Skip to main content

From a Methodology of the Margins to Neoliberal Appropriation and Beyond: The Lineages of PAR

  • Chapter
Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change

Abstract

This chapter builds on theoretical research that I have conducted over the past decade on both critical ethnography and participatory action research (PAR) (Jordan, 2002, 2003b). Originally, the aim of this research was to problematize what I perceived to be taken-for-granted practices in the conduct of mainstream qualitative research that were still shaped and informed by colonial relations generated by nineteenth-century anthropology and ethnography (Jordan, 1993). I became increasingly aware, however, that these relations were not simply historical residues that were specific to the conceptual practices of anthropology, but were more widely distributed throughout the social sciences, as Smith’s work in relation to sociology has amply demonstrated (Smith, 1987, 1990a, 1990b, 1994). As a consequence I turned my attention to forms of PAR that, historically, had been generated outside the academy by social movements in the Global South that appeared to hold out the possibility of eschewing the colonial legacy of mainstream social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1991). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 85–96). Newbury Park: Sag

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1993). Action research in education. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in classroom research (2nd ed., pp. 235–245). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (2000). Social capital in the creation of human capital. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications (pp. 17–42). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. (2008). Participatory management as colonial administration. In D. Sadhvi, & B. Cooke (Eds.), The new development management (pp. 111–128). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke, & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny (pp. 1–15). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. (1977). State formation and moral regulation in nineteenth-century Britain: Sociological investigations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Durham University, Durham, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P., & Corrigan, V. (1979). State formation and social policy until 1871. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P., & Sayer, D. (1985). The great arch. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Monk, D. B. (2007). Evil paradises: Dreamworlds of neoliberalism. New York: New Press: Distributed by W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. (1969). Subversion and social change in Colombia (J. D. Skiles, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (1998). Questioning the concept of the learning organisation. In S. M. Scott, B. Spencer, & A. M. Thomas (Eds.), Learning for life: Canadian readings in adult education (pp. 140–152). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, G. (1999). Learning in social action: A contribution to understanding informal education. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Millaer (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1985). The tyranny of the status quo. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (1986). The political economy of freedom. In R. Levitas (Ed.), The ideology of the new right (pp. 25–54). Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. C., & King, J. E. (2008). The rise of neoliberalism in advanced capitalist economies: A materialist analysis. Basingstoke, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (1993, May). Critical ethnography: Problems in contemporary theory and practice. Paper presented at the Canadian Learneds, Carleton University (Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (1996). Schooling the vocational: The Technical Vocational Education Initiative (TVEI) and the making of the enterprise culture. Unpublished Doctoral Disseration, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (2002). Critical ethnography and the sociology of education. In A. Antikainen, & C. Torres (Eds.), Sociology of education: Perspectives for the new century (pp. 82–100). Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (2003a). Critical ethnography and educational research: Re-envisioning the sociology of education in an era of globalisation. Education and Society, 21(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (2003b). Who stole my methodology: Co-opting PAR. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1 (2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., & Yeomans, D. (1991). Whither independent learning? The politics of curricular and pedagogical change in a polytechnic department. Studies in Higher Education, 16(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbani, R. (1986). Europe’s myths of orient. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2000). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications (pp. 43–67). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, J., Huxley, C., & Robertson, D. (1997). Just another car factory? Lean production and its discontents. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In P. Heelas, & P. Morrise (Eds.), The values of the enterprise culture: The moral debate (pp. 141–164). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadhvi, D., & Cooke, B. (Eds.). (2008). The new development management. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T., & Field, J. (1998). Social capital, human capital and the learning society. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(4), 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990a). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990b). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1994). The relations of ruling: A feminist inquiry. Paper presented at the Group for Research into Institutionalization and Professionalization of Knowledge-Production (GRIP), University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1991). Customs in common. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Social Capital Measurement in CDD Operations. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/EXTTSOCIALCAPITAL/0,,contentMDK:20193038~isCURL:Y~menuPK:418220~pagePK: 148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:401015,00.html

  • Yeatman, A. (1997). Contract, status and personhood. In G. Davis, B. Sullivan, & A. Yeatman (Eds.), The new contractualism? (pp. 39–56). Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeatman, A. (1998). Interpreting contemporary contractualism. In M. Dean, & B. Hindess (Eds.), Governing Australia: Studies in the contemporary rationalities of government (pp. 227–241). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Dip Kapoor Steven Jordan

Copyright information

© 2009 Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jordan, S. (2009). From a Methodology of the Margins to Neoliberal Appropriation and Beyond: The Lineages of PAR. In: Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (eds) Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics