An Overview of Nasal Dorsal Augmentation

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Structural deficiencies of the nasal dorsum most commonly derive from congenital, traumatic, and iatrogenic etiologies. Alternatively, dorsal deficiency may be a manifestation of a generally underprojected nose with otherwise appropriate relationships between the radix, dorsum, and tip. In analyzing dorsal deficiency, associated anatomic abnormalities leading to compromise of both aesthetic form and respiratory function must be recognized and incorporated into the reconstructive plan. The cornerstone of augmentation rhinoplasty employs either autologous graft or alloplastic implant material to restore dorsal height and structural support to the nasal skeleton. Many autologous and alloplastic materials are currently available to the rhinoplasty surgeon, each of which carries a characteristic profile of relative advantages and limitations. Although most rhinoplasty surgeons prefer autologous materials, the choice of material must be individualized to each patient. The reconstructive plan ultimately formulated emerges after thoughtful consideration of the extent of the dorsal deficiency, characteristics of the overlying skin-soft tissue envelope, history of prior surgery, associated structural abnormalities, preferences of the surgeon, and views of the patient. Regardless of the specific methods used to augment the nasal dorsum, optimizing the aesthetic profile and maximizing respiratory function in a sustainable manner with minimal patient risk and morbidity remain the primary objectives.

REFERENCES

• 1 Niechajev I. Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;  23 395-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Gryskiewicz J M. Waste not, want not: the use of AlloDerm in secondary rhinoplasty.  Plast Reonstr Surg. 2005;  116 1999-2004
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Celik M, Haliloglu T, Baycin N. Bone chips and diced cartilage: an anatomically adopted graft for the nasal dorsum.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;  28 8-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Orten S S, Hilger P A. Facial analysis of the rhinoplasty patient. In: Papel ID Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. New York, NY; Thieme Medical Publishers 2002: 361-368
  Google Scholar
• 5 Romo T, Sclafani A P, Jacono A A. Nasal reconsruction using porous polyethylene implants.  Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  16 55-61
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gurley J M, Pilgram T, Perlyn C A et al.. Long-term outcome of autogenous rib graft nasal reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 1895-1905
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Godin M S, Waldman R, Johnson C M. The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) in rhinoplasty. A 6-year experience.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;  121 1131-1136
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kim D W, Toriumi D M. Nasal analysis for secondary rhinoplasty.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2003;  11 399-419
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kamer F M, McQuown S. Revision rhinoplasty.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;  114 257-266
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Krause C J. Augmentation rhinoplasty.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1975;  8 743-752
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Flowers R S, Smith E M. Technique for correction of the retracted columella, acute columellar-labial angle, and long upper lip.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;  23 243-246
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Adamson P A, Doud Galli S K. Rhinoplasty approaches.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;  7 32-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Murrell G L. Auricular cartilage grafts and nasal surgery.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114 2092-2102
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lohuis PJFM, Watts S J, Vuyk H D. Augmentation of the nasal dorsum using Gore-Tex: intermediate results of a retrospective analysis of experience in 66 patients.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2001;  26 214-217
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Clark J M, Cook T A. Immediate reconstruction of extruded alloplastic nasal implants with irradiated homograft costal cartilage.  Laryngoscope. 2002;  112 968-974
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Deva A K, Merten S, Chang L. Silicone in nasal augmentation rhinoplasty: a decade of clinical experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 1230-1237
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Byrd H S, Hobar P C. Alloplastic nasal and perialar augmentation.  Clin Plast Surg. 1996;  23 315-326
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Sherris D A, Kern E B. The versatile autogenous rib graft in septorhinoplasty.  Am J Rhinol. 1998;  12 221-227
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Fanous N, Samaha M, Yoskovitch A. Dacron implants in rhinoplasty. A review of 136 cases of tip and dorsum implants.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;  4 149-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ahn J, Honrado C, Horn C. Combined silicone and cartilage implants. Augmentation rhinoplasty in Asian patients.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;  6 120-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lovice D B, Mingrone M D, Toriumi D M. Rhinoplasty and septoplasty. Grafts and implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;  32 113-141
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Becker D G, Becker S S, Saad A A. Auricular cartilage in revision rhinoplasty.  Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  19 41-52
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Endo T, Nakayama Y, Ito Y. Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1200 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 54-59
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Murakami C S, Cook T A, Guida R A. Nasal reconstruction with articulated irradiated rib cartilage.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;  117 327-330
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Adams W P, Rohrich R J, Gunter J P et al.. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 265-270
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Daniel R K, Calvert J W. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 2156-2171
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Erol O O. The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 2229-2241
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Davis R E, Wayne I. Rhinoplasty and the nasal SMAS augmentation graft.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;  6 124-132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Gryskiewicz J M, Rohrich R J, Reagan B J. The use of alloderm for the correction of nasal contour deformities.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 561-570
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Adamson P A. Grafts in rhinoplasty.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;  126 561-562
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Graham B S, Thiringer J K, Barrett T L. Nasal tip ulceration from infection and extrusion of a nasal alloplastic implant.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;  44 362-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Yanaga H, Koga M, Imai K et al.. Clinical application of biotechnically cultured autologous chondrocytes as novel graft material for nasal augmentation.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;  28 212-221
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Adams J S. Grafts and implants in nasal and chin augmentation.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1987;  20 913-930
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Godin M S, Waldman R, Johnson C M. Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex. A 10-year experience.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;  1 118-121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Baran C N, Tiftikcioglu Y O, Baran N K. The use of alloplastic materials in secondary rhinoplasties: 32 years of clinical experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 1502-1516
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Pham RTH, Hunter P D. Use of porous polyethylene as nasal dorsal implants in Asians.  J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;  8 102-106
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Harley S DresnerM.D. 

Centennial Lakes Medical Center

7373 France Avenue South, Suite #410, Edina, MN 55435