CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27(01): e117-e122
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744169
Original Research

Surgical Use of Supraclavicular Artery Flap for Head and Neck Cancer Defects Repair: Personal Experience

1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
,
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est, Hospital Bolognini, Seriate (BG), Italy
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction For a long time, major surgical defects after oncological surgery have always been challenging cases for surgeons in terms of wound healing and covering technique.

Objectives To demonstrate the feasibility of supraclavicular artery flap (SCAF) in the reconstruction of surgical defects in those “fragile” patients undergoing oncological surgery who could not possibly have endured the timeframes involved in using microvascular free flaps.

Methods Between January 2018 and January 2019, at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est Hospital (Bergamo, Italy), we reported the cases of 11 patients in whom the SCAF was used for surgical reconstruction after oncological surgery in our Otolaryngology Department. The median age of the 11 patients was 68.7 years old.

Results The SCAF has proved, in almost all 11 cases in which it was used, to be very reliable and, above all, easy and quick to make in those “fragile” patients without the need for further intervention. There was only one case in which the resection involved the auricle entirely and a small area of perimeatal bone exposure occurred, which, anyway, healed by secondary intention.

Conclusion The SCAF is an extremely versatile flap for head and neck surgery to be considered especially for fragile and vulnerable patients who cannot undergo prolonged surgical time. Moreover, this technique has also shown high feasibility in small hospitals where there is not a plastic surgery department and the surgeon may face the difficulty of practicing surgical reconstruction after enlarged resection.



Publication History

Received: 25 September 2021

Accepted: 26 January 2022

Article published online:
01 August 2022

© 2023. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (06) 941-948
  • 2 Sandu K, Monnier P, Pasche P. Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction: experience in 50 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (04) 1261-1267
  • 3 Robbins KT, Shaha AR, Medina JE. et al; Committee for Neck Dissection Classification, American Head and Neck Society. Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (05) 536-538
  • 4 Kozin ED, Sethi RK, Herr M. et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the supraclavicular artery island flap and fasciocutaneous free flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154 (01) 66-72
  • 5 Anand AG, Tran EJ, Hasney CP, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES. Oropharyngeal reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: a new flap alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 438-441
  • 6 Chu MW, Levy JM, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES. Tracheostoma reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (06) 677-679
  • 7 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction: surgical technique and refinements. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (06) 933-940
  • 8 Chen WL, Zhang DM, Yang ZH. et al. Extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap based on the transverse cervical artery for head and neck reconstruction after cancer ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (10) 2422-2430
  • 9 Alves HR, Ishida LC, Ishida LH. et al. A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (10) 1350-1356
  • 10 Giordano L, Di Santo D, Occhini A. et al. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (12) 4403-4412
  • 11 Kim RJT, Izzard ME, Patel RS. Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstructing defects in the head and neck region. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 19 (04) 248-250
  • 12 Adams AS, Wright MJ, Johnston S. et al. The use of multislice CT angiography preoperative study for supraclavicular artery island flap harvesting. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (03) 312-315
  • 13 Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (11) 1247-1255
  • 14 Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1878-1884 , discussion 1885–1886
  • 15 Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 842-851 , discussion 852–854
  • 16 Pallua N, Wolter TP. Defect classification and reconstruction algorithm for patients with tracheostomy using the tunneled supraclavicular artery island flap. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395 (08) 1115-1119
  • 17 Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) 115-123
  • 18 Giordano L, Bondi S, Toma S, Biafora M. Versatility of the supraclavicular pedicle flap in head and neck reconstruction. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014; 34 (06) 394-398
  • 19 Emerick KS, Herr MA, Deschler DG. Supraclavicular flap reconstruction following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (08) 1777-1782
  • 20 Wu H, Chen WL, Yang ZH. Functional reconstruction with an extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap following ablation of advanced oropharyngeal cancer. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (06) 1668-1671
  • 21 Goyal N, Emerick KS, Deschler DG. et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after supraclavicular flap reconstruction in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Head Neck 2016; 38 (11) 1615-1620
  • 22 Sands TT, Martin JB, Simms E, Henderson MM, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES. Supraclavicular artery island flap innervation: anatomical studies and clinical implications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (01) 68-71