CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27(03): e536-e546
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761170
Invited Paper

Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery*

Luiz P. Kowalski
1   Head and Neck Surgery Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Abstract

This paper is a transcript of the 29th Eugene N. Myers, MD International Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) in 2020. By the end of the 19th century, the survival rate in treated patients was 10%. With the improvements in surgical techniques, currently, about two thirds of patients survive for > 5 years. Teamwork and progress in surgical reconstruction have led to advancements in ablative surgery; the associated adjuvant treatments have further improved the prognosis in the last 30 years. However, prospective trials are lacking; most of the accumulated knowledge is based on retrospective series and some real-world data analyses. Current knowledge on prognostic factors plays a central role in an efficient treatment decision-making process. Although the influence of most tumor- and patient-related prognostic factors in head and neck cancer cannot be changed by medical interventions, some environmental factors—including treatment, decision-making, and quality—can be modified. Ideally, treatment strategy decisions should be taken in dedicated multidisciplinary team meetings. However, evidence suggests that surgeons and hospital volume and specialization play major roles in patient survival after initial or salvage head and neck cancer treatment. The metrics of surgical quality assurance (surgical margins and nodal yield) in neck dissection have a significant impact on survival in head and neck cancer patients and can be influenced by the surgeon's expertise. Strategies proposed to improve surgical quality include continuous performance measurement, feedback, and dissemination of best practice measures.

* Presented as the 29th Eugene N. Myers, MD International Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer - American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) 2020.




Publication History

Received: 23 August 2022

Accepted: 26 September 2022

Article published online:
04 August 2023

© 2023. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN). International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020. May 20, 2020. http://www.gco.iarc.fr
  • 2 Gospodarowicz MK, Honson DE, Hutter RVP, O'Sullivan B, Lobin LH, Wittekind C. Prognostic Factors in Cancer. New York, USA: Wiley-Liss; 2001: 809
  • 3 Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Hermans J, Molenaar J, Briaire JJ, le Cessie S. Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2001; 23 (09) 718-724
  • 4 Windon MJ, D'Souza G, Faraji F. et al. Priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer 2019; 125 (08) 1281-1289
  • 5 List MA, Stracks J, Colangelo L. et al. How Do head and neck cancer patients prioritize treatment outcomes before initiating treatment?. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18 (04) 877-884
  • 6 Gill SS, Frew J, Fry A. et al. Priorities for the head and neck cancer patient, their companion and members of the multidisciplinary team and decision regret. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011; 23 (08) 518-524
  • 7 List MA, Rutherford JL, Stracks J. et al. Prioritizing treatment outcomes: head and neck cancer patients versus nonpatients. Head Neck 2004; 26 (02) 163-170
  • 8 van der Schroeff MP, Steyerberg EW, Wieringa MH, Langeveld TP, Molenaar J, Baatenburg de Jong RJ. Prognosis: a variable parameter: dynamic prognostic modeling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2012; 34 (01) 34-41
  • 9 Kanatas A, Ghazali N, Lowe D. et al. Issues patients would like to discuss at their review consultation: variation by early and late stage oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal subsites. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270 (03) 1067-1074
  • 10 Rogers SN, Thomson F, Lowe D. The Patient Concerns Inventory integrated as part of routine head and neck cancer follow-up consultations: frequency, case-mix, and items initiated by the patient. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018; 100 (03) 209-215
  • 11 Jungerman I, Toyota J, Montoni NP. et al. Patient Concerns Inventory for head and neck cancer: Brazilian cultural adaptation. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2017; 63 (04) 311-319
  • 12 Rogers SN, Alvear A, Anesi A. et al. Variations in concerns reported on the patient concerns inventory in patients with head and neck cancer from different health settings across the world. Head Neck 2020; 42 (03) 498-512
  • 13 Hoesseini A, Dronkers EAC, Sewnaik A, Hardillo JAU, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Offerman MPJ. Head and neck cancer patients' preferences for individualized prognostic information: a focus group study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 399
  • 14 Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, Kowalski LP. Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer 2005; 114 (05) 806-816
  • 15 Carvalho AL, Ikeda MK, Magrin J, Kowalski LP. Trends of oral and oropharyngeal cancer survival over five decades in 3267 patients treated in a single institution. Oral Oncol 2004; 40 (01) 71-76
  • 16 Cooper JS, Porter K, Mallin K. et al. National Cancer Database report on cancer of the head and neck: 10-year update. Head Neck 2009; 31 (06) 748-758
  • 17 Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Vartanian JG, Magrin J, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Factors that influence treatment decision in older patients with resectable head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (05) 835-840
  • 18 Ribeiro KC, Kowalski LP, Latorre MR. Impact of comorbidity, symptoms, and patients' characteristics on the prognosis of oral carcinomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126 (09) 1079-1085
  • 19 Pugliano FA, Piccirillo JF, Zequeira MR, Fredrickson JM, Perez CA, Simpson JR. Clinical-severity staging system for oral cavity cancer: five-year survival rates. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120 (01) 38-45
  • 20 Piccirillo JF. Importance of comorbidity in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (10) 2242
  • 21 Peterson LA, Bellile EL, Wolf GT. et al; University of Michigan Head and Neck Specialized Program of Research Excellence Program. Cigarette use, comorbidities, and prognosis in a prospective head and neck squamous cell carcinoma population. Head Neck 2016; 38 (12) 1810-1820
  • 22 Habbous S, Harland LT, La Delfa A. et al. Comorbidity and prognosis in head and neck cancers: Differences by subsite, stage, and human papillomavirus status. Head Neck 2014; 36 (06) 802-810
  • 23 Okuyemi OT, Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel E. TNM staging compared with a new clinicopathological model in predicting oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma survival. Head Neck 2014; 36 (10) 1481-1489
  • 24 Winquist E, Agbassi C, Meyers BM, Yoo J, Chan KKW. Head and Neck Disease Site Group. Systemic therapy in the curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46 (01) 29
  • 25 Gordon SA, Reiter ER. Effectiveness of critical care pathways for head and neck cancer surgery: A systematic review. Head Neck 2016; 38 (09) 1421-1427
  • 26 Tham T, Machado R, Herman SW, Kraus D, Costantino P, Roche A. Personalized prognostication in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of nomograms according to the AJCC precision medicine core (PMC) criteria. Head Neck 2019; 41 (08) 2811-2822
  • 27 Patel SG, Lydiatt WM. Staging of head and neck cancers: is it time to change the balance between the ideal and the practical?. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97 (08) 653-657
  • 28 Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF. et al. Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer 2016; 122 (21) 3307-3315
  • 29 Zanoni DK, Patel SG. New AJCC: How does it impact oral cancers?. Oral Oncol 2020; 104: 104607
  • 30 Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O'Sullivan B. et al. Head and Neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67 (02) 122-137
  • 31 Kattan MW, Hess KR, Amin MB. et al; members of the AJCC Precision Medicine Core. American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66 (05) 370-374
  • 32 Andry G, Hamoir M, Leemans CR. The evolving role of surgery in the management of head and neck tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 2005; 17 (03) 241-248
  • 33 Guy JB, Benna M, Xia Y. et al. Quality insurance in head and neck cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A watchful eye on real-life experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 91: 35-38
  • 34 Hassett MJ. Quality improvement in the era of big data. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (28) 3178-3180
  • 35 Graboyes EM, Townsend ME, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF, Nussenbaum B. Evaluation of quality metrics for surgically treated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142 (12) 1154-1163
  • 36 Hughes C, Homer J, Bradley P. et al. An evaluation of current services available for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer in the UK (2009-2010). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012; 24 (10) e187-e192
  • 37 Deneuve S, Babin E, Lacau-St-Guily J. et al. Guidelines (short version) of the French Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Society (SFORL) on patient pathway organization in ENT: The therapeutic decision-making process. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2015; 132 (04) 213-215
  • 38 Friedland PL, Bozic B, Dewar J, Kuan R, Meyer C, Phillips M. Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2011; 104 (08) 1246-1248
  • 39 Hoban CW, Beesley LJ, Bellile EL. et al. Individualized outcome prognostication for patients with laryngeal cancer. Cancer 2018; 124 (04) 706-716
  • 40 Myers EN. Head and neck oncology–2010, Part I. Otolaryngol Pol 2010; 64 (03) 136-146
  • 41 Myers EN. Head and neck oncology–2010, part II. Otolaryngol Pol 2010; 64 (04) 204-214
  • 42 Kirkegård J, Aahlin EK, Al-Saiddi M. et al. Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. Br J Surg 2019; 106 (06) 756-764
  • 43 Grünwald V, Chirovsky D, Cheung WY. et al; GLANCE H&N STUDY Investigators. Global treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Results of the GLANCE H&N study. Oral Oncol 2020; 102: 104526
  • 44 O'Sullivan B, Mackillop W, Gilbert R. et al. Controversies in the management of laryngeal cancer: results of an international survey of patterns of care. Radiother Oncol 1994; 31 (01) 23-32
  • 45 van Overveld LFJ, Braspenning JCC, Hermens RPMG. Quality indicators of integrated care for patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (02) 322-329
  • 46 Westin T, Stalfors J. Tumour boards/multidisciplinary head and neck cancer meetings: are they of value to patients, treating staff or a political additional drain on healthcare resources?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16 (02) 103-107
  • 47 Stalfors J, Lundberg C, Westin T. Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127 (01) 82-87
  • 48 Shellenberger TD, Weber RS. Multidisciplinary team planning for patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018; 30 (04) 435-444
  • 49 Licitra L, Keilholz U, Tahara M. et al. Evaluation of the benefit and use of multidisciplinary teams in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2016; 59: 73-79
  • 50 Snow GB. Evaluation of new treatment methods for head and neck cancer: a challenge. Acta Otolaryngol 1989; 107 (5-6): 352-356
  • 51 Ridge JA. We show pictures, they show curves. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (12) 1170-1175
  • 52 Torgerson T, Johnson AL, Jellison S. et al. Reporting of Clinical Trial Interventions Published in Leading Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Journals. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (09) E507-E514 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28404. [published online ahead of print, 2019 Nov 20]
  • 53 Wasserman JM, Wynn R, Bash TS, Rosenfeld RM. Levels of evidence in otolaryngology journals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (05) 717-723
  • 54 Bentsianov BL, Boruk M, Rosenfeld RM. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology journals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126 (04) 371-376
  • 55 Huang YQ, Traore K, Ibrahim B, Sewitch MJ, Nguyen LHP. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 47 (01) 34
  • 56 Kaper NM, Ramakers GGJ, Aarts MCJ, van der Heijden GJMG. Publications on clinical research in otolaryngology–A systematic analysis of leading journals in 2010. Front Surg 2019; 6: 18
  • 57 Lerut T. The surgeon as a prognostic factor. Ann Surg 2000; 232 (06) 729-732
  • 58 Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998; 280 (20) 1747-1751
  • 59 Neoptolemos JP, Russell RCG, Bramhall S, Theis B. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (10) 1370-1376
  • 60 van Lanschot JJ, Rutten HJ, Boom RP, Gouma DJ. [Importance of regional surgery networks]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000; 144 (24) 1148-1152
  • 61 Eskander A, Merdad M, Irish JC. et al. Volume-outcome associations in head and neck cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2014; 36 (12) 1820-1834
  • 62 Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV. et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346 (15) 1128-1137
  • 63 Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (22) 2117-2127
  • 64 Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME. et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg 2006; 49 (04) 251-258
  • 65 Urbach DR, Bell CM, Austin PC. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ 2003; 168 (11) 1409-1414
  • 66 Eskander A, Irish J, Groome PA. et al. Volume-outcome relationships for head and neck cancer surgery in a universal health care system. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (09) 2081-2088
  • 67 Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44 (05) 632-637
  • 68 Iwatsuki M, Yamamoto H, Miyata H. et al. Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on data from 145,523 Japanese patients collected from a nationwide web-based data entry system. Gastric Cancer 2019; 22 (01) 190-201
  • 69 Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017; 359: j4366
  • 70 Gourin CG, Forastiere AA, Sanguineti G, Koch WM, Marur S, Bristow RE. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of laryngeal cancer surgical care. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (01) 85-90
  • 71 Renzulli P, Laffer UT. Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005; 165: 86-104
  • 72 Liu JB, Huffman KM, Palis BE. et al. Reliability of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's quality of care measures for hospital and surgeon profiling. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224 (02) 180-190.e8
  • 73 Yi D, Monson JRT, Stankiewicz CC, Atallah S, Finkler NJ. Impact of colorectal surgeon case volume on outcomes and applications to quality improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33 (05) 635-644
  • 74 Cramer JD, Speedy SE, Ferris RL, Rademaker AW, Patel UA, Samant S. National evaluation of multidisciplinary quality metrics for head and neck cancer. Cancer 2017; 123 (22) 4372-4381
  • 75 Pasieka JL. The surgeon as a prognostic factor in endocrine surgical diseases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2000; 9 (01) 13-20 , v–vi
  • 76 Adkisson CD, Howell GM, McCoy KL. et al. Surgeon volume and adequacy of thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery 2014; 156 (06) 1453-1459 , discussion 1460
  • 77 Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, Perez EA, Molina MA, Goodwin WJ, Salloum RM. Impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome for head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (04) 1001-1009
  • 78 Sharma A, Schwartz SM, Méndez E. Hospital volume is associated with survival but not multimodality therapy in Medicare patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer 2013; 119 (10) 1845-1852
  • 79 Chen AY, Pavluck A, Halpern M, Ward E. Impact of treating facilities' volume on survival for early-stage laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2009; 31 (09) 1137-1143
  • 80 Chen AY, Fedewa S, Pavluck A, Ward EM. Improved survival is associated with treatment at high-volume teaching facilities for patients with advanced stage laryngeal cancer. Cancer 2010; 116 (20) 4744-4752
  • 81 Lee CC, Ho HC, Chou P. Multivariate analyses to assess the effect of surgeon volume on survival rate in oral cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. Oral Oncol 2010; 46 (04) 271-275
  • 82 Lin CC, Lin HC. Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Surgery 2008; 143 (03) 343-351
  • 83 Kim HI, Kim TH, Choe JH. et al. Surgeon volume and prognosis of patients with advanced papillary thyroid cancer and lateral nodal metastasis. Br J Surg 2018; 105 (03) 270-278
  • 84 Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP. et al. The impact of surgical volume on racial disparity in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (08) 2733-2739
  • 85 Carey RM, Fathy R, Shah RR. et al. Association of type of treatment facility with overall survival after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (01) e1919697
  • 86 Kowalski LP, Sanabria A. Priority setting in head and neck oncology in low-resource environments. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 27 (03) 198-202
  • 87 David JM, Ho AS, Luu M. et al. Treatment at high-volume facilities and academic centers is independently associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer 2017; 123 (20) 3933-3942
  • 88 Dunn PM. Oliver Wendell Holmes (1809-1894) and his essay on puerperal fever. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92 (04) F325-F327
  • 89 Holmes OW. Medical Essays, 1842–1882. Boston, Houghton: Mifflin and Co; 1883
  • 90 Yamashita S, Conrad C. A prognostic factor under the surgeon's control. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (04) 393
  • 91 Liu CJ, Chou YJ, Teng CJ. et al. Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Cancer 2015; 121 (16) 2782-2790
  • 92 Drosdeck JM, Osayi SN, Peterson LA, Yu L, Ellison EC, Muscarella P. Surgeon and nonsurgeon personalities at different career points. J Surg Res 2015; 196 (01) 60-66
  • 93 Emanuel EJ, Gudbranson E. Does medicine overemphasize IQ?. JAMA 2018; 319 (07) 651-652
  • 94 Leach LS, Myrtle RC, Weaver FA. Surgical teams: role perspectives and role dynamics in the operating room. Health Serv Manage Res 2011; 24 (02) 81-90
  • 95 Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A. et al; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (15) 1434-1442
  • 96 Shubeck SP, Kanters AE, Dimick JB. Surgeon leadership style and risk-adjusted patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (02) 471-474
  • 97 Clayman GL, Eicher SA, Sicard MW, Razmpa E, Goepfert H. Surgical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients 80 years of age and older. Head Neck 1998; 20 (03) 216-223
  • 98 McGuirt WF, Loevy S, McCabe BF, Krause CJ. The risks of major head and neck surgery in the aged population. Laryngoscope 1977; 87 (08) 1378-1382
  • 99 Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Shaha AR. et al. Treatment considerations for head and neck cancer in the elderly. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119 (03) 169-174
  • 100 Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Vartanian JG, Magrin J, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Validation of the Washington University head and neck comorbidity index in a cohort of older patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (06) 603-607
  • 101 Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Vartanian JG, Magrin J, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Comorbidity is a prognostic factor in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14 (04) 1449-1457
  • 102 Kowalski LP, Alcantara PS, Magrin J, Parise Júnior O. A case-control study on complications and survival in elderly patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Am J Surg 1994; 168 (05) 485-490
  • 103 Hoekstra HJ, Wobbes T, Heineman E, Haryono S, Aryandono T, Balch CM. Fighting global disparities in cancer care: A surgical oncology view. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (07) 2131-2136
  • 104 Poston GJ. Global cancer surgery: The Lancet Oncology review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41 (12) 1559-1561
  • 105 Brennan M. The role of U.S. cancer centers in global cancer care. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (03) 747-749
  • 106 Kim WS, Ban MJ, Chang JW. et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted neck dissection in head and neck cancer: a 3-year prospective case study and analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (12) 1191-1197
  • 107 Weinstein GS, O'Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (12) 1220-1226
  • 108 Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD. Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149 (06) 885-892
  • 109 Albergotti WG, Gooding WE, Kubik MW. et al. Assessment of surgical learning curves in transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (06) 542-548
  • 110 Oishi M, Fukuda M, Yajima N. et al. Interactive presurgical simulation applying advanced 3D imaging and modeling techniques for skull base and deep tumors. J Neurosurg 2013; 119 (01) 94-105
  • 111 Nishio N, Fujii M, Hayashi Y. et al. Preoperative surgical simulation and validation of the line of resection in anterolateral craniofacial resection of advanced sinonasal sinus carcinoma. Head Neck 2017; 39 (03) 512-519
  • 112 Hewitt ME, Simone JV. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1999. : ix, 246.
  • 113 Takes RP, Halmos GB, Ridge JA. et al. Value and quality of care in head and neck oncology. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22 (09) 92
  • 114 Porter ME. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2477-2481
  • 115 Weber RS. Improving the quality of head and neck cancer care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (12) 1188-1192
  • 116 Simon C, Caballero C. Quality assurance and improvement in head and neck cancer surgery: From clinical trials to national healthcare initiatives. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2018; 19 (07) 34
  • 117 Simon C, Dietz A, Leemans CR. Quality assurance in head and neck cancer surgery: where are we, and where are we going?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 27 (02) 151-156
  • 118 Simon C, Caballero C, Gregoire V. et al. Surgical quality assurance in head and neck cancer trials: an EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Group position paper based on the EORTC 1420 ‘Best of’ and 24954 ‘larynx preservation’ study. Eur J Cancer 2018; 103: 69-77
  • 119 Jacobs JR, Pajak TF, Weymuller E, Sessions D, Schuller DE. Development of surgical quality-control mechanisms in large-scale prospective trials: head and neck intergroup report. Head Neck 1991; 13 (01) 28-32
  • 120 Jacobs JR, Pajak TF, Snow JB, Lowry LD, Kramer S. Surgical quality control in head and neck cancer. Study 73-03 of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (04) 489-493
  • 121 Lewis CM, Weber RS, Hanna EY. Quality of care in head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2011; 13 (02) 120-125
  • 122 Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK. et al. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (25) 6233-6239
  • 123 Nouraei SA, Middleton SE, Hudovsky A. et al. A national analysis of the outcome of major head and neck cancer surgery: implications for surgeon-level data publication. Clin Otolaryngol 2013; 38 (06) 502-511
  • 124 Gourin CG, Tufano RP, Forastiere AA, Koch WM, Pawlik TM, Bristow RE. Volume-based trends in thyroid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (12) 1191-1198
  • 125 Bhoday J, Martling A, Straßburg J, Brown G. Session 1: The surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer?. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (Suppl. 01) 36-38
  • 126 Peyronnet B, Tondut L, Bernhard JC. et al; members of the French Committee of Urologic Oncology (CCAFU). Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study. BJU Int 2018; 121 (06) 916-922
  • 127 Pera M. The surgeon as a risk factor: the need for shared individual outcome reports and quality improvement strategies. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (06) 533-534
  • 128 Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D. et al. Surgeon volume in parathyroid surgery-surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (08) 843-847
  • 129 Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D. et al. Surgeon volume in thyroid surgery: Surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (11) 2630-2639
  • 130 Nouraei SA, Virk JS, Middleton SE. et al. A national analysis of trends, outcomes and volume-outcome relationships in thyroid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (02) 354-365
  • 131 Nouraei SA, Mace AD, Middleton SE. et al. A stratified analysis of the perioperative outcome of 17623 patients undergoing major head and neck cancer surgery in England over 10 years: Towards an Informatics-based Outcomes Surveillance Framework. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (01) 11-28
  • 132 Graboyes EM, Gross J, Kallogjeri D. et al. Association of compliance with process-related quality metrics and improved survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142 (05) 430-437
  • 133 Hessel AC, Moreno MA, Hanna EY. et al. Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer. Cancer 2010; 116 (14) 3408-3416
  • 134 Schoppy DW, Rhoads KF, Ma Y. et al. Measuring institutional quality in head and neck surgery using hospital-level data: Negative margin rates and neck dissection yield. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (11) 1111-1116
  • 135 Chen MM, Megwalu UC, Liew J, Sirjani D, Rosenthal EL, Divi V. Regionalization of head and neck cancer surgery may fragment care and impact overall survival. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (06) 1413-1419
  • 136 Divi V, Chen MM, Nussenbaum B. et al. Lymph node count from neck dissection predicts mortality in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (32) 3892-3897
  • 137 Li MM, Puram SV, Silverman DA, Old MO, Rocco JW, Kang SY. Margin analysis in head and neck cancer: State of the art and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (12) 4070-4080
  • 138 Hinni ML, Ferlito A, Brandwein-Gensler MS. et al. Surgical margins in head and neck cancer: a contemporary review. Head Neck 2013; 35 (09) 1362-1370
  • 139 Thomas Robbins K, Triantafyllou A, Suárez C. et al. Surgical margins in head and neck cancer: Intra- and postoperative considerations. Auris Nasus Larynx 2019; 46 (01) 10-17
  • 140 Meier JD, Oliver DA, Varvares MA. Surgical margin determination in head and neck oncology: current clinical practice. The results of an International American Head and Neck Society Member Survey. Head Neck 2005; 27 (11) 952-958
  • 141 Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11 (01) 9-22
  • 142 Zanoni DK, Migliacci JC, Xu B. et al. A proposal to redefine close surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (06) 555-560
  • 143 Johnson RE, Sigman JD, Funk GF, Robinson RA, Hoffman HT. Quantification of surgical margin shrinkage in the oral cavity. Head Neck 1997; 19 (04) 281-286
  • 144 Egemen O, Bingöl D, Orman Ç, Sayilgan AT, Özkaya Ö, Akan M. Quantification of the surgical margin shrinkage in lip cancer: determining the relation between the surgical and histopathologic margins. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (06) 2152-2155
  • 145 Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Kumaran C. Post-resection mucosal margin shrinkage in oral cancer: quantification and significance. J Surg Oncol 2005; 91 (02) 131-133
  • 146 Umstattd LA, Mills JC, Critchlow WA, Renner GJ, Zitsch III RP. Shrinkage in oral squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of tumor and margin measurements in vivo, post-resection, and post-formalin fixation. Am J Otolaryngol 2017; 38 (06) 660-662
  • 147 Nocon CC, Ajmani GS, Bhayani MK. Association of facility volume with positive margin rate in the surgical treatment of head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144 (12) 1090-1097
  • 148 Amit M, Na'ara S, Leider-Trejo L. et al. Improving the rate of negative margins after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective randomized controlled study. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E1803-E1809
  • 149 Maxwell JH, Thompson LD, Brandwein-Gensler MS. et al. Early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Sampling of margins from tumor bed and worse local control. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (12) 1104-1110
  • 150 Miles BA, Patsias A, Quang T, Polydorides AD, Richards-Kortum R, Sikora AG. Operative margin control with high-resolution optical microendoscopy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (10) 2308-2316
  • 151 Šifrer R, Urbančič J, Strojan P, Aničin A, Žargi M. The assessment of mucosal surgical margins in head and neck cancer surgery with narrow band imaging. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (07) 1577-1582
  • 152 Garofolo S, Piazza C, Del Bon F. et al. Intraoperative narrow band imaging better delineates superficial resection margins during transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015; 124 (04) 294-298
  • 153 Hamdoon Z, Jerjes W, McKenzie G, Jay A, Hopper C. Optical coherence tomography in the assessment of oral squamous cell carcinoma resection margins. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2016; 13: 211-217
  • 154 Francisco AL, Correr WR, Azevedo LH. et al. Fluorescence spectroscopy for the detection of potentially malignant disorders and squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2014; 11 (02) 82-90
  • 155 Poh CF, Anderson DW, Durham JS. et al. Fluorescence visualization-guided surgery for early-stage oral cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142 (03) 209-216
  • 156 Cals FL, Bakker Schut TC, Hardillo JA, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Koljenović S, Puppels GJ. Investigation of the potential of Raman spectroscopy for oral cancer detection in surgical margins. Lab Invest 2015; 95 (10) 1186-1196
  • 157 Zhang J, Rector J, Lin JQ. et al. Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9: 406
  • 158 Agrama MT, Reiter D, Cunnane MF, Topham A, Keane WM. Nodal yield in neck dissection and the likelihood of metastases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128 (02) 185-190
  • 159 Agrama MT, Reiter D, Topham AK, Keane WM. Node counts in neck dissection: are they useful in outcomes research?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124 (04) 433-435
  • 160 Bhattacharyya N. The effects of more conservative neck dissections and radiotherapy on nodal yields from the neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (04) 412-416
  • 161 Jose J, Coatesworth AP, MacLennan K. Cervical metastases in upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma: histopathologic analysis and reporting. Head Neck 2003; 25 (03) 194-197
  • 162 Kohler HF, Cunha IW, Kowalski LP. Impact of modified radical neck dissections on the number of retrieved nodes, recurrence and survival. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2010; 76 (03) 374-377
  • 163 Truong PT, Vinh-Hung V, Cserni G, Woodward WA, Tai P, Vlastos G. Member of the International Nodal Ratio Working Group. The number of positive nodes and the ratio of positive to excised nodes are significant predictors of survival in women with micrometastatic node-positive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44 (12) 1670-1677
  • 164 Coburn NG, Swallow CJ, Kiss A, Law C. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer 2006; 107 (09) 2143-2151
  • 165 Wang J, Hassett JM, Dayton MT, Kulaylat MN. Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (06) 1600-1608
  • 166 Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Pilati P, Nitti D. N-ratio: a novel independent prognostic factor for patients with stage-III cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (01) 310-315
  • 167 Spillane AJ, Cheung BL, Winstanley J, Thompson JF. Lymph node ratio provides prognostic information in addition to american joint committee on cancer N stage in patients with melanoma, even if quality of surgery is standardized. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (01) 109-115
  • 168 Gil Z, Carlson DL, Boyle JO. et al. Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer 2009; 115 (24) 5700-5710
  • 169 Kim SY, Nam SY, Choi SH, Cho KJ, Roh JL. Prognostic value of lymph node density in node-positive patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (08) 2310-2317
  • 170 Sayed SI, Sharma S, Rane P. et al. Can metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) predict survival in oral cavity cancer patients?. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108 (04) 256-263
  • 171 Patel SG, Amit M, Yen TC. et al; International Consortium for Outcome Research (ICOR) in Head and Neck Cancer. Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research. Br J Cancer 2013; 109 (08) 2087-2095
  • 172 Yousem DM, Gad K, Tufano RP. Resectability issues with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27 (10) 2024-2036
  • 173 Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312 (25) 1604-1608
  • 174 Champion GA, Piccirillo JF. The impact of computed tomography on pretherapeutic staging in patients with laryngeal cancer: demonstration of the Will Rogers' phenomenon. Head Neck 2004; 26 (11) 972-976
  • 175 Agnello F, Cupido F, Sparacia G. et al. Computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A practical approach. Neuroradiol J 2017; 30 (03) 197-204
  • 176 Misono S, Rue T, Rajendran J, Davis GE. Effects of upstaging from PET scan on survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2010; 32 (10) 1283-1287
  • 177 Basu S, Alavi A. PET-based personalized management in clinical oncology: An unavoidable path for the foreseeable future. PET Clin 2016; 11 (03) 203-207
  • 178 Jorgensen JB, Smith RB, Coughlin A. et al. Impact of PET/CT on staging and treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 160 (02) 261-266
  • 179 Joo YH, Yoo IR, Cho KJ. et al. The value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessing contralateral neck in head and neck cancer patients with unilateral node metastasis (N1-3). Clin Otolaryngol 2014; 39 (06) 338-344
  • 180 Ivanovic J, Anstee C, Ramsay T. et al. Using surgeon-specific outcome reports and positive deviance for continuous quality improvement. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100 (04) 1188-1194 , discussion 1194–1195
  • 181 Shellenberger TD, Madero-Visbal R, Weber RS. Quality indicators in head and neck operations: a comparison with published benchmarks. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137 (11) 1086-1093
  • 182 Oosting SF, Haddad RI. Best practice in systemic therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 815
  • 183 Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg 2002; 137 (01) 20-27
  • 184 Yi SG, Wray NP, Jones SL. et al. Surgeon-specific performance reports in general surgery: an observational study of initial implementation and adoption. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (04) 636-647.e1
  • 185 Hatfield MD, Ashton CM, Bass BL, Shirkey BA. Surgeon-specific outcome reports in general surgery: Establishing benchmarks for peer comparison within a single hospital. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222 (02) 113-121
  • 186 Weber RS, Lewis CM, Eastman SD. et al. Quality and performance indicators in an academic department of head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (12) 1212-1218
  • 187 Lewis CM, Monroe MM, Roberts DB, Hessel AC, Lai SY, Weber RS. An audit and feedback system for effective quality improvement in head and neck surgery: Can we become better surgeons?. Cancer 2015; 121 (10) 1581-1587
  • 188 Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Your guide to choosing quality health care. https://archive.ahrq.gov/consumer/qnt/ . August 5, 2020.
  • 189 Lira RB, de Carvalho AY, de Carvalho GB, Lewis CM, Weber RS, Kowalski LP. Quality assessment in head and neck oncologic surgery in a Brazilian cancer center compared with MD Anderson Cancer Center benchmarks. Head Neck 2016; 38 (07) 1002-1007
  • 190 Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ 2015; 351: h4672
  • 191 Schwartz D, Fischhoff B, Krishnamurti T, Sowell F. The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110 (38) 15242-15246