Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voice in Student Essays

  • Chapter
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres

Abstract

Voice in written language — a metaphorical concept capturing the sense of author identity that comes through when readers interact with texts — has intrigued many writing teachers and researchers. While some teachers regard voice to be an essential feature of good writing, others consider it to be unnecessary, if not distracting, especially in the context of academic and professional writing. One of the most obvious reasons for this discrepancy is the varied conception of voice. In the early years, voice was conceptualized in individualistic terms, focusing on the expression of authentic self (Elbow, 1968; Stewart, 1969, 1972). This perspective has often been at odds with social-constructionist views of voice that emphasize the normative aspects of language use (Cope and Kalantzis, 1993; Hyland, 2008). There are more recent, social-constructivist conceptions of voice that see individual and social voice to be mutually constitutive and inevitable (Ivanič, 1998; Ivanič and Camps, 2001; Matsuda, 2001; Prior, 2001). Studies using a social-constructivist definition of voice (Matsuda, 2001) have shown that voice plays an important role in advanced academic literacy (Matsuda and Tardy, 2007; Tardy and Matsuda, 2009). Yet, as Tardy (this volume) has pointed out, the debate over the notion of voice has tended to be caught in a simplistic individual—social dichotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACT (2011) Writing test scores. Retrieved July 21, 2011 from http://www.act.org/aap/writing/sample/rubric.html

  • Allison, H. (2009) ‘Reading/writing connections for generation 1.5’ in Roberge, M., M. Siegal and L. Harklau (eds) Generation 1.5 in college composition: teaching academic writing to USeducated learners of ESL (New York: Routledge), pp. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. (2011, April) ‘Overview of the National Study of Writing Instruction’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. and J. Langer (2006) The state of writing instruction in America’s schools: what existing data tell us (Albany, NY: Center on English Learning and Achievement). Retrieved July 29, 2011 from http://www.albany.edu/aire/news/news_literacy.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S.W. (2006) ‘Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing’, Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 413–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1995) The elements of language curriculum: a systematic approach to program development (New York: Heinle & Heinle).

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board (2010) AP English Language and Composition 2010 Scoring Guidelines. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/english_lang/samp.html?englang

  • College Board (2011) SAT Essay Scoring Guide. Retrieved August 7, 2011, from http://sat.collegeboard.org/scores/sat-essay-scoring-guide

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010) English Language Arts Standards. Retrieved July 23, 2011, from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/english-language-arts-standards/writing-6–12/grade-11–12/

  • Cope, B. and M. Kalantzis (eds) (1993) The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing (London: Falmer Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Writing Program Administrators (2000) The WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition. Retrieved August 9, 2011 from http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html

  • DiPardo, A., B. A. Storms and M. Selland (2011) ‘Seeing voices: assessing writerly stance in the NWP analytic writing continuum’, Assessing Writing, 16, 170–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, L. B. (2005) ‘Democracy in schools: truly a matter of voice’, English Journal, 94 (5), 52–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (2008) TOEF iBT test independent writing rubrics. Retrieved August, 11, 2011, from http://www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/scores/interpret/

  • Educational Testing Service (2011) GRE score level descriptions for the analytic writing measure. Retrieved August, 11, 2011 from http://www.ets.org/gre/revised_general/prepare/analytical_writing/score_level_descriptions/

  • Elbow, P. (1968) ‘A method for teaching writing’, College English, 30, 115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, R. (2005) ‘Composition at the turn of the twenty-first century’, College Composition and Communication, 56 (4), 654–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, C. (2002) ‘Multiple voices, multiple genres: fiction for young adults’, English Journal, 92 (2), 52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, I. (1987) ‘Voice as juice: some reservations about evangelic composition’, College Composition and Communication, 38, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haswell, R. (2005) ‘Researching teacher evaluation of second language writing via prototype theory’ in Matsuda, P. K. and T. Silva (eds) Second language writing research: perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms-Park, R. and P. Stapleton (2003) ‘Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate 12 argumentative writing: an empirical study with pedagogical implications’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 245–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G. (2002) The testing trap: how state writing assessments control learning (New York: Teachers College Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2008) ‘Disciplinary voices: interactions in research writing’, English Text Construction, 1 (1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International English Language Testing System (n.d.) IELTS TM Task 2 Writing band descriptors (public version). Retrieved August 11, 2011, from http://www.ielts.org/PDF/UOBDs_WritingT2.pdf

  • Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R. and D. Camps (2001) ‘I am how I sound: voice as self-representation in L2 writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. L., S. A. Zinkgraf, D. R. Wormuth, V. F. Hartfiel and J. B. Hughey (1981) Testing ESL composition: a practical approach (Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, J. V. (2007, November) ‘Discourses of writing in high-stakes direct writing assessments’, Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, J. V. (2009) ‘Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: exploring variability’, Assessin AW riting, 14 (1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, J. V. (2010) ‘Voice, genre, and intentionality: an integrated methods study of voice criteria in the evaluation of secondary students’ writing’ (PhD dissertation, New York University). Dissertations & Theses @ New York University (Publication No. AAT3426956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, J. V. (2011) ‘Subjectivity, intentionality, and manufactured moves: teachers’ perceptions of voice in the evaluation of secondary students’ writing’, Research in the Teaching of English 46 (1). 92–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, A. A. and P. K. Matsuda (2008) ‘First-year composition in the 20th century US higher education: a historical overview’ in Friedrich, P. (ed.) Teaching academic writing (London: Continuum). pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHaney, P. A. (2004) ‘Let every voice be heard: focus essays create democratic classrooms’, English Journal, 93 (5), 72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2001) ‘Voice in Japanese written discourse: implications for second language writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2011, March) ‘Conceptions of voice in writing assessment rubrics’. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. and C. M. Tardy (2007) ‘Voice in academic writing: the rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review’, English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Governors’ Association (2011) Forty-nine states and territories join common core standards initiative. Retrieved July 29, 2011, from http://www.nga.org/cms/home/news-room/news-releases/page_2009/co12-content/main-content-list/title_forty-nine-states-and-territories-join-common-core-standards-initiative.html

  • Northwest Regional Education Laboratory (2008) 6+ 1 Trait definitions. Retrieved August 15, 2009 from http://www.thetraits.org/definitions.php

  • New York State Education Department (2007) Comprehensive examination in English: scoring key and rating guide. Retrieved April 15, 2007 from http://www.nysedregents.org/testine/enere/lre-107.pdf

  • Oregon DOE (2010a) Official scoring guide, writing 2010–2011. Retrieved July 21, 2011. from http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/Dage/?=32

  • Oregon DOE (2010b) Oregon’s statewide assessment system technical report: Volume 2, test development. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?=1305

  • Prior, P. (2001) ‘Voices in text, mind, and society: sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. and D. Atkinson (1999) ‘Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. and R. B. Kaplan (1996) ‘Audience and voice in current Ll composition texts: some implications for ESL student writers’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5 (1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, T. (2004) Crafting authentic voice (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglern, R. and M. VanZant (2010) ‘Privileging students’ voices: a coteaching philosophy that evokes excellence in all learners’, English Journal, 100 (2), 41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spandel, V. (2009) Creating writers through 6-trait writing assessment and instruction, 5th edn (Columbus, Ohio: Allyn and Bacon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, M. and D. Appleman (2011) ‘Voice in the context of literacy studies’, Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. C. (1969) ‘Prose with integrity: a primary objective’, College Composition and Communication, 20, 223–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. C. (1972) The authentic voice: a prewriting approach to student writing (Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, C. M. and P. K. Matsuda (2009) ‘The construction of author voice by editorial board members’, Written Communication, 26, 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2006) ‘Investing in assessment: designing tests to promote positive washback’ in Matsuda, P. K., C. Ortmeier-Hooper and X. You (eds) The politics of second language writing: in search of the promised land (West Lafayette, Ind.: Parlor Press), pp. 222–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. M. (2006) ‘Review of Susanmarie Harrington, Keith Rhodes, Ruth Overman Fischer, R. and R. Malenczyk’s The outcomes book: debate and consensus after the WPA Outcomes Statement’, WPA: Writing Program Administration, 29 (3), 111–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C. G. and L. Llosa (2008) ‘Voice in high-stakes Ll academic writing assessment: implications for L2 writing instmction’, Assessing Writing, 13, 153–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, USA

    Paul Kei Matsuda

  2. University of New Mexico, USA

    Jill V. Jeffery

Authors
  1. Paul Kei Matsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill V. Jeffery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Ken Hyland

  2. Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain

    Carmen Sancho Guinda

Copyright information

© 2012 Paul Kei Matsuda and Jill V. Jeffery

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matsuda, P.K., Jeffery, J.V. (2012). Voice in Student Essays. In: Hyland, K., Guinda, C.S. (eds) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation