Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18(3): 189-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-831906
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Simultaneous Breast Augmentation with Periareolar Mastopexy

Steven P. Davison1 , Scott L. Spear1
  • 1Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 August 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Augmentation mammaplasty is frequently used to fill out the soft tissue envelope of the breast. This is most successful with minimal skin laxity or when there is no need for significant nipple movement. The addition of a periareolar mastopexy can reduce the skin envelope; however, its value is limited to those with no more than mild second-degree ptosis. Although this is a valuable technique, the risks involved with the operation are additive, and, accordingly, patient selection and surgical technique is important.

KEYWORDS

Augmentation - periareolar mastopexy - breast ptosis - mastopexy - breast lift

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gonzales-Ulloa M. Correction on hypertrophy of the breast by means of exogenous material.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;  25 15-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Persoff M M. Mastopexy with expansion augmentation.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;  27(1) 13-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990;  14(2) 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Regnault P. The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;  37 31-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Owsley Jr J K. Simultaneous mastopexy and augmentation for correction of the small, ptotic breast.  Ann Plast Surg. 1979;  2(3) 195-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gruber R P, Jones Jr H W. The “donut” mastopexy: indications and complications.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;  65(1) 34-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Puckett C L, Meyer V H, Reinisch J F. Crescentic mastopexy and augmentation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  75(4) 533-539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Spear S L, Kassan M, Little J W. Guidelines in concentric mastopexy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;  85(6) 961-966
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baran C N, Peker F, Ortak T, Sensoz O, Baran N K. Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammaplasty: enlarged areola flattened nipple.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;  25(4) 286-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Spear S L. Augmentation/mastopexy: “surgeon, beware”.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112(3) 905-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Spear S L, Low M, Ducic I. Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  51(6) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Maxwell G P. Breast asymmetry.  Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2001;  121(6) 473-588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Karnes J, Morrison W, Salisbury M, Schaeferle M, Beckman P, Ersek R A. Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000;  24(2) 148-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Scott L SpearM.D. F.A.C.S. 

Georgetown University Hospital

3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC 20007

      >