Skip to main content

Military Markets, Masculinities and the Global Political Economy of the Everyday: Understanding Military Outsourcing as Gendered and Racialised

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors give an introduction to military outsourcing as a gendered and racialised process. First, they provide an overview of the research field of critical gender and postcolonial studies on military privatisation. Second, they demonstrate the contributions of this research to the gender-sensitive analysis of war and military institutions. Third, they argue for a feminist political economy approach to the study of private military and security companies. Drawing upon their own research, they theorise private military security as an issue of labour, which deeply affects the everyday lives of men and women in the industry’s recruitment sites in the Global South.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Martial race was, and continues to be, an ambiguous racial logic and practice that allowed colonial armies to categorise indigenous labour in hierarchical terms. It claims that some indigenous people, such as the Sikhs, Kamba, Maori and Gurkhas are more naturally suitable for military service. For detailed descriptions of how martial race worked in practice in military operations and more currently, in private security see Enloe 1980; Ware 2010; Chisholm 2014a, 2015, 2016.

  2. 2.

    Gurkhas are a group of Nepalese nationals with over 200 years of military service with the British military, the Indian army, the Brunei Saltan’s army and the Singaporean police. For a detailed history of them see Coleman’s A Special Corps (1999).

References

  • Abrahamsen, R. & Williams, M.C. (2011). Security Beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, D.D. (2005). The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baggiarini, B. (2015). Military Privatization and the Gendered Politics of Sacrifice. In M. Eichler (Ed.) Gender and Private Security in Global Politics (pp. 37–54). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, I., & Silvey, R. (2008). Beyond States and Markets. The Challenges of Social Reproduction. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, I.V. (2009). (Re)Producing American Soldiers in an Age of Empire. Politics and Gender, 5: 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, A. (2012). Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndtsson, J., & Stern, M. (2011). Private Security and the Public–Private Divide: Contested Lines of Distinction and Modes of Governance in the Stockholm- Arlanda Security Assemblage. International Political Sociology, 5 (4): 408–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. (2014a). The Silenced and Indispensible: Gurkhas in Private Military Security Companies. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16 (1): 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. (2014b). Marketing the Gurkha Security Package: Colonial Histories and Neoliberal Economies of Private Security. Security Dialogue, 45 (4): 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. (2015). From Warriors of Empire to Martial Contractors: Reimagining Gurkhas in Private Security. In M. Eichler (Ed.) Gender and Private Security in Global Politics (pp. 95–113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. (2016). Postcoloniality and Race in Private Security Markets. In Abrahamsen, R. & Leander, A. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies (pp. 177–186). Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. & Stachowitsch, S. (2016) Everyday Matters in Global Private Security Supply Chains: A Feminist Global Political Economy Perspective on Gurkhas in Private Security. Globalizations, 13 (6): 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, A.P. (1999). A Special Corps. The Beginnings of Gorkha Service with the British. Bishop Auckland: The Pentland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2006). Everyday Life in the Global Political Economy. In M. de Goede (Ed.) International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics (pp. 219–237). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. (2013). Gender and the Privatization of Security: Neoliberal Transformation of the Militarized Gender Order. Critical Studies on Security, 1: 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. (2014). Citizenship and the Contracting Out of Military Work: From National Conscription to Globalized Recruitment. Citizenship Studies, 8 (6–7): 600–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. (Ed.). (2015). Gender and Private Security in Global Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. & Chisholm, A. (2015). Privatising the Politics of Military Marriages: Female Spouses and Private Security. Paper Presented at International Studies Association Annual Conference in New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, J. (2005). Stitching-up the Labour Market. Recruitment, Gender and Ethnicity in the Multinational Firm. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, J. (2010). Locating the ‘Everyday’ in International Political Economy: That Roar Which Lies on the Other Side of Silence. International Studies Review, 12: 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, J. (Ed.). (2015). Introduction: Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Political Economy: Crossing Divides and Rebuilding Bridges. Politics & Gender, 11 (2): 406–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (1980). Ethnic Soldiers: State Security in a Divided Society. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Making Feminist Sense of International Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, V. & Von Boemcken, Marc. (2011). Guns for Hire: Motivations and Attitudes of Private Security Contractors. Armed Forces and Society, 37 (4): 725–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higate, P. (2012a). ‘Cowboys and Professionals’: The Politics of Identity Work in Private and Military Security Company. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40: 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higate, P. (2012b). Martial Races and Enforcement Masculinities of the Global South: Weaponising Fijian, Chilean and Salvadoran Postcoloniality in Mercenary Sector. Globalizations, 9: 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higate, P. (2012c). Drinking Vodka from the ‘Butt-Crack’. Men, Masculinities and Fratriarchy in Private Militarized Security Company. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14: 450–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higate, P. (2012d). In the Business of (In)Security. Mavericks, Mercenaries and Masculinities in the Private Security Company. In A. Kronsell, & E. Svedberg, (Eds.) Marking Gender, Making War. Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices (pp. 183–196). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2012). Of ‘True Professionals’ and ‘Ethical Hero Warriors’: A Gender-Discourse Analysis of Private Military and Security Companies. Security Dialogue, 43 (6): 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2015). The Licence to Exploit: PMSCs, Masculinities and the Third Country National. In M. Eichler (Ed.) Gender and Private Security in Global Politics. (pp. 114–130). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, C. (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, E. (2008). Security: Collective Good or Commodity. European Journal of International Relations, 14 (3): 379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, E. (2013). The United States, PMSCs and the State Monopoly on Violence: Leading the Way Towards Norm Change. Security Dialogue, 441: 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, A. (2005). The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33 (3): 803–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, A. (Ed.). (2013). The Commercialization of Security in Europe: Consequences for Peace and Reconciliation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, A., & Van Munster, R. (2007). Private Security Contractors in the Debate About Darfur: Reflecting and Reinforcing Neo-Liberal Governmentality. International Relations, 21 (2): 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy, S. (2009). Private Security Companies and Civil Wars. Civil Wars Special Issue Non State External Actors and Civil Wars, 11 (1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersohn, U. (2011). The Other Side of COIN: Private Security Companies and Counterinsurgency Operations. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 34 (10): 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingeot, L. (2012). Dangerous Partnerships. Private Military and Security Companies and the UN. New York: Global Policy Forum and Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. & True, Jacqui. (2014). Equality Means Business? Governing Gender Through Transnational Public-Private Partnerships. Review of International Political Economy, 21 (6): 1137–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, S., & Yeung, C. (2008). Private Military Security Companies and Gender: Gender and Security Sector Reform Toolkit. Geneva: DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. C. (1999). Citizen-Soldiers and Manly Warriors: Military Service and Gender in the Civic Republican Tradition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearin, C. (2006). Special Operations Forces a Strategic Resource: Public and Private Divides. Parameters, 36: 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, V. (2015). Engendering Accountability in Private Security and Public Peacekeeping. In M. Eichler (Ed.) Gender and Private Security in Global Politics (pp. 169–186). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowitsch, S. (2012). Gender Ideologies and Military Labor Markets in the US. London-New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachowitsch, S. (2013a). Professional Soldier, Weak Victim, Patriotic Heroine. Gender Ideologies in Debates on Women’s Military Integration in the US. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15 (2): 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowitsch, S. (2013b). Military Privatization and the Remasculinization of the State: Making the Link Between Outsourcing of Military Security and Gendered State Transformations. International Relations, 27: 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowitsch, S. (2014). The Reconstruction of Masculinities in Global Politics: Gendering Strategies in the Field of Private Security. Men and Masculinities, Online First, Oct. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachowitsch, S. (2015). Military Privatization as a Gendered Process: A Case for Integrating Feminist International Relations and Feminist State Theories. In M. Eichler (Ed.) Gender and Private Security in Global Politics (pp. 19–36). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2008). Contingent Commodities. Mobilizing Labour in and beyond Southeast Asia Forests. In J. Nevins, & L. Peluso (Eds.) Taking Southeast Asia to Market. Commodities, Nature and People in the Neoliberal Age (pp. 27–42). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, V. (2010). Whiteness in the Glare of War. Soldiers, Migrants and Citizenship. Ethnicities, 10 (3): 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Chisholm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chisholm, A., Stachowitsch, S. (2017). Military Markets, Masculinities and the Global Political Economy of the Everyday: Understanding Military Outsourcing as Gendered and Racialised. In: Woodward, R., Duncanson, C. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51677-0_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics