reconstruction of Women in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. 2009. The Women and Peace Hypothesis? The Effect of Opponent Negotiators’ Gender on the Evaluation of Compromise Solutions in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, International Negotiation, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis, S. 2002. Ein- und Aus-Blicke feministischer Friedensarbeit. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspektiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 105–119.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurana, D. 2002. International Peacekeeping Operations: To Neglect Gender is to Risk Peacekeeping Failure. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, S. 2009. Loyalist Women Paramilitaries in Northern Ireland: Beginning a Feminist Conversation about Conflict Resolution, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 262–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, G. L. 1996. The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niva, S. 1998. Tough and Tender: New World Order Masculinity and the Gull War. In M. Zalewski and J. Parpart (eds), The “Man” Question in International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, L. 2001. Gender Mainstreaming in Practice: The United Nations Transitional Assistance Group in Namibia. In L. Olsson and T. L. Tryggestad (eds), Women and International Peacekeeping. London: Frank Cass, pp. 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar, S. 2009. Feminist International Relations and Women Militants: Case Studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 2, June, pp. 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. 2013. Gender Expertise as Feminist Strategy. In G. Caglar, E. Prügl and S. Zwingel (eds), Feminist Strategies in International Governance. London: Routledge, pp. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. and Thompson, H. 2013. The Whistleblower: Interview with Kathryn Bolkovac and Madeleine Rees, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puechguirbal, N. 2003. Women and War in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, Summer, pp. 1271–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razack, S. H. 2004. Dark Fhreats and White Knights: The Somalia Affair, Peacekeeping and the New Imperialism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M. 2002. International Intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina: The Cost of Ignoring Gender. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, A. 2012. Feminist Knowledge and Emerging Governmentality in UN Peacekeeping, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 348–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. M. and Paskeviciute, A. 2003. Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, R. 2009. Armed Conflicts, Post-War Reconstruction and Gendered Subjectivities. In C. Eifler and R. Seifert (eds), Gender Dynamics and Post-conflict Reconstruction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. 2012. Gender Hierarchy, International Structure, and the Causes of War, International Theory, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. and Gentry, C. E. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjelsbaek, I.2001. Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiehm, J. H. 1982. The Protected, the Protector, the Defender, Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 2, No. 3–4, pp. 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiehm, J. H. 1989. Arms and the Enlisted Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M. and Warriner, I. 1997. Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict, World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 250–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tétreault, M. A. (ed.) 1994. Women and Revolution in Africa, Asia, and the New World. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Women’s Memorial 2011. Statistics on Women in the Military. http://www.womensmemorial.org/Press/stats.html. Accessed 30 August 2012.

  • Tickner, J. A. 1999. Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama, International Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryggestad, T. 2009. Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, Global Governance, Vol.15, No. 4, pp. 539–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, J. D. 2010. Gendering the State: Performativity and Protection in International Security. In L. Sjoberg (ed.), Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmuht, U. C. 2002. Warum bleiben Kriege gesellschaftsfähig? Zum weiblichen Gesicht des Krieges. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspectiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich, pp. 87–103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, theState, and Symbolic Exchange. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. 1987. Doing Gender, Gender and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, June, pp. 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, S. 2003. Gender and Peacekeeping: The United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, Summer, pp. 1283–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, S. 2004. Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J. 2006. Variation in Sexual Violence during War, Politics & Society, Vol. 34, No. 3, September, pp. 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J. 2009. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society, Vol. 37, No. 1, March, pp. 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarkov, D. 2002. Srebrenica Trauma: Masculinity, Military and National Sell-Image in Dutch Daily Newspapers. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. 2003. Männer und Kinder zuerst. Über die Notwendigkeit von Geschlechterkonstruktionen zur Legitimierung und Durchführung von Kriegen. In S. Albrecht, W. Goldschmidt and G. Stuby (eds), Die Welt zwischen Recht und Gewalt: Internationale Sozialordnung, Völkerrecht und Demokratie, Hamburg (Germany): VSA-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Elisabeth Prügl

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prügl, E. (2014). Feminist Interventions in International Relations. In: Verschuur, C., Guérin, I., Guétat-Bernard, H. (eds) Under Development: Gender. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356826_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics