Abstract
In this chapter, Freedberg sets out to establish a more rigorous basis for the understanding of empathy, and proposes a novel hypothesis about the neural substrate of judgment. After discussing the history of empathy in aesthetic theory and the frequently ambiguous conceptualizations of aesthetic judgment within cognitive neuroscience of art, he confines empathy to the domain of motor responses. Moving on to examine the role of immediate and automatic bodily reactions both in the perception of visual images and in aesthetic response, he emphasizes the precognitive dimension of empathy and its place in the understanding of such responses. He distinguishes empathy from sympathy by assessing the degree of cognitive content of each. Finally, he shows how these positions enable a new neural theory of aesthetic judgment predicated on the modulation of bottom-up responses, the ensual of self-awareness, and the detachment from absorption essential for judgment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I discussed not only the well-known war photos by Brady and Gardner, but also those by Reed Brockway Bontecou in a lecture entitled The Great Paradox of Civil War Photography: Art History, Neuroscience and the Real War, given at the Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 31, 2013, which I hope to publish on another occasion.
- 2.
The feeling is clear; the precise location of the feeling less so.
- 3.
For a vigorous dismissal of what Nelson Goodman called the “tingle-immersion theory,” see Goodman (1976, p. 112).
- 4.
See the more recent and excellent work by Thomas Hilgers that suggests Kant never intended his notion of disinterested judgment to be detached from the body – pace Nietzsche in The Genealogy of Morals, III, 6 and my own earlier work. See Nietzsche (1887/1996); for Hilgers’ work (which I hope will be published soon), see for the moment Hilgers (2010).
- 5.
On the subject of the enhanced motor potentials evoked upon observing the raised hand and extended wrist gesture (as in Michelangelo’s Adam warding off the Angel in the Expulsion from Paradise mentioned in this paragraph), see Battaglia, Lisanby, & Freedberg (2011). For a recent behavioral study of the automatic imitation of “goal-less” actions, see Chiavarino, Bugiani, Grandi, & Colle (2013).
- 6.
Warburg grappled with this issue from the very beginning. The Vorbemerkung to his dissertation on Botticelli’s Birth of Venus and Spring concludes “Nebenbei sei bemerkt, dass dieser Nachweis für die psychologische Aesthetik deshalb bemerkenswerth ist, weil man hier in den Kreisen der schaffenden Künstler den Sinn für den ästhetischen Akt der ‘Einfühlung’ in seinem Werden als stilbildende Macht beobachten kann”. (Warburg, 2010, pp. 39–40; Engl. transl. in Warburg, 1999, p. 89).
- 7.
- 8.
“Daß diese Engramme leidenschaftlicher Erfahrung als gedächtnisbewahrtes Erbgut überleben und vorbildlich den Umriss bestimmen, den die Künstlerhand schafft” (Mnemosyne Einleitung, B 10/VI 929, in Warburg, 2012, p. 631, own transl.). See also Gombrich and Saxl (1986, p. 245).
- 9.
“Das schwierigste Problem für die bildende Kunst, lenkt das Festhalten der Bilder des bewegten Lebens” (Warburg 2012, p. 107). See also the contribution to this subject by Philippe-Alain Michaud (1998).
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Several examples in Gombrich and Saxl (1986, pp. 248–50). Gombrich cites the Allgemeine Ideen, and the notebooks for 1927–1928, p. 20 (“Das antikische Dynamogramm wird in maximaler Spannung aber unpolarisiert in Bezug auf die passive oder aktive Energetik des nachfühlenden, nachsprechenden (erinnernden) überliefert. Erst der Kontakt mit der Zeit bewirkt die Polarisation. Diese kann zur radikalen Umkehr (Inversion) des echten antiken Sinnes führen”) and p. 67 (“die Polarization der Dynamogramme durch die Antikische Mneme”); Koos, Pichler, Rappl, and Swoboda (1994). The source for the first of these passages is given as 1.6.1929.
- 13.
See my discussion of their work further below. For a general view of Jeannerod’s theory of motor cognition and its relationship with what neuroscientists call imagery (what humanists would call the imagination of images), see Jeannerod (2006).
- 14.
The whole study of emotion was long neglected precisely because of this attitude (I remember discussing this in 1980 with Amélie Rorty, whose anthology Explaining Emotions (Rorty, 1980) played a major role in the renewed philosophical interest in the topic).
- 15.
To say this, however, is not to claim that bodily movements that precede emotion are necessarily precognitive, though they may in many instances be automatic. Automatic responses can just as well be the result of training as the result of precognitive mechanisms.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
This translation from E. C. Marchant, London-New York: 1923. Not surprisingly the passage is quoted on the very first page of Jennifer Montagu (1994).
- 19.
- 20.
Learned examples of such denial are provided by Willibald Sauerländer (1989) and the many predecessors he cites.
- 21.
I am grateful to Thomas Metzinger for reminding me of Lipps’ views on the precise role of these elements in the relationship between empathy and aesthetics.
- 22.
Perceiving and assessing the level of pain experienced by a person in photographs (hands and feet in situations likely to cause pain) is associated with significant changes in activity in the ACC, anterior insula, cerebellum and, to a lesser extent, the thalamus. Activity in the ACC is “strongly correlated with observers’ ratings of the others pain suggesting that activity of this region is modulated according to subjects’ reactivity to the pain of others” (Jackson, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2005, p. 771).
- 23.
Other areas of the brain (in particular, the inferior parietal lobule and the hippocampal formation) are also generally regarded as parts of the DMN, but discussion of their role in the relationship between detachment, contemplation and judgment can wait for another occasion (see Buckner, Andrews-Hanna, & Schacter, 2008; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Smallwood et al., 2013).
- 24.
See earlier Kirk et al. (2011). For a further analysis of the aesthetic implications, see Kirk and Freedberg (2015) and Kirk and Freedberg (forthcoming). Significantly, patients with DLPFC lesions seem to have “deficits in empathetic ability related to cognitive flexibility” as opposed to those with right VMPC regions where empathetic deficits are profound and relate to affective recognition and emotional and body states (as highlighted in the present discussion). See, for example, Shamay-Tsoory, Tomer, Berger, and Aharon-Peretz (2003).
References
Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). A Role for Somatosensory Cortices in the Visual Recognition of Emotion as Revealed by Three-Dimensional Lesion Mapping. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(7), 2683–2690.
Alberti, L. B. (1966). On Painting (rev. ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Evidence for the Default Network’s Role in Spontaneous Cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 322–335.
Battaglia, F., Lisanby, S., & Freedberg, D. (2011). Corticomotor Excitability During Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(79), 1–6.
Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans., based on the German edition by R. Tiedemann). Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Berenson, B. (1896). The Florentine Painters of the Renaissance. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Berenson, B. (1960). The Italian Painters of the Renaissance. London: Fontana.
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will. An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio7879851
Bonaventura (1961). Meditations on the Life of Christ: an Illustrated Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century (I. Ragusa & R. Green, Trans. & Ed.). Princeton Monographs in Art and Archaeology, no. 35. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The Brain’s Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.
Casati, R., & Pignocchi, A. (2007). Mirror and canonical neurons are not constitutive for aesthetic response. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(10), 410.
Charcot, J. M. (1991). Clinical Lectures on the Diseases of the Nervous System (R. Harris, Ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
Chiavarino, C., Bugiani, S., Grandi, E., & Colle, L. (2013). Is Automatic Imitation Based on Goal Coding or Movement Coding? A Comparison of Goal-Directed and Goal-Less Actions. Experimental psychology, 60(3), 213–225.
Crary, J. (1999). Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L. (2000). Dysfunction in the Neural Circuitry of Emotion Regulation – a Possible Prelude to Violence. Science, 289(5479), 591–594.
Decety, J. (1996). Do Imagined and Executed Actions Share the Same Neural Substrate? Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 87–93.
Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). Neural Correlates of Feeling Sympathy. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 127–138.
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural Mechanisms Subserving the Perception of Human Actions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(5), 172–178.
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2001). Functional Anatomy of Execution, Mental Simulation, Observation, and Verb Generation of Actions: A Meta-Analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12(1), 1–19.
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2002). Does Visual Perception of Object Afford Action? Evidence from a Neuroimaging Study. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 212–222.
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy. Behavioral Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3(2), 71–100.
Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grèzes, J., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). A Pet Exploration of the Neural Mechanisms Involved in Reciprocal Imitation. Neuroimage, 15(1), 265–272.
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping Motor Representations with Positron Emission Tomography. Nature, 371(6498), 600–602.
Decety, J., Grèzes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F., & Fazio, F. (1997). Brain Activity During Observation of Actions. Influence of Action Content and Subject’s Strategy. Brain, 120(10), 1763–1777.
Féré, Ch. (1900). Sensation Et Mouvement, Études Expérimentales De Psycho-Mécanique [Sensation and movement. Experimental studies of psycho-mechanics] (rev. 2nd ed.). Paris: Alcan.
Freedberg, D. (2011). Movement, Embodiment, Emotion. In T. Dufrenne & A.-C. Taylor (Eds.). Cannibalismes Disciplinaires. Quand L’histoire De L’art E L’anthropologie Se Rencontrent [Disciplinary canibalism. When history of art and anthropology meet] (pp. 37–61). Paris: INHA/Musée du Quai Branly.
Freedberg, D. (2013). Dürer’s Limbs’. In S. Buck & S. Porras (Eds.). The Young Dürer (pp. 37–46). London: Courtauld Institute of Art.
Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007a). Motion, Emotion and Empathy in Aesthetic Experience. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(5), 197–203.
Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007b). Mirror and Canonical Neurons Are Crucial Elements in esthetic Response. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(7), 411.
Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 23–48.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A Unifying View of the Basis of Social Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(9). 396–403.
de Gelder, B. (2006). Towards the Neurobiology of Emotional Body Language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(3), 242–249.
Gombrich, E. H., & Saxl, F. (1986). Aby Warburg: An Intellectual Biography (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2008). The Visual Systems Re-Viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 774–785.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Graziano, M. S., Taylor, C. S., & Moore, T. (2002). Probing Cortical Function with Electrical Stimulation. Nature Neuroscience, 5(10), 921.
Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V. (2004). Default-Mode Activity During a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1484–1492.
Gusnard, D. A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Self-Referential Mental Activity: Relation to a Default Mode of Brain Function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 98(7), 4259–4264.
Gusnard, D. A., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Searching for a Baseline: Functional Imaging and the Resting Human Brain. National Review of Neuroscience, 2(10), 685–694.
Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., Kirveskari, E., Salenius, S., & Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Activation of Human Primary Motor Cortex During Action Observation: A Neuromagnetic Study. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 95(25), 15061–15065.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilgers, T. (2010). On Aesthetic Disinterestedness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical Mechanisms of Human Imitation. Science, 286(5449), 2526–2528.
Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How Do We Perceive the Pain of Others? A Window into the Neural Processes Involved in Empathy. Neuroimage, 24(3), 771–779.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1)(pt. 2), 103–109.
Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford Psychology Series. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S. & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the Self? An Event-Related FMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 785–794.
Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J. L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). A Touching Sight: Sii/Pv Activation During the Observation and Experience of Touch. Neuron, 42(2), 335–346.
Kirk, U., & Freedberg, D. (2015). Contextual Bias and Insulation against Bias during Aesthetic Rating: The Roles of Ventromedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex. In J. P. Huston, M. Nadal, F. Mora, L. Agnati & C. J. Cela-Condé (Eds.). Art, Aesthetics and the Brain (pp. 158–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirk, U. & Freedberg, D. (forthcoming). Cognitive Framing Modulates Emotional Experience through the DLPFC-VLPFC Network: an fMRI Study.
Kirk, U., Harvey, A., & Montague, P. R. (2011). Domain Expertise Insulates against Judgment Bias by Monetary Favors through a Modulation of Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 108(25), 10332–10336.
Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Recognition of Self-Generated Actions from Kinematic Displays of Drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 456–465.
Koos, M., Pichler, W., Rappl, W., & Swoboda, G. (Eds.) (1994). Begleitmaterial zurAusstellung ‘Aby M. Warburg, Mnemosyne’ [Accompanying material for the exhibition ‘Aby M. Warburg, Mnemosyne’]. Hamburg: Dölling und Galitz.
Lipps, T. (1903). Einfühlung, Innere Nachahmung und Organenempfindungen [Empathy, inner imitation, and organic sensations]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 1(2–3), 185–204.
Marrow, J. H. (1979). Passion Iconography in Northern European Art of the Late Middle Ages and Early Renaissance: A Study of the Transformation of Sacred Metaphor into Descriptive Narrative. Ars Neerlandica, Kortrijk: Van Ghemmert.
Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). Infant Imitation and Memory: Nine-Month-Olds in Immediate and Deferred Tests. Child Development, 59(1), 217–225.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn Infants Imitate Adult Facial Gestures. Child Development, 54(3), 702–709.
Michaud, P.-A. (1998). Aby Warburg Et L’image En Mouvement [Aby Warburg and the moving image]. Vues, Paris: Macula.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Montagu, J. (1994). The Expression of the Passions. The Origin and Influence of Charles Le Brun’s Conférence Sur L’expresson Générale Et Particulière. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Moran, J. M., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2013). What Can the Organization of the Brain’s Default Mode Network Tell Us About Self-Knowledge? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 391.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1881/1997). Daybreak (M. Clark & B. Leiter, Ed., R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1886/1989). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future (W. A. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1887/1996). On the Genealogy of Morals (D. Smith, Trans.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1967). The Will to Power (W. A. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Rethinking Feelings: An FMRI Study of the Cognitive Regulation of Emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1215–1229.
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The Cognitive Control of Emotion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(5), 242–249.
Peelen, M. V. (2005). Selectivity for the Human Body in the Fusiform Gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(1), 603–608.
Peelen, M. V., & Downing, J. J. (2005). Is the Extrastriate Body Area Involved in Motor Actions? Nature Neuroscience, 8(2), 125.
Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Head, A. S., Potter, D. D., Broennimann, R., Milner, A. D., & Jeeves, M. A. (1985). Visual Analysis of Body Movements by Neurones in the Temporal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey: A Preliminary Report. Behavioural Brain Research, 16(2–3), 153–170.
Pliny the Elder (1857). Historia naturalis [Natural history], XXXIV (J. Bostock & H. T. Riley, Trans.). London: Henry G. Bohn.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A Default Mode of Brain Function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 98(2), 676–682.
Ringbom, S. (1984). Icon to Narrative: The Rise of the Dramatic Close-up in Fifteenth-Century Devotional Painting (2nd ed.). Doornspijk: Davaco.
Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., & Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent Properties of Periarcuate Neurons in Macaque Monkeys. Ii. Visual Responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 2(2), 147–163.
Rorty, A. (1980). Explaining Emotions. Topics in Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rosenheim, J. (2013). Photography and the American Civil War. Metropolitan Museum of Art series. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Sauerländer, W. (1989). Überlegungen zu dem Thema Lavater und die Kunstgeschichte [Considerations on Lavater and the history of art]. Idea. Jahrbuch der Hamburger Kunsthalle, 8, 15–30.
Schaub, M., Suthor, N., & Fischer-Lichte, E. (2005). Ansteckung: Zur Körperlichkeit eines ästhetischen Prinzips [Contagion. On the bodily character of an aesthetic principle]. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of Empathy Deficits following Prefrontal Brain Damage: the Role of the Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(3), 324–337.
Von Simson, O. G. (1953). Compassio and Co-Redemptio in Rogier Van Der Weyden’s Descent from the Cross. The Art Bulletin, 35(1), 9–16.
Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Cooperation between the Default Mode Network and the Frontal-Parietal Network in the Production of an Internal Train of Thought. Brain Research, 1428, 60–70.
Smallwood, J., Tipper, C., Brown, K., Baird, B., Engen, H., Michaels, J. R., Grafton, S., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Escaping the Here and Now: Evidence for a Role of the Default Mode Network in Perceptually Decoupled Thought. Neuroimage, 69, 120–125.
Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory Investigations of Empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 271–314). New York: Academic Press.
Umiltà, M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2012). Abstract Art and Cortical Motor Activation: an EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 311.
Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2012). The Brain on Art: Intense Aesthetic Experience Activates the Default Mode Network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 66.
Warburg, A. (1999). The Renewal of Pagan Antiquity: Contributions to the Cultural History of the European Renaissance. Texts & Documents. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities.
Warburg, A. (2010). Werke in einem Band [Works in one volume] (P. Ladwig, M. Treml, & S. Weigel, Eds.). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Wedepohl, C. (2012). Von der ‘Pathosformel’ zum ‘Gebärdensprachatlas’. Dürers Tod des Orpheus und Warburgs Arbeit an einer ausdruckstheoretisch begründeten Kulturgeschichte. [From the ‘pathos-formula’ to the ‘atlas of sign language’. Dürer’s Death of the Orpheus and Warburg’s work on an expression based theory of cultural history]. In M. A. Hurttig (Ed.). Die entfesselte Antike. Aby Warburg und die Geburt der Pathosformel [The unleashed antiquity. Aby Warburg and the birth of the pathos-formula] (pp. 33–50). Cologne: Wallraf-Richartz Museum and Fondation Courboud/Buchhandlung Walther König.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freedberg, D. (2017). From Absorption to Judgment: Empathy in Aesthetic Response. In: Lux, V., Weigel, S. (eds) Empathy. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51298-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51299-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)