J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(08): 438-445
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748131
Original Article

Development and Standardization of SCAN-C Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children

Robert W. Keith
Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This paper reports on the development and standardization of SCAN-C: Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children-Revised. The revisions include new test instructions that have been reworded to make them easier for young children, aural stimuli presented on a compact disc, a revision of the Competing Words subtest, and the addition of a Competing Sentences subtest. Normative data on the new test were obtained on 650 children age 5 years, 0 months, to 11 years, 11 months. Analysis of new standardization data revealed systematic improvement in performance with increasing age. A new method of calculating the composite standard score gives equal weighting to each subtest of SCAN-C. Subtest test-retest reliability was substantially improved over the original SCAN, with SCAN-C correlations ranging from .65 to .82 for 5 to 7 year olds. Concurrent validity tests found that SCAN-C test results can be viewed with the same confidence as SCAN.

Abbreviations: AFG = Auditory Figure-Ground, CD = compact disc, COMP = composite score, CS = Competing Sentences, CW = Competing Words, FW = Filtered Words



Publication History

Article published online:
13 April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
  • Amos NE, Humes LE. (1998). SCAN test-retest reliability for first- and third-grade children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:834–845.
  • Bench J, Bamford J. (1979). Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children. London: Academic Press.
  • Bradham TS, Smith T. (1999). Test Environment Effect on Performance of Children on the SCAN. Presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, November 18–21, San Francisco.
  • Cranford JL, Kennalley T, Svoboda W, Kipp K. (1996). Changes in central auditory processing following temporal lobectomies in children. J Am Acad Audiol 7:289–295.
  • Dietrich KN, Succop PA, Berger OG, Keith RW. (1992). Lead exposure and the central auditory abilities and cognitive development of urban children: the Cincinnati Lead Study cohort at age 5 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 14:51–56.
  • Emerson MF, Crandall KK, Seikel JA , Chermak GD. (1997). Observations on the use of SCAN to identify children at risk for central auditory processing disorder. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools 28:43–49.
  • Guilford JP, Fruchter B. (1978). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. 6th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Humes L, Amos N, Wynne M. (1998). Issues in the assessment of central auditory processing disorders. In: Bess FH, ed. Children with Hearing Impairment: Contemporary Trends. Nashville: Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 127–136.
  • Keith RW. (1986). SCAN: A Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Keith RW. (1994). SCAN-A:A Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Adolescents and Adults. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Keith RW. (2000). SCAN-C Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in ChildrenRevised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Keith RW, Engineer P. (1991). Effects of methylphenidate on the auditory processing abilities of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Learn Disabil 24:630–636.
  • Spafford DA. (1990). Central Auditory Processing: Relationship Between Central Auditory Processing and Intellectual and Academic Functioning in Learning Disabled Children with Reading Problems. Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Stromberg E. (1988). Comparison of School Day Scripts and Auditory Processing Test Scores of Regular Education Second Graders to a Teacher Rating for Ability to Follow Classroom Oral Directions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.