Abstract
Does feminist International Relations (IR) have anything to say about development? Twenty years ago the question would have been purely rhetorical: feminists working in the field of IR were deeply informed by literature on gender and development, and they contributed to this literature. However, in the wake of the militarisation of international politics in the new century, feminists in IR shifted their attention to studying security and to critiquing the traditional core of the field. The same seemed true for development as development practitioners recognised that countries embroiled in violent conflict ranked at the bottom of measures of development. Concepts such as risk-reduction, conflict prevention, conflict resolution, peace building and state-building joined the vocabulary of development. In this context, feminist IR scholarship became relevant for development in a new way. It put at the centre of attention two propositions. First, there is a relationship between war and gender and second, processes of peace-making and post-war reconstruction are thoroughly gendered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aharoni, S. 2011. Gender and “Peace-work”: An Unofficial History of the Israeli-Palestinian Formal Peace Negotiations, Politics and Gender, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 391–416.
Anderson, M. J. 2010. Transnational Feminisms and Norm Diffusion in Peace Processes: The Cases of Burundi and Northern Ireland, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 4, No. 1, March, pp. 1–21.
Bell, C. and O’Rourke, C. 2010. Peace Agreements or Pieces of Paper? The Impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on Peace Processes and Their Agreements, International Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 59, October, pp. 941–980.
Butler, C. K., Gluch, T. and Mitchell, N. J. 2007. Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 669–687.
Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United State Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, 2nd edn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Caprioli, M. 2000. Gendered Conflict, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 53–68.
Caprioli, M. 2003. Gender Equality and State Aggression: The Impact of Domestic Gender Equality on State First Use of Force, International Interactions, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 195–214.
Caprioli, M. 2005. Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict, International Studies Quarterly, No. 49, pp. 161–178.
Caprioli, M. Boyer, M. 2001. Gender, Violence, and International Crisis, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 503–518.
Carey, H. F. 2001. Women and Peace and Security: The Politics of Implementing Gender Sensitivity Norms in Peacekeeping. In L. Olsson and T. L. Tryggestad (eds), Women and International Peacekeeping. London: Frank Cass, pp. 49–68.
Carpenter, R. C. 2003. Women and Children First: Gender, Norms and Humanitarian Evacuation in the Balkans 1991–95, International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 661–694.
Clausewitz, C. von 1984[1832]. On War, M. Howard and P. Paret (eds) New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cockburn, C. 2010. Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War: A Feminist Standpoint, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, June, pp. 139–157.
Cockburn, C. and Zarkov, D. (eds) 2002. The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. Bosnia and the Netherlands. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
De Leeuw, M. 2002. A Gentlemen’s Agreement: Srebrenica in the Context of Dutch War History. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 162–182.
Dudink, S. 2002. The Unheroic Men of a Moral Nation: Masculinity and Nation in Modern Dutch History. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 146–161.
Ehrenreich, B., Pollit, K., Ferguson, R. B., Tiger, L. and Jaquette, J. S. 1999. Fukuyama’s Follies: So What, if Women Ruled the World? Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 118–122.
Eifler, C. 2002. Soldatin — ein neuer Job für Frauen? Geschlechterkonstruktionen im Vergleich USA, BRD und Russland. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspectiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich, pp. 163–172.
Elshtain, J. B. 2009. Woman, the State, and War, International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 289–303.
Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, C. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, C. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, C. 2002. Demilitarization — Or More of the Same? Feminist Questions to Ask in the Postwar Moment. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 22–32.
Enloe, C. 2007. Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Enloe, C. 2010. Nimo’s War, Emma’s War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eriksson Baaz, M. and Stern, M. 2009. Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC), International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 495–518.
Farr, K. 2009. Extreme War Rape in Today’s Civil-War-Torn States: A Contextual and Comparative Analysis, Gender Issues, No. 26, pp. 1–41.
Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.
Freedman, J. 2011. Explaining Sexual Violence and Gender Inequalities in the DRC, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 170–175.
Fukuyama, E 1998. Women and the Evolution of World Politics, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 24–40.
Gizelis, T.-I. 2009. Gender Empowerment and United Nations Peacebuilding, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 505–523.
Goldstein, J. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, H. 2009. Peacebuilding Through a Gender Lens and the Challenges of Implementation in Rwanda and Côte d’Ivoire, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 287–318.
Hudson, V. M., Caprioli, M., Ballil-Spanvill, B., McDermott, R. and Emmett, C. E 2008/09. The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States, International Security, Vol. 33, No. 3, Winter, pp. 7–45.
Hutchings, K. 2008. Making Sense of Masculinity and War, Men and Masculinities, Vo. 10, No. 4, June, pp. 389–404.
Jennings, K. M. 2009. The Political Economy of DDR in Liberia: A Gendered Critique, Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, pp. 475–494.
Kinsella, H. 2005. Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War. In M. N. Barnett and R, Duvall (eds), Power and Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kronsell, A. and Svedberg, E. (eds) 2012. Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices. New York: Routledge.
Leiby, M. L. 2009. Wartime Sexual Violence in Guatemala and Peru, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 445–468.
MacKenzie, M. 2009. Securitization and Desecuritization: Female Soliders and the Reconstruction of Women in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 241–261.
Maoz, I. 2009. The Women and Peace Hypothesis? The Effect of Opponent Negotiators’ Gender on the Evaluation of Compromise Solutions in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, International Negotiation, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 519–536.
Mathis, S. 2002. Ein- und Aus-Blicke feministischer Friedensarbeit. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspektiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 105–119.
Mazurana, D. 2002. International Peacekeeping Operations: To Neglect Gender is to Risk Peacekeeping Failure. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 41–50.
McEvoy, S. 2009. Loyalist Women Paramilitaries in Northern Ireland: Beginning a Feminist Conversation about Conflict Resolution, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 262–286.
Mosse, G. L. 1996. The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niva, S. 1998. Tough and Tender: New World Order Masculinity and the Gull War. In M. Zalewski and J. Parpart (eds), The “Man” Question in International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 109–128.
Olsson, L. 2001. Gender Mainstreaming in Practice: The United Nations Transitional Assistance Group in Namibia. In L. Olsson and T. L. Tryggestad (eds), Women and International Peacekeeping. London: Frank Cass, pp. 97–110.
Parashar, S. 2009. Feminist International Relations and Women Militants: Case Studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 2, June, pp. 235–256.
Prügl, E. 2013. Gender Expertise as Feminist Strategy. In G. Caglar, E. Prügl and S. Zwingel (eds), Feminist Strategies in International Governance. London: Routledge, pp. 57–73.
Prügl, E. and Thompson, H. 2013. The Whistleblower: Interview with Kathryn Bolkovac and Madeleine Rees, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 102–109.
Puechguirbal, N. 2003. Women and War in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, Summer, pp. 1271–1281.
Razack, S. H. 2004. Dark Fhreats and White Knights: The Somalia Affair, Peacekeeping and the New Imperialism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Reardon, B. 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Rees, M. 2002. International Intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina: The Cost of Ignoring Gender. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 51–67.
Reeves, A. 2012. Feminist Knowledge and Emerging Governmentality in UN Peacekeeping, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 348–369.
Regan, P. M. and Paskeviciute, A. 2003. Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 287–302.
Seifert, R. 2009. Armed Conflicts, Post-War Reconstruction and Gendered Subjectivities. In C. Eifler and R. Seifert (eds), Gender Dynamics and Post-conflict Reconstruction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 21–48.
Sjoberg, L. 2012. Gender Hierarchy, International Structure, and the Causes of War, International Theory, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–38.
Sjoberg, L. and Gentry, C. E. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. New York: Zed Books.
Skjelsbaek, I.2001. Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 211–237.
Stiehm, J. H. 1982. The Protected, the Protector, the Defender, Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 2, No. 3–4, pp. 367–376.
Stiehm, J. H. 1989. Arms and the Enlisted Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Tessler, M. and Warriner, I. 1997. Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict, World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 250–281.
Tétreault, M. A. (ed.) 1994. Women and Revolution in Africa, Asia, and the New World. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
The Women’s Memorial 2011. Statistics on Women in the Military. http://www.womensmemorial.org/Press/stats.html. Accessed 30 August 2012.
Tickner, J. A. 1999. Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama, International Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1–12.
Tryggestad, T. 2009. Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, Global Governance, Vol.15, No. 4, pp. 539–557.
Wadley, J. D. 2010. Gendering the State: Performativity and Protection in International Security. In L. Sjoberg (ed.), Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 38–58.
Waltz, K. N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wasmuht, U. C. 2002. Warum bleiben Kriege gesellschaftsfähig? Zum weiblichen Gesicht des Krieges. In C. Harders and B. Roß (eds), Geschlechterverhältnisse in Krieg und Frieden: Perspectiven der feministischen Analyse internationaler Beziehungen. Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich, pp. 87–103.
Weber, C. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, theState, and Symbolic Exchange. New York: Cambridge University Press.
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. 1987. Doing Gender, Gender and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, June, pp. 125–151.
Whittington, S. 2003. Gender and Peacekeeping: The United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, Summer, pp. 1283–1288.
Whitworth, S. 2004. Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Wood, E. J. 2006. Variation in Sexual Violence during War, Politics & Society, Vol. 34, No. 3, September, pp. 307–341.
Wood, E. J. 2009. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society, Vol. 37, No. 1, March, pp. 131–162.
Young, I. M. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–25.
Zarkov, D. 2002. Srebrenica Trauma: Masculinity, Military and National Sell-Image in Dutch Daily Newspapers. In C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov (eds), The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 183–203.
Zwingel, S. 2003. Männer und Kinder zuerst. Über die Notwendigkeit von Geschlechterkonstruktionen zur Legitimierung und Durchführung von Kriegen. In S. Albrecht, W. Goldschmidt and G. Stuby (eds), Die Welt zwischen Recht und Gewalt: Internationale Sozialordnung, Völkerrecht und Demokratie, Hamburg (Germany): VSA-Verlag.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Elisabeth Prügl
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prügl, E. (2014). Feminist Interventions in International Relations. In: Verschuur, C., Guérin, I., Guétat-Bernard, H. (eds) Under Development: Gender. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356826_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356826_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-67554-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35682-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)