Complete Myocardial Revascularization Using Arterial Grafts Only in Patients with Unstable Angina: Impact on Early Outcome

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were 1) to assess early clinical outcomes for patients with unstable angina (UA) who undergo urgent/emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); and 2) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of complete revascularization using strictly arterial grafts in this patient group. Patients and Methods: Between September 2001 and May 2005, a total of 961 patients underwent CABG at our center. One hundred and sixty-seven (17.4 %) of these individuals underwent urgent or emergent CABG because of UA, and 794 (82.6 %) underwent elective CABG for stable angina (SA). Of the 167 patients with UA, 59 (35.3 %) underwent complete revascularization using arterial grafts only (AO subgroup: internal thoracic arteries and radial arteries) and the other 108 received a combination of arterial and venous grafts (AV subgroup: 1 internal thoracic artery plus saphenous vein grafts). Results: The UA group had a significantly higher proportion of women and a significantly higher rate of left main coronary artery disease than the SA group (p = 0.016 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly longer in the UA group (p = 0.01). Higher proportions of the UA group required inotropic support (p = 0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump support (p = 0.001), and re-exploration for bleeding or cardiac tamponade (p = 0.005). This group also had a significantly longer mean time on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001) and a longer mean intensive care unit stay (p = 0.01). The rates of operative mortality (first 30 days) in the SA and UA groups were 1.8 % and 6 %, respectively (p = 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the AO and AV subgroups with respect to any of the preoperative or intraoperative findings. The AO group had a significantly shorter mean intensive care unit stay than the AV group (p = 0.05). The AV group had a roughly fivefold higher operative mortality than the AO group (8.3 % vs. 1.7 %, respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.17). Conclusion: Urgent or emergent CABG in the setting of UA is associated with increased but acceptable rates of mortality and morbidity. Complete myocardial revascularization using arterial grafts only (combinations of internal thoracic and radial arteries) is feasible and safe in this patient group.

References

• 1 Theroux P, Fuster V. Acute coronary syndromes: unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.  Circul. 1998;  97 1195-1206
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Braunwald E, Antman E M, Beasley J W, Califf R M, Cheitlin M D, Hochman J S, Jones R H, Kereiakes D, Kupersmith J, Levin T N, Pepine C J, Schaeffer J W, Smith E EIII, Steward D E, Théroux P. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina).  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;  40 1366-1374
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 de Feyter P J, Serruys P W, Unger F, Beyar R, de Valk V, Milo S, Simon R, Regensburger D, Crean P A, McGovern E, van den Heuvel P, van Cauwelaert C, Penn I, Tyers G F, Lindeboom W. Bypass surgery versus stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease in patients with unstable angina compared with stable angina.  Circul. 2002;  105 2367-2372
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 He G W. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 277-284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rizzoli G, Schiavon L, Bellini P. Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  22 781-786
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Cohen G, Tamariz M G, Sever J Y, Liaghati N, Guru V, Christakis G T, Bhatnagar G, Cutrara C, Abouzahr L, Goldman B S, Fremes S E. The radial artery versus the saphenous vein graft in contemporary CABG: a case-matched study.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 180-186
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny J Y, Jebara V, Barrier P, Fabiani J N, Deloche A, Guermonprez J L, Carpentier A. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  116 981-989
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Tatoulis J, Buxton B F, Fuller J A. Bilateral radial artery grafts in coronary reconstruction: technique and early results in 261 patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 714-719
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Maiani M, Giunti G, Leacche M. Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary arteries for non-elective surgical revascularization in unstable angina.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;  28 120-126
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Fiore A C, Naunheim K S, Dean P, Kaiser G C, Pennington G, Willman V L, McBride L R, Barner H B. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;  49 202-209
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Louagie Y A, Jamart J, Buche M, Eucher P M, Schoevaerdts D, Collard E, Gonzalez M, Marchandise B, Schoevaerdts J C. Operation for unstable angina pectoris: factors influencing adverse in-hospital outcome.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  59 1141-1149
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Bjessmo S, Hammar N, Sandberg E, Ivert T. Reduced risk of coronary artery bypass surgery for unstable angina during a 6-year period.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;  18 388-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Disch D L, Rader T A, Cresci S, Leone T C, Barger P M, Vega R, Wood P A, Kelly D P. Changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: 1987 - 1990. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  57 416-423
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Edwards F H, Clark R E, Schwartz M. Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database experience.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  57 12-19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Urgent surgical revascularization of unstable angina. Influence of double mammary arteries.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;  20 747-754
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bjessmo S, Ivert T, Flink H, Hammar N. Early and late mortality after surgery for unstable angina in relation to Braunwald class.  Am Heart J. 2001;  141 9-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Fremes S E, Goldman B S, Christakis G T, Ivanov J, Weisel R D, Salerno T A, David T E. Current risk of coronary bypass for unstable angina.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;  5 235-242
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Onorati F, De Feo M, Mastroroberto P, di Virgilio A, Esposito A, Polistena M, Renzulli A, Cotrufo M. Unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation: surgical revascularization with different strategies.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;  27 1043-1050
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Teoh K H, Christakis G T, Weisel R D, Katz A M, Tong C P, Mickleborough L L, Scully H E, Baird R J, Goldman B S. Increased risk of urgent revascularization.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;  93 291-299
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ali I S, Buth K J, Maitland A. Impact of perioperative intravenous nitroglycerin on in-hospital outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting for unstable angina.  Am Heart J. 2004;  148 727-732
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Sadanandan S, Cannon C P, Gibson C M, Murphy S A, DiBattiste P M, Braunwald E. TIMI Study Group . A risk score to estimate the likelihood of coronary artery bypass surgery during the index hospitalization among patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  44 799-803
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Fazel S, Mallidi H R, Pelletier M P, Sever J Y, Christakis G T, Goldman B S, Fremes S E. Radial artery use is safe in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  75 1414-1421
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Reddy V S, Parikh S M, Drinkwater Jr D C, Lo A, Rauth T P, Moleski R M, Chang P A. Morbidity after procurement of radial arteries in diabetic patients and the elderly undergoing coronary revascularization.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  73 803-808
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Sergeant P T, Blackstone E H, Meyns B P. Does arterial revascularization decrease the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 1-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Manasse E, Sperti G, Suma H, Canosa C, Kol A, Martinelli L, Schiavello R, Crea F, Maseri A, Possati G F. Use of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  62 1076-1083
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Vedat Nisanoglu

Cardiovascular Surgery
Turgut Ozal Medical Center
Inonu University

Elazig yolu 10. km

44315 Malatya

Turkey

Phone: + 90 42 23 41 06 60

Fax: + 90 42 23 41 11 80

Email: vnisanoglu@inonu.edu.tr