Skip to main content

Assessment for Learning in English Language Classrooms in China: Contexts, Problems, and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: New Language Learning and Teaching Environments ((NLLTE))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the use of assessment for learning (AfL) in English language classrooms in all educational settings in China. The chapter starts with a brief introduction to AfL: the definition, principles, and theoretical underpinnings, drawing upon literature from both general education and English language teaching (ELT). The chapter then attempts to make sense of the assessment contexts in China by teasing out the issues at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. It then reviews the empirical evidence of AfL in China based on the themes that emerged: teacher conceptions of AfL, teacher AfL practice, and AfL and teacher assessment literacy. These research findings are discussed by problematizing AfL implementation in the Chinese ELT contexts. This chapter concludes with an agenda for future research and suggestions concerning how to better prepare teachers for AfL in both pre- and in-service teacher education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (AFT, NCME, & NEA). (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARG. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge School of Education. Retrieved January 11, 2016, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/http://assessment-reform-group.org/CIE3.PDF

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Culture, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Hong Kong: CERC & ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Boud (Ed.), The psychology of the chinese people (pp. 312–266). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L. (2008a). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L. (2008b). Assessment literacy training and teachers’ conceptions of assessment. In C. Rubie-Davies & C. Rawlinson (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 285–302). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L., & Gao, L. (2015). Chinese teachers’ conceptions of assessment for and of learning: Six competing and complementary purposes. Cogent Education, 2(1), 993836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers' conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (2006). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). High-stakes examination preparation that controls teaching: Chinese prospective teachers’ conceptions of excellent teaching and assessment. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(5), 541–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., Kettle, M., Klenowski, V., & May, L. (2013). Interpretations of formative assessment in the teaching of English at two Chinese universities: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 831–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2009). English language assessment and the Chinese learners. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education (CMoE). (2003). Full-time high school English curriculum requirements. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education (CMoE). (2007). College English curriculum requirements. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education (CMoE). (2011). Nine-year compulsory education English curriculum standards. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area: English language curriculum guide (primary 1–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2006). English language education key learning area: New senior secondary curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: School-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers' beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471–499). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers' assessment practices: An integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment for learning: A compelling conceptualization. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 279–287). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, P. Y. (2014). The unbearable lightness of the curriculum: What drives the assessment practices of a teacher of English as a foreign language in a Chinese secondary school. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504). Norwell, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Zhang, W. (2014). The impact of the integrated feedback on students' writing revisions. Foreign Languages in China, 11(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC Journal, 45(3), 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y. (2010). The place of language testing and assessment in the professional preparation of foreign language teachers in China. Language Testing, 27(4), 555–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V. (2009). Editorial: Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., Mak, P., & Burns, A. (2016). EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom. Language Teaching Research, 20(2), 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levison, B., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D., & Wu, Z. (2014). New development of research on language assessment literacy. Modern Foreign Languages, 37(5), 711–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedder, D., & James, M. (2012). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 33–49). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese EFL students’ attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pair work setting. RELC Journal, 30(1), 79–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, H. (2014). The components of language assessment literacy and development strategies. Global Education, 43(6), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2011). Professional development of teachers—A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. F., Hill, M. F., Cowie, B., & Gilmore, A. (2014). Preparing teachers to use the enabling power of assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 418–445). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobart, G. (2012). Validity in formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 233–249). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2009). A survey of college English teachers and teaching. Foreign Language World, 4, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2011). On the state of college English teaching in China and its future development. Foreign Languages in China, 5(4–11), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, K. (1993). Classroom interaction and teacher questions revisited. RELC Journal, 24(2), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Li, H., & Li, B. (2010). College students’ self-assessment of their English reading abilities. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Studies, 33(5), 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. (2016). Teacher assessment planning within the context of university English language teaching (ELT) in China: Implications for assessment literacy. Australia Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Carless, D. (2016). ‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: Cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759

  • Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate: Competition examinations and their consequences. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R. (2004). Using the principles of exploratory practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, T., & Yang, Y. (2014). An empirical study of learners’ self-assessment on oral English proficiency by means of videotaping. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 4, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors of this chapter would like to acknowledge the financial support for this study in part by the National Social Science Foundation of China (grant #12CYY026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, J., Xu, Y. (2017). Assessment for Learning in English Language Classrooms in China: Contexts, Problems, and Solutions. In: Reinders, H., Nunan, D., Zou, B. (eds) Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60092-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60092-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60091-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60092-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics