Skip to main content

Narrative Theory at the Limit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Theory Matters

Abstract

The trend in narratological research over the last two decades has been to diversify into a range of contextual narratologies, whilst at the same time consolidating the sense of narrative as a foundational cognitive concept; a sense consequent upon the ‘narrative turn’ across a range of disciplines in the humanities and beyond. These are fundamentally opposed tendencies: the first as a move beyond formalism to culturally situated, ideological views of narrative; the second as a new universalism based upon neurological and evolutionary premises. But both have resulted in a diminishment of the theoretical dimension of literary narratology, in favour of ‘applied’ narratological readings intended to illuminate the particular case, or to revise the received typologies and terminologies of the structuralist heritage. Contextualist narratologies have rarely moved beyond formalism without also subordinating theory to interpretation; cognitive narratology has tended to invoke the sciences of the mind as a source of new concepts and terms with which to describe the experience of the literary text, and the value of that encounter. This essay is concerned to affirm the value of literary narrative study, but suggests that such affirmation is not to be found in the broad idea that such study is vindicated by the evident importance and ubiquity of narrative as a mode of sense-making. Rather, it argues for the theoretical role of narratology as a highly tuned analytical perspective upon that ubiquity, in reciprocal dialogue with the various disciplinary discourses in which it is now recognized, whether as an opportunity or a problem. Narrative theory is hence a crucial interdiscipline able both to demonstrate the value of narrative and to critique its limitations throughout the range of its current relevance as a means and object of study. As an illustrative limit case, the essay considers the relation between narrative theory and complexity science, both as an exemplary dialogue across the ‘two cultures‘ divide, and as the basis for a renewed concept of the distinctive contribution of literary narrative studies within such an enlarged sphere of academic and social relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abbott, H. Porter. ‘Unnarratable Knowledge: The Difficulty of Understanding Evolution by Natural Selection’. Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Ed. D. Herman. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003. 143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, H. Porter. ‘Narrative and Emergent Behavior’. Poetics Today 29.2 (2008): 227–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1974 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, Monika. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London/New York: Routledge, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gymnich, Marion. ‘Linguistics and Narratology: The Relevance of Linguistic Criteria to Postcolonial Narratology’. Literature and Linguistics: Approaches, Models and Applications. Ed. Marion Gymnich et al. Trier: WVT, 2002. 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. ‘Introduction’. Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Ed. David Herman. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Steven. Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. London: Allen Lane, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, Suzanne. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanser, Susan. ‘Toward a Feminist Narratology’. Style 20 (1986): 341–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanser, Susan. Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Narrative and Complex Systems’. ICNS: Interdisciplinary Centre for Narrative Studies, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/narrative-studies/research-themes/complex-systems/. Date accessed: 12 September 2014.

  • Page, Ruth E. Literary and Linguistic Approaches to Feminist Narratology. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Alan. Fictional Minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James. Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James. Experiencing Fiction: Progressions, Judgments, and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James and Peter Rabinowitz. ‘Introduction: Understanding Narrative’. Understanding Narrative. Ed. James Phelan and Peter Rabinowitz. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1994. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Gerald. ‘On a Postcolonial Narratology’. A Companion to Narrative Theory. Ed. James Phelan and Peter Rabinowitz. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 372–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1993 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Roy. ‘“Contextualism” Revisited: A Survey (and Defence) of Postcolonial and Intercultural Narratives’. Journal of Literary Theory 1 (2007): 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepney, Susan and Richard Walsh, eds. Narrating Complexity. London: Springer, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Mark. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Richard. The Rhetoric of Fictionality: Narrative Theory and the Idea of Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Richard. ‘Emergent Narrative in Interactive Media’. Narrative 19.1 (2011): 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhol, Robyn. Gendered Interventions: Narrative Discourse in the Victorian Novel. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunshine, Lisa. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walsh, R. (2016). Narrative Theory at the Limit. In: Middeke, M., Reinfandt, C. (eds) Theory Matters. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47428-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics