Abstract
Far from simply asserting that in On Certainty Wittgenstein manifests a pragmatist strand because of the emphasis he puts on action, the author refers to the texts of the pragmatists and in particular to the ‘pragmatic maxim’, and argues that Wittgenstein explores very similar ideas, especially in a set of remarks written during what she labels Wittgenstein’s ‘pragmatist week’, in March 1951. Further inquiries are devoted to the concepts of habits, practices, and conduct. One of the results of the pragmatists’ and Wittgenstein’s approaches to action is that the latter is embedded within a habit, a stream, or a form of life and cannot be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of a single rational output of an agent stemming from a free decision.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Also in CP 5.400–402.
- 2.
Also in CP 5.371.
- 3.
See Misak (2004, pp. 12–14).
- 4.
See CP 5.196, from ‘Pragmatism and Abduction’, 1903.
- 5.
In ‘Pragmatism: The Normative Sciences’.
- 6.
In ‘Three Types of Reasoning’, 1903.
- 7.
In ‘Pragmatism and Abduction’, 1903.
- 8.
Again in ‘‘Pragmatism and Abduction’.
- 9.
In ‘What Pragmatism Is’, 1905.
- 10.
See CP 5.504, from ‘Consequences of Critical Common-Sensism’, 1905.
- 11.
- 12.
From ‘A Survey of Pragmaticism’, 1907; also in EP 2, pp. 401–402, and SW, p. 272.
- 13.
Yet, in my view, the expression ‘externalism’ (like any other ‘ism’) needs qualification when referred to Wittgenstein, as his reflections cannot easily be put under this label. See in particular the remarks on the internal and the external in LW, which show a very sophisticated and unconventional outlook.
- 14.
From ‘A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God’, 1908.
- 15.
From ‘An Essay toward Improving our Reasoning in Security and Uberty’, prob. 1913.
- 16.
From ‘Pragmatism’, 1907.
- 17.
‘What Pragmatism Is’, quoted in Hookway (2012, p. 173) from EP 2, p. 332.
- 18.
But see also Wu (1994).
- 19.
On this topic see also Putnam (1992a).
- 20.
See for instance MT, pp. 4, 143.
- 21.
See PR, §230g; BT, p. 95 and in general sec. 32 and sec. 60; PI, §§80–81, 268–269, 543, 578; RPP I, §306; LW II, pp. 81 ff.
- 22.
- 23.
But see the different opinion of Chauviré (2003, p. 96), who underlines the closeness to scientific conceptions.
- 24.
From MS 131, p. 70.
- 25.
Originally in MS 110, p. 231 (1931), quoted in Schulte (1999, p. 318).
- 26.
Notice that William James repeatedly compares truths and the banknotes of the credit system (see for instance P, p. 100), and remember his metaphor of the ‘cash value’ (P, p. 32).
- 27.
On the difference between use and usefulness, see also Moyal-Sharrock (2007, p. 171).
- 28.
Compare the chapter on the stream of thought in James’ PP (1890, originally appearing in 1884 as an article) with Peirce’s metaphor of thought as a melody in ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’ (1878), and also with Peirce’s article ‘The Law of Mind’, 1892 (W 8, pp. 126–157, CP 6.102–163, CLL, pp. 202–237).
- 29.
From ‘Consequences of Critical Common-Sensism’. A similar characterization of thought can be found in ‘Some Consequences of Four Incapacities’, where Peirce affirms that the meaning of a thought is virtual and not actual (W 2, p. 227, CP 5.289). We will examine this passage in next chapter.
- 30.
See for example PI, §§591, 633; PPF, sec. vi; RPP II, §§242–243.
- 31.
Rhees (2003, p. 32). The original formulation of PI, §511 is in MS 110, p. 292 (1931).
- 32.
Ramsey wrote about tautologies and contradictions as ‘degenerate cases’ of propositions in ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’, 1925 (see Ramsey 1990, Chap. 8).
- 33.
See MS 153, p. 40v (1931); MS 116, p. 51 (circa 1937–1938); MS 119, p. 87v (1937); the same themes can be found in some typescripts: TS 211, pp. 521, 529 (1932); BT, p. 340; TS 228, p. 10 (1945–1946); TS 233, p. 56 (1945–1946).
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
BT, p. 155. See also BT, sec. 10 and LCL, pp. 63–64.
- 37.
Faust is mentioned again in the PP chapter on the will; other quotes can be found for instance in ‘Reflex Action and Theism’ (WB, p. 61), in ‘The Sentiment of Rationality’ (WB, p. 90), in VRE. On Goethe and James cf. Richardson (2006, sec. 12).
- 38.
- 39.
It is not by chance that in Goethe one can find what we may call a ‘proto-pragmatic maxim’ like this: ‘Indeed, strictly speaking, it is useless to attempt to express the nature of a thing abstractedly. Effects we can perceive, and a complete history of those effects would, in fact, sufficiently define the nature of the thing itself. We should try in vain to describe a man’s character, but let his acts be collected and an idea of the character will be presented to us’. This is in the Preface of the Theory of Colors (Goethe 1840), which Wittgenstein knew very well (McGuinness 2012, pp. 456–458).
- 40.
Originally published in 1881, then in WB.
- 41.
Originally published in 1884, then in WB.
- 42.
Published in 1896 as an article, it also gives the title to the collection of essays WB, which appeared the following year with a dedication to Peirce.
- 43.
He announces this in the Preface of WB.
- 44.
From ‘What Pragmatism Is’, 1905.
- 45.
From ‘Mind and Matter’, 1893.
- 46.
- 47.
According to Coliva (2013), the pragmatic acceptation of a certainty, also and chiefly if it has a normative nature, requires that the content of the norm be grasped; in this sense, it is only because we have grasped its content, that a certainty can work as a practical platitude not subject to doubt.
- 48.
An idea we could perhaps compare to Peirce’s concept of instinctive insight, CP 5.604. For other aspects, the idea Moyal-Sharrock gleans from Wittgenstein could be put side by side with James’ description of rationality in ‘The Sentiment of Rationality’ (in WB).
- 49.
Quoted in Schulte (1993, pp. 22, 167).
- 50.
See Pihlström (2012).
- 51.
James’ relevance is clear for example in BBB, pp. 150–151, PI §§611–631, LPP, pp. 157–158 and 202–204, RPP I, §§759 ff. See also Citron (2015a), pp. 20–22. Goodman’s work is very detailed on these issues.
- 52.
- 53.
From MS 110, p. 12. Quoted here with the translation used in Shusterman (2008, p. 126). Original text: ‘Die Musik scheint manchem eine primitive Kunst zu sein mit ihren wenigen Tönen & Rythmen. Aber einfach ist nur ihre Oberfläche [ihr Vordergrund] während der Körper der die Deutung dieses manifesten Inhalts ermöglicht die ganze unendliche Komplexität besitzt die wir in dem Äußeren der anderen Künsten angedeutet finden & die die Musik verschweigt. Sie ist in gewissem Sinne raffinierteste aller Künste’.
- 54.
- 55.
Also in Z, §567; originally in MS 137, p. 54a, June 1948, then in TS 232, pp. 753–754.
- 56.
See Marchetti (2015b) on this.
- 57.
This was pointed out to me by an anonymous reviewer, who referred chiefly to Peirce.
Bibliography
PU—A Pluralistic Universe. New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1909.
Andronico. M. 1998. Antropologia e metodo morfologico. Studio su Wittgenstein. Naples: La Città del Sole.
Bain, A. 1868. Mental Science. A Compendium to Psychology and the History of Philosophy. New York: Appleton & Co.
Bambrough, R. 1981. Peirce, Wittgenstein and Systematic Philosophy. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume VI, The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, ed. P.A. French, T.E. Uehling Jr., and H.K. Wettstein. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Boncompagni, A. 2013. Enactivism and the ‘Explanatory Trap’. A Wittgensteinian Perspective. Methode—Analytic Perspectives 2 (2): 27–49.
Boncompagni, A. 2014. On Trying to Say What ‘Goes Without Saying’. Wittgenstein on Certainty and Ineffability. Journal of Theories and Research in Education / Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica 9 (1): 51–68.
Breithaupt, F., Raatzsch, R., and Kremberg, B. eds. 2003. Goethe and Wittgenstein. Seeing the Worlds Unity in Its Variety (Wittgenstein Studien 5). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Calcaterra, R.M. 2012. Truth in Progress: The Value of the Facts-and-Feelings Connection in William James. In American and European Values: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives, ed. M.C. Flamm, J. Lacks, and K.P. Skowronski. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Chauviré, C. 2003. Le grand miroir. Essais sur Peirce et sur Wittgenstein. Besançon Cedex: Presses Universitaires Franc-Comtoises.
Citron, G. ed. 2015b. A Discussion Between Wittgenstein and Moore on Certainty (1939): From the Notes of Norman Malcolm. Mind 124 (493): 72–84.
Colapietro, V. 2011. Allowing our Practices to Speak for Themselves: Wittgenstein, Peirce, and Their Intersecting Lineages. In New Perspectives on Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy, ed. R.M. Calcaterra. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Coliva, A. 2013. Hinges and Certainty. A Précis of Moore and Wittgenstein. Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense. Philosophia 41 (1): 1–12.
Egidi, R. 1983. Intenzione e ipotesi in Wittgenstein. In Wittgenstein. Momenti di una critica del sapere, ed. A. Gargani, A.G. Conte, and R. Egidi. Naples: Guida Editori.
Engelmann. M.L. 2012. Wittgenstein’s New Method and Russell’s The Analysis of Mind. Journal of Philosophical Research 37: 283–311.
Franzese, S. 2008. The Ethics of Energy. William James Moral Philosophy in Focus. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Gill, J. 1974. Saying and Showing: Radical Themes in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Religious Studies 10 (3): 279–290.
Goethe, J.W. 1840. Theory of Colours. London: J. Murray.
Goodman, R. 2002. Wittgenstein and William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, A. 2014. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and On Certainty. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hookway, C. 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim. Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutto, D.D., and Myin, E. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism. Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, MA and London: Mit Press.
Kilpinen, E. 2009. Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Action. In Pragmatist Perspectives (Acta Philosophica Fennica vol. 86), ed. S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.
Koopman, C. 2014. Conduct Pragmatism: Pressing Beyond Experientialism and Lingualism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (2): 145–174.
Lovejoy, A. 1908. The Thirteen Pragmatisms. Part I: The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 5 (1): 5–12; Part II: The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 5 (2): 29–39.
Marchetti, S. 2015a. Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marchetti, S. 2015b. Unfamiliar Habits: James and the Ethics and Politics of Self-Experimentation. William James Studies 11: 102–113.
McGinn, M. 2001. Saying and Showing and the Continuity of Wittgenstein’s Thought. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 9 (1): 24–36.
McGuinness, B. 2002. In the Shadow of Goethe: Wittgenstein’s Intellectual Project. European Review 10 (4): 447–457.
McGuinness, B. ed. 2012. Wittgenstein in Cambridge. Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Menand, L. 2001. The Metaphysical Club. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Misak, C. 2004. Truth and the End of Inquiry. A Peircean Account of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monk, R. 1991. Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. 2000. Words as Deeds: Wittgenstein’s ‘Spontaneous Utterances’ and the Dissolution of the Explanatory Gap. Philosophical Psychology 13 (3): 355–372.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. 2003. Logic in Action: Wittgenstein’s Logical Pragmatism and the Impotence of Scepticism. Philosophical Investigations 26 (2): 125–148.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. 2007. Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ogden, C.K. and Richards, I.A. 1960. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pihlström, S. 2012. A New Look at Wittgenstein and Pragmatism. The European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (2): 9–26.
Putnam, H. 1992a. The Permanence of William James. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 46 (3): 17–31.
Putnam, H. 2001. Rules, Attunement, and ‘Applying Words to the World’. The struggle to Understand Wittgenstein’s Vision of Language. In The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism or Deconstruction, ed. L. Nagl and C. Mouffe. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Ramsey, F.P. 1931. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Ed. R.B. Braithwaite. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ramsey, F.P. 1990. Philosophical Papers. Ed. D.H. Mellor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhees, R. 2003. Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. There—Like Our Life. Ed. D.Z. Phillips. Oxford: Blackwell.
Richardson, R.D. 2006. William James in the Maelstrom of American Modernism: A Biography. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Rorty, R. 1961. Pragmatism, Categories and Language. The Philosophical Review 70 (2): 197–223.
Russell, B. 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Rydenfelt, H. 2009. The Meaning of Pragmatism. James on the Practical Consequences of Belief. Cognitio—Revista de Filosofia 10 (1): 81–89.
Schulte, J. 1993. Experience and Expression. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schulte, J. 1999. Wittgenstein—auch ein Pragmatist? In Philosophieren über Philosophie, ed. R. Raatzsch. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
Shusterman, R. 2008. Body Consciousness. A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shusterman, R. 2012a. The Body as Background. Pragmatism and Somaesthetics. In Knowing Without Thinking. Mind, Action, Cognition, and the Phenomenon of the Background, ed. Z. Radman. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shusterman, R. 2012b. Thinking Through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, P. ed. 2013. Special issue of Intellectica, 2 (60), ‘Pragmatism and Cognitive Science’.
Wu, Y. 1994. Peirce’s Arguments for His Pragmatic Maxim. In Living Doubt. Essays Concerning the Epistemology of Charles S. Peirce, ed. G. Debrock and M. Hulswit. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boncompagni, A. (2016). Chapter 4: Action and the Pragmatic Maxim. In: Wittgenstein and Pragmatism. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58847-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58847-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58846-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58847-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)