Abstract
Dualism has been a key theme in feminist theory over the past 20–30 years. In one of their earliest insights, second-wave feminists noted that western thought is structured by an interweaving network of radical, hierarchical, fixed dichotomies, and that women have generally found themselves on the wrong side of these divides. Feminist analyses have demonstrated that seemingly neutral concepts such as ‘rationality’, ‘individuality’, ‘secularism’, ‘objectivity’ and ‘citizenship’ are, in fact, premised on assumptions of dualism.1 Feminist theory has itself contributed to the dualistic world-view. Recently, some feminist theorists have pointed out that, with its split between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’, a dualistic division between biological and social realities has been central to the second-wave feminist project (Kirby 1991; Nicholson 1994).
1,950 mile-long open wound
dividing a pueblo, a culture,
running down the length of my body,
staking rods in my flesh,
splits me splits me
me raja me raja
This is my home
this thin edge of
barbwire.
(Gloria Anzaldúa 1987: 2–3)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anzaldúa, G. 1987. Borderlands/ la Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benjamin, J. 1988. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination. London: Virago.
Bigwood, C. 1991. ‘Renaturalizing the Body (with the help of Merleau-Ponty)’, Hypatia, 6 (3): 54–73.
Bordo, S. 1987. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.
Boulderstone, K. 1997. ‘Hypericum perforatum’, The Homeopath, 64: 677–81.
Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cheney, J. 1989. ‘The Neo-stoicism of Radical Environmentalism’, Environmental Ethics, 11 (4): 293–325.
Cheney, J. 1994. ‘Nature/Theory/Difference: Ecofeminism and the Construction of Environmental Ethics’, in K. Warren (ed.) Ecological Feminism. London: Routledge.
Csordas, T. 1993. ‘Somatic Modes of Attention’, Cultural Anthropology, 8 (2): 135–56.
De Beauvoir, S. 1949; 1972. The Second Sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Elshtain, J.B. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Flax, J. 1992. ‘Is Enlightenment Emancipatory? A Feminist Reading of “What is Enlightenment?”’, in F. Barker et al. (eds.) Post-modernism and the Re-reading of Modernity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Frank, A. 1991. ‘For a Sociology of the Body: An Analytical Review’, in M. Featherstone et al. (eds.) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage.
Franklin, S. 1993. ‘Postmodern Procreation: Representing Reproductive Practice’, Science as Culture, 3 (4): 522–61.
Freund, P. 1990. ‘The Expressive Body: A Common Ground for the Sociology of Emotions and Health and Illness’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 12 (4): 452–77.
Goodison, L. 1992. Moving Heaven and Earth: Sexuality, Spirituality and Social Change. London: Pandora.
Goodman, F. 1986. Body Postures and the Religious Altered State of Consciousness: An Experimental Investigation’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 26: 81–118.
Gordon, D. 1988. ‘Tenacious Assumptions in Western Medicine’, In M. Lock and D. Gordon (eds.) Biomedicine Examined. London: Kluwer.
Griffin, S. 1978. Woman and Nature: The Roaring inside Her. New York: Harper and Row.
Grossinger, R. 1990. Planet Medicine: From Stone Age Shamanism to Post-Industrial Healing. 5th edition. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Haraway, D. [1985] 1991a. ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
Haraway, D. [1988] 1991b. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
Haraway, D. 1991c. ‘The Actors are Cyborg, Nature is Coyote, and the Geography is Elsewhere: Postscript to “Cyborgs at Large”’, in C. Penley and A. Ross (eds.) Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. 1992a. ‘Ecce Homo, Ain’t (ar’n’t) I a Woman, and Inappropriate/d Others: The Human in a Post-humanist Landscape’, in J. Butler and J. Scott (eds.) Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1992b. ‘The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others’, in L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. Treichler (eds.) Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1997. Modest-Witness@Second-Millenium. FemaleMan©-MeetsOncoMouse™. London: Routledge.
Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hein, H. 1992. ‘Liberating Philosophy: An End to the Dichotomy of Spirit and Matter’, in A. Garry and M. Pearsall (eds.) Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Holst, T. 1994. ‘In the Name of Rosen – on the Rosen Method and its Application in Sweden’, in H. Johannessen, et al. (eds.) Studies in Alternative Therapy 1: Contributions from the Nordic Countries. Odense: Odense University Press.
Jackson, J. 1994. ‘Chronic Pain and the Tension between the Body as Subject and Object’, in T. Csordas (ed.) Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, M. 1983. ‘Thinking through the Body: An Essay on Understanding Metaphor’, Social Analysis, 14: 127–49.
Jay, N. 1981. ‘Gender and Dichotomy’, Feminist Studies, 7 (1): 38–56.
Johannssen, H. 1996. ‘Individualized Knowledge: Reflexologists, Biopaths and Kinesiologists in Denmark’, in S. Cant and U. Sharma (eds.) Complementary and Alternative Medicines: Knowledge in Practice. London: Free Association Books.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning and Imagination and Reason. London: University of Chicago Press.
Kaufmann-Osborn, T. 1993. ‘Teasing Feminist Sense from Experience’, Hypatia, 8 (2): 124–44.
Keller, E.F. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kelly, M. and Field, D. 1996. ‘Medical Sociology, Chronic Illness and the Body’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 18 (2): 241–57.
King, Y. 1989. ‘Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and Nature/Culture Dualism’, in A. Jaggar and S. Bordo (eds.) Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. London: Rutgers University Press.
Kirby, V. 1991. ‘Corporeal Habits: Addressing Essentialism Differently’, Hypatia, 6 (3): 4–24.
Kleijnen, J. et al. 1991. ‘Clinical Trials of Homeopathy’, British Medical Journal, 302: 316–23.
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Law, J. and Mol, A. 1995. ‘Notes on Materiality and Sociality’, The Sociological Review, 43 (2): 274–94.
Lloyd, G. 1984. The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lorde, A. 1984. Sister Outsider. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
McKee, J. 1988. ‘Holistic Health and the Critique of Western Medicine’, Social Science and Medicine 26 (8): 775–84.
Minh-Ha, T. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing, Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Nicholls, P. 1995. ‘The Homeopathy Discussion Group’, in H. Johannessen, S. Gosvig Olesen and J. Østergård Anderson (eds.) Studies in Alternative Therapy 2: Body and Nature. Odense: Odense University Press.
Nicholson, L. 1994. ‘Interpreting Gender’. Signs, 20 (1): 79–105.
Ortner, S. 1974. ‘Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?’, in M. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere (eds.) Woman, Culture, Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Phelan, S. 1996. ‘Coyote Politics: Trickster Tales and Feminist Futures’, Hypatia, 11 (3): 130–49.
Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
Rich, A. 1977. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. London: Virago.
Sankaran, R. 1991. The Spirit of Homeopathy. Bombay: privately published.
Sankaran, R. 1994. The Substance of Homeopathy. Bombay: Homeopathic Medical Publishers.
Scott, A. 1996. ‘Embodied Politics: Emancipatory Epistemologies and Vitalistic Ontologies within Feminist Alternative Medicine’, University of Bradford: PhD thesis.
Scott, A. 1998. ‘Homeopathy as a Feminist Form of Medicine’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 20 (2): 191–214.
Sharma, U. 1995. ‘The Homeopathic Body: “Reification” and the Homeopathic “Gaze” ’, in H. Johannessen, S. Gosvig Olesen and J. Østergård Anderson (eds.) Studies in Alternative Therapy 2: Body and Nature. Odense: Odense University Press.
Star, S.L. 1991. ‘Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions’, in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.
Thornquist, E. 1995. ‘Musculoskeletal Suffering: Diagnosis and a Variant View’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 17 (2): 166–92.
Vithoulkas, G. 1986. The Science of Homeopathy. Wellingborough: Thorsons.
Warren, K. 1990. ‘The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism’, Environmental Ethics, 15 (2): 125–46.
Williams, G.H. 1984. ‘The Genesis of Chronic Illness: Narrative Reconstruction’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 6: 175–200.
Williams, S. 1996. ‘The Vicissitudes of Embodiment across the Chronic Illness Trajectory’, Body & Society, 2 (2): 23–47.
Winkler, C. (with Wininger, K.). 1994. ‘Rape Trauma: Contexts of Meaning’, in T. Csordas (ed.) Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 British Sociological Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott, A. (2001). The Storyteller’s Paradox: Homeopathy in the Borderlands. In: Cunningham-Burley, S., Backett-Milburn, K. (eds) Exploring the Body. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501966_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501966_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41694-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50196-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)