Skip to main content

Formal Welfarism and Intergenerational Equity

  • Chapter
Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Intergenerational justice is a matter that should primarily concern the present generation, since the individuals living now are those to take immediate decisions affecting generations that will be living in the future, and even in the far future, as we know, for example, from the exhaustibility of some resources or from the long-term effects of pollution such as global warming. Of course, each future generation will become ‘present’ at some point in time, and the reasoning followed for the present ‘present generation’ about intergenerational justice could be repeated at that point in time. But, to develop this reasoning, each present generation should have a representation of future generations’ interests. In that respect, a simple formulation of the problem that has been extensively analyzed consists in trying to find, under equity and efficiency conditions, an ordering of the set of possible ‘infinite utility streams’, that is, of the set of possible infinite sequences of utility levels attached to the successive generations starting with the present generation. In such a formulation, the welfare of each generation is represented by a single utility level, as if a generation were composed of a single individual or of a cohort of identical individuals with identical allocation.

I thank the participants to the IEA Roundtable Meeting on Intergenerational Equity, and in particular Geir Asheim and Walter Bossert, for their fruitful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the Belgian Science Policy Office (CLIMNEG 2 and IAP programmes) is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. ( 1951, 2d ed.1963), Social Choice and Individual Values ( New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G. B. and Tungodden, B. (2004) ‘Resolving Distributional Conflicts between Generations’, Economic Theory, vol. 24, pp. 221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C. (1985) ‘Axioms for Social Welfare Orderings,’ in: Hurwitz, L., Schmeidler, D. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds), Social Goals and Social Organizations: Essays in Memory of Elisha Pazner ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 19–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L. (1977) ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice,’ Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, pp. 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L. (2002) ‘Social Welfare Functionals and Interpersonal Comparability’, in Arrow, K., Sen A. and Suzumura K. (eds), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. I ( Amsterdam: Elsevier ), pp. 459–541.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atsumi, H. (1965) ‘Neoclassical Growth and the Efficient Program of Capital Accumulation’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 32, pp. 127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2003a) ‘Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams with Intergenerational Equity: the Impossibility of Being Paretian’, Econometrica, vol. 71, pp. 1557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2003b) ‘Utilitarianism for Infinite Utility Streams: a New Welfare Criterion and its Axiomatic Characterisation’, Working Paper no. 03–05, Department of Economics, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., Bossert W. and Donaldson, D. (2002) ‘Utilitarianism and the Theory of Justice’, in Arrow, K., Sen A. and Suzumura K. (eds), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. I ( Amsterdam: Elsevier ), pp. 543–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Sprumont Y. and Suzumura K. (2004) ‘The Possibility of Ordering Infinite Utility Streams’, Cahier 12–2004, CIREQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S. (1962) ‘The Existence of an Optimum Savings Program’, Econometrica, vol. 30, pp. 178–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1960) ‘Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory’, in Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S., and Suppes, P. (eds), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences ( Stanford: Stanford University Press ), pp. 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1965) ‘The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams’, Econometrica, vol. 33, pp. 170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, A. (1998) ‘Extended Pareto Rules and Relative Utilitarianism’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 15, pp. 521–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. (1952) ‘A Cardinal Concept of Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 66, pp. 366–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and Michel, P. (2003) ‘Intertemporal Equity and the Extension of the Ramsey Criterion’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 39, pp. 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, L. (1979) ‘On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings’,Econometrica vol. 47, pp. 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.J. (1976) ‘Equity, Arrow’s Conditions, and Rawls’ Difference Principle’, Econometrica, vol. 44, pp. 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.J. (1979) ‘Equity in Two Person Situations: Some Consequences’, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 1127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.C. (1972) Justice etEquité ( Paris: CNRS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1960) ‘Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience’, Econometrica, vol. 28, pp. 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers L. (1998) ‘Intertemporal Objective Functions. Strong Pareto versus Anonymity’, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. and Van Liedekerke, L. (1995) ‘Ultraproducts and Aggregation’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 24, pp. 217–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P. and d’Aspremont, C. (1998) ‘Utility Theory and Ethics’, in Barberà S., Hammond P. and Seidl C. (eds), Handbook of Utility Theory, vol. 1: Principles (Dordrecht: Kluwer ), pp. 371–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. (1928) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Savings’, Economic Journal, vol. 38, pp. 543–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare ( San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1976) ‘Welfare Inequalities and Rawlsian Axiomatics’, Theory and Decision,vol. 7, pp. 243–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977) ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, Econometrica vol. 45, pp. 1539–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966) ‘Some Formal Models of Grading Principles’, Synthèse, vol. 6, pp. 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.-G. (1980) ‘Equity Among Generations’, Econometrica, vol. 48, pp. 1251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpilrajn, E. (1930) ‘Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel’, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 16, pp. 386–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymark, J. A. (1981) ‘Generalized Gini Inequality Indices’, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 409–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, C. C. (1965) ‘Existence of Optimal Programmes of Accumulation for an Infinite Time Horizon’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 32, pp. 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

d’Aspremont, C. (2007). Formal Welfarism and Intergenerational Equity. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (eds) Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236769_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics