Skip to main content

An Ethnographic Approach to the Taking Place of the Event

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Event Studies

Part of the book series: Leisure Studies in a Global Era ((LSGE))

  • 1407 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter delineates an ethnographic methodology to explore urban events accounting for the contested contingency of their taking place. This approach marks a difference vis-à-vis more conventional ways to explore urban events, which frame them through static, outcome-oriented, managerial, and de-materialising perspectives that tend to miss and pacify its constitutive conflictuality. Following instead the path opened by a series of recent attempts to address urban events in their material, sensorial, dynamic, and contingent unfolding, this chapter presents a methodology focused on the conflictual taking place of the event: the coming together of practices, bodies, and spaces through which the event emerges, the often uncontrollable narratives, affects, and materialities it produces, as well as the dispositifs put in place to control them, to channel the event’s contingency into precise, meaningful, and safe outcomes. It is exactly these frictions—generated at the encounter between the lines of flight of the event and the attempts to control them, which the ethnography permits to unpack and describe. Significantly, this research methodology is applicable to different types of events at different scales, and this is illustrated by a comparative analysis of two case studies of urban events. The first is a neighbourhood festival set in Milan, aimed to foster social inclusion among different ethnic groups. The second is a mega event, the 2010 South Africa FIFA World Cup, as it takes place in the city of Johannesburg. Notwithstanding the sheer difference of scale, organisation, significance, and purpose between them, both events take place in the urban space and thus produce an impact on the pre-existent rhythm and atmosphere of the city, whose outcomes are always to some extent unpredictable and contested, and thus require an appropriate methodology to be accounted for. This comparative analysis shows how this ethnographic approach is fitting to this task, as well as its value in highlighting the emancipatory potential of the event, at its different scales and typologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. & Harrison, P. (Eds.) (2010). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. & Holden, A. (2008). Affective urbanism and the event of hope. Space and Culture, 11, 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2007). The event in Deleuze. Parrhesia, 2, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1941). Rabelais and his world. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C. (2011). Theory and events. Geoforum, 42(3), 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Barrio, M. J., Devesa, M., & Herrero, L. C. (2012). Evaluating intangible cultural heritage: The case of cultural festivals. City, Culture and Society, 3(4), 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boullier, D. (2011). Méthodes de Tri des Foules et des Publics dans le Parc Humain Lors des événements/Metodi di Ordinamento delle Folle e dei Pubblici all’Interno del Parco Umano in Occasione degli Eventi Urbani. Lo Squaderno, 19, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycoff, J. & Fussey, P. (2014). London’s shadow legacies: Security and activism at the 2012 Olympics. Contemporary Social Science, 9(2), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti, A. M. (2010a). Visibility in social theory and social research, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti, A. M. (2010b). On territorology. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, T. P. R. (2001). City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. & Page, S. J. (2012). The Routledge handbook of events. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansero, E., Del Corpo, B., Mela, A., & Ropolo, I. (2011). Olympic games, conflicts and social movements: The case of Torino 2006. In G. Hayes & J. Karamichas (Eds.), Olympic games, mega-events and civil societies. Globalization, environment, resistance. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is philosophy? London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della, P. D. (2008). Eventful protest, global conflicts. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J. (2008). Newspaper Design as Cultural Change. Visual Communication, 7(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M., Waitt, G., Gorman-Murray, A., & Gibson, C. (2011). Bodily rhythms: Corporeal capacities to engage with festival spaces. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eick, V. (2011). Secure our profits! The FIFATM in Germany 2006. In C. J. Bennett & K. Haggerty (Eds.), Security games: Surveillance and control at mega-events. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, J. (2003) Immigration. Memory and Place. Milan, the last Hundred Years. ebook, available online at: http://diffusion.org.uk/?tag=john-foot. Last accessed 24th March 2016.

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structural anthology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frew, M. & McGillivray, D. (2008). Exploring hyper-experiences: Performing the fan at Germany 2006. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 13(3), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giulianotti, R. (2011). Sport mega events, urban football carnivals and securitized commodification: The case of the English Premier League. Journal of Sport &amp Social Issues, 35(1), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K. F. (2011). Resisting urban spectacle: The 1984 Louisiana exposition and the contradictions of mega events. Urban Studies, 48(1), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, A. (2010). From the stadium to the fan zone: Host cities in a state of emergency. Soccer & Society, 11(6), 723–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. M., & Page, S. J. (2012). Geography and the study of events. In J. Cornell & S. J. Page (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (1992). The politics of the streets: A geography of Caribana. Political Geography, 11(2), 130–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M. & Kociatkiewicz, J. (2011). City festivals: Creativity and control in staged urban experiences. European Urban and Regional studies, 18(4), 392–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2012). Occupying the Olympic games through the use of social media. Paper presented at the Innovation and Research Office Ph.D. Conference, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, 1st March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacem, M. B. (2011). A Tunisian Renaissance. http://www.lacan.com/thesymptom/?page_id=1046.

  • Kempa, M., Stenning, P., & Wood, J. (2004). Policing communal spaces: A reconfiguration of the mass private property hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 44(4), 562–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KwaZulu-Natal, Department of Community Safety and Liaison. (2010). Traveller tips.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, A. & McCormack, D. P. (2009). Globalizations big and small: Notes on urban studies, actor network theory, and geographical scale. In I. Farias & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, L. H. (1998). The public realm. Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, B., Pinchuck, T., Reid, D., & Salter, G. (2002). The rough guide to South Africa. London: Rough Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, P. (2009). Glasgow rangers supporters in the city of Manchester: The degeneration of a ‘Fan Party’ into a ‘Hooligan Riot’. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44(4), 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, S. & Mbembe, A. (2004). Writing the world from an African Metropolis. Public Culture, 16(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoni, A. (2011). Tuning the City: Johannesburg and the 2010 World Cup. Urbe Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana [Brazilian Journal of Urban Management], 3(2), 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pløger, J. (2010). Presence experiences—The eventalisation of urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 848–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, N. (2011). Speed, rhythm and time-space: Museums and cities. Space and Culture, 14(2), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahola, F. (2014). Urban at large. Notes for an ethnography of urbanization and its frictious sites. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa (3), 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1995). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samatas, M. (2007). Security and surveillance in the Athens 2004 Olympics: Some lessons from a troubled story. International Criminal Justice Review, 17(3), 220–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, M. & Adang, O. (2010). The poles are coming! Fan behaviour and police tactics around the World Cup Match Germany vs. Poland. Sport in Society, 13(3), 470–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell Jr., W. H. (1996). Three temporalities: Toward a sociology of the event. In T. J. McDonald (Ed.), The historic turn in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, R., & Stone, P. R. (2012). Socio- cultural impacts of events. Meanings, authorized transgression and social capital. In J. Cornell & S. J. Page (eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnerbrink, R. (2006). Nomadology or ideology? Žižek’s critique of deleuze. Parrhesia, 1, 62–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, R. F. (2013). An ethnographic exploration of knowledge practices within the Queensland Music Festival. International Journal of Event and Festival Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1974). Drama, fields, and metaphors. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C. (2008). Building a safe South Africa. SouthAfrica.Info, 06 November. Retrieved from http://www.southafrica.info/2010/project2010column32.htm.

  • Zizek, S. (2014). Event: A philosophical journey through a concept. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pavoni, A., Citroni, S. (2016). An Ethnographic Approach to the Taking Place of the Event. In: R Lamond, I., Platt, L. (eds) Critical Event Studies. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52384-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52386-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics