Initial Evaluation of Focal Bone Lesions: How Do We Do It?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Focal bone lesions are frequent, and management greatly depends on the characteristics of their images. After briefly discussing the required work-up, we analyze the most relevant imaging signs for assessing potential aggressiveness. We also describe the imaging aspects of the various types of lesion matrices and their clinical implications.

Publication History

Article published online:
25 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Gondim Teixeira PA, Lombard C, Moustache-Espinola P. et al. Initial Characterization of focal bone lesions with conventional radiographs or computed tomography: diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement assessment. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bestic JM, Wessell DE, Beaman FD. et al; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Primary Bone Tumors. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 ( 5S(: S226-S238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Ribeiro GJ, Gillet R, Hossu G. et al. Solitary bone tumor imaging reporting and data system (BTI-RADS): initial assessment of a systematic imaging evaluation and comprehensive reporting method. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (10) 7637-7652
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Blum A, Teixeira P. . Scanner et IRM ostéo-articulaires en pratique. Membres et ceintures. Accessed December 22, 2022 at: https://livre.fnac.com/a16303991/Alain-Blum-Scanner-et-IRM-osteo-articulaires-en-pratique.
  PubMed
• 5 Gondim Teixeira PA, Ledrich M, Kauffmann F. et al. Qualitative 3-T proton MR spectroscopy for the characterization of musculoskeletal neoplasms: update on diagnostic performance and indications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208 (06) 1312-1319
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Schwaiger BJ, Schneider C, Kronthaler S. et al. CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (07) 4680-4689
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Caracciolo JT, Temple HT, Letson GD, Kransdorf MJ. A modified Lodwick-Madewell grading system for the evaluation of lytic bone lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (01) 150-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Bodden J, Neumann J, Rasper M. et al. Diagnosis of joint invasion in patients with malignant bone tumors: value and reproducibility of direct and indirect signs on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2022; 32 (07) 4738-4748
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Zwaga T, Bovée JVMG, Kroon HM. Osteosarcoma of the femur with skip, lymph node, and lung metastases. Radiographics 2008; 28 (01) 277-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Wilkins RM, Pritchard DJ, Burgert Jr EO, Unni KK. Ewing's sarcoma of bone. Experience with 140 patients. Cancer 1986; 58 (11) 2551-2555
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Costelloe CM, Madewell JE. Radiography in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (01) 3-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Freire V, Moser TP, Lepage-Saucier M. Radiological identification and analysis of soft tissue musculoskeletal calcifications. Insights Imaging 2018; 9 (04) 477-492
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Oliveira I, Chavda A, Rajakulasingam R, Saifuddin A. Chondral tumours: discrepancy rate between needle biopsy and surgical histology. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (07) 1115-1125
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Patel A, Davies AM, Botchu R, James S. A pragmatic approach to the imaging and follow-up of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and knee. Clin Radiol 2019; 74 (07) 517-526
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ní Mhuircheartaigh J, McMahon C, Lin YC, Wu J. Diagnostic yield of percutaneous biopsy for sclerotic bone lesions: influence of mean Hounsfield units. Clin Imaging 2017; 46: 53-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Chang IJ, Ilaslan H, Sundaram M, Schils J, Subhas N. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions: diagnostic outcomes. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47 (05) 661-669
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hegde G, Azzopardi C, Patel A, Davies AM, James SL, Botchu R. “Do-not-touch” lesions of bone revisited. Clin Radiol 2022; 77 (03) 179-187
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Cotten A. . Imagerie musculosqueletique: Pathologies générales. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Accessed December 22, 2022 at: https://www.livres-medicaux.com/corps-entier/7458-imagerie-musculosquelettique-pathologies-generales-2eme-edition.html.
  PubMed
• 19 Ribeiro GJ, Gillet R, Blum A, Teixeira PAG. Imaging report and data system (RADS) for bone tumors: where do we stand and future directions. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (02) 151-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lacroix M, Aouad T, Feydy J. et al. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncology imaging: a critical review of current applications. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104 (01) 18-23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Evans AR, Bottros J, Grant W, Chen BY, Damron TA. Mirels' rating for humerus lesions is both reproducible and valid. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (06) 1279-1284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Gondim Teixeira PA, Villani N, Ait Idir M. et al. Ultra-high resolution computed tomography of joints: practical recommendations for acquisition protocol optimization. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11 (10) 4287-4298
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar