Skip to main content
Log in

Survey results from airlines that use revenue management software systems

  • AGIFORS Conference Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

To our knowledge, even though vendors have been successfully selling revenue management (RM) software systems to major airlines and smaller carriers for more than 20 years, no one has ever surveyed the airlines to assess their satisfaction with the current systems. After years of consulting with many of these air carriers, the author felt that it would be helpful to the airline industry (and maybe the vendors) to do such a survey. We had a 66 per cent response rate, representing carriers with a wide variety in annual revenues (big, medium and small carriers) and a wide variety in the region of the world where they are headquartered. The results indicate that: (1) Six different RM vendors were chosen by the airlines who responded. (2) The mean length-of-use for these RM systems was 8.2 years. (3) More than 97 per cent of their flights were being processed by the RM system. (4) User analysts actively managed about 63 per cent of the flights. (5) Overall satisfaction with the vendors was 3.49 (mode was 4) on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). (6) Satisfaction with training provided by vendors was 3.31 (mode was 2). (7) Satisfaction with technical support by vendors was 3.34 (mode was 3). (8) Satisfaction with user friendliness of graphical interfaces was 3.32 (mode was 3). (9) 27 per cent of carriers had changed vendors over the years. (10) More than 50 per cent of the airlines had purchased separate group modules, about 1/3 had purchased network modules and pricing support systems and approximately 1/5 had purchased a ‘low fare’ module. Additional, in-depth statistical analysis and summarised answers to open-ended questions on the RM systems' strengths and weaknesses are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belobaba, P. P. (1989) Application of a probabilistic decision model to airline seat inventory control. Operations Research 37: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, J. I. and van Ryzin, G. J. (1999) Revenue management: Research overview and prospects. Transportation Science 33 (2): 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, L. and Bodily, S. E. (1992) A taxonomy and research overview of perishable asset revenue management: Yield management, overbooking, and pricing. Operations Research 40 (5): 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry R Weatherford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherford, L. Survey results from airlines that use revenue management software systems. J Revenue Pricing Manag 8, 323–329 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.11

Keywords

Navigation